Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
General Christian
Paul and Eastern Orthodox Tradition: New & Old Perspectives

Paul and Eastern Orthodox Tradition: New & Old Perspectives

Last updated on: March 19, 2024 at 7:51 pm by B. J. Oropeza

Paul and Eastern Orthodox Tradition: New & Old Perspectives 2024-03-19T19:51:56-07:00 B. J. Oropeza

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Among the various perspectives on Paul is the viewpoint held by those from the Eastern Orthodox tradition. Athanasios Despotis provides us with good insight on Paul in this tradition. I had the privilege of catching up to him asking him about some of his scholarly research.

Professor Despotis belongs to the faculty department of the New Testament at Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität, Bonn, Germany. He has published monographs such as, Greek and Byzantine Philosophical Exegesis*,* Eastern Church Identities 5 (Leiden: Brill, 2022) (with James Buchanan Wallace), a study on Paul and John regarding conversion-experience and memory entitled in German, Bekehrungserfahrung Und Bekehrungserinnerung Bei Paulus und Johannes (Brill Schoningh, 2021), and another German work that compares the New Perspectives on Paul with Greek Orthodox interpretation: Die ‘New Perspective on Paul’ und die grieschisch-orthodoxe Paulus interpretation. Die Veröffentlichungen des Instituts für Orthodoxe Theologie 11 (EOS Verlag, 2014).

Despotis has published a volume in English also from Mohr Siebeck entitled, Participation, Justification, and Conversion: Eastern Orthodox Interpretation of Paul and the Debate between Old and New Perspectives on Paul. This book became the topic of my interview with Dr. Despotis.

Eastern Orthodox Perspective on Paul

Cover of Participation, Justification, and Conversion. Copy from Mohr Siebeck publishers. A copy was given to me for this interview.

The Interview

Oropeza

To refresh our readers, the New Perspective originated largely through E. P. Sanders’s famous work, Paul and Palestinian Judaism (Fortress Press). His work demonstrated through ancient Jewish-Palestinian literature that the “Judaism” in Paul’s day was a religion of grace. A number of Protestant theologians had incorrectly understood it as a legalistic “works-righteousness” religion. Sanders claimed that Jews held to covenantal nomism in which God by grace chose Israel and established a covenant with them (Mosaic) that they were expected to obey. James D. G. Dunn, N. T. Wright, and others developed their theology from this viewpoint to teach that Paul’s problem with Mosaic law was not due to it being legalistic but ethnocentric. Paul’s rivals were attempting to make his gentile converts into Jews by having them circumcised and observe Jewish customs. Hence, Paul opposed them by insisting that gentiles only need faith in Christ* to be considered righteous, not “works of the law.”

Dr. Despotis, you have written not one but two books that engage the New Perspective on Paul with the Greek Orthodox tradition — Participation, Justification, and Conversion (Mohr Siebeck) and Die ‘New Perspective on Paul’ (EOS). That is quite an accomplishment!

Could you please tell me what your main thesis is in the earlier work, Die ‘New Perspective on Paul’?

Despotis

The first volume is my “Habilitationsschrift” in German, which was unanimously accepted by the Protestant Faculty of the University of Bonn in 2012 and published by EOS-Verlag in 2014. In this work I undertake a historical-critical analysis of key Pauline texts on justification by faith.

I also examine how three prominent schools of modern exegesis interpret these passages— proponents of the New Perspective on Paul (NPP), scholars of the Paul within Judaism persuasion (or Radical New Perspective on Paul), and defenders of the Lutheran interpretation. In addition, I engage with Eastern patristic and contemporary Greek exegesis of Paul in order to identify significant parallels and differences between the NPP and Eastern patristic interpretations.

Oropeza

How is this book different than your more recent Mohr Siebeck volume, Participation, Justification, and Conversion: Eastern Orthodox Interpretation of Paul and the Debate between Old and New Perspectives on Paul?

Despotis

Upon completion of the first book, and building on this research, I published a collaborative project in the WUNT II series for Mohr Siebeck (WUNT stands for Wissenschaftlichen Untersuchungen zum Neuen Testament: “Scientific Investigations in the New Testament”). This project includes thirteen international scholars. It addresses various issues, including the meaning of the concept of participatory union in Paul and its significance in the process of justification by faith. It also explores the relationship between these concepts and the conversion experiences of early Christ-followers, analyzing how they reflect such experiences.

Oropeza

What do you consider to be the main points of agreement between the New Perspective and Eastern Orthodoxy?

Despotis

My study of the Greek patristic material has shown that the key themes of the New Perspective are in part already present in the Greek Fathers. The continuity between Jewish and Christian “religion,” the ethnocentric or “nationalistic” aspect of Paul’s opponents’ criticism of his “lawless” gospel, and the ecclesiological significance of Paul’s doctrine of justification by faith are all concepts that the Greek Fathers were also aware of. I have demonstrated this by references to patristic works.

Oropeza

What are the main differences?

Despotis

Eastern patristic interpretations emphasize a radically new reality in Christ. According to this view, the difference between Paul and Judaism cannot be understood on the basis of legalism or nationalism—i.e., ethnocentrism (Dunn, Wright)—but rather on an ontological basis, namely the incomparable superiority of the new reality in Christ.

The reason why Paul turns from his zeal for the Jewish nation to faith in Christ is that in Christ a new reality emerges. This is one in which death is abolished and a person can now attain holiness and eternal life through faith in Christ. Certainly, this approach excludes any other way of salvation except through faith in Christ.

This interpretation, then, cannot agree with Krister Stendahl’s****** thesis that the Jews have the υἱοθεσία (“sonship”/ “adoption as sons”) and they do not need to come to Christ to become God’s children. There is a strong Christocentric view that distinguishes the Greek Orthodox tradition from the New Perspective. Christ is incomparably superior to the Law because he has fulfilled what the Law had prepared humanity for: the destruction of death.

Oropeza

What is your (or Eastern Orthodoxy’s) perspective on E. P. Sander’s covenantal nomism? Do you agree with Sanders’s interpretation of Second Temple Judaism as a religion involving grace for “getting in” and nomism to be “staying in” the covenant as a “pattern of religion”?

Despotis

In my view, the terms “religion,” “getting in,” “staying in” and the like are technical conventions that cannot accurately interpret ancient religious-philosophical thinkers.

Hellenistic Jewish exegetes like Philo of Alexandria or Greek fathers like John Chrysostom understood Judaism or early Christianity as “true philosophy” rather than “religion.” Moreover, these thinkers share with the New Testament writers a compatibilist understanding of “salvation history.” Accordingly, divine action and free human choice are of vital importance both for entering and remaining in the “people of God.”

Oropeza

What is the relationship between faith/trust and obedience or covenant keeping?

Despotis

Πίστις (often translated as “faith”) is not understood as a counterpoint to human works or boasting. Πίστις, by which one enters the community, is not a blind faith injected from outside, but it presupposes active human obedience to the gospel; for example, Romans 6:17 (ὑπηκούσατε δὲ ἐκ καρδίας/ “you obeyed from the heart”). It is always linked to ritual baptism into the community of Christ’s believers (Galatians 3:26–27).

The Pauline πίστις also refers to ongoing and active faithfulness to the gospel, so that human behavior is essential for final salvation or justification (e.g., Galatians 6:4). Otherwise, there is a danger that the gift of God’s call and the effect of baptism will be lost.

Oropeza

Sounds like there is a real potential for believers to commit apostasy. Since I have written four different books on this subject of apostasy, I surely would not disagree! New Perspective scholars like James Dunn and Kent Yinger, I think, also would not disagree with this. And Don Garlington has written forcefully on the importance of perseverance in Paul.

I’ll be back shortly with some more questions…

Notes

* Regarding the phrase, pistis Christou, such as found in Galatians 2:16, James Dunn insists that it is to be understood as “faith in Christ,” whereas N. T. Wright (and Richard Hays) claim it is “faithfulness of Christ.” As is evident here, and with Stendahl below, New Perspective scholars do not always agree with each other. For similarities and differences, along with a trajectory in relation to other perspectives, see B. J. Oropeza and Scot McKnight “‎Paul in Perspective: An Overview of the Landscape More than 40 Years after Paul and Palestinian Judaism,” in Perspectives on Paul: Five Views (Baker Academic, 2020), 1–24.

