On Violence in The Seed (a Follow-Up to My Review) with Erik Guzman

Last updated on: April 4, 2017 at 4:53 pm by Chuck McKnight

On Violence in The Seed (a Follow-Up to My Review) with Erik Guzman 2017-04-04T16:53:59-07:00 Chuck McKnight

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

In my recent review of Erik Guzman’s The Seed, I mentioned one part of the book that I found troubling—the idea that God would have commanded Adam to commit an act of violence in order to take his rightful place in creation. However, I also pointed out that because it’s an allegory, I may have been pressing the symbolism further than the author intended.

After I posted my review, Erik took some time to chat about it with me on Facebook. So I thought I’d share some of our conversation (with his permission) in order to clear up some of what was bothering me.

On the one hand, he agreed with my take on allegory:

I like what you said about the story being left to the reader to interpret. I very much want that. I see this book as a mythic spiritual memoir, and by telling my story I hope to tell the story that’s common to all—Love’s story. I really don’t want to impose my meanings, but invite people into it to see themselves.

On the other hand, it seems I did indeed read something into the story that Erik had not intended:

It was really interesting to me that you saw taking the tail as Love’s endorsement of violence. I hadn’t thought of it that way.

He went on to offer a different way of looking at it:

When Love and Wyrm made their deal, I hoped to convey that Love was offering him redemption and life. In fact, that’s what Love was always offering to Wyrm—eternal life and freedom.

But Wyrm, using his freedom, chose to be all that is not Love and life. His obsession with reason and justice (the tree of the knowledge of good and evil) led him to not trust Love.

With full foreknowledge, Love knew the beginning from the end, and at the beginning offered to give Wyrm what he wanted, but it wasn’t really pity or a mercy killing in my mind. It was more letting death be death.

And by offering humanity the ability to take death by the tail, Love was offering mastery over all that is not Love and life.

But this next bit was what really clicked with me:

Also, in writing this book, I started out knowing Madria and Ruak were aspects of my personality. During writing, I came to realize Tatus was too. Beyond the writing, I’m seeing that Love and Wyrm were me too. Love is me in union with God. Wyrm is that part of me that wants to fade to black. I’d like that anti-Love part of me to do just that (along with Tatus—the old man, my ego).

Now that’s an interpretation I can get behind. Not committing violence against any personal being, but destroying that which is harmful in my own life.

Thanks for the clarifications, Erik, and thanks again for an enjoyable book!

Previous Post

July 18, 2016

The Seed by Erik Guzman (Book Review)

Next Post

October 11, 2016 Logos 7 (Software Review)

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Church Personal Reviews Scripture Social Justice Theology

Select a Month August 2021 September 2020 August 2020 July 2019 March 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 July 2016 June 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What is the meaning of "Immanuel" in the prophecy of Isaiah?

Select your answer to see how you score.

God the Healer God with Us God the Redeemer God Provides