Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
General Christian
Religion News
Beverly Roberts Gaventa on Romans: An Interview

Beverly Roberts Gaventa on Romans: An Interview

Last updated on: December 20, 2024 at 11:38 pm by B. J. Oropeza

Beverly Roberts Gaventa on Romans: An Interview 2024-12-20T23:38:13-07:00 B. J. Oropeza

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

I have the privilege of interviewing Beverly Roberts Gaventa on her new commentary on Romans. As many already know, Dr. Gaventa is one of the foremost authorities on Romans and the apocalyptic Paul. She is Helen H. P. Manson Professor Emerita of New Testament Literature and Exegesis, Princeton Theological Seminary. She also held the position of president of the Society of Biblical Literature (2016), and she received the Burkitt Medal for Biblical Studies from the British Academy, due to her many distinguished contributions to New Testament scholarship (2020).

Some of her distinguished works include, When in Romans: An Invitation to Linger with the Gospel according to Paul (Baker Academic, 2018); Apocalyptic Paul: Cosmos and Anthropos in Romans 5–8 (Baylor University Press, 2013); Our Mother Saint Paul (Westminster John Knox, 2007); Mary: Glimpses of the Mother of Jesus (Augsburg Fortress, 1999), and commentaries on 1–2 Thessalonians for the Interpretation series, and Acts for Abingdon New Testament Commentaries.

And now her latest work is a comprehensive commentary entitled, Romans written for The New Testament Library series (Louisville: Westminster John Knox Press, 2024).

Romans commentary

Romans: A Commentary – The New Testament Library by Beverly Roberts Gaventa

The Interview

Oropeza

You are well-known for your apocalyptic view of Paul. For our audience’s sake, could you provide us with some of the basic features of the apocalyptic Paul?

Gaventa

In Our Mother Saint Paul, I wrote that “Paul’s apocalyptic theology has to do with the conviction that in the death and resurrection of Jesus Christ, God has invaded the world as it is, thereby revealing the world’s utter distortion and foolishness, reclaiming the world, and inaugurating a battle that will doubtless culminate in the triumph of God over all God’s enemies” (p. 81). This involves human liberation, receiving the gift of the Spirit, and being grafted together into the body of Christ.

I am largely content with that statement, although today I would amplify what is meant by “invasion.” While the word does justice to some of Paul’s language, it neglects the radical extent to which God’s power differs from human notions of power.

God’s power looks a lot like the weakness of the cross, to begin with. And that statement also suggests that Paul’s apocalyptic means a dramatically different way of thinking about the world.

Oropeza

What are some significant ways that your apocalyptic reading of Paul enlightens your interpretation of Romans?

Gaventa

I would want to flip that question. My reading of Romans shapes and reshapes my apocalyptic interpretation. Crucial for me is the statement in Romans 1:16 that the gospel is the apocalypse of God’s power. God’s power—again, a rescuing (saving) power—runs throughout the letter, as I understand it.

I think that focus on God’s rescuing initiative helps especially when we come to Romans 9–11. Otherwise, the interpretation gets tangled up in Paul’s developing comments about Israel (and it often neglects his critique of gentile arrogance).

Oropeza

I like your focus on the notion of God’s rescuing power from Rom 1:16, a text that I and many others consider to be part of Paul’s guiding thesis for much of the letter.

What do you consider to be the purpose of Romans? Why, or what primary reasons, did Paul write this letter?

Gaventa

I don’t think any single purpose accounts for the whole of the letter. At the outset he indicates he intends to preach—i.e., declare the good news—for those in Rome, and the letter begins that undertaking. But he also wants their prayers for his trip to Jerusalem, which is clearly a source of serious concern (Rom 15:25–32).

Oropeza

I agree with you that there is more that one purpose to this letter. Now that I finally finished the first (rough) draft of my own commentary on Romans, I see that more clearly than ever. My view will be in print in another year or so in an article entitled, “The Purposes of Paul’s Letter to the Romans: Moving the Debate Forward,” where I engage with some of the scholars in Karl Donfried’s The Romans Debate (2nd ed. Peabody: Hendrickson).

And speaking of debates, I’m sure you are well aware that there is a controversy regarding the audience’s identity in Romans. A number of scholars claim it’s a mixed audience of Jews and gentiles, or a mostly gentile audience. Although some have argued for a Jewish audience (e.g., Steve Mason), a recent trend argues for a purely gentile audience (e.g., Stanley Stowers, Runar Thornsteinsson, Andrew Das, William Campbell, etc.). Where do you stand on this issue?

Gaventa

The audiences (plural) contain both Jews and gentiles, as seems clear from the names in chapter 16 and various points within the letter. But it’s important to recognize that most of these gentiles come from the ranks of those already attracted to the synagogue—or at least to features of Jewish life.

Oropeza

I concur. And regarding Romans 16, I don’t think it works to argue as some do that Paul’s imperatival use of greetings suggests that those whom he greets were not among the hearers of this letter. An often-overlooked point is that Paul also says to greet Mary among the many names in Romans 16. She labored for them—that is, the recipients of this letter (Rom 16:6). The reason Paul could say this is because she belonged to the same Christ-community as the auditors hearing this letter in Rome (I will be expanding on this point in an upcoming article and my commentary).

You bring out a number of insights in this work. What would you consider to be one of the most important points that you would want your readers to learn from your commentary?

Gaventa

One of the things I learned from working on the commentary was its preoccupation with worship, by which I mean human reverence for God, human life that begins with an acknowledgement of its status as created rather than Creator. I see that not just in Romans 1, but in the catena of Romans 3, the liturgical language of 12:1, and in numerous doxologies and Amens.

I would hope readers would find that feature of the letter a helpful orientation to the rest of the letter.

Oropeza

Thank you for your time and insights, Beverly!

Contemplative

Religion News

Education and Religion

apocalypse

apocalyptic

Beverly Roberts Gaventa

Paul the Apostle: Studies

Pauline Theology

Post-New Perspective on Paul

Romans

women teachers

Beverly Roberts Gaventa

book review

Commentary

interview

New Testament Library

Romans

About B. J. Oropeza

B. J. Oropeza, Ph.D., Durham University (England), is Professor of Biblical and Religious Studies at Azusa Pacific University and Seminary. Among his many publications include Perspectives on Paul: Five Views (Baker Academic), Practicing Intertextuality (Cascade), and editor and/or contributor to the Scripture, Texts, and Tracings volumes (Romans; 1 Corinthians; 2 Cor & Phil; Gal & 1 Thess: Fortress Academic). He participated on Bible translation teams for the NRSV (updated edition), Common English Bible (CEB), and Lexham English Septuagint (LES). He also has commentaries on 1 Corinthians (New Covenant commentary series: Cascade) and 2 Corinthians (longer work—Rhetoric of Religious Antiquity: SBL Press; shorter work—Wesley One-Volume Commentary). His current specialties include Romans, intertextuality, and Perspectives on Paul. He can be followed on X-Twitter (@bjoropeza1) and Instagram (@bjoropeza1). You can read more about the author here.

Previous Post

September 7, 2024

The Meaning of Baptism for the Dead in 1 Corinthians 15:29

Next Post

October 5, 2024 How to Be Born Again: John Wesley’s Perspective

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category "in Christ" 1 Corinthians 1 Enoch 1 John 2:19 1 Peter 1 Thessalonians 1 Timothy 1Peter 2 Corinthians 2 Timothy 400 years of silence A. I. A. M. Hunter Abraham Achilles Tatius Acts 13 Acts 19 Acts 22 Acts 26 Acts 9 addiction adultery Aesop's Fables Affliction afterlife allegiance allusions amanuensis Amen Ananias Ancient Biography Andrew Wilson Andronicus Angels anger Anglicanism anointing aorist tense Apep apocalypse apocalyptic Apocrypha apologetics apostasy Apostle Apostle Paul Aquinas archaeology archangel Ardel Caneday Arminianism armor of God article from journal artificial intelligence Asbury ascension atlas atonement Augustine Augustus authorship Awakening awards baptism Battle of Armageddon beasts behemoth Belial Beliar belief Benediction between Testaments Beverly Roberts Gaventa Bible Bible discrepancies Bible Gateway Bible reading Bible reading plan Bible Study Bible translations Bible version Bible versions biblical inerrancy Biblical Theology blasphemy blindness Boethius boldness Book of Acts Book Review Born Again bravery burial Caesar calling Calvinism canon canon Cassius Dio Catholics Channing Crisler charistmatic Christ Christian behavior Christian origins Christian theology Christians Christology church church fathers Church of England Chuza Cleopas Commandments Commentaries congregation conversion Corinthian letters coronavirus courage Covenant covenant theology covenantal nomism coveting COVID-19 Craig Keener Crescens crocodile Cross crucifixion curse custom Cyprian Daily Bread Dale Allison Damascus Damascus Experience Damascus road David Moffitt Day of Atonement deacon dead Dead Sea Scrolls death Deity of Christ Demas demonology demons determinism Deuteronomy Devil devotion dinosaur Dio Chrysostom divided I Divine Christology divine punishment divorce Do not fear Doxology dragon E. P. Sanders Eastern Orthodox Ebeneazer Urga echoes ekklesia election Elijah the Prophet Elymas embodiment of the gospel embodying the gospel emperor empty tomb Encouragement end times enlightement Ephesians Ephesus Epistles of Paul eschatology eternal life Ethics (Christian) euchlaion Eusebius of Caesarea evangelical evangelism evidence exile extreme unction Ezekiel faith falling away false prophet fate father Father's Day favorite Fear film Final Judgment Flood foreknowledge foreordain forgiveness fornication freewill from Saul to Paul Galatians Gary Cooper Genesis Gentile studies Gentiles geography giants gift gift giving global perspective Glossa Ordinaria God God perception good news gospel gospel 2.0 Gospel of John Gospel of Luke Gospel of Mark Gospel of Matthew Gospels grace gratitude Great Awakening Greco-Roman Greco-Roman world Greek Greek classic literature Greek lexicon Greek Orthodox Greek prepositions greetings guilt Habakkuk hair Halloween head covering head coverings healing heaven Hebrew Hebrews hermeneutics Hesed high Christology Higher Christology highlights holiness holy Holy Bible Holy Scriptures Holy Spirit Homer hospitable hospitality how to read the Bible human effort I Am sayings imperialism in Adam In Christ inspiration intercession Interpretation intertestamental period Intertextuality Interview intimidation Isaiah Israel Israel (land of) James James D. G. Dunn Jason Staples Jerome Jesus Jesus sayings Jesus traditions Jesus: Studies Jewish literature Jewish names Jewish Scripture Jewish studies Jews Joanna Job John John 3:16 John Chrysostom John Hyrcanus John Mark John of Damascus John the Baptist John Wesley Josephus joy Judaism Judgment day Julia Junia Justice justification kerygma King Kingdom kingdom of God Krister Stendahl lament Law lecture hall letter writing Letters of Paul Leucippe et Clitophon Leviathan Leviticus light Logical fallacy looting Lord Lord's Prayer lose salvation Lot Lotan love lovingkindness Lucifer Luke lust Luther LXX maenads Malachi Marcion marginalization marital affair marriage martyrdom Mary Matt Damon Medieval theologians Medieval theology memorization mercy Michael the Archangel miracles Mishnah missiology mission missionary missions monergism monogenes monster monsters Mysterious Ways mythology N. T. Wright name change names narrative Nephilim New Birth new covenant new covenant pneumaism new creation New Perspective on Paul New Testament New Testament use of Old Testament Noah Noah's ark non-Christian oath obedience Odysseus Odyssey oil Old Testament only begotten Origen Outpouring pagan pagans parable paraceratherium Parousia participation in Christ Pastoral Letters patristic theology Paul in prison Paul letter of Paul teaching Paul the Apostle: Studies Paul within Judaism Paul's calling Paul's conversion Paul's death Pauline Theology persecution perseverance perseverance of the saints Persis personal devotion pesher Peter Abelard Philo philosophy Phoebe Pink Floyd pistis Plague plutarch pneuma pneumagism popular culture sayings Porneia Post-New Perspective on Paul praise prayer preaching predestination Prisca Priscilla Prison Epistle Prophecy prophets Psalm Psalms Pseudepigrapha Q Q source quest for the historic Jesus quotations Rabbi Pinhas be Yair Rabbinic literature Rainer Riesner raised from the dead rapture reading missiologically reading plan recipients reciprocity reconciliation Red Herring red letter edition redemption Reformation Regeneration rejoicing reminder renewal repentance restoration resurrection revival righteousness riot Roman Antiquity Roman names romance Romans Romans 12-16 Romans 16 Romans 4:25 Romans 7 Rome Rufus's mother sacrificial system salvation Salvation/Soteriology sanctification Satan Satan's fall Saul the Pharisee SBL Scholars school Scripture Second coming of Christ Second Temple Judaism secretary Septuagint Sergeant York Sergius Paulus Servant in Isaiah sex and sexuality sex ethics sexual immorality sheep sick sin sinful nature single Christians and dating social justice Society of Biblical Literature sons of God soteriology spinosaurus spiritual gifts spiritual renewal spiritual warfare Stephen Wilson struggle Study Bible studying the Bible Suetonius suffering Suffering Servant suggestive commentary Survey synergism Synoptic Gospels Tacitus teacher teaching telos temptation Tertius The Chosen the flesh Theology Thomas Aquinas Thomas Robinson Thomas Schreiner Thorn Thucydides Timothy Titus tongues Top 10 top 12 Torah trust Tryphaena Tryphosa Tyrannus U2 Ugaritic Ukraine Ukrainian Uncategorized unconditional love unforgiving Union with Christ unity/solidarity unpardonable sin Valentine's Day veils vice vices victory warnings Watchers witnessing Woman ministers women women ministers women speakers women teachers word of God works works of the law worship writing YouVersion Zen Hess

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What is the Hebrew name for the book of Genesis?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Elohim Shema Bereshit Torah