N.T. Wright On Paul

Last updated on: May 7, 2014 at 11:57 am by Pascal-Emmanuel Gobry

N.T. Wright On Paul 2014-05-07T11:57:27+01:00 Pascal-Emmanuel Gobry

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

I’m sure I’m not alone in thinking that N.T. Wright is one of the most important theologians and Christian scholars alive today. I started “getting into” him because of his work on the Resurrection, and later discovered his work on Paul, which I find to be absolutely fascinating and rings true to me at every word (though that doesn’t mean much given my deep ignorance of all things biblical and theological).

Wright’s work on Paul stretches out over many thousands of pages, so it was a bit of a challenge to find a summary on his thesis on Paul, until I found this document (PDF) on the unofficial N.T. Wright Page (a great resource). Again, I find this to be absolutely fascinating and true, and worth reading for anybody interested about Paul and the question of justification (and if you aren’t, what are you doing here?).

The reason I point this out is not just because it’s interesting, but because it seems to me to confirm what I wrote about earlier, which is that, after hacking through many weeds, we find that the New Testament, the Catholic Church, the Eastern Orthodox Church, and most Protestant accounts, or accounts that most Protestants wouldn’t disagree with, actually agree on justification. Again, I am an ignoramus (I really mean that), so I may be wrong. But I really do increasingly believe that, at its heart, the Reformation was all one big misunderstanding. (How can a simple misunderstanding lead to such a dramatic event? Well, the prince of this world is the father of lies and division.)

—

EDIT: While googling around I found this dashed-off answer by N.T. Wright to the “Why not Catholic?” question. He has a lot of good shots at us, which we should take with joy and humility (yes, we’ve been behind on this whole Bible stuff). I particularly appreciated this:

To say “Wow, I want that stuff, I’d better go to Rome” is like someone suddenly discovering (as I’m told Americans occasionally do — sorry, cheap shot) that there are other countries in the world and so getting the first big boat he finds in New York to take him there . . . when there were plenty of planes lined up and waiting at JFK. Rome is a big, splendid, dusty old ocean liner, with lots of grand cabins, and, at present, quite a fine captain and some excellent officers — but also quite a few rooms in need of repair. Yes, it may take you places, but it’s slow and you might get seasick from time to time.

Boy, that weird, big, half-broken, dusty ocean liner, why, that sounds a lot like….the Body of Christ. I think of Francis’ description of the Church as a field hospital and I think of how in World War II all of the “good” ships were repurposed for military purposes and so the hospital ships were these barely-seaworthy clanking wrecks. Yep, that’s the barque of Peter alright.

Also I want to read more Wright on Mary.

Uncategorized

Previous Post

May 7, 2014

A Few Words About That Harvard Black Mass...

Next Post

May 8, 2014 Reflecting On The Marian Dogmas (1): What The Marian Dogmas Tell Us About The Bible

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Elsewhere Mary New Distributism Parish of PEG Synod for the Famiy Theology of Women Uncategorized What I'm Reading

Select a Month June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What did Isaiah say about Egypt's future in his oracles?

Select your answer to see how you score.

It would be conquered It would conquer Israel It would prosper It would rule Persia