Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
General Christian
History and Religion
Jewish Identity & the Law: Jason Staples on Romans 2 & 10

Jewish Identity & the Law: Jason Staples on Romans 2 & 10

Last updated on: April 5, 2024 at 6:46 am by B. J. Oropeza

Jewish Identity & the Law: Jason Staples on Romans 2 & 10 2024-04-05T06:46:02-07:00 B. J. Oropeza

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

We are back again with some more questions for Jason A. Staples. This time we discuss Jewish identity, living by the Law (Torah), and Christ as the “end” of the Law. In our first episode, we covered, among other things, Israel’s restoration related to the end times. All these and many other issues are addressed more fully in Dr. Staples’s recent book, Paul and the Resurrection of Israel: Jews, Former Gentiles, Israelites (Cambridge University Press, 2024).

To refresh our memory, Dr. Staples comes from the Department of Philosophy and Religious Studies at North Carolina State University, where he is an assistant teaching professor. It is my pleasure once again to converse with him.

Part 2 of the Interview

Oropeza

I like that you argue that gentiles are not the only audience of Paul’s. So how do you interpret the “so-called” Jew in Romans 2:17? There’s lots of controversy over that verse being really about a gentile wanting to be Jew. Let me cite if for you:

Romans 2:17 Now if you call yourself/are called (ἐπονομάζῃ/eponamazê) a Jew and rely on the Law and boast in God,

Used by the author's permission: Jason Staples

Jason Staples’s daughters holding up his books: Paul and the Resurrection of Israel and The Idea of Israel

2:18 and you know the divine will and you determine vital matters, being instructed from the Law, 2:19 and so you have convinced yourself to be a guide of the blind, a light of those in darkness, 2:20 a corrector of the foolish, a teacher of children, having the embodiment of the knowledge and truth in the Law. 2:21 You, then, who teach another, do you not teach yourself? You who preach to another not to steal, do you steal? 2:22 You who say not to commit adultery, do you commit adultery? You who detests idols, do you commit sacrilege? 2:23 You who boasts in the Law, on account of your transgression of the Law you dishonor God! 2:24 For, “the name of God is being blasphemed among the nations because of you,” just as it is written.

What is your viewpoint of this text?

Staples

When I wrote my dissertation, I was open to the recent proposal that Romans 2:17 refers to someone born a gentile who has been circumcised and “calls himself a Jew,” though Paul denies Jewish status to such a person. But as I worked on this book, it became increasingly clear that view doesn’t hold up.

For one thing, Lionel Windsor published 2021 a careful analysis of the phrase in question. He concluded that in every case elsewhere in Greek literature, this form of the word *eponomazô/*ἐπονομάζω (here, ἐπονομάζῃ) means “are called.” A different grammatical construction is always used for the reflexive “call yourself” meaning. The same year (2021), Markus Öhler published a book chapter concluding the same on other grounds.

So, Rom 2:17 does not say, “If you call yourself a Jew,” as argued by those who have suggested he’s referring to a newly-circumcised convert to Judaism not otherwise received as a Jew by others. Instead, it says, “if you are called a Jew,” referring to someone who is recognized as a Jew by others—the very definition of what constitutes “Jewishness” from a sociological perspective.

Oropeza

It’s interesting that three prominent critiques of this same interpretation were all published in the same year—2021 is when my own article came out on this subject through Academia Letters: “Is the Jew in Romans 2:17 Really a Gentile? Second Thoughts on a Recent Interpretation”.

Staples

When Paul objects to gentiles being circumcised in Galatians, it’s not because circumcision doesn’t work to convert them into Jews. Quite the contrary! It’s because it works all too well! Genevive Dibley’s chapter in Israel and the Nations is brilliant on this point, such that “every man who becomes circumcised is obligated to keep the whole Torah” (Galatians 5:3).

By becoming Jews through circumcision, they effectively bring themselves under the very curse of the Torah from which Jesus came to rescue Israel (Galatians 3:10–14). After all, the covenant curses only apply to those to whom the covenant applies—that is, Israel.

That whole line of argumentation in Galatians is incoherent if Paul doesn’t think circumcision actually works in terms of making gentiles into Jews. The problem as Paul sees it is that becoming a Jew isn’t a solution for gentiles, for Jews themselves need the transformation and deliverance the messiah came to bring to Israel. Paul is operating within typical contemporary Jewish theology in that respect. It was commonplace in early Judaism that Israel required divine deliverance due to Israel’s historic covenantal disobedience. Paul merely argues that this deliverance is already happening through Jesus.