** Krister Stendahl is considered a sort of precursor or “grandfather” to the New Perspective on Paul. His article, “The Apostle Paul and the Introspective Conscience of the West,” Harvard Theological Review 56 (1963) 199–215, was influential on Sanders, Dunn, and others. Among other things, it argues that Paul did not suffer from guilt related to sinning or not being able to keep Mosaic Law perfectly as a Pharisee. Rather, Paul considered himself blameless regarding Law observance (cf. Phil 3:3–8). He also held to other doctrines not necessarily embraced by New Perspective scholars. His relevant thoughts are best captured in his book, Paul among Jews and Gentiles, and Other Essays (Fortress, 1976).

Contemplative

New Perspective on Paul

Paul the Apostle: Studies

Pauline Theology

Salvation/Soteriology

Union with Christ

Athanasios Despotis

Eastern Orthodox tradition

Greek Orthodox

New Perspective on Paul

Participation Justification and Conversion

Paul the Apostle

About B. J. Oropeza

B. J. Oropeza is Professor of Biblical and Religious Studies at Azusa Pacific University and Seminary. Among his many works are Perspectives on Paul: Five Views (Baker Academic). He can be followed on X-Twitter: @bjoropeza1 You can read more about the author here.

Previous Post

February 25, 2024

The Gospel of Paul: Evaluating a Protestant Perspective

Next Post

March 13, 2024 Justification & Union with Christ: An Eastern Orthodox View

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category "in Christ" 1 Corinthians 1 Enoch 1 John 2:19 1 Peter 1 Thessalonians 1 Timothy 1Peter 2 Corinthians 2 Timothy 400 years of silence A. I. A. M. Hunter Abraham Achilles Tatius Acts 13 Acts 19 Acts 22 Acts 26 Acts 9 addiction adultery Aesop's Fables Affliction afterlife allegiance allusions amanuensis Amen Ananias Ancient Biography Andrew Wilson Andronicus Angels anger Anglicanism anointing aorist tense Apep apocalypse apocalyptic Apocrypha apologetics apostasy Apostle Apostle Paul Aquinas archaeology archangel Ardel Caneday Arminianism armor of God article from journal artificial intelligence Asbury ascension atlas atonement Augustine Augustus authorship Awakening awards baptism Battle of Armageddon beasts behemoth Belial Beliar belief Benediction between Testaments Beverly Roberts Gaventa Bible Bible discrepancies Bible Gateway Bible reading Bible reading plan Bible Study Bible translations Bible version Bible versions biblical inerrancy Biblical Theology blasphemy blindness Boethius boldness Book of Acts Book Review Born Again bravery burial Caesar calling Calvinism canon canon Cassius Dio Catholics Channing Crisler charistmatic Christ Christian behavior Christian origins Christian theology Christians Christology church church fathers Church of England Chuza Cleopas Commandments Commentaries congregation conversion Corinthian letters coronavirus courage Covenant covenant theology covenantal nomism coveting COVID-19 Craig Keener Crescens crocodile Cross crucifixion curse custom Cyprian Daily Bread Dale Allison Damascus Damascus Experience Damascus road David Moffitt Day of Atonement deacon dead Dead Sea Scrolls death Deity of Christ Demas demonology demons determinism Deuteronomy Devil devotion dinosaur Dio Chrysostom divided I Divine Christology divine punishment divorce Do not fear Doxology dragon E. P. Sanders Eastern Orthodox Ebeneazer Urga echoes ekklesia election Elijah the Prophet Elymas embodiment of the gospel embodying the gospel emperor empty tomb Encouragement end times enlightement Ephesians Ephesus Epistles of Paul eschatology eternal life Ethics (Christian) euchlaion Eusebius of Caesarea evangelical evangelism evidence exile extreme unction Ezekiel faith falling away false prophet fate father Father's Day favorite Fear film Final Judgment Flood foreknowledge foreordain forgiveness fornication freewill from Saul to Paul Galatians Gary Cooper Genesis Gentile studies Gentiles geography giants gift gift giving global perspective Glossa Ordinaria God God perception good news gospel gospel 2.0 Gospel of John Gospel of Luke Gospel of Mark Gospel of Matthew Gospels grace gratitude Great Awakening Greco-Roman Greco-Roman world Greek Greek classic literature Greek lexicon Greek Orthodox Greek prepositions greetings guilt Habakkuk hair Halloween head covering head coverings healing heaven Hebrew Hebrews hermeneutics Hesed high Christology Higher Christology highlights holiness holy Holy Bible Holy Scriptures Holy Spirit Homer hospitable hospitality how to read the Bible human effort I Am sayings imperialism in Adam In Christ inspiration intercession Interpretation intertestamental period Intertextuality Interview intimidation Isaiah Israel Israel (land of) James James D. G. Dunn Jason Staples Jerome Jesus Jesus sayings Jesus traditions Jesus: Studies Jewish literature Jewish names Jewish Scripture Jewish studies Jews Joanna Job John John 3:16 John Chrysostom John Hyrcanus John Mark John of Damascus John the Baptist John Wesley Josephus joy Judaism Judgment day Julia Junia Justice justification kerygma King Kingdom kingdom of God Krister Stendahl lament Law lecture hall letter writing Letters of Paul Leucippe et Clitophon Leviathan Leviticus light Logical fallacy looting Lord Lord's Prayer lose salvation Lot Lotan love lovingkindness Lucifer Luke lust Luther LXX maenads Malachi Marcion marginalization marital affair marriage martyrdom Mary Matt Damon Medieval theologians Medieval theology memorization mercy Michael the Archangel miracles Mishnah missiology mission missionary missions monergism monogenes monster monsters Mysterious Ways mythology N. T. Wright name change names narrative Nephilim New Birth new covenant new covenant pneumaism new creation New Perspective on Paul New Testament New Testament use of Old Testament Noah Noah's ark non-Christian oath obedience Odysseus Odyssey oil Old Testament only begotten Origen Outpouring pagan pagans parable paraceratherium Parousia participation in Christ Pastoral Letters patristic theology Paul in prison Paul letter of Paul teaching Paul the Apostle: Studies Paul within Judaism Paul's calling Paul's conversion Paul's death Pauline Theology persecution perseverance perseverance of the saints Persis personal devotion pesher Peter Abelard Philo philosophy Phoebe Pink Floyd pistis Plague plutarch pneuma pneumagism popular culture sayings Porneia Post-New Perspective on Paul praise prayer preaching predestination Prisca Priscilla Prison Epistle Prophecy prophets Psalm Psalms Pseudepigrapha Q Q source quest for the historic Jesus quotations Rabbi Pinhas be Yair Rabbinic literature Rainer Riesner raised from the dead rapture reading missiologically reading plan recipients reciprocity reconciliation Red Herring red letter edition redemption Reformation Regeneration rejoicing reminder renewal repentance restoration resurrection revival righteousness riot Roman Antiquity Roman names romance Romans Romans 12-16 Romans 16 Romans 4:25 Romans 7 Rome Rufus's mother sacrificial system salvation Salvation/Soteriology sanctification Satan Satan's fall Saul the Pharisee SBL Scholars school Scripture Second coming of Christ Second Temple Judaism secretary Septuagint Sergeant York Sergius Paulus Servant in Isaiah sex and sexuality sex ethics sexual immorality sheep sick sin sinful nature single Christians and dating social justice Society of Biblical Literature sons of God soteriology spinosaurus spiritual gifts spiritual renewal spiritual warfare Stephen Wilson struggle Study Bible studying the Bible Suetonius suffering Suffering Servant suggestive commentary Survey synergism Synoptic Gospels Tacitus teacher teaching telos temptation Tertius The Chosen the flesh Theology Thomas Aquinas Thomas Robinson Thomas Schreiner Thorn Thucydides Timothy Titus tongues Top 10 top 12 Torah trust Tryphaena Tryphosa Tyrannus U2 Ugaritic Ukraine Ukrainian Uncategorized unconditional love unforgiving Union with Christ unity/solidarity unpardonable sin Valentine's Day veils vice vices victory warnings Watchers witnessing Woman ministers women women ministers women speakers women teachers word of God works works of the law worship writing YouVersion Zen Hess

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who lost his strength when his hair was cut?

Select your answer to see how you score.

David Elijah Samson Absalom