Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
General Christian
History and Religion
Do Gentiles in Christ Become Israel? Re-reading Romans 11:25–26

Do Gentiles in Christ Become Israel? Re-reading Romans 11:25–26

Last updated on: August 20, 2023 at 8:49 pm by B. J. Oropeza

0 Comments

Do Gentiles in Christ Become Israel? Re-reading Romans 11:25–26 2023-08-20T20:49:10-07:00 B. J. Oropeza

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

In Romans 9–11 the Apostle Paul claims that many from Israel have become hard hearted, rejecting the gospel about their Messiah, Jesus. At the same time, many gentiles have believed this message. In Romans 11:25–26, however, we learn that Israel’s hardening is only temporary. Once the “fullness” of the gentiles comes in (i.e., they get saved), “all Israel” will be saved.

Several interpretations of “all Israel” are possible, but a prominent position these days is to interpret “Israel” in Romans 11:26 as inclusive of believing gentiles; i.e., the church (the so-called ecclesiological interpretation). According to this viewpoint, the gentiles, along with the Jewish remnant that believes in Jesus (Rom 11:5–7), are to be identified as “all Israel” that will be saved:

Israel & the Reading of Scripture. “Star of David Star” via Pixabay.com

“For I do not want you to be ignorant, brothers and sisters, this mystery—so that you may not be wise in yourselves—that a hardening has happened in part to Israel until when the fullness of the nations/gentiles has come in; and so all Israel will be saved” (Romans 11:25–11:26a).

There are several strengths and weakness with this viewpoint. We will first ponder on some of its strengths and then its weaknesses. Ultimately, I believe that ethnic Israel—not the gentiles and Israel, nor the church and Israel—refers to “all Israel” in this passage.

“All Israel” as including the Gentiles?

Perhaps the most popular supporter of this position is Dr. N. T. Wright, former Bishop of Durham (see his book, Paul and the Faithfulness of God, pp. 1195–1253).

To assist in his interpretation, Wright translates “and so” (kai houtôs) at the beginning of 11:26 as “that is how”: Thus, for Wright, the hardening of Israel lasts until the fullness of gentiles comes in, and “that is how all Israel will be saved.” Given this translation, we can see how easy it is to equate the “fullness of the gentiles coming in” with “all Israel will be saved” implying that the gentiles now belong to Israel.

But kai houtôs can be translated in different ways, whether as “and so” (NIV; NRSV) or “and in this way” (ESV; CSB; similar to Wright’s version), or in a temporal sense that essentially means “and then” “and after that,” “and subsequently” (see e.g., Robert Jewett, Romans, 701*). A number of commentators understand it in the latter sense, pointing out that earlier in the same passage the word “until” (achri) marks a time element. The “fullness of the gentiles” must happen first before “all Israel” can be saved.

In other words, given the prophetic anticipation of Zion here (see Rom 11:26b–11:27), all the gentiles (the nations) must first come into Zion, filling up the spiritual city with its fullness. Or, alternatively, the “full number” of nations must first come into that city. Zion probably means more than simply Jerusalem here. It represents the place of the divine presence, the holy place of the righteous, and thus this passage has to do with these gentiles getting saved and now worshipping the one true God in Christ rather than their idols. Once that event happens, then all Israel will be saved.

Given this disagreement over translations, the issue on whether the gentiles are to be included as “all Israel” cannot be decided on the basis of kai houtôs.

Here are Other Points N. T. Wright uses to Support his View

Israel has largely refused to believe the gospel about the Messiah, Jesus (Rom 10). As a result, God raises up gentiles who inherit the privileges that once were exclusively Israel’s, provoking them to jealousy (Rom 10:19; 11:13–14).
There is a distinction between the elect “remnant” of Israel and “the rest” of Israel who are hardened (Rom 11:7). Not all who are Israel are Israel (Rom 9:6). The hardened Israel suffers spiritual blindness “for ever” (dia pantos) (Rom 11:8–10; cf. Psalm 68[69]:23–24). The other Israel is the elect remnant.
If some of the hardened Israelites end up accepting the gospel, that would mean “life from the dead” (Rom 11:15). According to Wright, this refers not to a futuristic general resurrection but present-day baptism, as in Romans 6:3–11. These Israelites are the “some” whom Paul says might be saved as a result of being provoked to jealousy (Rom 11:14).
For Wright, the saving of “some” of them in Rom 11:14 counts as the “fullness” of Israel (Rom 11:12). He believes a very large number will be saved. Even so, this does not have to do with Israel being saved en masse at the second coming of Christ.
In Romans 11:16–24, the “firstfruits” refers to both the Messiah and the remnant of Israel. The “lump” refers to the hardened members of Israel. The branches of the olive tree are also the remnant, and broken branches are unbelieving Jews. The olive tree is metaphorically Israel, one family rooted in the patriarchs and promises. The broken branches could be re-engrafted in, being saved by being provoked to jealousy rather than by the second coming.
The engrafting of the unnatural wild branches refers to the gentiles, who are now engrafted into Israel as a result of their believing in Christ. Thus, for Wright, “Israel” consists of the entire people of God, including believing gentiles.
In Romans 11:25–32, “until” (a temporal marker) “the ‘fullness’ of the nations comes in” refers to the gentiles entering into the olive tree. These verses do not tell us what happens to hardened Israel at the time of that “fullness.” We can expect that a much greater number of hardened Israel will be provoked to jealousy and so be saved as a result of this fullness of the gentiles/nations.
In Romans 11:27, “when” (hotan) means “whenever” so the citation reads: “when(ever) I take away their sins.” This is an indefinite time, a repeated event, rather than pointing to a single future event like the second coming. It refers instead to a steady influx of hardened Israel being saved rather than a one-time event.

Here is My Critique of this Position

The “fullness” of Israel in Romans 11:12 corresponds with the “fullness” of the gentiles in Romans 11:25. Both texts refer to the totality of the people involved (cp. “all” in Rom 11:32). This “fullness” of Israel, then, is not the same thing as the mention of “some” Israelites that might be saved through Paul’s gentile ministry in 11:14.
In Romans 11:14, the Greek construction ei + pôs + subjunctive or future verb connotes a hesitant expectancy: “if somehow,” “in hope that perhaps,” or “possibly” (cp. Rom 1:10; 1 Cor 9:27; 2 Cor 2:7; etc.). By way of contrast, Paul speaks more confidently concerning the “all” who are saved and shown mercy in Romans 11:26 and 11:30–32. Hence, Romans 11:14 and Romans 11:26 do not refer to the same thing, even as “some” in 11:14 does not mean the same thing as “all” in 11:26.
The olive tree is never referred to here as Israel; otherwise, the severed branches could not be called Israel in 11:11.
The gentiles remain identified as unnatural wild olive branches rather than the natural branches (i.e., the Israel that remained, the remnant). Hence, a distinction between “gentiles” and “Israel” continues to be maintained in this metaphorical illustration of the olive tree. The gentiles do not become Israel or part of Israel.
The phrase dia pantos in Rom 11:8–10 does not mean “forever” but “continually” (cp. 2 Thess 2:16; Heb 2:15; Acts 2:25; 24:16). The phrase, for example, is used of the demoniac who experienced “continual” torment (Mark 5:5), but that is not the same thing as experiencing torment “forever.” Jesus heals this demoniac man of his continual torment. So what difference does this nuance make? Hardened Israel will not be hardened “forever” but will eventually be saved, as Paul will affirm in Rom 11:26.
It is highly questionable in Rom 11:25 that the gentiles “coming in” refers to their entrance into the olive tree as “Israel.” Israel is not said to be the olive tree (see #3 above). Had Paul meant in 11:25 that the gentiles are engrafted into the olive tree, he would more likely have used egkentrizô (to “engraft”) as he does in Rom 11:16–24 rather than eiserchomai (to “come in”) as he does in Rom 11:25. The active voice “may come in” “may enter in” stands in contrast to the passive voice used for being engrafted in Rom 11:16–24.
If not the olive tree, then where do the gentiles “come in” to? Most likely this refers to their entrance into Zion, which is cited in Paul’s Scripture quote in Rom 11:26b–27 of Isaiah 59:20–21. Zion is the place of the Lord’s presence and points to the future salvation and restoration of Israel that is inclusive of the nations coming to Zion (see Isaiah 59–62).
It does not make good sense for Paul to be writing about “Israel” in fully ethnic terms throughout Romans 9–11, and then all of the sudden, the gentiles are included in the name “Israel” in 11:25–26! Would the original readers in Rome readily comprehend this? Also, Paul’s quote regarding Jacob in Isa 59:20 (in Rom 11:26–27), clearly refers to him as Israel, not the gentiles/nations.
The more plausible view of Romans 11:26 is to understand “all Israel” being saved as something that will take place in the future, from Paul’s perspective. That is, ethnic Israel will be saved after the fullness of the gentiles takes place. This salvation will apparently take place or reach its culmination at the end of the present age. That is when the spiritual blindness of hardened Israel will be removed, and they will then be able to perceive and believe Jesus the Messiah, the “deliverer” from Zion (Rom 11:26b; cf. 1 Thess 1:10).
Nowhere does Paul ever explicitly call the gentiles “Israel” in any of his letters. That is also true of Romans 11:26.**

Conclusion

“All Israel” in Romans 11:26 refers to ethnic Israel. My conclusion, then, is that the gentiles do not become part of Israel. Paul affirms the elect “remnant” of Israel who are already believers in Jesus Messiah (Rom 11:5), and he also anticipates a time when many of the hardened Israelites (“the rest”: Rom 11:7) will be freed from that hardening and come to believe and be saved. He looks forward to a day when both the “elect remnant” and “the rest” of Israel will be united as “all Israel.” For Paul, all the twelve tribes of Israel will once again be reunited.

* For the best Bible commentaries on Romans, see my Patheos blog, B. J. Oropeza, “Top 12 Commentaries on Romans.”

** For the complete article of my view, see B. J. Oropeza, “The Identity and Destiny of ‘All Israel’ in Paul’s Apocalyptic Imagination: Revisiting Rom. 11.26.” In The Scriptures in the Book of Revelation and Apocalyptic Literature: Essays in Honour of Steve Moyise, ed. Susan Docherty and Steve Smith, LNTS 634 (London: T.& T Clark/Bloomsbury, 2023), 171-82.

Evangelical

History and Religion

Education and Religion

Salvation/Soteriology

soteriology

All Israel

fullness of the gentiles

About B. J. Oropeza

B. J. Oropeza, Ph.D. University of Durham, is Professor of Biblical and Religious Studies at Azusa Pacific University and Seminary (Azusa, CA). Among his many publications include Perspectives on Paul: Five Views (Baker Academic) and Practicing Intertextuality (Cascade Books). He also worked on the NRSVue and Common English translations of the Bible, as well as the Lexham Interlinear Septuagint version. You can read more about the author here.

Previous Post

August 2, 2023

Reading 1 Timothy 2:9–15: Are Women Forbidden to Teach at Church?

Next Post

August 28, 2023 The Pursuit of Holiness: Hebrews 12:14

Recent Comments

0 | Leave a Comment

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category "in Christ" 1 Corinthians 1 Enoch 1 John 2:19 1 Peter 1 Thessalonians 1 Timothy 1Peter 2 Corinthians 2 Kings 2 Timothy 400 years of silence 70 nations A. I. A. M. Hunter Abraham Achilles Tatius Acts 13 Acts 19 Acts 22 Acts 26 Acts 9 addiction adultery Aesop's Fables Affliction afterlife allegiance allusions amanuensis Amen Ananias Ancient Biography Andrew Wilson Andronicus Angels anger Anglicanism anointing aorist tense Apep apocalypse Apocalypse of Abraham apocalyptic Apocrypha apologetics apostasy Apostle Apostle Paul Aquinas archaeology archangel Ardel Caneday Arminianism armor of God article from journal artificial intelligence Asbury ascension atlas atonement Augustine Augustus authorship Awakening awards baptism Battle of Armageddon beasts behemoth Belial Beliar belief Benediction between Testaments Beverly Roberts Gaventa Bible Bible discrepancies Bible Gateway Bible reading Bible reading plan Bible Study Bible translations Bible version Bible versions biblical inerrancy Biblical Theology blasphemy blindness Boethius boldness Book of Acts Book of Jubilees Book Review Born Again bravery burial Caesar calling Calvinism canon canon Cassius Dio Catholics Channing Crisler charistmatic Christ Christian behavior Christian origins Christian theology Christians Christology church church fathers Church of England Chuza Cleopas Commandments Commentaries congregation conversion Corinthian letters coronavirus courage Covenant covenant theology covenantal nomism coveting COVID-19 Craig Keener Crescens crocodile Cross crucifixion curse custom Cyprian Daily Bread Dale Allison Damascus Damascus Experience Damascus road David Moffitt Day of Atonement deacon dead Dead Sea Scrolls death Deity of Christ Demas demonology demons determinism Deuteronomy Devil devotion dinosaur Dio Chrysostom divided I Divine Christology divine punishment divorce Do not fear Doxology dragon E. P. Sanders Eastern Orthodox Ebeneazer Urga echoes Egyptian animal worship ekklesia election Elijah the Prophet Elisha the Prophet Elisha's bones Elymas embodiment of the gospel embodying the gospel emperor empty tomb Encouragement end times enlightement Ephesians Ephesus Epistles of Paul eschatology eternal life Ethics (Christian) euchlaion Eusebius of Caesarea evangelical evangelism evidence exile extreme unction Ezekiel faith Fall of Adam and Eve fall of the nations falling away false prophet fate father Father's Day favorite Fear film Final Judgment Flood Flood of Noah foreknowledge foreordain forgiveness fornication freewill from Saul to Paul Galatians Gary Cooper Genesis Gentile studies Gentiles geography giants gift gift giving global perspective Glossa Ordinaria God God perception good news gospel gospel 2.0 Gospel of John Gospel of Luke Gospel of Mark Gospel of Matthew Gospels grace gratitude Great Awakening Greco-Roman Greco-Roman world Greek Greek classic literature Greek lexicon Greek Orthodox Greek prepositions greetings guilt Habakkuk hair Halloween head covering head coverings healing heaven Hebrew Hebrews hermeneutics Hesed high Christology Higher Christology highlights holiness holy Holy Bible Holy Scriptures Holy Spirit Homer hospitable hospitality how to read the Bible human effort I Am sayings Idolatry Idols imperialism in Adam In Christ inspiration intercession Interpretation intertestamental period Intertextuality Interview intimidation Isaiah Israel Israel (land of) James James D. G. Dunn Japheth Jason Staples Jerome Jesus Jesus sayings Jesus traditions Jesus: Studies Jewish literature Jewish names Jewish Scripture Jewish studies Jews Joanna Job John John 3:16 John Chrysostom John Hyrcanus John Mark John of Damascus John the Baptist John Wesley Josephus joy Judaism Judgment day Julia Junia Justice justification kerygma King Kingdom kingdom of God Krister Stendahl lament Law Law of Moses lecture hall letter writing Letters of Paul Leucippe et Clitophon Leviathan Leviticus light Logical fallacy looting Lord Lord's Prayer lose salvation Lot Lotan love lovingkindness Lucifer Luke lust Luther LXX maenads Malachi Marcion marginalization marital affair marriage martyrdom Mary Matt Damon Medieval theologians Medieval theology memorization mercy Michael the Archangel miracles Mishnah missiology mission missionary missions monergism monogenes monster monsters Mosaic Law Moses Mysterious Ways mythology N. T. Wright name change names narrative nations Nephilim New Birth new covenant new covenant pneumaism new creation New Perspective on Paul New Testament New Testament use of Old Testament Nimrod Noah Noah's ark nomism non-Christian oath obedience Odysseus Odyssey oil Old Testament only begotten Origen Outpouring pagan pagans parable paraceratherium Parousia participation in Christ Pastoral Letters patristic theology Paul in prison Paul letter of Paul teaching Paul the Apostle: Studies Paul within Judaism Paul's calling Paul's conversion Paul's death Pauline Theology persecution perseverance perseverance of the saints Persis personal devotion pesher Peter Abelard Philo philosophy Phoebe Pink Floyd pistis Plague plutarch pneuma pneumagism popular culture sayings Porneia Post-New Perspective on Paul praise prayer preaching predestination Prisca Priscilla Prison Epistle Prophecy prophets Psalm Psalms Pseudepigrapha Q Q source quest for the historic Jesus quotations Rabbi Pinhas be Yair Rabbinic literature Rainer Riesner raised from the dead rapture reading missiologically reading plan recipients reciprocity reconciliation Red Herring red letter edition redemption Reformation Regeneration rejoicing reminder renewal repentance restoration resurrection revival righteousness riot Roman Antiquity Roman names romance Romans Romans 12-16 Romans 16 Romans 4:25 Romans 7 Rome Rufus's mother sacrificial system salvation Salvation/Soteriology sanctification Satan Satan's fall Saul the Pharisee SBL Scholars school Scripture Second coming of Christ Second Temple Judaism secretary Septuagint Sergeant York Sergius Paulus Servant in Isaiah sex and sexuality sex ethics sexual immorality sheep sick sin sinful nature single Christians and dating social justice Society of Biblical Literature sons of God sons of Noah soteriology Spain spinosaurus spiritual gifts spiritual renewal spiritual warfare Stephen Wilson struggle Study Bible studying the Bible Suetonius suffering Suffering Servant suggestive commentary Survey synergism Synoptic Gospels Table of the nations Tacitus Tarshish teacher teaching telos temptation Tertius The Chosen the flesh Theology Thomas Aquinas Thomas Robinson Thomas Schreiner Thorn Thucydides Timothy Titus tongues Top 10 top 12 Torah trust Tryphaena Tryphosa Tyrannus U2 Ugaritic Ukraine Ukrainian Uncategorized unconditional love unforgiving Union with Christ unity/solidarity unpardonable sin urgency Valentine's Day veils vice vices victory warnings Watchers Wisdom of Solomon witnessing Woman ministers women women ministers women speakers women teachers word of God works works of the law worship writing YouVersion Zen Hess zombie

Select a Month November 2026 October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What river did John baptize Jesus in?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Tigris River Jordan River Red Sea Nile River