So, in Romans 2:17, instead of narrowing the scope to gentile converts and ruling native-born Jews out of the argument, the “if you are called a Jew” phrase instead serves exactly the opposite function. That is, it broadens the scope to include anyone who might be identified as a Jew, whether by birth or conversion. Paul is casting a wide net here.

Oropeza

In the same context of Romans 2, Paul goes on to write:

2:25 For circumcision is of value if you observe the Law, but if you are a transgressor of the Law, your circumcision has become a foreskin! 2:26 Thus if the one with the foreskin keeps the righteous requirements of the Law, will not his foreskin be reckoned as circumcision? 2:27 Then the one who by nature has a foreskin, who fulfills the Law, will judge you who, with the written code and circumcision, are a transgressor of the Law! 2:28 For a person is not a Jew who is one merely outwardly, nor is circumcision merely something outwardly in the flesh, 2:29 but he is a Jew in secret [ἐν τῷ κρυπτῷ/ en tô kruptô], and circumcision is of the heart in Spirit not in written code. This person’s praise is not from humans but from God.

Who do you think is being identified as the secret or inward Jew in 2:29?

Staples

The basic argument of Romans 2 is that because final judgment will be based on works—a bedrock teaching that appears in nearly every Pauline letter*****—Jewish status is insufficient to ensure a good judgment. Thus, Paul argues that if someone otherwise called a Jew does not adequately do the just things required in Torah, that person’s Jewishness is thereby forfeited.

Consequently, the ultimate maintenance of Jewish status requires the spirit, which circumcises the heart and thereby grants the capacity to fully obey and pass through judgment unscathed and with one’s Jewishness intact.

The “secret” or “inward” Jew of Rom 2:28–29 is therefore the one whose heart is circumcised to match the flesh. Of note, I don’t think these verses mean gentile converts become Jews. Instead, Paul is arguing that those who are physically circumcised still need heart circumcision by the spirit in order to be Jewish both inside and out.

Oropeza

In our earlier episode, you brought up that Leviticus 18:5 in Galatians 3:12 and Romans 10:5 functions as a positive statement: “the human who does these things will live by them.” Many interpret Leviticus 18:5 negatively, as human works or doing the law in contrast with faith. Could you elaborate on the reasons for your interpretation?

Staples

Leviticus 18:5 says “the human who does these things will live by them,” referring to the Torah’s commands. On my reading, Paul understands this verse as referring specifically to the singular person—Jesus. It is he who will fulfill all these things properly and gain “life,” that is, eternal life, the power over death.

I don’t think it’s mere coincidence that when Paul cites this verse in Galatians 3:12, the very next word is “Christ,” the very one Paul argues accomplished Leviticus 18:5. Nor is it an accident that in Romans he cites Leviticus 18:5 immediately after declaring that “Christ is the telos [end/goal] of the Torah” (Romans 10:4).

That is, by receiving the life promised by the Torah, Jesus has brought the Torah to its ultimate purpose, and Jesus’s resurrection is the proof that he’s the one of whom the Torah speaks. Paul thus enlists the Torah as witness to Jesus’s messianic status.

On my reading, Paul sees Leviticus 18:5 as a proof-text for the resurrection in parallel with Habakkuk 2:4, “the just one [Jesus] by fidelity will live.” Each verse promises life, and each refers to the singular individual who gains that life.

I get pretty deep into the grammatical weeds in the book’s discussion of these passages, but I think this reading of Paul’s use of Leviticus 18:5 makes the most sense both in the flow of his arguments and in that it seems very unlikely to me that Paul would cite a passage from Torah against his own gospel, which he presents as the proper fulfillment of Torah.

Oropeza

I have a different understanding of Habakkuk 2:4, but I want to stay on track here with your point about Romans 10:4. Could you elaborate some more on Paul’s claim that Christ is the telos [end/goal] of the law? In your view is this related to Moses’s prediction of another prophet in Deuteronomy 18:15–22?

Staples

Absolutely. For one thing, the final independent clause of the Torah—the literal “end of the Torah”—says, “Since that day, a prophet has not risen in Israel like Moses….” (Deut 34:10–12). In the Greek version,** the word for “arisen” here is anistēmi, a word used of the resurrection in the New Testament.

As I mentioned above, Paul argues that Jesus’s resurrection is the proof of his authority. Jesus is the prophet who has “arisen,” making him the one to whom the very end of the Torah points.

Beyond that, this final statement of the Torah signals back to Deut 18:15–22, where Moses says, “YHWH your God will raise up for you a prophet like me from among you, from your brothers. To him you shall listen” (18:15). Since the people would not listen to God directly (18:16–17), God promises to “raise up a prophet like you [Moses] from among their brothers, and I will put my words in his mouth, and he will speak to them” (18:18).

It’s, therefore, no accident that right after calling the Messiah “the end of the Torah,” Romans 10:6–8 then cites Deuteronomy 30:12–14, which promises a time when the word of God will finally be put into the mouth and heart of the people.

It’s a very compressed and complex passage, but the point is that Jesus is the “prophet like Moses” who, having arisen from the dead, delivers the Torah to the people’s hearts, transforming them in a way that Moses himself could not.

Notes

* Apart from Romans 2:6–16, see for example, Rom 14:10–12; 1 Cor 4:4–5; 2 Cor 5:10; 11:25 cf. Col 3:24–25.

** The standard Greek version of the Torah and Deut 34 is the Septuagint (LXX). For an English translation of this text, see, for example, NETS.

Contemplative

History and Religion

Education and Religion

Second Temple Judaism

Paul and the Resurrection of Israel

Romans 2

About B. J. Oropeza

B. J. Oropeza, Ph.D., Durham University (England), is Professor of Biblical and Religious Studies at Azusa Pacific University and Seminary. Among his many publications are Perspectives on Paul: Five Views (Baker Academic), Scripture, Texts, and Tracings in Galatians and 1 Thessalonians (Fortress Academic), and commentaries on 1 Corinthians (New Covenant commentary series: Cascade), and 2 Corinthians (Rhetoric of Religious Antiquity: SBL Press). He can be followed on X-Twitter (@bjoropeza1) and Instagram (@bjoropeza1). You can read more about the author here.

Previous Post

March 22, 2024

Paul and the Resurrection of Israel. A Restoration Viewpoint

Next Post

April 8, 2024 Paul and the Resurrection of Israel Part 3: The Conclusion

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category "in Christ" 1 Corinthians 1 Enoch 1 John 2:19 1 Peter 1 Thessalonians 1 Timothy 1Peter 2 Corinthians 2 Timothy 400 years of silence A. I. A. M. Hunter Abraham Achilles Tatius Acts 13 Acts 19 Acts 22 Acts 26 Acts 9 addiction adultery Aesop's Fables Affliction afterlife allegiance allusions amanuensis Amen Ananias Ancient Biography Andrew Wilson Andronicus Angels anger Anglicanism anointing aorist tense Apep apocalypse apocalyptic Apocrypha apologetics apostasy Apostle Apostle Paul Aquinas archaeology archangel Ardel Caneday Arminianism armor of God article from journal artificial intelligence Asbury ascension atlas atonement Augustine Augustus authorship Awakening awards baptism Battle of Armageddon beasts behemoth Belial Beliar belief Benediction between Testaments Beverly Roberts Gaventa Bible Bible discrepancies Bible Gateway Bible reading Bible reading plan Bible Study Bible translations Bible version Bible versions biblical inerrancy Biblical Theology blasphemy blindness Boethius boldness Book of Acts Book Review Born Again bravery burial Caesar calling Calvinism canon canon Cassius Dio Catholics Channing Crisler charistmatic Christ Christian behavior Christian origins Christian theology Christians Christology church church fathers Church of England Chuza Cleopas Commandments Commentaries congregation conversion Corinthian letters coronavirus courage Covenant covenant theology covenantal nomism coveting COVID-19 Craig Keener Crescens crocodile Cross crucifixion curse custom Cyprian Daily Bread Dale Allison Damascus Damascus Experience Damascus road David Moffitt Day of Atonement deacon dead Dead Sea Scrolls death Deity of Christ Demas demonology demons determinism Deuteronomy Devil devotion dinosaur Dio Chrysostom divided I Divine Christology divine punishment divorce Do not fear Doxology dragon E. P. Sanders Eastern Orthodox Ebeneazer Urga echoes ekklesia election Elijah the Prophet Elymas embodiment of the gospel embodying the gospel emperor empty tomb Encouragement end times enlightement Ephesians Ephesus Epistles of Paul eschatology eternal life Ethics (Christian) euchlaion Eusebius of Caesarea evangelical evangelism evidence exile extreme unction Ezekiel faith falling away false prophet fate father Father's Day favorite Fear film Final Judgment Flood foreknowledge foreordain forgiveness fornication freewill from Saul to Paul Galatians Gary Cooper Genesis Gentile studies Gentiles geography giants gift gift giving global perspective Glossa Ordinaria God God perception good news gospel gospel 2.0 Gospel of John Gospel of Luke Gospel of Mark Gospel of Matthew Gospels grace gratitude Great Awakening Greco-Roman Greco-Roman world Greek Greek classic literature Greek lexicon Greek Orthodox Greek prepositions greetings guilt Habakkuk hair Halloween head covering head coverings healing heaven Hebrew Hebrews hermeneutics Hesed high Christology Higher Christology highlights holiness holy Holy Bible Holy Scriptures Holy Spirit Homer hospitable hospitality how to read the Bible human effort I Am sayings imperialism in Adam In Christ inspiration intercession Interpretation intertestamental period Intertextuality Interview intimidation Isaiah Israel Israel (land of) James James D. G. Dunn Jason Staples Jerome Jesus Jesus sayings Jesus traditions Jesus: Studies Jewish literature Jewish names Jewish Scripture Jewish studies Jews Joanna Job John John 3:16 John Chrysostom John Hyrcanus John Mark John of Damascus John the Baptist John Wesley Josephus joy Judaism Judgment day Julia Junia Justice justification kerygma King Kingdom kingdom of God Krister Stendahl lament Law lecture hall letter writing Letters of Paul Leucippe et Clitophon Leviathan Leviticus light Logical fallacy looting Lord Lord's Prayer lose salvation Lot Lotan love lovingkindness Lucifer Luke lust Luther LXX maenads Malachi Marcion marginalization marital affair marriage martyrdom Mary Matt Damon Medieval theologians Medieval theology memorization mercy Michael the Archangel miracles Mishnah missiology mission missionary missions monergism monogenes monster monsters Mysterious Ways mythology N. T. Wright name change names narrative Nephilim New Birth new covenant new covenant pneumaism new creation New Perspective on Paul New Testament New Testament use of Old Testament Noah Noah's ark non-Christian oath obedience Odysseus Odyssey oil Old Testament only begotten Origen Outpouring pagan pagans parable paraceratherium Parousia participation in Christ Pastoral Letters patristic theology Paul in prison Paul letter of Paul teaching Paul the Apostle: Studies Paul within Judaism Paul's calling Paul's conversion Paul's death Pauline Theology persecution perseverance perseverance of the saints Persis personal devotion pesher Peter Abelard Philo philosophy Phoebe Pink Floyd pistis Plague plutarch pneuma pneumagism popular culture sayings Porneia Post-New Perspective on Paul praise prayer preaching predestination Prisca Priscilla Prison Epistle Prophecy prophets Psalm Psalms Pseudepigrapha Q Q source quest for the historic Jesus quotations Rabbi Pinhas be Yair Rabbinic literature Rainer Riesner raised from the dead rapture reading missiologically reading plan recipients reciprocity reconciliation Red Herring red letter edition redemption Reformation Regeneration rejoicing reminder renewal repentance restoration resurrection revival righteousness riot Roman Antiquity Roman names romance Romans Romans 12-16 Romans 16 Romans 4:25 Romans 7 Rome Rufus's mother sacrificial system salvation Salvation/Soteriology sanctification Satan Satan's fall Saul the Pharisee SBL Scholars school Scripture Second coming of Christ Second Temple Judaism secretary Septuagint Sergeant York Sergius Paulus Servant in Isaiah sex and sexuality sex ethics sexual immorality sheep sick sin sinful nature single Christians and dating social justice Society of Biblical Literature sons of God soteriology spinosaurus spiritual gifts spiritual renewal spiritual warfare Stephen Wilson struggle Study Bible studying the Bible Suetonius suffering Suffering Servant suggestive commentary Survey synergism Synoptic Gospels Tacitus teacher teaching telos temptation Tertius The Chosen the flesh Theology Thomas Aquinas Thomas Robinson Thomas Schreiner Thorn Thucydides Timothy Titus tongues Top 10 top 12 Torah trust Tryphaena Tryphosa Tyrannus U2 Ugaritic Ukraine Ukrainian Uncategorized unconditional love unforgiving Union with Christ unity/solidarity unpardonable sin Valentine's Day veils vice vices victory warnings Watchers witnessing Woman ministers women women ministers women speakers women teachers word of God works works of the law worship writing YouVersion Zen Hess

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What nature miracle did Jesus perform during a storm on the sea?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Calmed the wind and waves Fed the crew Walked on water Turned water to oil