Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
General Christian
Relationships and Religion
Paul and the Resurrection of Israel Part 3: The Conclusion

Paul and the Resurrection of Israel Part 3: The Conclusion

Last updated on: April 21, 2024 at 6:34 pm by B. J. Oropeza

Paul and the Resurrection of Israel Part 3: The Conclusion 2024-04-21T18:34:45-07:00 B. J. Oropeza

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

We are back for a third and final round with some more questions for Jason A. Staples, based on his recent book, Paul and the Resurrection of Israel: Jews, Former Gentiles, Israelites (Cambridge University Press, 2024). He teaches as a professor in the Department of Philosophy and Religious Studies at North Carolina State University.

Our previous episodes covered Israel’s restoration (Pt. 1) related to the end times, and Pt. 2: Jewish identity, living by the Law (Torah), and Christ as the “end” of the Law. For the conclusion we will address Dr. Staples’s view of the new covenant, fullness of the gentiles in Romans 11:25-26, and use of the term, pneuma (spirit).

The Interview: Part 3

Oropeza

In your book, I like your emphasis on the new covenant in Jeremiah 31:31–34 (Hebrew text/ Jer 38:31-34: Greek Text, LXX). This passage is echoed in the texts of the Lord’s Supper, both in the Gospels and Paul (1 Corinthians 11:23-26), again in 2 Corinthians 3:3–18, and yet again in Hebrews.

I’m curious, how do you think Paul read Jeremiah 31:32? It says that this new covenant God will be establishing is not according to the covenant God established with their fathers when taking them out of Egypt. In other words, the text appears to be saying that the new covenant would not be the same as the Mosaic covenant.

Staples

I think Paul understands the difference as spiritual (pneumatic) versus fleshly. The problem with the previous covenant was the incapacity of the fleshly people to keep it. Thus “the Torah was powerless because it was weak through the flesh” (Romans 8:3).

Here I think Paul is very much in agreement with Hebrews 8:8, which says that the problem with the “first covenant” was the people. The solution is therefore the transformation of the people, thus addressing the fault of the first covenant.

As Paul understands it, the difference is that rather than being inscribed on tablets of stone, the new covenant is inscribed on the heart. And rather than requiring a fleshly people to keep a spiritual Torah, the new covenant makes the people spiritual (pneumatic).

Oropeza

One of the unique interpretations in your book is that you argue for a connection between the fullness of the nations/gentiles in Romans 11:25–26 and a parallel in Genesis 48. Could you elaborate on this?

Staples

In Romans 11:25–26, Paul tells the gentiles in the church, “a partial insensibility has come upon Israel until the fullness of the nations has entered, and thus all Israel will be saved.”

This phrase, “the fullness of the nations” appears only one other time in early Jewish literature. That other instance is in Genesis 48:19, where the patriarch Jacob/Israel crosses his hands when blessing the children of Joseph, explaining that whereas the firstborn Manasseh would become a great people, “his younger brother [Ephraim] will be greater than he, and his seed will become the fullness of the nations.”

This passage is highly significant in the narrative arc of Genesis. Previously, Abraham was promised that “by/in you all the families will be blessed” (Gen 12:3) and “in your seed all the nations of the land will be blessed” (Gen 22:18). That specific blessing is then passed to Isaac (Gen 26:4), who then passes it to Jacob/Israel (Gen 27:29). Then, at the end of Genesis, Ephraim is chosen as the heir of this blessing, with the twist that “his seed will become the fullness of the nations.”

I don’t think it’s accidental that Paul employs such an unusual phrase from such a climactic passage at the climax of his own argument, right at the moment he explains how “all Israel“—not only Jews but the non-Jewish portion of Israel—will be saved.

Oropeza

I recall reading that you connect Hosea also to this argument?

Staples

Paul has already cited Hosea’s promise to northern Israel, whom God had divorced with the words “you are not my people and I am not your God” (Hosea 1:9). He states that God would one day restore them: “I will call those who were ‘not my people’ ‘my people’” (Romans 9:25; Hosea 1:10/2:1).

But Paul interprets that promise of northern Israel’s restoration as though it referred to the nations (Romans 9:24). On the one hand this is a surprising move, but on the other this is perfectly sensible. After all, what would “not my people” mean if not “gentiles”?

Here Paul seems to understand Israel’s divorce (cf. Jeremiah 3:8) as resulting in Israel’s “gentilization”—having wanted to be like the nations, they assimilated among the nations, their children becoming no less gentiles than the nations in which they were scattered. Or, as 2 Kings 17:15 says, “They went after the nothing and became nothing/empty” (cf. Romans 1:21).

I should add here that these passages are not about Jews, of whom it was never said, “you are not my people.” Nor would any Jewish interpreter read, “you are not my people” as referring to Jews. Instead, this specifically refers to Israel. But the Prophets continue to promise Israel’s restoration and reunion with Judah—all Israel will be saved, not just Judah.

The question is how such a thing could happen if Israel had de facto gentilized. Thus, Paul argues that the gentiles receiving the spirit are being both ethically and ethnically transformed in a divine action that amounts to life from the dead (Romans 11:15), Israel’s promised resurrection from dry bones (Ezekiel 37).

