Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
General Christian
Education and Religion
A Jewish Paul: Part 3 of the Interview with Matthew Thiessen

A Jewish Paul: Part 3 of the Interview with Matthew Thiessen

Last updated on: February 12, 2024 at 7:35 pm by B. J. Oropeza

A Jewish Paul: Part 3 of the Interview with Matthew Thiessen 2024-02-12T19:35:02-07:00 B. J. Oropeza

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

We are back for a third and final segment of a three-part interview with Matthew Thiessen, author of the recent book, A Jewish Paul: The Messiah’s Herald to the Gentiles (Grand Rapids: Baker Academic, 2023). Dr. Thiessen is an associate professor of religious studies at McMaster University. He presents us with a well-written and provocative interpretation of Paul in this book.

If you missed the previous segments, click here for Part 1 and here for Part 2.

Part 3: Conclusion of the Interview with Matthew Thiessen

The Messiah's Herald to the Gentiles

A Jewish Paul by Matthew Thiessen

Oropeza

Your connection of “spirit”/pneuma with Abraham, Jesus, and gentiles is quite interesting. I’ve noticed, however, that Stoic philosophy is primarily used to support pneuma as a light material substance, whether fine particles, aether, or something else. It is held not only by you but also by Troels Engberg-Pedersen, Matt Novenson, and others. But Paul is Jewish, not Stoic. Maybe I overlooked it, or it’s in one of your other books, but are there Second Temple Jewish sources that support pneuma as a material substance?

Thiessen

Although Paul is Jewish this does not mean that he was uninfluenced by the philosophical and scientific currents of his day. Of course, he was no Stoic philosopher nor did he spend time writing scientific treatises on the ontological or metaphysical nature of pneuma. So, as is so often the case with Paul and other ancient writers, we have to fill in gaps from the literary remains of others. When Paul used pneuma, what would others have likely heard?

Oropeza

I’m glad you raise this question; salient interpretation should always be concerned with how Paul’s original auditors might have heard his letters.

Thiessen

Other Jewish writers were not also involved in scientific discussions either. The closest we get, and this is something that Engberg-Pedersen discusses, is the Wisdom of Solomon. This work is not straightforwardly Stoic in its thinking, but it does seem to contain stoicized elements, especially in relation to pneuma.

For instance, Wisdom speaks of the pneuma of the Lord filling the world and holding all things together (Wis 1:7) and then of divine wisdom in ways that evoke Stoic thinking about the pneuma: “wisdom is more mobile than any motion; because of her pureness she pervades and penetrates all things. For she is a breath of the power of God” (Wis 7:24–25).

In my own reading of Paul, I find it very suggestive that when he talks about the resurrected body, he speaks of it as a pneumatic body in the same context that he compares the resurrected body to astral bodies—sun, stars, and moon (1 Corinthians 15:35–49). To become a heavenly being and to enjoy the heavenly realm, one must become like the heavenly realm.

Here ancient scientists, following Aristotle, speak often of a fifth element of the cosmos, aether. Aetherial, heavenly bodies are material, but made of the best kind of matter—immortal, unchangeable, indestructible. Paul doesn’t use that language, but he uses the language of stars, and glory (doxa), and pneuma. And he uses the same language of the pneumatic bodies of the resurrection that ancient scientists do of aether.

Oropeza

Volker Rabens stresses the importance of the relational aspect regarding pneuma in Paul. What are your thoughts about the Holy Spirit as a personal being with which one has a relationship?

Thiessen

Rabens has written a lot on the topic of pneuma in ancient Judaism and Paul, and his work stresses the relational side of pneuma. This is an important aspect of Paul’s thought about the pneuma. This pneuma is not just any pneuma, not some sort of impersonal pneuma, but the pneuma of the Messiah, God’s son, and the pneuma of God who raised Jesus from the dead. That must always remain central to an account of pneuma.

Oropeza

I agree.

Thiessen

But I also balk a little bit at the language of relationship, perhaps because of modern connotations or limitations to the term that Rabens may not intend. When we speak of relationship, we naturally bring in notions of an external person—my relationships with my students or family. There are parallels here to how Paul thinks of one’s experience with the pneuma, but there are also dissimilarities.

For Paul, the pneuma is also something that inhabits a person and something in which a person dwells—believers are both in Christ and Christ is in believers through the presence of the pneuma. I fear the language of “relationship” does not capture the full extent of the participatory side of Paul’s pneumatic thought.

