Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Catholic
Religious Music and Entertainment
Misinterpretations Of Colbert’s Remarks On The Afterlife

Misinterpretations Of Colbert’s Remarks On The Afterlife

Last updated on: June 4, 2026 at 1:59 am by Henry Karlson

0 Comments

Misinterpretations Of Colbert’s Remarks On The Afterlife 2026-06-04T01:59:45-05:00 Henry Karlson

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

DonkeyHotey: Stephen Colbert / flickr

One of the dogmatic teachings of the Catholic Church, a teaching which was officially defined at the Fifth Lateran Council (1512-1517), but believed before then, is the immortality of the soul. We told told that when we die, we do not cease to exist; there is a “part” of us, named the soul, which continues to “live on.” Thanks to the way death is influenced by sin, when we die, our soul finds itself in an imperfect situation, as it is no longer united with the body it was intended to be joined with throughout all eternity. What the soul experiences after death, the kind of existence it has before the general resurrection, is rather nebulous; there are various elements of it which we have been told, but how those elements work together, we are not told. Theologians have debated with each other what the our intermediate state of existence, the existence we experience between our death and the resurrection, will be like. There are a large variety of opinions. To be orthodox, their views must not contradict what the church teaches, but beyond that, there is a large number of views which one can have. What, then, must be included in our considerations? That there will be a particular judgment after death, one which affects our experience of the “time” between death and the resurrection, that some might be judged to perdition, some might be judged and called to “paradise,” and the rest of us will find ourselves in a state between perdition and bliss, in a state where we find ourselves being purified from all the corruption our sins have had on us. We are also told that at the end of history, everyone will be brought back life, sharing in the general resurrection from the dead, whereupon they will experience the final or universal judgment which determine our eternal fate. After the general resurrection, we will never die, that is, our soul will never be separated from our body ever again.

I have extensively studied the theology of death. I have read through a great variety of theological and dogmatic sources, and through them, I have seen a great variety of descriptions concerning what our intermediate state is like. I have learned how Scripture itself contains a diversity of thought on the matter, with the immortality of the soul being very nebulous in the pre-Christian era, while in the New Testament, we find confirmation of the idea, even if what it means for those who are dead is not expressly stated. That is, I have seen even in the New Testament, there is enough ambiguity on what happens after death that Christians have come to many diverse conclusions, as can be seen in the way many have come to believe in the false notion of soul sleep due to Paul’s euphemism for death. Catholic teaching, however, affirms that there is a conscious element to our experience after death, one which allows us to connect, in some way, to those who are among the living. I have, thanks to all that I have learned, formed various opinions of my own, some which are peculiar to myself. I am especially influenced from my Eastern Christian traditions, some which are controversial, such as the notion of the “toll houses”; but I do so recognizing that the descriptions used to explain the toll houses as stations one goes through in one’s ascent into heaven as being metaphorical, serving a similar role as the “fires of purgatory.” Both the toll houses and the fires of purgatory are used to explain the kinds of experiences the soul undergoes as it is being purified and made ready for its entry into heaven.

Thanks to my studies, and what they have revealed concerning the ambiguous nature of the soul after death, I have been somewhat surprised by the way Stephen Colbert was criticized for his own simple answer to the question as to what he thinks happens after death. The reason it was not a complete surprise is because I knew that there are some people who like to take what he says or does, and find any way they can criticize him, because they do not like his political affiliations. By doing so, they risk falling for the sin of calumny. What he said in and of itself can be interpreted in many ways; and just like Ecclesiastes, some interpretations can be perfectly orthodox, while others can be very unorthodox. Because we are called to look to the best interpretation of what others say when trying to understand them, it is wrong to demand the worst interpretations possible are what someone means so long as there other, more orthodox ways, their words can be understood. This is true for the way people deal with Colbert, especially if they show their interpretation requires them to engage an argument from silence, condemning him for what he didn’t say, that is, because he didn’t mention the resurrection:

I think of, almost like, it’s more like a feeling, and the feeling is that when we die, I think there is some continuance of some kind. But it’s like a dispersion of the self into some other greater being. And I don’t have any other feelings beyond that.[1]

While Colbert did not mention the resurrection, this does not mean he does not believe in it. Previously, he publicly recited the Nicene Creed on his show, indicating it is what he believed; and so, if we are going to interpret what he said, it is best to include this admission, using that as a hermeneutical key to understand what he meant instead of trying to suggest he denied the resurrection at the end of time. So why didn’t he mention it? While I can’t read his mind, it seemed to me that he was answering a particular question: what happens to us immediately after we die? From the Christian tradition, especially the Catholic tradition, the answer is not “we are resurrected” but that we enter into the intermediary state between our death and the resurrection. If so, then it would be obvious not to mention the general resurrection, as that does not occur until “later” (at least, in a conventional sense, because when talking about time after death, there are many questions which can be raised, and there are many reasons why it might be best to no longer think of that state as being temporal in nature, making any temporal discussions concerning the soul after death to be metaphoric, and not literal, events). What Colbert does do is affirm dogmatic teaching by saying the soul continues after death. He points out, through analogy, what he think the state is like, where it is a “dispersion of the self” into “some greater being.” Since the soul is no longer connected to the body, it is quite possible to think of this “dispersion of the self.” Indeed, it is normative to say, as the soul is meant to be with the body, the soul apart from the body is an imperfect state, one which loses aspects of the self, aspects connected to the body, making it seem like a dispersion. During that “time,” the soul can and will undergo purification (purgatory/toll houses), a purification which will affect our notion of the self. For, to be perfect, we will have to “die to the self,” that is, to overcome our false sense of the self and the attachments which formed from it, so that in our death, if we have not done so during our temporal existence, the false self will be entirely eliminated, allowing the soul, once it is purified, to experience union with God, the “greater being” which is beyond all names (including the name of God). Union with God, and with it, our theosis, is the purpose of our life. Thus, when I read and listen to what Colbert said, I find a perfectly sound way to read it, even when he talks about the dispersion of the self into some greater being.

Since Colbert is not a theologian, nor is he a philosopher, it is not surprising he does not have much to say on the state of the soul after death. But what he does say does not have to be seen as some sort of Gnostic rejection of the resurrection, but merely a presentation of what Christian teaching has always said happened at death: there is a part of us, the soul, which continues in a form of existence independent from its body; while it is good that we do not find ourselves annihilated at death, the state we find ourselves in between death and the resurrection is an imperfect state, as we are meant to be embodied. I think the tension of that imperfection is hinted in Colbert’s words, which is why, what he is talking about is not some Gnostic talk about the soul after death, but a Christian interpretation of that state. It certainly is not Gnostic to talk about union with God. It is basic Christian teaching. Christian theology has consistently struggled to describe the experience of the soul after death, but it has always recognized that whatever that state is like, it is a lesser kind of state than it will have after our resurrection from the dead. Colbert doesn’t mention the resurrection, but that doesn’t mean he denied it; he is silent about it here. To me, it is because he seems to want to talk about what happens at the moment when we die, doing so in a general form which many, not just Christians, can recognize as validating their view, something which good Christian theology always does. Colbert at other places has mentioned his belief in the resurrection. We should read those instances together with what he says here, so that we can recognize he is giving a very simple presentation coming from his Christian faith. I think only those of ill will, those who want to engage calumny, are purposefully making a case for him to be a heretic. In doing so, not only are they causing confusion concerning what Colbert says, but also about Christian theology in general. For, I fear that those who are not well informed about Christian theology and its teachings concerning the soul after death will come to believe Christianity denies both the intermediate state between death and the resurrection, and union with God, when it reality, both are fundamental teachings of the Christian faith.

[1] Quoted from John Brown, “Stephen Colbert prompts accusations of heresy over afterlife view: ‘We become Febreze’” in The Christian Post (5-22-2026).

* This Is Another Post From My Personal (Informal) Reflections And Speculations Series

Stay in touch! Like A Little Bit of Nothing on Facebook.
If you liked what you read, please consider sharing it with your friends and family!

N.B.: While I read comments to moderate them, I rarely respond to them. If I don’t respond to your comment directly, don’t assume I am unthankful for it. I appreciate it. But I want readers to feel free to ask questions, and hopefully, dialogue with each other. I have shared what I wanted to say, though some responses will get a brief reply by me, or, if I find it interesting and something I can engage fully, as the foundation for another post. I have had many posts inspired or improved upon thanks to my readers.

General Christian

Religious Music and Entertainment

Religion News

Previous Post

June 2, 2026

Transforming Our Conscience Like Abraham

Next Post

June 7, 2026 How Faithful Actions, Not Mere Belief, Lead To Justification

Recent Comments

0 | Leave a Comment

"First things first is the easiest way forward. "If someone is bleeding profusely, we must ..."

Dr.Cajetan Coelho

Why We Must Embrace Empathy, Sympathy ..."

"Gosh, did that hit the spot. I have been having great anxiety lately. And I ..."

Mark Wilson

Rejecting Doom: Christian Hope And Human ..."

"Justice and peace are two sides of the same coin. Where there is justice, there ..."

Dr.Cajetan Coelho

Justice First, Charity Beyond It: Serving ..."

"Thank you for your very, very powerful and very, very insightful analysis of the relationship ..."

alwayspuzzled

Justice First, Charity Beyond It: Serving ..."

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Abortion Abraham abuse Aesthetics AI Aliens Ambrose Ancestors and Everything Andrew Angels Animals Anne Anthony Antisemitism apologetics Apophatic Apostle John Aquinas Artificial Intelligence Asanga Ascension Asceticism Assumption Atheism Attachment Augustine Authority Avarice Balthasar Baptism Beauty Biden birthright citizenship Bishops Black History Books Buddhism Bulgakov Byzantine Calendar C.S. Lewis Calcidius Catholic Catholicism Catholicism Celibacy Charity Chastity children Chrismation Christ Christmas Christology Church Climate Change Common Good Communion Confession Confirmation Conscience Constantine conventions conversion councils Covid Creation Cross Dead Death Death Penalty Debate Deception Demagogues Demons Desert Monks Desert Mothers Desire destruction development Dialogue Dignity Dionsyius Dionysius Discipline Diversity Division Doctor Who doctrine dogma Dormition Dualism Easter Easter Series Ecumenical Councils Ecumenism Education Election Empathy Environment Error Eschatology eschaton Eternity Ethics Eucharist Evangelism Eve Evil evolution Faeries Faith Fear femininity Ficino Florence Florensky Folktale Fools Forgiveness Freedom Future gender Gentile Gentiles Glory Gnostic God gods Good Samaritan Goodness Gospel Government Grace Great Fast Guns Halloween Hate healing Health Heaven Hell Hellenism Heresy Hierarchy Hildegard Hinduism History Holiness Holy Spirit Holy Week Hope Horror Human rights humanity Humility hypocrisy ICE icon icons Identification Identity Idol II Nicea Immigration incarnation Individualism Informal Reflections Inklings Intention Inter-Religious Interfaith Internet Interpretation Intrinsic evil Irenaeus Islam Israel Jacob Jerome Jesus Jews John Chrysostom John of Damascus John the Baptist Joseph Judaism justice Justification kenosis Kindnesss Kingdom of God Kingdom of Heaven Law Law of Moses Lazarus Leaf by Niggle Lent Lenten Reflection Liberation Theology Lies Life Listen Literature Liturgy locutions Logic Logos Love Marriage Martyrs Mary Mass Maximos The Confessor Meanness Meditation Mercy Middle Path Migrants Mind Miracles Miriam Morals Moses Movies Music Muslims Myths Names Nationalism Native Americans New Year Nicea Nicholas Nothing Novatian Obedience Occam's Razor Ordination Origen Original Sin Orthodox orthopraxis Pagans Palamas Palm Sunday Paradise Paschaltide Paul Peace Pentecost person Peter piety PKD Plato pluralism Plurality Poem Poetry Poiltics Politics Poor Pope Pope Francis Pope Leo XIV Post Office Prayer Pride Pro-life Prodigal Son propaganda Prophecy Prophets Providence Putin Racism Reading Reason Reflection Refugees Relationships Religion Religion Series Religious Liberty Repent Republicans Rest Resurrection Rich Rites Russia Sacraments Saints Salvation Salvian Santa Science Scripture Self-Giving Sexuality Sibyl Sick Silence Sin Singlehood Social Justice Society Sodom Solovyov Speculations Spiritual Reflection St. Cyril of Alexandria St. Justin Martyr Suffering Sunday of the Paralytic Man Sunday of the Samaritan Woman Superhero Supreme Court Teaching Technology Thanksgiving The Father the Universe Theological Reflection Theology Theosis Theotokos Thomas Timaeus Time Tolerenace Tolkien Tradition Transfiguration Trinity Trump Truth Uncategorized Unity Universities USCCB Vainglory Value Vatican II Vegetarian Vices Violence Virtue Vocations War Water Welcome Wisdom Womanhood Women Work World View Worship Writing Zacchaeus

Select a Month November 2026 October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz