November 9th

Last updated on: October 1, 2016 at 10:30 am by Jason M. Brown

November 9th 2016-10-01T10:30:07-08:00 Jason M. Brown

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

In the summer of 2008, I found myself yelling ‘legalize democracy!’ at a crowd of rodeo-goers in Laramie, Wyoming. I was finishing off an excruciating season of canvassing for the Ralph Nader Presidential campaign, and convincing people to sign my petition for ballot access, was like asking them to poke their eyes out with a dull pencil.

Nader, during his four runs as a third party candidate, pitched himself as the lefts’ untainted moral option. If you were going to vote your values, you were going to vote Nader. Unfortunately, after Bush won in 2000 with a narrow lead over Gore, liberals blasted Nader as a spoiler. In 2000, Nader received 3 million votes (2.75%), not a ton, but something. In 2004, Nader tanked at 400,000 votes at a dismal .38 percent; 2008 didn’t turn out much better, and some of the lowest moments in my life were sulking in a Walmart parking lot, dodging security guards, and trying not to feel depressed after yet another cold rejection.

These days, in the face of another Presidential election, my Facebook feed is often a volley of insults between liberals fed up with obstinate Bernie-or-Busters, and the Green Party faithful would sooner vote for a chicken in a Panda suit than Hillary Clinton. Yet, this year’s third party candidates don’t seem to fare any better than Nader did in 2004 and 2008. Gary Johnson is polling at just under ten percent, and Dr. Jill Stein consistently under five. Bernie Sanders knew he couldn’t win on a third party ticket; and despite a media bias, and a Democratic Party that early on circled the wagons around Hillary Clinton, he almost won the nomination. Almost.

As a long time third party voter, I am captured by arguments on both sides: we need to break with the two party system, we need to build an independent movement of progressive bottom up power, we need to draw the line. Yet, this year at least, even though I am registered to vote in Clinton landslide county, I am feel reservations about even a symbolic vote for the Green Party in a safe state. What if Stein were elected? Would the world change? Would any of Steins platform be implemented? Would we achieve universal healthcare over night? I seriously doubt it. Yet I am wary of a Democratic Party with absolutely no accountability on the issues other than the slogan ‘Not Trump!’ We seem to keep having these arguments. ‘This is an historical election,’ ‘we need all hands on deck,’ ‘once Clinton is elected then we can hold her accountable,’ ‘Clinton isn’t perfect, but who is?’ ‘Think of the Supreme Court nominations!’ ‘This is our last chance to do something about climate change!’ I get it.

While I agree that a Trump presidency would be a disaster for poor people, for black people, for Syrian people, for polar bears; would a Clinton presidency be any better? Well… I have to admit, yes, I think it would. I actually do think there would be significant, substantive differences in a Clinton presidency around the issues I care about most: climate change action, racial justice, defeating ISIS, women’s rights. But again, the Democratic Party has consistently sold out progressive causes, from welfare reform, to healthcare reform, to climate change to gun control.

It seems as though the Presidential race is a distraction from the real work that needs to be done in a thousand communities across the country. We need more voices, more choice in our elections at every level. We need real accountability not just for political parties but for corporations, and lobbyists like the NRA. We need truth and reconciliation for Native peoples who suffer disproportionate rates of just about every social problem and daily see their sacred sites bulldozed in the name of progress. We need truth and reconciliation on racism and the war against black people who are gunned down at crisis levels. We need a broad and deep conversation about white privilege, male privilege and sexism where men like me are mostly listening. We need to defeat ISIS in ways that do not metastasize their appeal. We need to make sure that no one goes bankrupt when they get sick. I don’t see these as even on the table during a Trump presidency. Does that make me a sell out? Does that mean I am compromising my values? Maybe. But, regardless of who wins on November 8, on November 9, I hope we can come together and talk about the ways to make our world better than we found it, with or without the US President.

Previous Post

September 12, 2016

The Hajj and 9/11

Next Post

October 14, 2016 Spiritual Ecology is not Always Natural Ecology

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Anthropocene Camino de Santiago Catholicism Film Holyscapes Homily Liturgy Monk Nature New Monasticism New Story Pilgrimage Poetry Politics Prayer Religion and Spirituality Silence Spiritual Ecology Spring Spriritual Ecology Theology Uncategorized Walking Writing

Select a Month June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 August 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who were the first two sons of Adam and Eve?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Isaac and Ishmael Cain and Abel Seth and Enosh Jacob and Esau