Oropeza

Regarding Christology, I concur with you regarding the pre-existence of Messiah, though I have argued that Christ was on rather than embodied in the “rock” in 1 Corinthians 10:4. I base this on gezerah shawah* and the use of “Lord” in Exodus 17:5–6 and Numbers 20:7–11 (Oropeza, 1 Corinthians, 127–28).

However, on Jesus’s resurrection, even though you rightly affirm it is a pneuma body (1 Corinthians 15:42–44), I tend to agree with James Ware** on the importance of the human aspect of Jesus’s resurrected body. There is an empty tomb in the Gospels, and Paul mentions that Jesus was “buried” before he “rose on the third day” (1 Cor 15:3–4). The notion of burial not only assumes that Jesus died but also that his body laid in a tomb and, given the resurrection, it vacated that tomb. For me, there is both continuity and discontinuity with regard to Jesus’s body at the resurrection and our own earthly bodies at the future resurrection.*** I’m not clear on what you think happened to the earthly body of Jesus. Could you elaborate?

Thiessen

A Jewish Paul. The Interview, pt. 2

Matthew Thiessen with his book, A Jewish Paul.

While I don’t think Paul makes it entirely clear what he thinks happened with Jesus’s earthly body, I think we can draw out not only from 1 Corinthians 15:4, but also from 1 Cor 15:52 (“For the trumpet will sound, and the dead will be raised imperishable, and we will be changed”) that Paul thinks dead bodies come back to life at the resurrection. So, I have no problem taking 1 Cor 15:4 to imply that Jesus’s flesh-and-blood body was raised from the dead.

At the general resurrection, both those living and those dead will be transformed, though. Some people take this to mean that Paul envisages flesh-and-blood bodies being invested with an imperishable power that keeps their fleshly bodies from decomposing, aging, and dying. I, and others, have suggested that this view is right to believe that the resurrection entails embodiment.

But we think that statements like “flesh and blood cannot inherit the kingdom of God” and “nor does the perishable inherit the imperishable” (1 Cor 15:50) imply that Paul thinks the transformation that occurs in the resurrection is from a flesh-and-blood body to a body that consists of pneuma, and is therefore a body that is fit for a celestial habitat.

On my reading, Paul thinks that as resurrected humans ascend to the heavenly realm their raised flesh-and-blood bodies undergo transformation into entirely pneumatic bodies so that they can survive in their new environment. And so I think this is what he thinks happened to Jesus’s resurrected body—he became a life-giving pneuma (1 Cor 15:45). Both Jesus and those raised in him undergo a change where the heavier, coarser, and corruptible elements of the body are transformed into the entirely imperishable substance of pneuma.

Oropeza

I like that you emphasize the election of Israel as permanent and thus Israel’s hardening must be temporal in Romans 11. I would add that divine hardening is a form of divine punishment resulting from prior human disbelief, sin, or rebellion against God, just as in Romans 1:18–32, even when it also serves the further purpose of saving others (I discuss divine hardening, especially in Mark and Paul, in my Apostasy in the New Testament Communities series). Do you have any thoughts about how and/or when this hardening will end?

Thiessen

I find Paul’s statements toward the end of Romans 11 quite helpful here. There Paul claims that his readers, gentiles, were in the past disobedient but have now received mercy, while Israel has now become disobedient but that God in the future would have mercy on them too (Romans 11:31–32).

What this seems to imply is that Paul would have characterized Israel’s past behavior as generally obedient. Only now, at the coming of the Messiah, does Paul think Israel can be generally characterized as disobedient. And this disobedience, for Paul, is defined as apistia, a lack of faith or faithfulness that the Messiah’s coming surprisingly elicits (Romans 11:23).

In Romans 11 it sounds like God’s eschatological plan has taken a surprising detour—God has decided to bring gentiles into his eschatological deliverance, but in order to do this God needs to harden Israel temporarily. While Paul does not appear to get into specifics, he hopes that once the full number of gentiles comes in, many through Paul’s own work, then God would show mercy to Israel as well. And it sounds to me that Paul expected or hoped for this to come about in his own lifetime.

Oropeza

Thank you Matt, these interviews have been quite fascinating!****

Notes

* Gezerah Shawah is one of seven ancient interpretative principles attributed to Rabbi Hillel. This one involves “an analogy drawn between two verses in the Torah based upon a word they have in common.” See further on his and other midrash principles in Lori Baron and B. J. Oropeza, “Midrash,” in Exploring Intertextuality, eds. B. J. Oropeza and Steve Moyise (Eugene: Cascade, 2016), esp. 63–80 (quote on 66).

