Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
General Christian
History and Religion
How is the Unpardonable Sin Committed?

How is the Unpardonable Sin Committed?

Last updated on: June 24, 2024 at 7:25 am by B. J. Oropeza

How is the Unpardonable Sin Committed? 2024-06-24T07:25:49-07:00 B. J. Oropeza

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

There is one sin that is unpardonable according to Jesus—blaspheming the Holy Spirit. But under which circumstances is it committed according to Scripture? Let us look at the three biblical passages where the unpardonable sin appears:

The Fruit represents sin.

The Unpardonable Sin – Blaspheming the Holy Spirit. “apple thorn gold paint” via pixabay.com

Matthew 12:31–32

In Matthew 12:31-32 those who are in danger of blaspheming the Holy Spirit are Jesus’s unbelieving religious opponents. Important for our purposes, these opponents are not identified as Christ’s followers.

Matthew’s Gospel includes two separate incidents where the opponents claim that Jesus performs his miracles, exorcisms, by a demonic power (Matt 9:32–34; 12:24). The blaspheming thus has to do with their wrong evaluation of what the Spirit of God was accomplishing through Jesus. The opponents reject the definitive sign of God’s impending kingdom that brings forth prophetic words and deeds.

Moreover, the Spirit is related to divine healing and proclamation associated with the forgiveness of sins, and the opponents’ problem is one of unforgiveness—both of others and their own need to be forgiven. They could not, as James Williams affirms, comprehend “the true nature of God’s disposition toward and work in the world” (James G. Williams “Note on the ‘Unforgivable Sin’ Logion.” New Testament Studies 12 1965:75–77).*

Mark 3:28–29

Mark’s version attributes the unpardonable sin likewise to Jesus’ unbelieving opponents, the religious leaders. The accusation is that Jesus is demonized, perhaps suggesting a repetitive charge (Mark 3:22; 3:30). It is possible that the imperfect tense elegon (ἔλεγον) in these verses may imply that these opponents “kept on saying” Jesus performed exorcisms through the help of demonic power (see William Lane, Gospel of Mark, 136). But Mark uses the word and tense quite frequently: cp. e.g., Mark 2:16, 24; 3:21; 4:41; 5:31; 6:14–15; 6:35. Even so, Matthew uses the same tense in the parallel: Matt 9:34).

The result of persistent stubbornness exemplified by the escalating resistance towards Jesus’s message portrayed in Mark 2–3 functions as the ground for why divine hardening takes place in 4:10–12. Israel’s leaders at the time are seen as culprits in rejecting divine guidance. This condition in Mark’s Gospel results in spiritual hardening and blinding, a prevalent theme throughout (Mark 3:1–4:12/ Isa 1–6; Mark 7:1–13/Isa 29:13; Mark 12:1–12/Isa 5:1–7).

Prior resistance of these leaders towards Jesus and his miracles in Mark 2–3 fits well with the passage in which Jesus quotes Isaiah 6:9–10 in relation to those “outside” who do not comprehend his parables. Mark’s Gospel probably assumes that its audience will connect the dots between the outsiders’ spiritual blindness in Mark 4:10–12 and Jesus’s opponents who harden their heart in Mark 2–3 (e.g., 3:5–6).

Luke 12:10

Luke’s version of blaspheming the Holy Spirit is distinct from Matthew and Mark. This Gospel’s takes place in the context of persecution (Luke 12:10; cf. 12:4–9). Unlike the other Synoptic writers, Luke does not relate this sin to an accusation made by religious leaders that Jesus casts out devils by the power of Beelzebul (cf. Matt 12:22–32; Mark 3:19–30). That story is included in Luke 11:14–22 but without the warning related to their blaspheming the Spirit.

In Luke 12:4–12 Jesus’s addresses his warning to his disciples, who in the impending future will be brought before rulers and authorities. Acts lists numerous occasions in which the Christ-followers stand before such authorities (Acts 4:3–23; 5:17–40; 6:9–7:58; 16:19–36; 17:5–9; 18:12–17; 23:1–11; 24–26). The disciples must not fear persecution from such powers that can kill the body only. They should fear instead God who has power to cast them into Gehenna (Luke 12:5).

No doubt, if the disciples were to deny Christ during such times and not repent, they would also be denied by him and suffer eschatological punishment (Luke 12:8–9). Hence, in Luke the notion of blaspheming the Spirit does not appear to be understood as a temporary phenomenon relevant only to the pre-Easter blasphemy of Jesus’s opponents.

Who, then, is in danger of blaspheming the Spirit in Luke?

A case could be made that Jesus in Luke 12:8–9 exhorts the disciples and their followers not to fall away during coming persecutions. But blaspheming the Spirit in 12:10 may be directed against the persecutors instead of the disciples. This interpretation would seem to flow with 12:11–12, in which “they” (the opponents) will confront and persecute the disciples. At the same time, the Holy Spirit will give the disciples the right words to say when standing before their accusers.

This perspective complements the account of the authorities resisting the Spirit when Stephen preaches to them and his face shines as an angel (Acts 7:51; cf. Acts 6:15).

But this interpretation is far from certain. If the unpardonable sin here is committed by the persecutors, we would then need to explain how the Apostle Paul, a former persecutor of Christ’s followers, was forgiven even though consenting to Stephen’s death. He obviously saw the angelic presence on Stephen’s face, too. And yet, despite his consent to Stephen’s death, his sin was pardonable. He eventually became an apostle for Jesus (Acts 7:58; cf. 9:17).

Moreover, the conjunction “and” (καί) that begins Luke 12:10 would seem to connect well with the preceding verses 8–9. This verse may then suggest that the disciples are the ones who are in danger of blaspheming the Spirit. Early Christians adopted such an interpretation of the unpardonable sin (e.g., Didache 11.7; Origen, De Principiis. 1.3).

The Disciples?

I suggest, then, that uniquely in Luke 12:4-10, the unpardonable sin may be a warning to believers in Christ.

If persecution is being highlighted here, then in some sense it would seem to be associated with the unpardonable sin. The notion of committing apostasy (falling away) may be related to blaspheming the Spirit. But if so, we should keep in mind that not all forms of apostasy amount to committing the unpardonable sin. In particular, those who deny Jesus but afterward repent can be forgiven (Luke 12:9–10a). This shows that restoration is possible for defectors who deny Christ, and a similar case might be said of Peter’s famous denial (Luke 22:54–62).

Blaspheming the Holy Spirit, on the other hand, cannot be forgiven (Luke 12:10b). Perhaps the missing ingredient here is that blaspheming the Spirit involves not only denying Jesus but doing so despite the Spirit being manifested in an extraordinary way. The apostate in this case could have experienced the power of the Spirit when they were believers, but then they later deny Jesus and never feel the need to trust in him or repent again.

A more precise nuance in this context may suggest that this is a sin that Christ’s followers commit against the Holy Spirit during a time in which the Spirit is giving them correct words to say before their accusers (Luke 12:11–12). Rather than trust God’s Spirit at such times, they deny Christ. It is evident that the Spirit manifests in extraordinary ways at such moments of persecution (cf. Acts 4:8, 31; 6:10, 15), and rejection of the Spirit in the face of sublime visions or spiritual manifestations may amount to what becomes unpardonable (See similarly, Robert Tannehill, Luke, 203; Robert Menzies, Empowered for Witness, 166).

Conclusion

It becomes quite evident that the unpardonable sin of blaspheming the Holy Spirit is the end result of obduracy. The upshot of all this, especially in Mark, is that blaspheming the Spirit involves persistent hardness of heart that ultimately leads a person to reject or attribute to the devil the miraculous signs of God’s Spirit through Jesus.

Denying Christ and betraying Christians for fear of persecution are forgivable sins. On the hand, Luke’s Gospel may express an extreme form of divine intervention that is denied or rejected by those who were considered believers. Imagine if Paul, for example, after his Damascus encounter with Christ in Act 9, decided to reject him and persecute Christians again not long after he was healed of his temporary blindness and filled with the Spirit. That might be, hypothetically speaking, an example of the unpardonable sin in Luke.

In any case, the typical sins that people commit these days, including cussing out God, Christ, or the Spirit, do not appear to be what is meant by the unpardonable sin. And the person who is worried about his or her heart being hardened towards God obviously has not committed the unpardonable sin. A person who committed the unpardonable sin would not be worried about it! Repentance is always possible for those who have not hardened their hearts beyond reparation.

Notes

* For further notes on this subject and apostasy in general, see my book, B. J. Oropeza, In the Footsteps of Judas and Other Defectors: The Gospels, Acts, and Johannine Writings. Apostasy in the New Testament Communities, volume 1 (Eugene: Cascade, 2012), from which this study is derived.

Contemplative

History and Religion

Education and Religion

blaspheming the Holy Spirit

About B. J. Oropeza

B. J. Oropeza, Ph.D., Durham University (England), is Professor of Biblical and Religious Studies at Azusa Pacific University and Seminary. Among his many publications include Perspectives on Paul: Five Views (Baker Academic), Practicing Intertextuality (Cascade), and editor and/or contributor to the Scripture, Texts, and Tracings volumes (Romans; 1 Corinthians; 2 Cor & Phil; Gal & 1 Thess: Fortress Academic). He participated on Bible translation teams for the NRSV (updated edition), Common English Bible (CEB), and Lexham English Septuagint (LES). He also has commentaries on 1 Corinthians (New Covenant commentary series: Cascade) and 2 Corinthians (longer work—Rhetoric of Religious Antiquity: SBL Press; shorter work—Wesley One-Volume Commentary). His current specialties include Romans, intertextuality, and Perspectives on Paul. He can be followed on X-Twitter (@bjoropeza1) and Instagram (@bjoropeza1). You can read more about the author here.

Previous Post

June 10, 2024

Joanna & Chuza in 'The Chosen': A Bad Marriage in the Bible?

Next Post

July 7, 2024 Is John the Baptist Elijah? Comparing Matt 11:14 & John 1:21

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category "in Christ" 1 Corinthians 1 Enoch 1 John 2:19 1 Peter 1 Thessalonians 1 Timothy 1Peter 2 Corinthians 2 Timothy 400 years of silence A. I. A. M. Hunter Abraham Achilles Tatius Acts 13 Acts 19 Acts 22 Acts 26 Acts 9 addiction adultery Aesop's Fables Affliction afterlife allegiance allusions amanuensis Amen Ananias Ancient Biography Andrew Wilson Andronicus Angels anger Anglicanism anointing aorist tense Apep apocalypse apocalyptic Apocrypha apologetics apostasy Apostle Apostle Paul Aquinas archaeology archangel Ardel Caneday Arminianism armor of God article from journal artificial intelligence Asbury ascension atlas atonement Augustine Augustus authorship Awakening awards baptism Battle of Armageddon beasts behemoth Belial Beliar belief Benediction between Testaments Beverly Roberts Gaventa Bible Bible discrepancies Bible Gateway Bible reading Bible reading plan Bible Study Bible translations Bible version Bible versions biblical inerrancy Biblical Theology blasphemy blindness Boethius boldness Book of Acts Book Review Born Again bravery burial Caesar calling Calvinism canon canon Cassius Dio Catholics Channing Crisler charistmatic Christ Christian behavior Christian origins Christian theology Christians Christology church church fathers Church of England Chuza Cleopas Commandments Commentaries congregation conversion Corinthian letters coronavirus courage Covenant covenant theology covenantal nomism coveting COVID-19 Craig Keener Crescens crocodile Cross crucifixion curse custom Cyprian Daily Bread Dale Allison Damascus Damascus Experience Damascus road David Moffitt Day of Atonement deacon dead Dead Sea Scrolls death Deity of Christ Demas demonology demons determinism Deuteronomy Devil devotion dinosaur Dio Chrysostom divided I Divine Christology divine punishment divorce Do not fear Doxology dragon E. P. Sanders Eastern Orthodox Ebeneazer Urga echoes ekklesia election Elijah the Prophet Elymas embodiment of the gospel embodying the gospel emperor empty tomb Encouragement end times enlightement Ephesians Ephesus Epistles of Paul eschatology eternal life Ethics (Christian) euchlaion Eusebius of Caesarea evangelical evangelism evidence exile extreme unction Ezekiel faith falling away false prophet fate father Father's Day favorite Fear film Final Judgment Flood foreknowledge foreordain forgiveness fornication freewill from Saul to Paul Galatians Gary Cooper Genesis Gentile studies Gentiles geography giants gift gift giving global perspective Glossa Ordinaria God God perception good news gospel gospel 2.0 Gospel of John Gospel of Luke Gospel of Mark Gospel of Matthew Gospels grace gratitude Great Awakening Greco-Roman Greco-Roman world Greek Greek classic literature Greek lexicon Greek Orthodox Greek prepositions greetings guilt Habakkuk hair Halloween head covering head coverings healing heaven Hebrew Hebrews hermeneutics Hesed high Christology Higher Christology highlights holiness holy Holy Bible Holy Scriptures Holy Spirit Homer hospitable hospitality how to read the Bible human effort I Am sayings imperialism in Adam In Christ inspiration intercession Interpretation intertestamental period Intertextuality Interview intimidation Isaiah Israel Israel (land of) James James D. G. Dunn Jason Staples Jerome Jesus Jesus sayings Jesus traditions Jesus: Studies Jewish literature Jewish names Jewish Scripture Jewish studies Jews Joanna Job John John 3:16 John Chrysostom John Hyrcanus John Mark John of Damascus John the Baptist John Wesley Josephus joy Judaism Judgment day Julia Junia Justice justification kerygma King Kingdom kingdom of God Krister Stendahl lament Law lecture hall letter writing Letters of Paul Leucippe et Clitophon Leviathan Leviticus light Logical fallacy looting Lord Lord's Prayer lose salvation Lot Lotan love lovingkindness Lucifer Luke lust Luther LXX maenads Malachi Marcion marginalization marital affair marriage martyrdom Mary Matt Damon Medieval theologians Medieval theology memorization mercy Michael the Archangel miracles Mishnah missiology mission missionary missions monergism monogenes monster monsters Mysterious Ways mythology N. T. Wright name change names narrative Nephilim New Birth new covenant new covenant pneumaism new creation New Perspective on Paul New Testament New Testament use of Old Testament Noah Noah's ark non-Christian oath obedience Odysseus Odyssey oil Old Testament only begotten Origen Outpouring pagan pagans parable paraceratherium Parousia participation in Christ Pastoral Letters patristic theology Paul in prison Paul letter of Paul teaching Paul the Apostle: Studies Paul within Judaism Paul's calling Paul's conversion Paul's death Pauline Theology persecution perseverance perseverance of the saints Persis personal devotion pesher Peter Abelard Philo philosophy Phoebe Pink Floyd pistis Plague plutarch pneuma pneumagism popular culture sayings Porneia Post-New Perspective on Paul praise prayer preaching predestination Prisca Priscilla Prison Epistle Prophecy prophets Psalm Psalms Pseudepigrapha Q Q source quest for the historic Jesus quotations Rabbi Pinhas be Yair Rabbinic literature Rainer Riesner raised from the dead rapture reading missiologically reading plan recipients reciprocity reconciliation Red Herring red letter edition redemption Reformation Regeneration rejoicing reminder renewal repentance restoration resurrection revival righteousness riot Roman Antiquity Roman names romance Romans Romans 12-16 Romans 16 Romans 4:25 Romans 7 Rome Rufus's mother sacrificial system salvation Salvation/Soteriology sanctification Satan Satan's fall Saul the Pharisee SBL Scholars school Scripture Second coming of Christ Second Temple Judaism secretary Septuagint Sergeant York Sergius Paulus Servant in Isaiah sex and sexuality sex ethics sexual immorality sheep sick sin sinful nature single Christians and dating social justice Society of Biblical Literature sons of God soteriology spinosaurus spiritual gifts spiritual renewal spiritual warfare Stephen Wilson struggle Study Bible studying the Bible Suetonius suffering Suffering Servant suggestive commentary Survey synergism Synoptic Gospels Tacitus teacher teaching telos temptation Tertius The Chosen the flesh Theology Thomas Aquinas Thomas Robinson Thomas Schreiner Thorn Thucydides Timothy Titus tongues Top 10 top 12 Torah trust Tryphaena Tryphosa Tyrannus U2 Ugaritic Ukraine Ukrainian Uncategorized unconditional love unforgiving Union with Christ unity/solidarity unpardonable sin Valentine's Day veils vice vices victory warnings Watchers witnessing Woman ministers women women ministers women speakers women teachers word of God works works of the law worship writing YouVersion Zen Hess

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What does Revelation say will wipe away every tear from their eyes?

Select your answer to see how you score.

The tree of life The river of life God himself An angel