Thus, when Paul quotes Genesis 48:19 at the climax of his argument, he is explaining how God is restoring all Israel, even including the portion that had long since ceased to be Israel by incorporating gentiles within the people of God through the transformation by the spirit granted by Israel’s messiah.

Oropeza

I notice that you use the lower case “spirit” when addressing texts that are normally attributed to the Holy Spirit by other interpreters. Why is this?

Staples

Part of it is just convention; the default these days is to default to lowercase. I don’t capitalize pronouns referring to deity, for instance.

Another part is that I’m trying to be faithful to the Greek texts as I understand them. I’m a firm believer in the principle that if the source passage is ambiguous, a translation should strive to be equally ambiguous if at all possible.

As you know, the ancient manuscripts themselves don’t distinguish “spirit” from “Spirit,” and it’s not always clear where (or if) Paul is thinking along the lines of “the Holy Spirit” in trinitarian terms.

Take Romans 1:4 for example, where Paul says Jesus was “determined the son of God in power through a spirit of holiness.” Is Paul here referring to “the Holy Spirit” in a personal third-member-of-the-Trinity fashion? If so, why the strange way of saying it?

One can certainly read such passages (and other passages in which Paul refers to “spirit” or “the spirit” without the “holy/sacred” adjective) in a trinitarian fashion. But as a historian, I didn’t want to predetermine that interpretation for my readers in my translations and discussions.

Oropeza

Neither would I. I would not want to add “Holy” to “S/spirit” unless the Greek actually stated this, nor would I assume already that any instance of πνεῦμα (pneuma) in Paul must refer to God’s Spirit.

Staples

By keeping “spirit” in lowercase throughout, I tried to maintain the same level of ambiguity that’s present in the texts themselves, allowing my readers to draw their own conclusions rather than deciding for them.

Oropeza

It’s been a pleasure, Jason, conversing with you. I hope your book gets the attention it deserves. Thank you for taking the time to do this interview!

Jason Staples - Paul and the Resurrection of Israel

Author Jason Staples with his daughters holding up his books, Paul and the Resurrection of Israel and The Idea of Israel

Contemplative

Relationships and Religion

History and Religion

fullness of the gentiles

Holy Spirit

new covenant

Paul and the Resurrection of Israel

restoration

Romans 11:25-26

About B. J. Oropeza

B. J. Oropeza, Ph.D., Durham University (England), is Professor of Biblical and Religious Studies at Azusa Pacific University and Seminary. Among his many publications are Perspectives on Paul: Five Views (Baker Academic), Scripture, Texts, and Tracings in Galatians and 1 Thessalonians (Fortress Academic), and commentaries on 1 Corinthians (New Covenant commentary series: Cascade), and 2 Corinthians (Rhetoric of Religious Antiquity: SBL Press). He can be followed on X-Twitter (@bjoropeza1) and Instagram (@bjoropeza1). You can read more about the author here.

Previous Post

April 4, 2024

Jewish Identity & the Law: Jason Staples on Romans 2 & 10

Next Post

April 22, 2024 What Christians Can Learn from Philo on Faith... or Trust?

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category "in Christ" 1 Corinthians 1 Enoch 1 John 2:19 1 Peter 1 Thessalonians 1 Timothy 1Peter 2 Corinthians 2 Kings 2 Timothy 400 years of silence A. I. A. M. Hunter Abraham Achilles Tatius Acts 13 Acts 19 Acts 22 Acts 26 Acts 9 addiction adultery Aesop's Fables Affliction afterlife allegiance allusions amanuensis Amen Ananias Ancient Biography Andrew Wilson Andronicus Angels anger Anglicanism anointing aorist tense Apep apocalypse apocalyptic Apocrypha apologetics apostasy Apostle Apostle Paul Aquinas archaeology archangel Ardel Caneday Arminianism armor of God article from journal artificial intelligence Asbury ascension atlas atonement Augustine Augustus authorship Awakening awards baptism Battle of Armageddon beasts behemoth Belial Beliar belief Benediction between Testaments Beverly Roberts Gaventa Bible Bible discrepancies Bible Gateway Bible reading Bible reading plan Bible Study Bible translations Bible version Bible versions biblical inerrancy Biblical Theology blasphemy blindness Boethius boldness Book of Acts Book Review Born Again bravery burial Caesar calling Calvinism canon canon Cassius Dio Catholics Channing Crisler charistmatic Christ Christian behavior Christian origins Christian theology Christians Christology church church fathers Church of England Chuza Cleopas Commandments Commentaries congregation conversion Corinthian letters coronavirus courage Covenant covenant theology covenantal nomism coveting COVID-19 Craig Keener Crescens crocodile Cross crucifixion curse custom Cyprian Daily Bread Dale Allison Damascus Damascus Experience Damascus road David Moffitt Day of Atonement deacon dead Dead Sea Scrolls death Deity of Christ Demas demonology demons determinism Deuteronomy Devil devotion dinosaur Dio Chrysostom divided I Divine Christology divine punishment divorce Do not fear Doxology dragon E. P. Sanders Eastern Orthodox Ebeneazer Urga echoes ekklesia election Elijah the Prophet Elisha the Prophet Elisha's bones Elymas embodiment of the gospel embodying the gospel emperor empty tomb Encouragement end times enlightement Ephesians Ephesus Epistles of Paul eschatology eternal life Ethics (Christian) euchlaion Eusebius of Caesarea evangelical evangelism evidence exile extreme unction Ezekiel faith falling away false prophet fate father Father's Day favorite Fear film Final Judgment Flood foreknowledge foreordain forgiveness fornication freewill from Saul to Paul Galatians Gary Cooper Genesis Gentile studies Gentiles geography giants gift gift giving global perspective Glossa Ordinaria God God perception good news gospel gospel 2.0 Gospel of John Gospel of Luke Gospel of Mark Gospel of Matthew Gospels grace gratitude Great Awakening Greco-Roman Greco-Roman world Greek Greek classic literature Greek lexicon Greek Orthodox Greek prepositions greetings guilt Habakkuk hair Halloween head covering head coverings healing heaven Hebrew Hebrews hermeneutics Hesed high Christology Higher Christology highlights holiness holy Holy Bible Holy Scriptures Holy Spirit Homer hospitable hospitality how to read the Bible human effort I Am sayings imperialism in Adam In Christ inspiration intercession Interpretation intertestamental period Intertextuality Interview intimidation Isaiah Israel Israel (land of) James James D. G. Dunn Jason Staples Jerome Jesus Jesus sayings Jesus traditions Jesus: Studies Jewish literature Jewish names Jewish Scripture Jewish studies Jews Joanna Job John John 3:16 John Chrysostom John Hyrcanus John Mark John of Damascus John the Baptist John Wesley Josephus joy Judaism Judgment day Julia Junia Justice justification kerygma King Kingdom kingdom of God Krister Stendahl lament Law Law of Moses lecture hall letter writing Letters of Paul Leucippe et Clitophon Leviathan Leviticus light Logical fallacy looting Lord Lord's Prayer lose salvation Lot Lotan love lovingkindness Lucifer Luke lust Luther LXX maenads Malachi Marcion marginalization marital affair marriage martyrdom Mary Matt Damon Medieval theologians Medieval theology memorization mercy Michael the Archangel miracles Mishnah missiology mission missionary missions monergism monogenes monster monsters Mosaic Law Moses Mysterious Ways mythology N. T. Wright name change names narrative Nephilim New Birth new covenant new covenant pneumaism new creation New Perspective on Paul New Testament New Testament use of Old Testament Noah Noah's ark nomism non-Christian oath obedience Odysseus Odyssey oil Old Testament only begotten Origen Outpouring pagan pagans parable paraceratherium Parousia participation in Christ Pastoral Letters patristic theology Paul in prison Paul letter of Paul teaching Paul the Apostle: Studies Paul within Judaism Paul's calling Paul's conversion Paul's death Pauline Theology persecution perseverance perseverance of the saints Persis personal devotion pesher Peter Abelard Philo philosophy Phoebe Pink Floyd pistis Plague plutarch pneuma pneumagism popular culture sayings Porneia Post-New Perspective on Paul praise prayer preaching predestination Prisca Priscilla Prison Epistle Prophecy prophets Psalm Psalms Pseudepigrapha Q Q source quest for the historic Jesus quotations Rabbi Pinhas be Yair Rabbinic literature Rainer Riesner raised from the dead rapture reading missiologically reading plan recipients reciprocity reconciliation Red Herring red letter edition redemption Reformation Regeneration rejoicing reminder renewal repentance restoration resurrection revival righteousness riot Roman Antiquity Roman names romance Romans Romans 12-16 Romans 16 Romans 4:25 Romans 7 Rome Rufus's mother sacrificial system salvation Salvation/Soteriology sanctification Satan Satan's fall Saul the Pharisee SBL Scholars school Scripture Second coming of Christ Second Temple Judaism secretary Septuagint Sergeant York Sergius Paulus Servant in Isaiah sex and sexuality sex ethics sexual immorality sheep sick sin sinful nature single Christians and dating social justice Society of Biblical Literature sons of God soteriology spinosaurus spiritual gifts spiritual renewal spiritual warfare Stephen Wilson struggle Study Bible studying the Bible Suetonius suffering Suffering Servant suggestive commentary Survey synergism Synoptic Gospels Tacitus teacher teaching telos temptation Tertius The Chosen the flesh Theology Thomas Aquinas Thomas Robinson Thomas Schreiner Thorn Thucydides Timothy Titus tongues Top 10 top 12 Torah trust Tryphaena Tryphosa Tyrannus U2 Ugaritic Ukraine Ukrainian Uncategorized unconditional love unforgiving Union with Christ unity/solidarity unpardonable sin urgency Valentine's Day veils vice vices victory warnings Watchers witnessing Woman ministers women women ministers women speakers women teachers word of God works works of the law worship writing YouVersion Zen Hess zombie

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What does Paul say happens when we are baptized into Christ Jesus?

Select your answer to see how you score.

We receive the Holy Spirit We become children of God We are saved We are baptized into his death