Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

henrykarlson

EWTN’s Influence On American Catholic Faith

Last updated on: October 23, 2025 at 6:17 am   by Henry Karlson

0 Comments

EWTN’s Influence On American Catholic Faith 2025-10-23T06:17:08-05:00 Henry Karlson

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Joe Copeland: EWTN Logo / Wikimedia Commons

When I first became Catholic, I saw first hand the beginnings of the division between American Catholicism and the rest of the Catholic world. While there were many secondary sources for this, such as the large number of Protestant converts who did not completely change their mindset and yet became popular Catholic figures in apologetics, they seem to merge together through EWTN. While EWTN had already begun its rise in America before I converted, it would later become a major powerhouse influencing Catholics, both those who watched their channel, and others through the churches and clergy who promoted their material. I saw how EWTN gained control of the way Catholicism was viewed in the United States, and it did so by pushing Catholics to embrace the developing culture wars in America, a fundamentalistic sensibility, and various elements of Catholic piety (especially, early on, with a focus on Marian apparitions, including many not approved by the church). Much was left out of their presentation. Theology was undermined by apologetics. Catholic social teaching, save for those elements which could connect with the culture war, were ignored, or worse, ridiculed.

Sir Morosus: Mother Angelica / Wikimedia Commons

While this was bad enough, it became worse; I saw Mother Angelica getting into fights with bishops, distorting and misrepresenting what they said in order to suggest they were heretics; even when the Vatican made her apologize, she did so in a backhanded way and the damage had been done. Catholics had been given a methodology and way of thinking which would, over time, grow until it would be the way many of them would deal with and treat the Pope when the Pope did not say or do as they wish. Thanks to the influence of EWTN, and many of its affiliates and offshoots, Catholics judged everything based upon the limited vision of the faith, the  vision given to them by EWTN, instead of seeking to understand and learn what they had not yet understood.

I have watched and seen where this has led: Catholics in America, clergy and laity alike, follow the vision started by EWTN, reinforced by politics, calling anyone who does not follow it a heretic, even if it is the Pope. They do so, also, with the methodology used by Mother Angelica. That is, they have a willingness to distort and misrepresent the Pope if necessary. This often done when the Pope tells Catholics to do something which stands against their own political ideology.  It is also what many of them learned thanks to various apologists who, in their debates with others, engaged others in the same fashion. Thus, from what I have seen, many Catholics have not learned to open up and listen and properly understand what they criticize, rather, if they find what is being said runs contrary to their own particular ideology, they think whoever says it must not only be wrong, but also be a heretic, and they are to be dealt with by any means possible.

Thus, I saw EWTN, and their associates, determining what Catholics would or would not hear about Catholicism. They gave rise to a new kind of sensibility in American Catholicism, one which easily found itself united with right-wing American ideologies. Catholic social doctrine was simplified, if not outright ignored, which is why, when Popes presented it in ways which countered those same right wing ideologies, it was the Popes who were rejected. At first, with St. John Paul II and Pope Benedict XVI, their reputation prevented American Catholics taking this too far; instead, EWTN and those like them, only presented elements from John Paul II and Benedict XVI which could be used for their ideology and found ways to ignore or reject everything else (such as by suggesting their writings were being corrupted and one would have to determine which part of their writings are authoritative and which was to be dismissed). Similarly, they wrongly focused on the notion of infallibility by suggesting if something is not infallible, then Catholics can easily dismiss it.  This is how many treated the way John Paull II and Benedict XVI’s engagement of the environment, or Pope Benedict XVI’s interests in social doctrine. During this time, we also saw the rise of Catholic influencers who took on what Mother Angelica started, but took it further, becoming even further from the center.

Things changed under Pope Francis.  Even before he was in office for a week, he had right-wing traditionalists in Latin America spreading malicious rumors and lies against him, rumors and lies which were picked up by Catholic media like EWTN. Then, when it was clear that Pope Francis was concerned about and promoted the necessity of Catholic social doctrine, that it must be followed even when it went against various political ideologies,  many in the Catholic media in the US, and with them, many bishops, started fighting Pope Francis. He was given nominal acknowledgment for what he said by the USCCB, but then they would ignore what he said they should do. I also saw various American bishops speaking out against and fighting Pope Francis, and those who did not, remained relatively silent, allowing those loud bishops to become the ones whose influence was felt far and wide on social media. We see these bishops treating Francis with the same disdain, the same misrepresentation, that Mother Angelica gave in the 90s to various American bishops. Thus, from what I have seen after becoming Catholic, I saw  Catholicism in America being led astray, and many of the American clergy were involved in that distortion. It is often something which I have found myself having to deal with time and time again in my writings.

Edgar Beltrán, The Pillar: Pope Leo XIV / Wikimedia Commons

When Pope Francis died, Pope Leo XIV showed he would continue what Francis started. However, he also showed us that he planned to do so in his own way. To me, it seems as if he is trying to be pastoral, trying to give a chance for many who drifted away during Francis’s pontificate to come back, to ease them back into the fullness of the faith. But it is also clear, he is not doing this by turning his back on Francis and what Francis started. He sees the crisis in the world today and the need for Catholics to properly deal with it. He understands that Catholics must promote the human dignity of all because that dignity is being questioned and attacked by authoritarian regimes. He continues to highlight the preferential option for the poor, and with it, show how migrants are among the poor whose rights must be protected. He, like St. John Paul II, Benedict XVI, and Francis, is concerned with climate change and the harm it is causing around the world.  He is telling us we can’t just sit back and do nothing but contemplate theological mysteries. Catholics must be at the forefront of the resistance to injustices in the world and the harm sin is causing it. He told the US bishops they cannot ignore the evil being done by the Trump administration, that they must actively resist Trump’s cruelty, a cruelty which is not only given to migrants, but to the poor and vulnerable. Sadly, I do not see the USCCB listening. Indeed, many in charge are close to Trump and seem to want to promote Trump the best they can, while offering no criticism of Trump or even acknowledge the evil he is doing. Thankfully, there are some bishops listening to Leo and they are speaking out and doing what they can to deal with the crisis which is at their feet, but we need to see more, and we need to see it as being a focal point of the work being done by the USCCB.

The lack of authentic direction from the USCCB, the way many Catholic influencers are ignoring basic teachings of Catholic social doctrine, cannot last. Pope Leo is going to have to do something. It has been clear to many, at least since the time of Pope Francis, a schism between America and Rome is starting to emerge. However, I think the roots of the schism go back decades, at least to the 90s if not earlier, and came from the way EWTN had taken over the American Catholic imagination, allowing its distorted presentation of Catholicism appear to be what authentic Catholicism is about.

This, at least, is a what I saw happening since I have become Catholic. To be sure, there are many layers to this which cannot be said in a short space. There are many influential Catholic figures not only tied with EWTN, but financed by many questionable sources; they  promote a pseudo-Catholicism, one which many listen to instead of the Pope. What I have is the dismissal of a large portion of authentic Catholic teaching in America, one which has Catholics believe teachings which go, not only against the Pope, but against what Jesus preached in his temporal ministry. Will the developing schism end with full schism, or will something change? I do not know. All I can do is offer my voice, promoting and showing the traditions of the church many now do not know or ignore.

 

* This Is Another Post From My Personal (Informal) Reflections And Speculations Series

 

Stay in touch! Like A Little Bit of Nothing on Facebook.
If you liked what you read, please consider sharing it with your friends and family!

N.B.:  While I read comments to moderate them, I rarely respond to them. If I don’t respond to your comment directly, don’t assume I am unthankful for it. I appreciate it. But I want readers to feel free to ask questions, and hopefully, dialogue with each other. I have shared what I wanted to say, though some responses will get a brief reply by me, or, if I find it interesting and something I can engage fully, as the foundation for another post. I have had many posts inspired or improved upon thanks to my readers.

General Christian

Politics and Religion

Pope

Pope Francis

Pope Leo XIV

EWTN

Pope

Pope Leo XIV

schism

Previous Post



October 22, 2025

Are We Making Excuses To Ignore The Poor?

Next Post



October 26, 2025 No Excuses:  God Will Not Be Fooled By Loopholes

Recent Comments

0 | Leave a Comment

"Gosh, did that hit the spot. I have been having great anxiety lately. And I ..."

Mark Wilson


Rejecting Doom: Christian Hope And Human ..."

"Justice and peace are two sides of the same coin. Where there is justice, there ..."

Dr.Cajetan Coelho


Justice First, Charity Beyond It: Serving ..."

"Thank you for your very, very powerful and very, very insightful analysis of the relationship ..."

alwayspuzzled


Justice First, Charity Beyond It: Serving ..."

"Given the amount of lethal malevolence that has prevailed in human history for the past ..."

alwayspuzzled


We Must Value Our Health


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Abortion Abraham abuse Aesthetics AI Aliens Ambrose Ancestors and Everything Andrew Angels Animals Anne Anthony Antisemitism apologetics Apophatic Apostle John Aquinas Artificial Intelligence Asanga Ascension Asceticism Assumption Atheism Attachment Augustine Authority Avarice Balthasar Baptism Beauty Biden birthright citizenship Bishops Black History Books Buddhism Bulgakov Byzantine Calendar C.S. Lewis Calcidius Catholic Catholicism Catholicism Celibacy Charity Chastity children Chrismation Christ Christmas Christology Church Climate Change Common Good Communion Confession Confirmation Conscience Constantine conventions conversion councils Covid Creation Cross Dead Death Death Penalty Debate Deception Demagogues Demons Desert Monks Desert Mothers Desire destruction development Dialogue Dignity Dionsyius Dionysius Discipline Diversity Division Doctor Who doctrine dogma Dormition Dualism Easter Easter Series Ecumenical Councils Ecumenism Education Election Empathy Environment Error Eschatology eschaton Eternity Ethics Eucharist Evangelism Eve Evil evolution Faeries Faith Fear femininity Ficino Florence Florensky Folktale Fools Forgiveness Freedom Future gender Gentile Gentiles Glory Gnostic God gods Good Samaritan Goodness Gospel Government Grace Great Fast Guns Halloween Hate healing Health Heaven Hell Hellenism Heresy Hierarchy Hildegard Hinduism History Holiness Holy Spirit Holy Week Hope Horror Human rights humanity Humility hypocrisy ICE icon icons Identification Identity Idol II Nicea Immigration incarnation Individualism Informal Reflections Inklings Intention Inter-Religious Interfaith Internet Interpretation Intrinsic evil Irenaeus Islam Israel Jacob Jerome Jesus Jews John Chrysostom John of Damascus John the Baptist Joseph Judaism justice Justification kenosis Kindnesss Kingdom of God Kingdom of Heaven Law Law of Moses Lazarus Leaf by Niggle Lent Lenten Reflection Liberation Theology Lies Life Listen Literature Liturgy locutions Logic Logos Love Marriage Martyrs Mary Mass Maximos The Confessor Meanness Meditation Mercy Middle Path Migrants Mind Miracles Miriam Morals Moses Movies Music Muslims Myths Names Nationalism Native Americans New Year Nicea Nicholas Nothing Novatian Obedience Occam's Razor Ordination Origen Original Sin Orthodox orthopraxis Pagans Palamas Palm Sunday Paradise Paschaltide Paul Peace Pentecost person Peter piety PKD Plato pluralism Plurality Poem Poetry Poiltics Politics Poor Pope Pope Francis Pope Leo XIV Post Office Prayer Pride Pro-life Prodigal Son propaganda Prophecy Prophets Providence Putin Racism Reading Reason Reflection Refugees Relationships Religion Religion Series Religious Liberty Repent Republicans Rest Resurrection Rich Rites Russia Sacraments Saints Salvation Salvian Santa Science Scripture Self-Giving Sexuality Sibyl Sick Silence Sin Singlehood Social Justice Society Sodom Solovyov Speculations Spiritual Reflection St. Cyril of Alexandria St. Justin Martyr Suffering Sunday of the Paralytic Man Sunday of the Samaritan Woman Superhero Supreme Court Teaching Technology Thanksgiving The Father the Universe Theological Reflection Theology Theosis Theotokos Thomas Timaeus Time Tolerenace Tolkien Tradition Transfiguration Trinity Trump Truth Uncategorized Unity Universities USCCB Value Vatican II Vegetarian Vices Violence Virtue Vocations War Water Welcome Wisdom Womanhood Women Work World View Worship Writing Zacchaeus

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Which king saw "the handwriting on the wall"?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Belshazzar Artaxerxes Nebuchadnezzar Cyrus

Related posts from A Little Bit of Nothing

Catholic

How Tradition Points Away From The Death Penalty

A Little Bit of Nothing

Catholic

Justice First, Charity Beyond It: Serving The Poor...

A Little Bit of Nothing

Catholic

AI, the Pope, and the Case for Responsible...

A Little Bit of Nothing

Catholic

Why Clean Water Is a Moral Obligation For...

A Little Bit of Nothing

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Catholic

Christ’s Two Natures And The Mystery Of Human...

The teaching of the incarnation is at the heart of the Christian...

Halloween, Tolkien, And The Victory of Grace

If I had to choose a favorite month of the year, it...

Creation, Preservation, and Teleology in Catholic Theology

As I write this, it is very early Monday morning. Like millions...

Why I Choose the Eucharist Over the Sermon

Choose the Eucharist, Not the Sermon What are we supposed to get...

5 Design Elements Found in Spiritually Rooted Homes

Putting Spirituality Into Home Decor Our homes are more than our living...

Credo: A Story of God Told with the...

About 10 years ago, I began to imagine a personal "Credo" that...

view all Catholic blogs

What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube