Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
General Christian
History and Religion
Which Letters of Paul did Paul Really Write?

Which Letters of Paul did Paul Really Write?

Last updated on: June 30, 2025 at 4:41 pm by B. J. Oropeza

Which Letters of Paul did Paul Really Write? 2025-06-30T16:41:54-07:00 B. J. Oropeza

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

The New Testament contains 13 letters attributed to the Apostle Paul, but which of these letters did he really write? Certain church fathers also thought that Paul wrote Hebrews, but this is unlikely. His name appears nowhere in this sermonic letter. Likewise, its Greek style, content, and theology suggest a different author, though one acquainted with Pauline churches. The author mentions Timothy as a “brother” (Heb 13:23).

Pauline authorship

The Apostle Paul writing. (A.I. image created by meta.ai)

Scholars normally break down the 13 Pauline letters as follows:

Undisputed letters of Paul: Romans, 1 Corinthians, 2 Corinthians, Galatians, Philippians, 1 Thessalonians, Philemon.

These seven letters are normally thought to be written by Paul. That is why they are called “undisputed” letters.

Disputed letters of Paul: Ephesians, Colossians, 2 Thessalonians, 1 Timothy, 2 Timothy, Titus.

There is no scholarly consensus on whether these six letters are actually penned by Paul. That is why they are called “disputed” letters. Others use the term Deutero-Pauline to describe them, a sort of “second” canon of letters that are questionably attributed to Paul.

In this short post, we cannot go into the reasons why each of these letters are rejected by some, questioned by others, and accepted as Paul by yet other scholars. Such inquiries of authorship developed from the Enlightenment period when biblical writings started to be critically examined. This took place through the process of reasoning rather than letting religious dogma of previous generations decide the issue.

A Pauline Spectrum

Modern (and post-modern) scholars normally take into consideration that Paul did not need to actually write his own letters for him to be considered the author. It is clear that Paul used an amanuensis or ancient secretary to write his letters for him. For instance, in Romans 16:22, Tertius claims to be such a writer.

Likewise, some of Paull’s colleagues such as Timothy, Silvanus (Silas), and Sosthenes are sometimes mentioned with him at the beginning of his letters (e.g., 1 Cor 1:1; 1 Thess 1:1, etc). They may have assisted with writing his letters.

Other times it’s at least possible that Paul may have given his colleagues freedom to write in his name. Or, perhaps a colleague may have written in a letter some of Paul’s memoirs after he was beheaded by Nero in Rome.

Still, others suggest that some letters attributed to Paul were written long after his death, and not by one of his colleagues. These writings, according to such a view, are pseudonyms.

So where do scholars stand on this issue these days regarding each of the 13 letters?

A Recent Survey on Pauline Authorship

New Testament professor Bruce N. Longenecker, along with his doctoral student Zen Hess, recently conducted a survey at the national Society of Biblical Literature (SBL) conference in San Diego (Nov. 23–26, 2024). They wanted to find out what biblical scholars today believe regarding the authorship of the 13 letters attributed to Paul. A total of 153 SBL members participated in the survey.

Longenecker’s survey takes into consideration three levels of Paul’s involvement with his letters. He may be significantly involved in writing his letters, somewhat involved, or not involved at all. Another option allows for the participant to be unsure of Paul’s involvement.

Here are the results of the survey:*

My Reflections on This Survey

We have to take into consideration potential setbacks regarding this survey. For example, many of the participants were probably Americans given that this survey was conducted in the U.S.A. Do American biblical scholars represent well other biblical scholars around the globe? I suspect that European scholars would generally be more skeptical about Paul’s authorship in certain letters, and scholars from other parts of the globe might be more conservative about Paul’s authorship.

Another potential setback is the number of survey participants. Only 153 members took the survey. This represents only a small fraction of the total amount of SBL members. If 1,530 members participated, the survey would seem to reflect better what SBL biblical scholars believe.

Nevertheless, this survey is helpful and may point to an encouraging trend. It perhaps shows that recent scholars who think critically about Pauline authorship are coming to conclusions that are steering them away from the pseudonym option that was quite popular in the 20th century.

In every case except for Ephesians and the Pastoral letters (1–2 Timothy, Titus), a majority of those surveyed think that Paul was significantly involved in the writing of letters attributed to him. If we include that Paul was either significantly or somewhat involved in the writing, then Ephesians receives a 65% majority.

The Pastoral letters, however, are still mixed even when we include Paul being somewhat involved with being significantly involved. The best of the three is 2 Timothy: 50% consider it to be either significantly or somewhat Paul; 41% not Paul (and another 10% unsure). At a virtual tie is 1 Timothy: 44% vs. 43% (and 13% unsure). Titus is slightly underwater with 44% vs. 45% (and 10% unsure).

Moving Forward

It appears that 2 Thessalonians, Colossians, and to a lesser extent, Ephesians, are finding their way back to the undisputed side of the Pauline corpus. The Pastoral letters, on the other hand, are not, though a slight but noticeable majority think Paul may at least be somewhat involved with 2 Timothy.

My own studies of the Pastoral letters lead me to consider that Luke, Paul’s colleague, may have had a hand in writing these. If so, then perhaps Paul may be “somewhat involved.” There is a unique cross-over of Greek vocabulary between these writings and Luke-Acts. More studies should be done to confirm (or disconfirm) this. Perhaps we should take more seriously the words in 2 Timothy 4:11 when Paul, apparently during his final days in prison, says that “Luke alone is with me.”

Notes

* This survey chart is used by permission from Bruce Longenecker. Elsewhere see it, for example, here.

Contemplative

History and Religion

Education and Religion

Paul the Apostle: Studies

SBL

Society of Biblical Literature

About B. J. Oropeza

B. J. Oropeza, Ph.D., Durham University (England), is Professor of Biblical and Religious Studies at Azusa Pacific University and Seminary. Among his many publications include Perspectives on Paul: Five Views (Baker Academic), Practicing Intertextuality (Cascade), and editor and contributor to the Scripture, Texts, and Tracings series (Fortress Academic): 1 Corinthians (vol. 1), Romans (vol. 2), 2 Corinthians & Philippians (vol. 3); and Galatians & 1 Thessalonians (vol. 4). He participated on Bible translation teams for the NRSV (updated edition), Common English Bible (CEB), and Lexham English Septuagint (LES). He also has commentaries on 1 Corinthians (New Covenant commentary series: Cascade) and 2 Corinthians (longer work—Rhetoric of Religious Antiquity: SBL Press; shorter work—Wesley One-Volume Commentary). His current specialties include Romans, intertextuality, and Perspectives on Paul. He can be followed on X-Twitter (@bjoropeza1) and Instagram (@bjoropeza1). You can read more about the author here.

Previous Post

June 18, 2025

Forget Ananias? A Minor Character in Acts with a Big Role

Next Post

July 12, 2025 Did Jesus or John say the famous words in John 3:16?

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category "in Christ" 1 Corinthians 1 Enoch 1 John 2:19 1 Peter 1 Thessalonians 1 Timothy 1Peter 2 Corinthians 2 Timothy 400 years of silence A. I. A. M. Hunter Abraham Achilles Tatius Acts 13 Acts 19 Acts 22 Acts 26 Acts 9 addiction adultery Aesop's Fables Affliction afterlife allegiance allusions amanuensis Amen Ananias Ancient Biography Andrew Wilson Andronicus Angels anger Anglicanism anointing aorist tense Apep apocalypse apocalyptic Apocrypha apologetics apostasy Apostle Apostle Paul Aquinas archaeology archangel Ardel Caneday Arminianism armor of God article from journal artificial intelligence Asbury ascension atlas atonement Augustine Augustus authorship Awakening awards baptism Battle of Armageddon beasts behemoth Belial Beliar belief Benediction between Testaments Beverly Roberts Gaventa Bible Bible discrepancies Bible Gateway Bible reading Bible reading plan Bible Study Bible translations Bible version Bible versions biblical inerrancy Biblical Theology blasphemy blindness Boethius boldness Book of Acts Book Review Born Again bravery burial Caesar calling Calvinism canon canon Cassius Dio Catholics Channing Crisler charistmatic Christ Christian behavior Christian origins Christian theology Christians Christology church church fathers Church of England Chuza Cleopas Commandments Commentaries congregation conversion Corinthian letters coronavirus courage Covenant covenant theology covenantal nomism coveting COVID-19 Craig Keener Crescens crocodile Cross crucifixion curse custom Cyprian Daily Bread Dale Allison Damascus Damascus Experience Damascus road David Moffitt Day of Atonement deacon dead Dead Sea Scrolls death Deity of Christ Demas demonology demons determinism Deuteronomy Devil devotion dinosaur Dio Chrysostom divided I Divine Christology divine punishment divorce Do not fear Doxology dragon E. P. Sanders Eastern Orthodox Ebeneazer Urga echoes ekklesia election Elijah the Prophet Elymas embodiment of the gospel embodying the gospel emperor empty tomb Encouragement end times enlightement Ephesians Ephesus Epistles of Paul eschatology eternal life Ethics (Christian) euchlaion Eusebius of Caesarea evangelical evangelism evidence exile extreme unction Ezekiel faith falling away false prophet fate father Father's Day favorite Fear film Final Judgment Flood foreknowledge foreordain forgiveness fornication freewill from Saul to Paul Galatians Gary Cooper Genesis Gentile studies Gentiles geography giants gift gift giving global perspective Glossa Ordinaria God God perception good news gospel gospel 2.0 Gospel of John Gospel of Luke Gospel of Mark Gospel of Matthew Gospels grace gratitude Great Awakening Greco-Roman Greco-Roman world Greek Greek classic literature Greek lexicon Greek Orthodox Greek prepositions greetings guilt Habakkuk hair Halloween head covering head coverings healing heaven Hebrew Hebrews hermeneutics Hesed high Christology Higher Christology highlights holiness holy Holy Bible Holy Scriptures Holy Spirit Homer hospitable hospitality how to read the Bible human effort I Am sayings imperialism in Adam In Christ inspiration intercession Interpretation intertestamental period Intertextuality Interview intimidation Isaiah Israel Israel (land of) James James D. G. Dunn Jason Staples Jerome Jesus Jesus sayings Jesus traditions Jesus: Studies Jewish literature Jewish names Jewish Scripture Jewish studies Jews Joanna Job John John 3:16 John Chrysostom John Hyrcanus John Mark John of Damascus John the Baptist John Wesley Josephus joy Judaism Judgment day Julia Junia Justice justification kerygma King Kingdom kingdom of God Krister Stendahl lament Law Law of Moses lecture hall letter writing Letters of Paul Leucippe et Clitophon Leviathan Leviticus light Logical fallacy looting Lord Lord's Prayer lose salvation Lot Lotan love lovingkindness Lucifer Luke lust Luther LXX maenads Malachi Marcion marginalization marital affair marriage martyrdom Mary Matt Damon Medieval theologians Medieval theology memorization mercy Michael the Archangel miracles Mishnah missiology mission missionary missions monergism monogenes monster monsters Mosaic Law Moses Mysterious Ways mythology N. T. Wright name change names narrative Nephilim New Birth new covenant new covenant pneumaism new creation New Perspective on Paul New Testament New Testament use of Old Testament Noah Noah's ark nomism non-Christian oath obedience Odysseus Odyssey oil Old Testament only begotten Origen Outpouring pagan pagans parable paraceratherium Parousia participation in Christ Pastoral Letters patristic theology Paul in prison Paul letter of Paul teaching Paul the Apostle: Studies Paul within Judaism Paul's calling Paul's conversion Paul's death Pauline Theology persecution perseverance perseverance of the saints Persis personal devotion pesher Peter Abelard Philo philosophy Phoebe Pink Floyd pistis Plague plutarch pneuma pneumagism popular culture sayings Porneia Post-New Perspective on Paul praise prayer preaching predestination Prisca Priscilla Prison Epistle Prophecy prophets Psalm Psalms Pseudepigrapha Q Q source quest for the historic Jesus quotations Rabbi Pinhas be Yair Rabbinic literature Rainer Riesner raised from the dead rapture reading missiologically reading plan recipients reciprocity reconciliation Red Herring red letter edition redemption Reformation Regeneration rejoicing reminder renewal repentance restoration resurrection revival righteousness riot Roman Antiquity Roman names romance Romans Romans 12-16 Romans 16 Romans 4:25 Romans 7 Rome Rufus's mother sacrificial system salvation Salvation/Soteriology sanctification Satan Satan's fall Saul the Pharisee SBL Scholars school Scripture Second coming of Christ Second Temple Judaism secretary Septuagint Sergeant York Sergius Paulus Servant in Isaiah sex and sexuality sex ethics sexual immorality sheep sick sin sinful nature single Christians and dating social justice Society of Biblical Literature sons of God soteriology spinosaurus spiritual gifts spiritual renewal spiritual warfare Stephen Wilson struggle Study Bible studying the Bible Suetonius suffering Suffering Servant suggestive commentary Survey synergism Synoptic Gospels Tacitus teacher teaching telos temptation Tertius The Chosen the flesh Theology Thomas Aquinas Thomas Robinson Thomas Schreiner Thorn Thucydides Timothy Titus tongues Top 10 top 12 Torah trust Tryphaena Tryphosa Tyrannus U2 Ugaritic Ukraine Ukrainian Uncategorized unconditional love unforgiving Union with Christ unity/solidarity unpardonable sin urgency Valentine's Day veils vice vices victory warnings Watchers witnessing Woman ministers women women ministers women speakers women teachers word of God works works of the law worship writing YouVersion Zen Hess

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who confronted David about his sin with Bathsheba?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Nathan Gad Samuel Joab