** James Ware, “Paul’s Understanding of the Resurrection in 1 Corinthians 15:36–54,” Journal of Biblical Literature 133 (2014) 809–835; also, James Ware, “The Resurrection of Jesus in the Pre-Pauline Formula of 1 Cor 15.3–5,” New Testament Studies 60 (2014) 475–98.

*** Some further ponderings of mine on resurrection related to dimension theory: hypothetically-speaking, as two-dimensional beings would not comprehend how a three-dimensional being who has the same properties of width and height as they do could move in and out of their space (since “depth” would be incomprehensible to them), so three-dimensional beings like ourselves cannot fully comprehend that a four-dimensional being can still have our same properties, but now with something new added (and of course, mortality taken away). Perhaps this analogy may help sharpen our imagination regarding continuity and discontinuity regarding resurrection bodies? (I learned a little bit about dimension theory from chemist, Dr. A. E. Wilder-Smith back in my Simon Greenleaf School of Law days.)

For my view of resurrection (though without discussing dimension theory), see, B. J. Oropeza, “Corinthian Diversity, Mythological Beliefs, and Bodily Immortality Related to the Resurrection (1 Corinthians 15),” in Scripture, Texts, and Tracings in Corinthians, eds. L. L. Belleville and B. J. Oropeza; Fortress Academic, 2019: 213–47.

**** To review Part 1 and Part 2 of this interview, click on the highlighted links towards the beginning of this page.

Jewish

Education and Religion

History and Religion

Paul the Apostle: Studies

Paul within Judaism

Pauline Theology

pneuma

Post-New Perspective on Paul

About B. J. Oropeza

B. J. Oropeza is Professor of Biblical and Religious Studies at Azusa Pacific University and Seminary. Among his many publications include books such as Perspectives on Paul: Five Views (Baker Academic), Jews, Gentiles, and the Opponents of Paul: Apostasy in the New Testament Communities, Vol. 2 (Cascade Books), and volumes from the Scripture, Texts, and Tracings in Paul series (Fortress Academic). He can be followed on X-Twitter (@bjoropeza1) and Instagram (@bjoropeza1) You can read more about the author here.

Previous Post

February 8, 2024

The Asbury Revival: The Outpouring's 1 Year Anniversary

Next Post

February 25, 2024 The Gospel of Paul: Evaluating a Protestant Perspective

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category "in Christ" 1 Corinthians 1 Enoch 1 John 2:19 1 Peter 1 Thessalonians 1 Timothy 1Peter 2 Corinthians 2 Timothy 400 years of silence A. I. A. M. Hunter Abraham Achilles Tatius Acts 13 Acts 19 Acts 22 Acts 26 Acts 9 addiction adultery Aesop's Fables Affliction afterlife allegiance allusions amanuensis Amen Ananias Ancient Biography Andrew Wilson Andronicus Angels anger Anglicanism anointing aorist tense Apep apocalypse apocalyptic Apocrypha apologetics apostasy Apostle Apostle Paul Aquinas archaeology archangel Ardel Caneday Arminianism armor of God article from journal artificial intelligence Asbury ascension atlas atonement Augustine Augustus authorship Awakening awards baptism Battle of Armageddon beasts behemoth Belial Beliar belief Benediction between Testaments Beverly Roberts Gaventa Bible Bible discrepancies Bible Gateway Bible reading Bible reading plan Bible Study Bible translations Bible version Bible versions biblical inerrancy Biblical Theology blasphemy blindness Boethius boldness Book of Acts Book Review Born Again bravery burial Caesar calling Calvinism canon canon Cassius Dio Catholics Channing Crisler charistmatic Christ Christian behavior Christian origins Christian theology Christians Christology church church fathers Church of England Chuza Cleopas Commandments Commentaries congregation conversion Corinthian letters coronavirus courage Covenant covenant theology covenantal nomism coveting COVID-19 Craig Keener Crescens crocodile Cross crucifixion curse custom Cyprian Daily Bread Dale Allison Damascus Damascus Experience Damascus road David Moffitt Day of Atonement deacon dead Dead Sea Scrolls death Deity of Christ Demas demonology demons determinism Deuteronomy Devil devotion dinosaur Dio Chrysostom divided I Divine Christology divine punishment divorce Do not fear Doxology dragon E. P. Sanders Eastern Orthodox Ebeneazer Urga echoes ekklesia election Elijah the Prophet Elymas embodiment of the gospel embodying the gospel emperor empty tomb Encouragement end times enlightement Ephesians Ephesus Epistles of Paul eschatology eternal life Ethics (Christian) euchlaion Eusebius of Caesarea evangelical evangelism evidence exile extreme unction Ezekiel faith falling away false prophet fate father Father's Day favorite Fear film Final Judgment Flood foreknowledge foreordain forgiveness fornication freewill from Saul to Paul Galatians Gary Cooper Genesis Gentile studies Gentiles geography giants gift gift giving global perspective Glossa Ordinaria God God perception good news gospel gospel 2.0 Gospel of John Gospel of Luke Gospel of Mark Gospel of Matthew Gospels grace gratitude Great Awakening Greco-Roman Greco-Roman world Greek Greek classic literature Greek lexicon Greek Orthodox Greek prepositions greetings guilt Habakkuk hair Halloween head covering head coverings healing heaven Hebrew Hebrews hermeneutics Hesed high Christology Higher Christology highlights holiness holy Holy Bible Holy Scriptures Holy Spirit Homer hospitable hospitality how to read the Bible human effort I Am sayings imperialism in Adam In Christ inspiration intercession Interpretation intertestamental period Intertextuality Interview intimidation Isaiah Israel Israel (land of) James James D. G. Dunn Jason Staples Jerome Jesus Jesus sayings Jesus traditions Jesus: Studies Jewish literature Jewish names Jewish Scripture Jewish studies Jews Joanna Job John John 3:16 John Chrysostom John Hyrcanus John Mark John of Damascus John the Baptist John Wesley Josephus joy Judaism Judgment day Julia Junia Justice justification kerygma King Kingdom kingdom of God Krister Stendahl lament Law Law of Moses lecture hall letter writing Letters of Paul Leucippe et Clitophon Leviathan Leviticus light Logical fallacy looting Lord Lord's Prayer lose salvation Lot Lotan love lovingkindness Lucifer Luke lust Luther LXX maenads Malachi Marcion marginalization marital affair marriage martyrdom Mary Matt Damon Medieval theologians Medieval theology memorization mercy Michael the Archangel miracles Mishnah missiology mission missionary missions monergism monogenes monster monsters Mosaic Law Moses Mysterious Ways mythology N. T. Wright name change names narrative Nephilim New Birth new covenant new covenant pneumaism new creation New Perspective on Paul New Testament New Testament use of Old Testament Noah Noah's ark nomism non-Christian oath obedience Odysseus Odyssey oil Old Testament only begotten Origen Outpouring pagan pagans parable paraceratherium Parousia participation in Christ Pastoral Letters patristic theology Paul in prison Paul letter of Paul teaching Paul the Apostle: Studies Paul within Judaism Paul's calling Paul's conversion Paul's death Pauline Theology persecution perseverance perseverance of the saints Persis personal devotion pesher Peter Abelard Philo philosophy Phoebe Pink Floyd pistis Plague plutarch pneuma pneumagism popular culture sayings Porneia Post-New Perspective on Paul praise prayer preaching predestination Prisca Priscilla Prison Epistle Prophecy prophets Psalm Psalms Pseudepigrapha Q Q source quest for the historic Jesus quotations Rabbi Pinhas be Yair Rabbinic literature Rainer Riesner raised from the dead rapture reading missiologically reading plan recipients reciprocity reconciliation Red Herring red letter edition redemption Reformation Regeneration rejoicing reminder renewal repentance restoration resurrection revival righteousness riot Roman Antiquity Roman names romance Romans Romans 12-16 Romans 16 Romans 4:25 Romans 7 Rome Rufus's mother sacrificial system salvation Salvation/Soteriology sanctification Satan Satan's fall Saul the Pharisee SBL Scholars school Scripture Second coming of Christ Second Temple Judaism secretary Septuagint Sergeant York Sergius Paulus Servant in Isaiah sex and sexuality sex ethics sexual immorality sheep sick sin sinful nature single Christians and dating social justice Society of Biblical Literature sons of God soteriology spinosaurus spiritual gifts spiritual renewal spiritual warfare Stephen Wilson struggle Study Bible studying the Bible Suetonius suffering Suffering Servant suggestive commentary Survey synergism Synoptic Gospels Tacitus teacher teaching telos temptation Tertius The Chosen the flesh Theology Thomas Aquinas Thomas Robinson Thomas Schreiner Thorn Thucydides Timothy Titus tongues Top 10 top 12 Torah trust Tryphaena Tryphosa Tyrannus U2 Ugaritic Ukraine Ukrainian Uncategorized unconditional love unforgiving Union with Christ unity/solidarity unpardonable sin urgency Valentine's Day veils vice vices victory warnings Watchers witnessing Woman ministers women women ministers women speakers women teachers word of God works works of the law worship writing YouVersion Zen Hess

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who was Aquila's wife?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Mary Lydia Priscilla Ruth