Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Catholic
Women in Religion
Feminine Representation In Theology: A Call For Balance

Feminine Representation In Theology: A Call For Balance

Last updated on: September 18, 2025 at 5:04 am by Henry Karlson

0 Comments

Feminine Representation In Theology: A Call For Balance 2025-09-18T05:04:08-05:00 Henry Karlson

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

National Library of the Netherlands: Two Angels Holding A Shroud With The Holy Wound (Often Represented As A Feminine Image As Christ Is Often Shown Giving Birth To The Church Through It) / picryl

God is without gender, and yet, we appropriate and apprehend God through various metaphors, various images which point to some element of the divine, including those with gender. Genesis tells us God have made humanity, male and female, in the divine image: “So God created man in his own image, in the image of God he created him; male and female he created them” (Gen. 1:27 RSV). There are many ways to interpret this verse. For example, one interpretation suggests it means that men and women alike, as men and women, are made in the image of God. That is, men and women are equally made in the image of God, that there is something in both of them which equally imagines God (such as human nature). Another interpretation suggests that this image of God is found only when men and women are viewed together, that is when they are united as one; that is, only when we view them as some sort of amalgamation which unites the to together, do we find how humanity imagines God. In general, the first interpretation is normative, and most interpreters ignore or reject the second. With either interpretation, we learn that it is important for us to consider God through both masculine and feminine images. While Scripture provides several instances where God is imagined with feminine metaphors and images, especially those related to motherhood, in general, Christians have grown accustomed to and use only masculine images for God. This is why many now have been led to think God is male. Obviously, this is a false understanding of God, one which limits our understanding of God as it denies us what can be apprehended about God through femininity. Jesus certainly didn’t limit the divine to masculine representations; this is why, when speaking of himself as God, he talks about the way he had been mothering Jerusalem (and all Israel). Thus, it is right to say:

The Abba of Jesus transcends all human gender characteristics, categories and distinctions. And yet, only an image of God that absorbs and incorporates what we traditionally refer to as masculine and feminine characteristics can approximate the God whom Jesus experienced. [1]

God is not male. God is not female. God is not male and female together. God transcends all genders, but because of this, all genders have something in them which allows them to represent God to us, and to do so equally. We must find ways to apprehend the truth of God as God is imagined or represented by all genders; since we have engaged more through the masculine than the feminine, we need to pursue what we have ignored and discern the way God can be and is imagine by feminine images. In this way, we will be able to overcome the imbalance which has occurred in Christian history and tradition, as feminist theologians point out:

The essence of feminist spirituality, then, is a reclaiming of female power beginning with the likeness of women to the divine, the rehabilitation of the body as the very locus of that divine likeness, and the right of women to participate in the shaping of religion and culture, i.e., of the realm of “spirit.” [2]

Historically, it has been common for Christian thinkers (and other philosophers) to equate the spirit with masculinity and material being (and bodies) with femininity. In doing so, this had led to some dangerous conclusions such as men are more important and greater than women as the soul is seen to be greater than the body. Similarly, it is said men should be able to dominate and control women just as the soul is said to control the body. The proper balance between the soul and body has been lost, where the two should come together in harmony. Sadly, due to this, the value and dignity of both women and the body have been undermined by many Christians.

Some Christians suggest we should say God is male because of the incarnation: Christ is male, therefore, God is male. Not only does this end up ignoring the distinction of the natures, a distinction which Chalcedon indicated must remain affirmed even after the incarnation, it also ignores the way Christ’s humanity is presented by Paul as transcending the various particular distinctions found in society. Christ’s humanity is the humanity of every human person so that in him, in his body, Paul says, there is neither male nor female. Jerome took this up on his writings as can be seen in in his translation of Origen: Jerome explained that the use of gender, in regards human language conventions, should not be used to have us impose a gender on God the Word, that is, the divine person who became incarnate:

Rather, although the ‘Word’ of God is of the masculine gender in Greek, and neuter with ourselves, yet all these matters with which this passage deals must be thought of in a manner that transcends masculine and neuter and feminine, and everything whatever to which these words refer. And this applies not only to the ‘Word’ of God, but also to His Church and to the perfect soul, who likewise is here called ‘the Bride.’ For thus says the Apostle: ‘For in Christ there is neither male nor female, but we are all one in Him.’[3]

As we have been accustomed to look at Christ, as well as God, purely from the masculine point of view, we should look to tradition as the foundation for going beyond this, such as the way Christ is said to give birth to the church on the cross. When we do so, we will see, time and time again, ways in which Christ is shown to have feminine qualities. We can and should use what is found in tradition and develop it further, showing how tradition is to be a living tradition, one which grows and works to deal with the needs of the times, needs which today include overcoming sexist talk about God, talk which uses Christianity and its tradition to undermine the dignity and value of the world, the body, and of femininity in general. This is extremely necessary today as we see many who are turning towards Christian nationalism, those who give into the temptation of Satan to take control of the world and dominate it, trying to pretend what they want to create is a Christian theocracy but in doing so, take and promote ideologies which run counter to Christianity and impose them upon society, ideologies which include those which devalue the dignity of women, the dignity of the body, and the value of the world at large (as can be seem in their misogyny, their willingness to promote torture, and their anti-environmental stand). Feminist theologians are right in connecting misogyny with hatred to the world, a hatred which approves and accepts environmental harm. Christians must respond to this crisis, making sure that the heresies which are found in Christian nationalism are repudiated, and to do this, they must truly delve into the feminine, and embrace the divine feminine, not as an absolute, but as a way to represent the God who is beyond male and female.

[1] Albert Haase, OFM, Living the Lord’s Prayer (Downers Grove, IL: Intervarsity Press, 2009), 32.

[2] Sandra M. Schneiders, Beyond Patching. Revised Edition (New York: Paulist Press, 2004), 80-81.

[3] Origen, “The Song of Songs: Commentary” in Origen: The Song of Songs, Commentary And Homilies. Trans. R.P. Lawson (New York: Newman Press, 1956), 201. We know Jerome inserted “neuter for ourselves” into the text because Origen wrote in Greek.

Stay in touch! Like A Little Bit of Nothing on Facebook.
If you liked what you read, please consider sharing it with your friends and family!

N.B.: While I read comments to moderate them, I rarely respond to them. If I don’t respond to your comment directly, don’t assume I am unthankful for it. I appreciate it. But I want readers to feel free to ask questions, and hopefully, dialogue with each other. I have shared what I wanted to say, though some responses will get a brief reply by me, or, if I find it interesting and something I can engage fully, as the foundation for another post. I have had many posts inspired or improved upon thanks to my readers.

Progressive Christian

Women in Religion

Previous Post

September 17, 2025

Liberation From Evil: God's Promise Of Redemption

Next Post

September 21, 2025 The Cross And Our Choices: Navigating The Path Of Love

Recent Comments

0 | Leave a Comment

"Gosh, did that hit the spot. I have been having great anxiety lately. And I ..."

Mark Wilson

Rejecting Doom: Christian Hope And Human ..."

"Justice and peace are two sides of the same coin. Where there is justice, there ..."

Dr.Cajetan Coelho

Justice First, Charity Beyond It: Serving ..."

"Thank you for your very, very powerful and very, very insightful analysis of the relationship ..."

alwayspuzzled

Justice First, Charity Beyond It: Serving ..."

"Given the amount of lethal malevolence that has prevailed in human history for the past ..."

alwayspuzzled

We Must Value Our Health

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Abortion Abraham abuse Aesthetics AI Aliens Ambrose Ancestors and Everything Andrew Angels Animals Anne Anthony Antisemitism apologetics Apophatic Apostle John Aquinas Artificial Intelligence Asanga Ascension Asceticism Assumption Atheism Attachment Augustine Authority Avarice Balthasar Baptism Beauty Biden birthright citizenship Bishops Black History Books Buddhism Bulgakov Byzantine Calendar C.S. Lewis Calcidius Catholic Catholicism Catholicism Celibacy Charity Chastity children Chrismation Christ Christmas Christology Church Climate Change Common Good Communion Confession Confirmation Conscience Constantine conventions conversion councils Covid Creation Cross Dead Death Death Penalty Debate Deception Demagogues Demons Desert Monks Desert Mothers Desire destruction development Dialogue Dignity Dionsyius Dionysius Discipline Diversity Division Doctor Who doctrine dogma Dormition Dualism Easter Easter Series Ecumenical Councils Ecumenism Education Election Empathy Environment Error Eschatology eschaton Eternity Ethics Eucharist Evangelism Eve Evil evolution Faeries Faith Fear femininity Ficino Florence Florensky Folktale Fools Forgiveness Freedom Future gender Gentile Gentiles Glory Gnostic God gods Good Samaritan Goodness Gospel Government Grace Great Fast Guns Hate healing Health Heaven Hell Hellenism Heresy Hierarchy Hildegard Hinduism History Holiness Holy Spirit Holy Week Hope Horror Human rights humanity Humility hypocrisy ICE icon icons Identification Identity Idol II Nicea Immigration incarnation Individualism Informal Reflections Inklings Intention Inter-Religious Interfaith Internet Interpretation Intrinsic evil Irenaeus Islam Israel Jacob Jerome Jesus Jews John Chrysostom John of Damascus John the Baptist Joseph Judaism justice Justification kenosis Kindnesss Kingdom of God Kingdom of Heaven Law Law of Moses Lazarus Leaf by Niggle Lent Lenten Reflection Liberation Theology Lies Life Listen Literature Liturgy locutions Logic Logos Love Marriage Martyrs Mary Mass Maximos The Confessor Meanness Meditation Mercy Middle Path Migrants Mind Miracles Miriam Morals Moses Movies Music Muslims Myths Names Nationalism Native Americans New Year Nicea Nicholas Nothing Novatian Obedience Occam's Razor Ordination Origen Original Sin Orthodox orthopraxis Pagans Palamas Palm Sunday Paradise Paschaltide Paul Peace Pentecost person Peter piety PKD Plato pluralism Plurality Poem Poetry Poiltics Politics Poor Pope Pope Francis Pope Leo XIV Post Office Prayer Pride Pro-life Prodigal Son propaganda Prophecy Prophets Providence Putin Racism Reading Reason Reflection Refugees Relationships Religion Religion Series Religious Liberty Repent Republicans Rest Resurrection Rich Rites Russia Sacraments Saints Salvation Salvian Santa Science Scripture Self-Giving Sexuality Sibyl Sick Silence Sin Singlehood Social Justice Society Sodom Solovyov Speculations Spiritual Reflection St. Cyril of Alexandria St. Justin Martyr Suffering Sunday of the Paralytic Man Sunday of the Samaritan Woman Superhero Supreme Court Teaching Technology Thanksgiving The Father the Universe Theological Reflection Theology Theosis Theotokos Thomas Timaeus Time Tolerenace Tolkien Tradition Transfiguration Trinity Trump Truth Uncategorized Unity Universities USCCB Value Vatican II Vegetarian Vices Violence Virtue Vocations War Water Welcome Wisdom Womanhood Women Work World View Worship Writing Zacchaeus

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz