Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

henrykarlson

Heresies Often Are Catalysts For Theological Reflection

Last updated on: February 12, 2026 at 2:53 am   by Henry Karlson

0 Comments

Heresies Often Are Catalysts For Theological Reflection 2026-02-12T02:53:39-05:00 Henry Karlson

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Heresies Seek To Undermine Our Communion. Photo From Ted: Communion Of The Apostles, St. Paul the Apostle Orthodox Church, Dayton, Ohio / Wikimedia Commons

Paul said that within the church, factions, and with them, heresies, that is private opinions which seek to divide up the church, would develop. “For, in the first place, when you assemble as a church, I hear that there are divisions among you; and I partly believe it, for there must be factions among you in order that those who are genuine among you may be recognized” (1 Cor. 11:18-19 RSV).  There will be those who, leaning on their own understanding and pride, will establish and promote heresies that will challenge Christianity; they will promote adherence to themselves over the greater community, leading to division instead of Christian unity. These factions, these heresies, will challenge Christians to understand the truth of the faith, to discern not only the truths found in those heresies, but the errors in the ways those truths are presented. Christians must respond to such heresies in the right fashion, that is, both in charity, but also with wisdom, lest in responding to a heresy, they likewise create a new one themselves and go astray as well.

The main problem with heresies, therefore, is that they divide up what should not be divided, undermining the work of Christ because Christ seeks to bring unity into a divided world. They use some element of the truth and turn it against the fullness of the truth itself, which is why they can entice many to follow them. They make their followers think denying their heretical teaching, the truths would automatically be denied, but that, of course, is not the case, as there are other ways to engage those truths. Nonetheless, when trying to deal with the claims of various heresies, we must acknowledge the truths which they are using. We must recognize not everything they teach is wrong, as Pope St Leo the Great indicated:

With other heresies, dearly beloved – though all of them deserve to be condemned in their contradiction among themselves – each heresy, taken in isolation, has something that might be true with respect to some part of it. [1]

If we dismissed any heresy as being completely and utterly false, we would have to end up denying the truth being presented by it. This is why it is imperative that we discern the truth which it is using and show how that truth is better represented in orthodox teaching, where that particular truth is allowed to find its proper place in the greater, holistic truth. Heresies are dangerous, therefore, not only by having Christian unity undermined, but also by the way it divides up the holistic truth. Many heresies are simple mistakes and those who make them end up being easily corrected, but when pride is in play, then those who create a heresy want to impose their private and imperfect view on the whole of the church. Such heretics are unwilling to listen to correction. This is why they end up bringing division into the church, because they will try to convince many Christians to follow them in their error instead of following the church. At the earliest stages of such conflicts, there might be a few rounds of dialogue which take place, but in the end, if the root causes of the heresy are not properly dealt with, and the number of its adherents continue to grow, hostility will arise until, at last, the church becomes divided. This is why it is better to deal with emerging heresies early on; to do that, church leaders and theologians need to understand why such heresies have arisen, the problems which they seek to answer, and provide a better solution to those problems than the heresy itself. If this does not happen the church becomes divided, it will happen after, but it will be much more difficult to do so, and not everyone will be able to be brought back to the orthodox faith. Thus, though they are dangerous, especially as they lead us away from the way of charity and communion, we must recognize when heresies arise, we are being shown a theological need, a concern which should be given a  proper theological response, one which acknowledges the elements of truth upheld by the heresy while showing those elements of the truth the heresy have ignored. This is why Leonardo Boff says, despite the danger contained in them, when heresies arise, the church is forced to deal with issues it has ignored, and this is what will lead to significant, indeed, necessary theological development in the Christian tradition:

Heresies are doctrines which do not allow faith to find itself in them or devotion to recognize itself in them, or formulas which contradict the normative data of scriptures. They constitute a grave danger to the faith; nevertheless, they also enable theology to move forward, since their refutation requires careful study and a more precise deepening of faith itself.[2]

Thus, heresies arise because the church, especially its clergy and theologians, have not properly dealt with the questions and concerns the faithful have concerning their faith. Some, starting with good intentions, take the lead, trying to help the faithful find answers, but sadly, they make mistakes when they do so. This becomes a serious problem when they become so attached to the mistakes they made they end up stopping authentic theological development themselves.

Sadly, history shows, the church often did not engage heresies in the best fashion; rather, it became the means for the institution and various authorities within it to reify their position and authority in the church instead of seeking to help those in need and engage others with the love needed to preserve unity:

Even though it has beneficial consequences, the concentration of churches around the bishop for self-defense in the battle against schisms and heresies also leads to a certain hypertrophy of sacramental hierarchism, which disrupts the ecclesial equilibrium. This historical development results in the general conviction that the Church is precisely a hierarchal organization that is adequate to and perfectly realizes the body of Christ. [3]

That is, even when the church offers a good theological answer to the question at hand, it often does so in a bad fashion, one which promotes clericalism; our focus becomes less on the doctrine or dogma being explained and more on the authority of the church and those who proclaim its teachings. Sergius Bulgakov, in his criticism of the institutionalization and clericalism of the church, did not deny the value of the sacrament of orders, nor the importance of theology (after all, he was a priest and a theologian), but he understood how the institutional church has harmed people by the way it let clericalism takeover. The answers given might be formally correct, but the actions of the church, and its leaders, often was just as bad as the heretics. The church and its officials were not as humble as they should have been. Bulgakov reminds us that we should look for ways we can come together in the eucharistic feast, to realize our communion comes through it and not our theological debates. Even Paul hinted at this: his discussion concerning heresies and divisions came in the midst of his discussion of the eucharist, pointing out that we should come together in the spirit of communion and engage each other in and with the spirit of love instead of looking for reasons to undermine that love and become divided:

When you meet together, it is not the Lord’s supper that you eat.  For in eating, each one goes ahead with his own meal, and one is hungry and another is drunk.  What! Do you not have houses to eat and drink in? Or do you despise the church of God and humiliate those who have nothing? What shall I say to you? Shall I commend you in this? No, I will not. (1 Cor. 11:20-22 RSV).

When we come together for communion, we should let the spirit of communion, the spirit of love, make sure we do not deny or break apart our unity with each other. We must share in the eucharistic gifts with a spirit of love, for such love is necessary for us to properly commune with the Lord, and through the Lord, with each other. We should not come to the table seeking to promote ourselves, our own private desires. We have our own lives, our own homes, where we can deal with them; when we come together, we are to transcend ourselves and engage the charity that not only will help us commune with each other, but to properly dialogue with each other and deal with the theological questions we have. That way, those questions will not need to lead to division but will actually help us learn together and discern the truth together, with the help of the Spirit of Truth, the Holy Spirit, who we receive with Christ in communion, because the Spirit came upon him and is with him since his baptism.


[1] St Leo the Great, Sermons. Trans. Jane Patricia Freeland CSJB and Agnes Josephine Conway SSJ (Washington, DC: CUA Press, 1996), 95-6 [Sermon 24].

[2] Leonardo Boff, Trinity and Society. Trans Paul Burns (Maryknoll, NY: Orbis Books, 1988; second printing, 1997), 46.

[3] Sergius Bulgakov, Bride of the Lamb. Trans. Boris Jakim (Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company, 2002), 276.

 

Stay in touch! Like A Little Bit of Nothing on Facebook.
If you liked what you read, please consider sharing it with your friends and family!

N.B.:  While I read comments to moderate them, I rarely respond to them. If I don’t respond to your comment directly, don’t assume I am unthankful for it. I appreciate it. But I want readers to feel free to ask questions, and hopefully, dialogue with each other. I have shared what I wanted to say, though some responses will get a brief reply by me, or, if I find it interesting and something I can engage fully, as the foundation for another post. I have had many posts inspired or improved upon thanks to my readers.

General Christian

Heresy

Theological Reflection

Theology

Doctrinal Development

heresies

Theology

Previous Post



February 11, 2026

My Engagements With World Religions: Buddhism Part I

Next Post



February 15, 2026 Embracing God's Image In Ourselves And Our Neighbors

Recent Comments

0 | Leave a Comment

"Gosh, did that hit the spot. I have been having great anxiety lately. And I ..."

Mark Wilson


Rejecting Doom: Christian Hope And Human ..."

"Justice and peace are two sides of the same coin. Where there is justice, there ..."

Dr.Cajetan Coelho


Justice First, Charity Beyond It: Serving ..."

"Thank you for your very, very powerful and very, very insightful analysis of the relationship ..."

alwayspuzzled


Justice First, Charity Beyond It: Serving ..."

"Given the amount of lethal malevolence that has prevailed in human history for the past ..."

alwayspuzzled


We Must Value Our Health


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Abortion Abraham abuse Aesthetics AI Aliens Ambrose Ancestors and Everything Andrew Angels Animals Anne Anthony Antisemitism apologetics Apophatic Apostle John Aquinas Artificial Intelligence Asanga Ascension Asceticism Assumption Atheism Attachment Augustine Authority Avarice Balthasar Baptism Beauty Biden birthright citizenship Bishops Black History Books Buddhism Bulgakov Byzantine Calendar C.S. Lewis Calcidius Catholic Catholicism Catholicism Celibacy Charity Chastity children Chrismation Christ Christmas Christology Church Climate Change Common Good Communion Confession Confirmation Conscience Constantine conventions conversion councils Covid Creation Cross Dead Death Death Penalty Debate Deception Demagogues Demons Desert Monks Desert Mothers Desire destruction development Dialogue Dignity Dionsyius Dionysius Discipline Diversity Division Doctor Who doctrine dogma Dormition Dualism Easter Easter Series Ecumenical Councils Ecumenism Education Election Empathy Environment Error Eschatology eschaton Eternity Ethics Eucharist Evangelism Eve Evil evolution Faeries Faith Fear femininity Ficino Florence Florensky Folktale Fools Forgiveness Freedom Future gender Gentile Gentiles Glory Gnostic God gods Good Samaritan Goodness Gospel Government Grace Great Fast Guns Hate healing Health Heaven Hell Hellenism Heresy Hierarchy Hildegard Hinduism History Holiness Holy Spirit Holy Week Hope Horror Human rights humanity Humility hypocrisy ICE icon icons Identification Identity Idol II Nicea Immigration incarnation Individualism Informal Reflections Inklings Intention Inter-Religious Interfaith Internet Interpretation Intrinsic evil Irenaeus Islam Israel Jacob Jerome Jesus Jews John Chrysostom John of Damascus John the Baptist Joseph Judaism justice Justification kenosis Kindnesss Kingdom of God Kingdom of Heaven Law Law of Moses Lazarus Leaf by Niggle Lent Lenten Reflection Liberation Theology Lies Life Listen Literature Liturgy locutions Logic Logos Love Marriage Martyrs Mary Mass Maximos The Confessor Meanness Meditation Mercy Middle Path Migrants Mind Miracles Miriam Morals Moses Movies Music Muslims Myths Names Nationalism Native Americans New Year Nicea Nicholas Nothing Novatian Obedience Occam's Razor Ordination Origen Original Sin Orthodox orthopraxis Pagans Palamas Palm Sunday Paradise Paschaltide Paul Peace Pentecost person Peter piety PKD Plato pluralism Plurality Poem Poetry Poiltics Politics Poor Pope Pope Francis Pope Leo XIV Post Office Prayer Pride Pro-life Prodigal Son propaganda Prophecy Prophets Providence Putin Racism Reading Reason Reflection Refugees Relationships Religion Religion Series Religious Liberty Repent Republicans Rest Resurrection Rich Rites Russia Sacraments Saints Salvation Salvian Santa Science Scripture Self-Giving Sexuality Sibyl Sick Silence Sin Singlehood Social Justice Society Sodom Solovyov Speculations Spiritual Reflection St. Cyril of Alexandria St. Justin Martyr Suffering Sunday of the Paralytic Man Sunday of the Samaritan Woman Superhero Supreme Court Teaching Technology Thanksgiving The Father the Universe Theological Reflection Theology Theosis Theotokos Thomas Timaeus Time Tolerenace Tolkien Tradition Transfiguration Trinity Trump Truth Uncategorized Unity Universities USCCB Value Vatican II Vegetarian Vices Violence Virtue Vocations War Water Welcome Wisdom Womanhood Women Work World View Worship Writing Zacchaeus

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who gave birth to Moses?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Orpah Keturah Merab Jochebed

Related posts from A Little Bit of Nothing

Catholic

How Right Belief Depends On Right Christian Living

A Little Bit of Nothing

Catholic

How The Apostles Begun The Process Of Doctrinal...

A Little Bit of Nothing

Catholic

What Value Is Theology If We Ignore Love?

A Little Bit of Nothing

Catholic

The Importance Of Contextual Awareness For Theology

A Little Bit of Nothing

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Catholic

Rejecting Doom: Christian Hope And Human Action

Christianity is a religion of hope. We are to have hope and...

It’s What Comes From Within Which Matters

One of the most difficult things for us to understand is why...

Why I Choose the Eucharist Over the Sermon

Choose the Eucharist, Not the Sermon What are we supposed to get...

5 Design Elements Found in Spiritually Rooted Homes

Putting Spirituality Into Home Decor Our homes are more than our living...

Credo: A Story of God Told with the...

About 10 years ago, I began to imagine a personal "Credo" that...

The Anatomy of Divine Revelation in Catholic Thought

The claim that God has made Himself known to human beings is...

view all Catholic blogs

What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube