Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Catholic
Education and Religion
Multiple Interpretations: The Key To Richer Text Engagement

Multiple Interpretations: The Key To Richer Text Engagement

Last updated on: July 2, 2025 at 7:49 am by Henry Karlson

0 Comments

Multiple Interpretations: The Key To Richer Text Engagement 2025-07-02T07:49:30-05:00 Henry Karlson

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Michal Novotný, Univerzita Karlova: Text Of The Talmud / Wikimedia Commons

Why Every Reading Is Interpretation: The Hidden Process

Every time we read a text, we are interpreting it. No matter what the text is, no matter how simple it seems it should be for us to understand what its author wants us to know, we still have to engage some sort of interpretive process to get that meaning. Often, we are unaware that the process is happening as it is automatic, making us think there is no interpretation going on. This is why many, especially fundamentalists, think any question they are given about the meaning of a text is answered by showing the text itself. In reality, everyone takes all kinds of assumptions with them as they read a text, assumptions which might change as they read the text, to be sure, but nonetheless assumptions which influence the interpretation process, making those assumptions serve as the hermeneutic lens they use to understand the text itself.

Hermeneutical Work

When reading texts written in other languages than the one(s) they know, a reader has to rely upon the interpretation(s) of its translator(s), because its translator(s) will have to decide what the author intended with the text in order to decide which words which best approximate and represent the original text. Sadly, many readers do not take this into account when they read a text in translation; they assume there is no interpretation going on in the process of translation, just as they assume there is no process of interpretation going on in their reading of the text. Even texts written in a reader’s own language, but from a different historical or cultural standpoint, will require them to do some hermeneutical work if they want to understand the text as it was originally meant to be read and interpreted.

Multiple Meanings

Thus, it is very important for us to be honest with ourselves; we must accept that every engagement we have with a text has us interpreting it as we read it. If we are conscious of this, we can better engage the text, as we will be able to raise various questions concerning the text, questions which will help us determine the author’s original intent instead of assuming the way we unconsciously interpret the text represents that intent:

In fact, the only way we can understand texts is by interpreting them, and the richer, more complicated, and distant from us by language and culture the text is, the more necessary and complex will be the required process of interpretation. The question is not whether we will interpret the text, but how. The refusal to interpret is a particular kind of interpretation and one which is not justified by our human experience with texts and reading. [1]

Those who cannot read the original language of a text, especially if the text is ancient, and from a culture far different from their own, they should read as many translations of the work as possible. Each translation will add to the many different possibilities for them to consider, many different ways to understand the text, with each translation given a nuance the others do not do. Translations, in this fashion, should be seen to complement each other. We must not assume any one translation is perfect, nor that any translation which differs from our favored translation as being bad (or wrong); rather, we must understand each translation represents a possible meaning which can be had from the text, a meaning which, again, comes in part from the translator and their interpretation of the text. Indeed, sometimes the original author might have wanted their work to have multiple meanings, and the best way to represent that is to offer many translations, each based upon one of those meanings. Pavel Florensky suggested this was the case with poetry:

We are also aware that, just as several translations of a poetic composition into another language or languages not only do not interfere with each other, but on the contrary actually complement one another, even though none of them can fully take place of the original, in the same way, scientific representations of the same reality can and must be multiplied, and this does not obstruct the truth in any way. Knowing this, we have learned not to criticize any given interpretation for what it does not give us, but to be grateful each time we are able to find a way to use it.[2]

This should help us understand why interpreting a holy book from any religious faith is difficult; when dealing with a faith which is not our own, we might have a bias which we impose upon our reading of the text, one which looks for the worst possible interpretation possible. On the other hand, when reading our own religious texts, the bias we have will come from tradition, from the way we have come to know and understand our religion apart from the text itself. If we acknowledge this, we can begin to explore various holy texts differently, maybe not completely neutral, but at least in a way so as to move beyond our own biases and try to understand the text based upon the context in which it was written. To do that right, we will have to do research, learning as much as the author’s context as possible. We should try to find out, if we can, when it was written, why it was written, and the audience to which it was written. We will have to try to learn how to think like the author thought by knowing the language they wrote in, and in accordance to the time and place in which the author lived, and the kinds of social and cultural beliefs they held. Even then, at best, what we will attain is an approximation of the author’s original intention with the text. Most people will not be able to do this, if, for no other reason, they won’t have the time necessary to do all the research necessary; when that is the case, they should accept the limitations this creates, knowing that it means they should not assume too much from their reading of the text. Of course, for religious texts, many will point out that it is meant to be a living text, that God is at work in and through it so it not only is to be interpreted the way it was originally intended to be interpreted when it was written, but it can be adapted to meet new situations, creating meanings that the human author did not intend. Even when this is the case, they still should be able to point out and acknowledge the evolution of meaning going on over time and how their current reading of the text might differ from what the original author intended.

Learn From Engagement

Thus, when we read a text, we must accept as a simple fact, we interpreting it as we read it. If we recognize this, we can be better readers, as we will more carefully consider how we are interpreting it as we read it. Indeed, we might take the time to try to discern various ways to interpret it, and not just the one way which is most obvious so us. This will give us multiple interpretations, multiple readings, of a text, each giving us something more to consider in the process, and when it is a text which we believe is invaluable, something meant to teach us or reveal to us something beyond our normal experience, such as a holy text, this certainly should be something which we would want, because then we will learn something from our engagement of the text instead of just using the text as a kind of pretext for our own assumptions.

[1] Sandra M. Schneiders, Beyond Patching. Revised Edition (New York: Paulist Press, 2004), 41.

[2] Pavel Florensky, Imaginaries in Geometry. Trans. Anna Maiorova and Karen Turnbull. Ed. Andrea Oppo and Massimiliano Spano (Milan: Mimesis International, 2021), 20.

Stay in touch! Like A Little Bit of Nothing on Facebook.
If you liked what you read, please consider sharing it with your friends and family!

N.B.: While I read comments to moderate them, I rarely respond to them. If I don’t respond to your comment directly, don’t assume I am unthankful for it. I appreciate it. But I want readers to feel free to ask questions, and hopefully, dialogue with each other. I have shared what I wanted to say, though some responses will get a brief reply by me, or, if I find it interesting and something I can engage fully, as the foundation for another post. I have had many posts inspired or improved upon thanks to my readers.

General Christian

Education and Religion

Previous Post

June 30, 2025

Prophets And Justice: A Reflection On Modern Injustices

Next Post

July 3, 2025 Christian Nationalism, A Demonic Imitation Seeking Division

Recent Comments

0 | Leave a Comment

"Gosh, did that hit the spot. I have been having great anxiety lately. And I ..."

Mark Wilson

Rejecting Doom: Christian Hope And Human ..."

"Justice and peace are two sides of the same coin. Where there is justice, there ..."

Dr.Cajetan Coelho

Justice First, Charity Beyond It: Serving ..."

"Thank you for your very, very powerful and very, very insightful analysis of the relationship ..."

alwayspuzzled

Justice First, Charity Beyond It: Serving ..."

"Given the amount of lethal malevolence that has prevailed in human history for the past ..."

alwayspuzzled

We Must Value Our Health

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Abortion Abraham abuse Aesthetics AI Aliens Ambrose Ancestors and Everything Andrew Angels Animals Anne Anthony Antisemitism apologetics Apophatic Apostle John Aquinas Artificial Intelligence Asanga Ascension Asceticism Assumption Atheism Attachment Augustine Authority Avarice Balthasar Baptism Beauty Biden birthright citizenship Bishops Black History Books Buddhism Bulgakov Byzantine Calendar C.S. Lewis Calcidius Catholic Catholicism Catholicism Celibacy Charity Chastity children Chrismation Christ Christmas Christology Church Climate Change Common Good Communion Confession Confirmation Conscience Constantine conventions conversion councils Covid Creation Cross Dead Death Death Penalty Debate Deception Demagogues Demons Desert Monks Desert Mothers Desire destruction development Dialogue Dignity Dionsyius Dionysius Discipline Diversity Division Doctor Who doctrine dogma Dormition Dualism Easter Easter Series Ecumenical Councils Ecumenism Education Election Empathy Environment Error Eschatology eschaton Eternity Ethics Eucharist Evangelism Eve Evil evolution Faeries Faith Fear femininity Ficino Florence Florensky Folktale Fools Forgiveness Freedom Future gender Gentile Gentiles Glory Gnostic God gods Good Samaritan Goodness Gospel Government Grace Great Fast Guns Hate healing Health Heaven Hell Hellenism Heresy Hierarchy Hildegard Hinduism History Holiness Holy Spirit Holy Week Hope Horror Human rights humanity Humility hypocrisy ICE icon icons Identification Identity Idol II Nicea Immigration incarnation Individualism Informal Reflections Inklings Intention Inter-Religious Interfaith Internet Interpretation Intrinsic evil Irenaeus Islam Israel Jacob Jerome Jesus Jews John Chrysostom John of Damascus John the Baptist Joseph Judaism justice Justification kenosis Kindnesss Kingdom of God Kingdom of Heaven Law Law of Moses Lazarus Leaf by Niggle Lent Lenten Reflection Liberation Theology Lies Life Listen Literature Liturgy locutions Logic Logos Love Marriage Martyrs Mary Mass Maximos The Confessor Meanness Meditation Mercy Middle Path Migrants Mind Miracles Miriam Morals Moses Movies Music Muslims Myths Names Nationalism Native Americans New Year Nicea Nicholas Nothing Novatian Obedience Occam's Razor Ordination Origen Original Sin Orthodox orthopraxis Pagans Palamas Palm Sunday Paradise Paschaltide Paul Peace Pentecost person Peter piety PKD Plato pluralism Plurality Poem Poetry Poiltics Politics Poor Pope Pope Francis Pope Leo XIV Post Office Prayer Pride Pro-life Prodigal Son propaganda Prophecy Prophets Providence Putin Racism Reading Reason Reflection Refugees Relationships Religion Religion Series Religious Liberty Repent Republicans Rest Resurrection Rich Rites Russia Sacraments Saints Salvation Salvian Santa Science Scripture Self-Giving Sexuality Sibyl Sick Silence Sin Singlehood Social Justice Society Sodom Solovyov Speculations Spiritual Reflection St. Cyril of Alexandria St. Justin Martyr Suffering Sunday of the Paralytic Man Sunday of the Samaritan Woman Superhero Supreme Court Teaching Technology Thanksgiving The Father the Universe Theological Reflection Theology Theosis Theotokos Thomas Timaeus Time Tolerenace Tolkien Tradition Transfiguration Trinity Trump Truth Uncategorized Unity Universities USCCB Value Vatican II Vegetarian Vices Violence Virtue Vocations War Water Welcome Wisdom Womanhood Women Work World View Worship Writing Zacchaeus

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz