Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Hippie Heretic

Home
Progressive Christian
On Christians Talking Dirty (RTT)

On Christians Talking Dirty (RTT)

Last updated on: April 25, 2017 at 8:49 am by Chuck McKnight

On Christians Talking Dirty (RTT) 2017-04-25T08:49:57-07:00 Chuck McKnight

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Paul Censored

For week four of Random Text Tuesday (RTT), my random-text selector gave me Ephesians 5:4. I’m pretty excited to tackle this one, as I think it is one of the most misused and misapplied verses out there. I’ll start by quoting a few different versions because the translations are all over the place for this verse.

No coarse, stupid, or flippant talk: these things are out of place; you should rather be thanking God. (REB)

Obscene language, silly talk, or vulgar jokes aren’t acceptable for believers. Instead, there should be thanksgiving. (CEB)

Don’t use dirty or foolish or filthy words. Instead, say how thankful you are. (CEV)

Let there be no filthiness nor foolish talk nor crude joking, which are out of place, but instead let there be thanksgiving. (ESV)

There must be no foul or salacious talk or coarse jokes—all this is wrong for you; there should rather be thanksgiving. (NJB)

So what does this mean? Is the author saying we shouldn’t use so-called “curse words”? And what makes something crude? Are we supposed to avoid talking about sex? What about just being silly or flippant—is there never a place for that? What exactly is this verse getting at?

Let’s first eliminate some of these ideas. I think it’s safe to say that the author of this passage does not intend to place any passages of scripture off limits. So if we can find it in scripture, then it’s probably not what he means here.

Since traditional authorship attributes Ephesians to Paul, we’ll start with another one of his passages, Philippians 3:8. Paul says that he regards everything as skybala in order to gain Christ. While nearly every English version provides a euphemism—“filth,” “refuse,” “rubbish,” “trash,” “garbage,” “dirt,” etc.—the most literal translation of the word is simply “shit.” So there goes the ban on “curse words”! (As if there could be a timeless consensus on what constitutes a “curse word” anyway.)

What about crude language? Just consider the following verse:

She lusted after their male consorts, whose sexual organs were like those of donkeys, and whose ejaculation was like that of horses. (Ezekiel 23:20, CEB)

And talking about sex? Here I need only point you to the beautifully erotic Song of Songs, the majority of which is devoted to the sexual encounters of an unmarried woman with her lover (much to the dismay of her patriarchal brothers). Among many other supposedly unmentionable things, it even praises the pleasure of oral sex, though most English translations sadly mute such content.

Much more could be said about the profanity, crude language, and sexually explicit content in the Bible, but these examples are sufficient for now. I don’t believe the author of Ephesians is talking about any of these things. So what is he talking about?

I’ve previously written about how “it all comes down to love.” This principle is true across the board. Love is the litmus test for our every action. That which is unloving should be avoided. But anything that is in line with love is fair game. So the kind of speech here forbidden must be speech that is in some way unloving—that is, speech which harms other people.

What might this look like? The paraphrase found in Eugene Peterson’s The Message offers one possibility:

Though some tongues just love the taste of gossip, those who follow Jesus have better uses for language than that.

And the NCV renders the first phrase as “there must be no evil talk among you,” which I think is a good generalization.

Are you telling stories that shame or slander someone else? Are you making light of a serious situation in a way that is hurtful to those affected by it? Are you using your words to invalidate someone’s experience? Are you crudely misappropriating a sexual orientation as slang (“That’s so gay”)? Are you failing to refer to people by the names, genders, or pronouns they identify with?

These are all examples of evil talk because they are all ways of causing harm to people with our speech. We must use our words for the good of others. Whatever we say, we must always speak with love.

Previous Post

April 21, 2017

I’m Giving Away a Stack of 7 Books! (R. Foster, B. MacHaffie, B. McLaren, R. Sider, J. Yoder, et al.)

Next Post

April 27, 2017 A Few Quick Thoughts on Jesus and Bibliolatry

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Church Personal Reviews Scripture Social Justice Theology

Select a Month August 2021 September 2020 August 2020 July 2019 March 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 July 2016 June 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who said: "The reason the Son of God appeared was to destroy the devil's work"?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Jesus Paul Peter John