Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

henrykarlson

Jesus’ Challenge Against Religious Corruption

Last updated on: April 22, 2026 at 1:12 am   by Henry Karlson

0 Comments

Jesus’ Challenge Against Religious Corruption 2026-04-22T01:12:30-05:00 Henry Karlson

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Ilyas Basim Khuri Bazzi Rahib:  Religious Icon Of Jesus Teaching His Disciples From 16h Century Arabic Manuscript Of The Gospels / Wikimedia Commons

Jesus was very concerned by the way many were exploiting the Jewish faith in his day. He was not against religion, nor religious authority, indeed, he defended that authority, but he was against those who used their authority to abuse or explain the faithful.  We see this in the Gospels in the way he engaged various Pharisees, Sadducees, Scribes, and Lawyers (those interested in the Law of Moses). Much of what he said which was critical of them, were critical only of those who used their positions for their own personal gain. To help the people, he sought to purify the way the Jewish tradition had developed, encouraging them to remove any abusive teaching or practice which had entered into tradition (purposefully or not). What he did not want us to do is look to Jewish traditions, nor even Jewish religious authorities, and assume they are all bad. He didn’t want us to believe they were always wrong, that what they taught, and the theological developments which came from them, should all be dismissed. He followed the way of the prophets who came before him, as earlier prophets confronted the religious and secular authorities of their time, showing how they had gone astray from the covenant. Jewish tradition was respected by him, including its developments, and many of his followers came from the Pharisees because they knew that Jesus was not fighting against them, but rather, he was promoting a necessary corrective, one which they also wanted, one which made sure religious abuse was rejected so that the faithful can live out their faith without fear. Such a corrective, to be sure, is not to be seen as true only for the Jewish tradition in Jesus’ time, but for all religious traditions, where tradition itself can be good, even if it can be infected with bad ideas and practices from time to time.

Christos Yannaras suggests we what Jesus was especially concerned about was a particularly bad legalistic turn which happened in his time, a turn which not everyone followed, and a turn which is certainly not exclusive to the Jewish religious tradition (as it is quite common in Christian history). This is why, the issue was not Judaism, but the problem of turning religious truth into a  legalistic enterprise. That is, we should understand Jesus was critical of all who would push for and create various rigid rules in the name of the faith (especially by those who are hypocrites and excuse themselves from the rules they create):

The history of the fall continues even in the structures of moral and religious life. Indeed, the structures of morality and religion are more successful than any other aspect of life in camouflaging and concealing the reality of the fall, the real corruption of man. Taking social utility as their frame of reference, they define sin merely as an objective transgression and virtue merely as a necessary and useful individual quality, thus definitely closing the way to repentance. Here we see why the harshest language in the Gospels is reserved for religious people and their rigid forms. [1]

It is important for us to read Jesus’ encounters with various religious authorities of his time and consider what it would mean if he were alive today, having his ministry primarily focused with Christians. Instead of Pharisees, Sadducees, Scribes, or Lawyers, he would be looking at and deconstructing what is being promoted by various theologians, bishops, academics, and politicians. If we are to follow him, to be his continuous presence in the world, we should do so as well, of course, in the way he did, which was critical but not dismissive.

While this was obvious to many, if not most, of Christ’s earliest followers, as they were themselves Jews trying to relate what Christ taught with their own Jewish background,  over time, as Gentiles became prominent in the church, many would wrongly read Jesus’ criticism of various religious authorities as Jesus attacking Judaism as a whole. Antisemitism in the Christian tradition developed, in part, because of this misunderstanding. Christians began to assume the bad examples found in Scripture represented Judaism as a whole, all the while ignoring the positive examples and ways Jesus reinforced Jewish traditions.

It is a shame that this is how the Christian tradition developed. Christians lost a valuable collaboration partner, one which they should have respected and treated as elders in the faith.  They ignored and lost much of the wisdom and insight of the Jewish tradition, and when they did this, when they believed they had nothing to gain from Judaism, they stopped studying it, stopped trying to understand it.  While, to be sure, Christians held interpretations of the Torah and the prophets that were never going to be the same as with the Jews, they still had much in common, and that commonality should have had Christians realize there was much they could learn from the Jews. Instead, save for a few rare examples to the contrary, Christian theologians cut themselves off from the wisdom of the Jews. Instead, many saw the Jews were an “other” who should be hated, and with that hate, destroyed; the fruit of this, of course, was the Holocaust, which was meant to be the “final solution” for the “problem of the Jews.” The real problem were the Christians, and the Holocaust merely served as a distillation and reflection of one of the worst ideologies Christians have ever embraced throughout history. And it was not just the Jews that would feel Christian hatred: what was justified against the Jews was used against many other around he world, from aboriginal peoples, the Romani, to people whose sexual orientation were different than the norm. Today, it is making itself known in the United States with Christian nationalism and the way so many Christians justify cruelty to whoever is currently seen as the “greatest threat” of the day, be it “the gays” or “Muslims” or “Mexicans.” Thus the cruelty Christians engaged against others, the cruelty which they continue to engage against others, represents a tradition which must be rejected and purged from Christianity. To be sure, while many Christians hold on to this tradition, many others see it for what it is, and, following Christ and Christ’s ways, desire to change things for the better, fixing what has become corrupt within the Christian tradition:

The horrors of the century – form the Holocaust to Rwanada – point to a level of moral perversity that is unimaginable. There is widespread recognition by all but the most indifferent and cynical that these evils amount to something more than a violation of mere social custom, aesthetic taste or sentiment. These horrors have led governments, religious institutions and humanitarian organisations to call for a level of philosophical backing for human rights that carries stronger moral authority than conventional treaties.[2]

The horrors of the Holocaust have shaken many people throughout the world. It made everyone, Christians and non-Christian alike, see the need to promote a humanism that affirms the inherent goodness and dignity of everyone, a humanism which also rejects any ideology that suggests Christians should embrace hate and return to the inhumane brutality many Christians used in the past. Sadly, as religion holds much power and sway in the world, people who have evil plans seek to use religion for their own end, which is one reason why religion is always ripe for abuse. When such abuse arises, there will be the need for some to heed the prophetic call, to follow in the footsteps not only of Jesus, but of the prophets who came before him, taking on the abuse, the legalism which is used to support such abuse, and point out again and again how God is always on the side of the abused. With the rise of Christian nationalism, it is especially important for Christian leaders to take on the corruption of the faith, and denounce those authorities, secular and religious, who are seeking to use religion for their own evil ends. This is one of the many ways the Christian faith (as with any faith) needs to be purified; it is a challenge Christians will have to face until the end of time, as generation after generation, there will arise new evils,  new forms of corruption, seeking to take on and add to the evil of the past. And just as such evil, though it comes from Christians, and has been found throughout Christian history, does not properly represent the teachings of Christ, so Christians must recognize people of other faiths have similar challenges, so not to assume the worst from other religious traditions merely because they see some use their faith for a bad end. It is especially important to prop up and defend anyone, from any religious faith (or lack of it), who supports and promotes the common good. They should be shown as representations of their faiths, showing how those who do bad do not need to be seen as representing the whole of their faith tradition (lest Christians become judged by the evils done by Christians throughout history, having them represent the faith, and not the good which Christ taught).


[1] Christos Yannaras, The Freedom of Morality. Trans. Elizabeth Briere (Crestwood, NY: St. Vladimir’s Seminary Press, 1984), 63-4.

[2] Stephen J. Pope, “Natural law and Christian ethics” in The Cambridge Companion to Christian Ethics. Ed. Robin Gill (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001), 92.

 

Stay in touch! Like A Little Bit of Nothing on Facebook.
If you liked what you read, please consider sharing it with your friends and family!

N.B.:  While I read comments to moderate them, I rarely respond to them. If I don’t respond to your comment directly, don’t assume I am unthankful for it. I appreciate it. But I want readers to feel free to ask questions, and hopefully, dialogue with each other. I have shared what I wanted to say, though some responses will get a brief reply by me, or, if I find it interesting and something I can engage fully, as the foundation for another post. I have had many posts inspired or improved upon thanks to my readers.

General Christian

History and Religion

Antisemitism

Jesus

Jews

Work

Anti-Semitism

Christianity

Jesus

Jews

Previous Post



April 20, 2026

The Hypocrisy of Trump’s Christian Supporters On Politics

Next Post



April 23, 2026 The Middle Path Of Humility

Recent Comments

0 | Leave a Comment

"First things first is the easiest way forward. "If someone is bleeding profusely, we must ..."

Dr.Cajetan Coelho


Why We Must Embrace Empathy, Sympathy ..."

"Gosh, did that hit the spot. I have been having great anxiety lately. And I ..."

Mark Wilson


Rejecting Doom: Christian Hope And Human ..."

"Justice and peace are two sides of the same coin. Where there is justice, there ..."

Dr.Cajetan Coelho


Justice First, Charity Beyond It: Serving ..."

"Thank you for your very, very powerful and very, very insightful analysis of the relationship ..."

alwayspuzzled


Justice First, Charity Beyond It: Serving ..."


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Abortion Abraham abuse Aesthetics AI Aliens Ambrose Ancestors and Everything Andrew Angels Animals Anne Anthony Antisemitism apologetics Apophatic Apostle John Aquinas Artificial Intelligence Asanga Ascension Asceticism Assumption Atheism Attachment Augustine Authority Avarice Balthasar Baptism Beauty Biden birthright citizenship Bishops Black History Books Buddhism Bulgakov Byzantine Calendar C.S. Lewis Calcidius Catholic Catholicism Catholicism Celibacy Charity Chastity children Chrismation Christ Christmas Christology Church Climate Change Common Good Communion Confession Confirmation Conscience Constantine conventions conversion councils Covid Creation Cross Dead Death Death Penalty Debate Deception Demagogues Demons Desert Monks Desert Mothers Desire destruction development Dialogue Dignity Dionsyius Dionysius Discipline Diversity Division Doctor Who doctrine dogma Dormition Dualism Easter Easter Series Ecumenical Councils Ecumenism Education Election Empathy Environment Error Eschatology eschaton Eternity Ethics Eucharist Evangelism Eve Evil evolution Faeries Faith Fear femininity Ficino Florence Florensky Folktale Fools Forgiveness Freedom Future gender Gentile Gentiles Glory Gnostic God gods Good Samaritan Goodness Gospel Government Grace Great Fast Guns Halloween Hate healing Health Heaven Hell Hellenism Heresy Hierarchy Hildegard Hinduism History Holiness Holy Spirit Holy Week Hope Horror Human rights humanity Humility hypocrisy ICE icon icons Identification Identity Idol II Nicea Immigration incarnation Individualism Informal Reflections Inklings Intention Inter-Religious Interfaith Internet Interpretation Intrinsic evil Irenaeus Islam Israel Jacob Jerome Jesus Jews John Chrysostom John of Damascus John the Baptist Joseph Judaism justice Justification kenosis Kindnesss Kingdom of God Kingdom of Heaven Law Law of Moses Lazarus Leaf by Niggle Lent Lenten Reflection Liberation Theology Lies Life Listen Literature Liturgy locutions Logic Logos Love Marriage Martyrs Mary Mass Maximos The Confessor Meanness Meditation Mercy Middle Path Migrants Mind Miracles Miriam Morals Moses Movies Music Muslims Myths Names Nationalism Native Americans New Year Nicea Nicholas Nothing Novatian Obedience Occam's Razor Ordination Origen Original Sin Orthodox orthopraxis Pagans Palamas Palm Sunday Paradise Paschaltide Paul Peace Pentecost person Peter piety PKD Plato pluralism Plurality Poem Poetry Poiltics Politics Poor Pope Pope Francis Pope Leo XIV Post Office Prayer Pride Pro-life Prodigal Son propaganda Prophecy Prophets Providence Putin Racism Reading Reason Reflection Refugees Relationships Religion Religion Series Religious Liberty Repent Republicans Rest Resurrection Rich Rites Russia Sacraments Saints Salvation Salvian Santa Science Scripture Self-Giving Sexuality Sibyl Sick Silence Sin Singlehood Social Justice Society Sodom Solovyov Speculations Spiritual Reflection St. Cyril of Alexandria St. Justin Martyr Suffering Sunday of the Paralytic Man Sunday of the Samaritan Woman Superhero Supreme Court Teaching Technology Thanksgiving The Father the Universe Theological Reflection Theology Theosis Theotokos Thomas Timaeus Time Tolerenace Tolkien Tradition Transfiguration Trinity Trump Truth Uncategorized Unity Universities USCCB Vainglory Value Vatican II Vegetarian Vices Violence Virtue Vocations War Water Welcome Wisdom Womanhood Women Work World View Worship Writing Zacchaeus

Select a Month November 2026 October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What kind of animal did Jesus ride into Jerusalem?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Donkey Horse Ox Camel

Related posts from A Little Bit of Nothing

Catholic

The Parable Of The Sower And The Word...

A Little Bit of Nothing

Catholic

How Christ Transformed The Meaning Of The Cross

A Little Bit of Nothing

Catholic

The Shared Struggle Against Antisemitism And Islamophobia

A Little Bit of Nothing

Catholic

The Danger Of Embracing The Hate We Oppose

A Little Bit of Nothing

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Catholic

Did You Know Holy Pagans Helped Shape Our...

Christians tend to have a negative view of the Canaanites; there is...

War As Hell: A Christian Argument For Peace

I don't understand it, and yet, I do. When Pope Leo XIV...

Is Catholicism The Fulfillment Of The Old Testament?

Catholicism makes sense only when wedded to the Old Testament. Put differently,...

How Grandma Tourism Helps Grandparents Live Their Vocation

Grandma, The New Travel Influencer What started as a nostalgia-inspired social media...

Hope for the World: Thoughts on ‘Credo: A...

This essay begins a series of meditations on “Credo: A Story of...

Why Is Catholicism Centered on an Instrument of...

Catholicism is strange. At its very center, Catholicism holds up a man...

view all Catholic blogs

What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube