Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Catholic
Women in Religion
We Should Never Accept The Notion That “Boys Will Be Boys”

We Should Never Accept The Notion That “Boys Will Be Boys”

Last updated on: May 28, 2024 at 2:19 am by Henry Karlson

0 Comments

We Should Never Accept The Notion That “Boys Will Be Boys” 2024-05-28T02:19:46-05:00 Henry Karlson

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Lorie Shaull: Boys Will Be Good Humans / Wikimedia Commons

There is a tendency for many to overlook men and their sexual sins, justifying it by saying something like “boys will be boys.” And yet, if a woman were to sin in a similar fashion, they would be looked down upon with outright contempt as she will be branded with all kinds of insults. Throughout history, men with positions of power and authority which they use to seduce and manipulate women, once they find such women no longer satisfy them, for whatever reason, cast them out and shame them, while they remain seen as good, honest citizens; in reality, those who have such power should be the ones held the most accountable, not the least, and those they have abused in this way seen as victims. To be sure, there have been some who have chastised such men, but usually we find such criticism coming from only a few, very particular, contexts, such as homilies exhorting clergy and monks to uphold their vows of chastity. For the most part, women have been expected to be better than men, and were treated far more harshly when they did not meet their social expectation.

Now that society has changed, men are often being made held accountable for what they do. If they are in position of power and abuse it, they have to face the consequences of their actions, consequences which can be, as they should be, rather harsh. Men now find they that have to consider women as persons and not mere objects for their pleasure, and that they should live out the kind of life which they expected out of women. Funny enough, many of them don’t think it is fair. They think they should be able to do what men have done throughout history. They don’t think more should be expected of them, while hypocritically expecting women to live out those same expectations. This is why many of them embrace “tradition,” as they are looking to the past, seeing the advantages men had, and want to keep them in the present, but all they are doing is abusing tradition, using it to justify their own sins.

It can be refreshing, then, if and when we find some authority, like a saint, who actually addresses men and admonishes them for their lack of chastity, not accepting the notion that “boys will be boys.” Sadly, though such admonitions are important, they often are influenced by the culture at large, so that even if someone were to properly criticize men, they often find a way to blame women defiling such men, or they suggest something drastic, like saying men should not have “familiarity” with women, as for example, St. Caesarius of Arles preached:

When we commend the good of chastity as something fitting and proper, dearly beloved, perhaps some young men who are still of vigorous age are saying: We are young, we cannot restrain ourselves. We can and should reply to these people that perhaps they are unable to observe chastity because they eat more than is proper and take more wine than they should, are unwilling to avoid familiarity with women, and neither fear nor blush to keep suspicious company. [1]

The first half of what he said is quite important; boys, or young men, or those who are not married, should not be treated as if they cannot restrain themselves, which of course, the “boys will be boys” narrative suggests. If such an excuse were accepted in regards violation of chastity, it will justify other moral lapses, as other passions will then be shown to be equally unrestrainable. And, as Caesarius seemed to understand, it is completely unjustifiable to treat men and women differently. He said they should be held to the same standards:

Perhaps some think that it is unlawful for women to commit fornication before marriage, but lawful for men. What is worse, these exceedingly grave evils that are worthy of punishment are committed by many men without any fear of the Lord, and in fact they have become so habitual on the part of many that they are considered common and slight, no longer regarded as serious sins. Now, in the Catholic faith, whatever is not lawful for men is equally unlawful for men. Man and woman are redeemed together for one price, the precious blood of Christ; they are called to one faith, and are assembled in one body of the Church.[2]

Sadly, Caesarius did not understand how, exactly, this should play out in society, as he suggested unrelated men and women should not be together in public society. This line of thought begins the process by which women become seen as bad society and blamed for what happens, because they are seen to seduce men and cause them to stumble. While, to be sure, we can find men and women seducing each other, historically men were the ones with power, and they often used it to get the women they wanted to use, but also, to make sure they received mercy while women did not. Despite the way he others believed men and women should generally be separated from each other in society, Caesarius said something which not only was important, but something which should be restated time and time again: men can and should be able to control themselves, and in a situation in which both men and women fornicate with equal freedom, they should be treated equally. Of course, in saying that we should realize the proper Christian reaction is to treat people, not with undue judgment and condemnation, but with mercy, realizing that it is not for us to “set others right,” as that attitude and way of being is itself worse than fornication itself:

See to it that you do not get caught up by the passion of those who are sick with the desire to set others right, as it were, of their own ability; they want to become reprovers, wanting to set aright all the faults of <their fellow> human beings. This is a serious passion, and it is recognizable in those who have been abandoned by the Lord’s care. This is especially the case if you are not the superior or head, but one of those in a subordinate role, and there are others like you. This is the role of superiors, and if you say you are doing this out of love, you are not <really> seeking for this love. In truth it would be better for you to be found having fallen into some act of fornication, rather than into this illness. [3]

[1] St. Caesarius of Arles, Sermons Volume I (1-80). Trans. Mary Magdeleine Mueller, OSF (New York: Fathers of the Church, 1956), 214 [Sermon 43].

[2] St. Caesarius of Arles, Sermons Volume I, 215 [Sermon 43].

[3] St. Isaac of Nineveh, Headings on Spiritual Knowledge (The Second Part, Chapters 1-3). Trans. Sebastian Brock (Yonkers, NY: St Vladimir’s Seminary Press, 2022), 110 [Chapter 3; Second Discourse].

General Christian

Women in Religion

Relationships and Religion

Previous Post

May 26, 2024

God Is At Work In The Saints

Next Post

May 29, 2024 Religions Should Show Us The Way Of Peace And Reconciliation

Recent Comments

0 | Leave a Comment

"Gosh, did that hit the spot. I have been having great anxiety lately. And I ..."

Mark Wilson

Rejecting Doom: Christian Hope And Human ..."

"Justice and peace are two sides of the same coin. Where there is justice, there ..."

Dr.Cajetan Coelho

Justice First, Charity Beyond It: Serving ..."

"Thank you for your very, very powerful and very, very insightful analysis of the relationship ..."

alwayspuzzled

Justice First, Charity Beyond It: Serving ..."

"Given the amount of lethal malevolence that has prevailed in human history for the past ..."

alwayspuzzled

We Must Value Our Health

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Abortion Abraham abuse Aesthetics AI Aliens Ambrose Ancestors and Everything Andrew Angels Animals Anne Anthony Antisemitism apologetics Apophatic Apostle John Aquinas Artificial Intelligence Asanga Ascension Asceticism Assumption Atheism Attachment Augustine Authority Avarice Balthasar Baptism Beauty Biden birthright citizenship Bishops Black History Books Buddhism Bulgakov Byzantine Calendar C.S. Lewis Calcidius Catholic Catholicism Catholicism Celibacy Charity Chastity children Chrismation Christ Christmas Christology Church Climate Change Common Good Communion Confession Confirmation Conscience Constantine conventions conversion councils Covid Creation Cross Dead Death Death Penalty Debate Deception Demagogues Demons Desert Monks Desert Mothers Desire destruction development Dialogue Dignity Dionsyius Dionysius Discipline Diversity Division Doctor Who doctrine dogma Dormition Dualism Easter Easter Series Ecumenical Councils Ecumenism Education Election Empathy Environment Error Eschatology eschaton Eternity Ethics Eucharist Evangelism Eve Evil evolution Faeries Faith Fear femininity Ficino Florence Florensky Folktale Fools Forgiveness Freedom Future gender Gentile Gentiles Glory Gnostic God gods Good Samaritan Goodness Gospel Government Grace Great Fast Guns Halloween Hate healing Health Heaven Hell Hellenism Heresy Hierarchy Hildegard Hinduism History Holiness Holy Spirit Holy Week Hope Horror Human rights humanity Humility hypocrisy ICE icon icons Identification Identity Idol II Nicea Immigration incarnation Individualism Informal Reflections Inklings Intention Inter-Religious Interfaith Internet Interpretation Intrinsic evil Irenaeus Islam Israel Jacob Jerome Jesus Jews John Chrysostom John of Damascus John the Baptist Joseph Judaism justice Justification kenosis Kindnesss Kingdom of God Kingdom of Heaven Law Law of Moses Lazarus Leaf by Niggle Lent Lenten Reflection Liberation Theology Lies Life Listen Literature Liturgy locutions Logic Logos Love Marriage Martyrs Mary Mass Maximos The Confessor Meanness Meditation Mercy Middle Path Migrants Mind Miracles Miriam Morals Moses Movies Music Muslims Myths Names Nationalism Native Americans New Year Nicea Nicholas Nothing Novatian Obedience Occam's Razor Ordination Origen Original Sin Orthodox orthopraxis Pagans Palamas Palm Sunday Paradise Paschaltide Paul Peace Pentecost person Peter piety PKD Plato pluralism Plurality Poem Poetry Poiltics Politics Poor Pope Pope Francis Pope Leo XIV Post Office Prayer Pride Pro-life Prodigal Son propaganda Prophecy Prophets Providence Putin Racism Reading Reason Reflection Refugees Relationships Religion Religion Series Religious Liberty Repent Republicans Rest Resurrection Rich Rites Russia Sacraments Saints Salvation Salvian Santa Science Scripture Self-Giving Sexuality Sibyl Sick Silence Sin Singlehood Social Justice Society Sodom Solovyov Speculations Spiritual Reflection St. Cyril of Alexandria St. Justin Martyr Suffering Sunday of the Paralytic Man Sunday of the Samaritan Woman Superhero Supreme Court Teaching Technology Thanksgiving The Father the Universe Theological Reflection Theology Theosis Theotokos Thomas Timaeus Time Tolerenace Tolkien Tradition Transfiguration Trinity Trump Truth Uncategorized Unity Universities USCCB Vainglory Value Vatican II Vegetarian Vices Violence Virtue Vocations War Water Welcome Wisdom Womanhood Women Work World View Worship Writing Zacchaeus

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz