Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

henrykarlson

The Quest For The Words To Express Faith in Jesus

Last updated on: June 2, 2025 at 2:49 pm   by Henry Karlson

0 Comments

The Quest For The Words To Express Faith in Jesus 2025-06-02T14:49:17-05:00 Henry Karlson

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Jjensen: Icon From The Mégalo Metéoron Monastery In Greece, Representing The First Ecumenical Council of Nicea / Wikimedia Commons

“And this is eternal life, that they know thee the only true God, and Jesus Christ whom thou hast sent”  (Jn. 17:3 RSV). The Christian faith is about a personal, experiential relationship with Jesus, a relationship which allows them to join themselves to him and participate in the glory of the divine life through him. We know the one who has been sent into the world, the divine person who became incarnate so as to reveal to us the fullness of divine revelation in a form which we can properly apprehend, but also in a form which is able to personally interact with us and transform us through our interaction. We come to know him and his relationship with his Father, and through it, we receive also the gift of the Spirit. We discover that the Father, Son and Spirit are one, and yet there remains personal distinctions between them. We learn that there is no simple monism in the Godhead, and that because we and the whole of creation is created in the image and likeness of God, we are also meant to be one in a way which still allows for plurality (or diversity). We can come to know and understand these truths in a variety of ways, some which can be put to words, but many in ways which cannot.

We might want to be silent. We might just want to rest in our transcendent experience of Jesus, in the truth which lies beyond words. But we cannot. “Who do you say I am”? That is the question Jesus asked Peter, and it is a question which Christians, over time, have found themselves coming to time and time again. It is certainly the question that raised itself even more after Jesus’ death and resurrection from the dead. It is the main question which lay behind the Council of Nicea.  It is not because Christians did not, in general, have a sense of who they believed Jesus to be; rather, they did not know how to put their faith into words. Many different traditions developed, many different ways to express the truth, emerged. The problem is that many come to understand those traditions in a simplistic, fundamentalistic way, and started to use them and reify them in ways which ended up contradicting the intention and meaning behind them. Christians began disputing with each other as to who Jesus is, with some, taking the literalistic interpretation of the words they learned to describe him against those who used other formulas, until some understood one such formula, taken in part from Scripture, as saying he was the first-born of creation, the greatest creature ever made by God. This interpretation is what the Arians following Arius stated. Christian intuition, the faith which preceded this systematic interpretation of Christ, said otherwise—Jesus was and is God, God with us, God who became one with us, and not just another creature. It was not easy to express how this could be, and it would take centuries before Christians would have developed the technical vocabulary they needed to explain how this was possible, with Nicea serving as the foundational turning point with the way it used the word homoousios (of the same substance or essence) to explain the way the Father and the Son (and the Holy Spirit) were one even if they were distinct.

Thus, we find at the time of Nicea, Christians had been given back their freedom in society, their freedom to worship, and with it, they received back many of the lands which had been unjustly taken from before Constantine came into power. Now that they were free and did not have to worry about secular society, they got to look inward and see that the Christian message, over time, had become confused, and that there was the need to end that confusion, to make sure that Christians around the world had a general proclamation they can use to help counter that confusion. Constantine saw the need for this because, having come to believe in the Christian faith, and the way he believed it could and would find its place in Rome, he saw the  infighting of Christians interfering not only with the Christian witness but also with society as a whole. Christians threatened the unity and peace he wanted to establish. To solve the problem he saw brewing,  he had Ossius of Cordova first investigate what was happening in Alexandria surrounding the conflict between the Patriarch Alexander of Alexandria and Arius, and later, to convene the Nicene Council in order to have Christians come together and affirm together what it is they believed about Jesus (that Jesus is the Christ, the Son of the Living God, the Son of the Father, eternally begotten of the Father before all ages, consubstantial or homoousios with the Father). However, it was not just the proclamation of the faith which was the concern of the council, it was Christian praxis, that is, there was the need to have some basic principles or disciplines expected to be followed around the world. The disciplines, to be sure, could be changed over time, and they were, but the principles behind them, just as the principles behind the Christological definition, remain.

The Nicene Creed itself was, at first, highly debated among Christians, even among those who agreed with its intended meaning because it introduced technical (philosophical) language into the official proclamation of the faith; that is, with the introduction of the word homoousios (consubstantial) into the creed, there were many who questioned what that would truly mean going forward, especially as the word could seem to imply the Father and the Son are one, not just in essence, but in person (as the word was previously used by modalists for that point). That is why we find a significant debate among those who agreed with the intention of the Nicene Creed as to the use of the homoousios, but the more they saw how it was employed to defend orthodoxy against Arianism, the more those who questioned its use began to accept it. Nonetheless, we find that what was begun at Nicea would need further exploration at later ecumenical councils, beginning with Constantinople, where the plurality in unity could be better explained by adapting another technical word to represent the plurality (hypostasis), which at the time of Nicea, was also used to represent the unity (at Nicea, it was understood as another term to use to describe the nature of God, while it would develop as a way to represent the persons of the Trinity).

Christians from the beginning have been challenged to find the right words to express their faith in Jesus. We still find it to be a challenge. We have been given contours to help us do so, contours which we should not neglect, as they will help us express our faith. But we should not see them as all that we can or should say. Jesus asked Peter who he said Jesus was, and Jesus asks us this as well. It is a question which we, likewise, should ask ourselves, as we look to and ponder Jesus and why we love him so much we identify ourselves with him and his mission to the world.

 

Stay in touch! Like A Little Bit of Nothing on Facebook.
If you liked what you read, please consider sharing it with your friends and family!

N.B.:  While I read comments to moderate them, I rarely respond to them. If I don’t respond to your comment directly, don’t assume I am unthankful for it. I appreciate it. But I want readers to feel free to ask questions, and hopefully, dialogue with each other. I have shared what I wanted to say, though some responses will get a brief reply by me, or, if I find it interesting and something I can engage fully, as the foundation for another post. I have had many posts inspired or improved upon thanks to my readers.

General Christian

History and Religion

Ecumenical Councils

Faith

Jesus

Nicea

Work

Fathers of the First Ecumenical Council

Jesus

Nicea

Previous Post



May 29, 2025

Jesus's Ascension: Bridging Heaven And Earth

Next Post



June 3, 2025 Addressing The Crises Of Contemporary Catholicism

Recent Comments

0 | Leave a Comment

"Gosh, did that hit the spot. I have been having great anxiety lately. And I ..."

Mark Wilson


Rejecting Doom: Christian Hope And Human ..."

"Justice and peace are two sides of the same coin. Where there is justice, there ..."

Dr.Cajetan Coelho


Justice First, Charity Beyond It: Serving ..."

"Thank you for your very, very powerful and very, very insightful analysis of the relationship ..."

alwayspuzzled


Justice First, Charity Beyond It: Serving ..."

"Given the amount of lethal malevolence that has prevailed in human history for the past ..."

alwayspuzzled


We Must Value Our Health


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Abortion Abraham abuse Aesthetics AI Aliens Ambrose Ancestors and Everything Andrew Angels Animals Anne Anthony Antisemitism apologetics Apophatic Apostle John Aquinas Artificial Intelligence Asanga Ascension Asceticism Assumption Atheism Attachment Augustine Authority Avarice Balthasar Baptism Beauty Biden birthright citizenship Bishops Black History Books Buddhism Bulgakov Byzantine Calendar C.S. Lewis Calcidius Catholic Catholicism Catholicism Celibacy Charity Chastity children Chrismation Christ Christmas Christology Church Climate Change Common Good Communion Confession Confirmation Conscience Constantine conventions conversion councils Covid Creation Cross Dead Death Death Penalty Debate Deception Demagogues Demons Desert Monks Desert Mothers Desire destruction development Dialogue Dignity Dionsyius Dionysius Discipline Diversity Division Doctor Who doctrine dogma Dormition Dualism Easter Easter Series Ecumenical Councils Ecumenism Education Election Empathy Environment Error Eschatology eschaton Eternity Ethics Eucharist Evangelism Eve Evil evolution Faeries Faith Fear femininity Ficino Florence Florensky Folktale Fools Forgiveness Freedom Future gender Gentile Gentiles Glory Gnostic God gods Good Samaritan Goodness Gospel Government Grace Great Fast Guns Hate healing Health Heaven Hell Hellenism Heresy Hierarchy Hildegard Hinduism History Holiness Holy Spirit Holy Week Hope Horror Human rights humanity Humility hypocrisy ICE icon icons Identification Identity Idol II Nicea Immigration incarnation Individualism Informal Reflections Inklings Intention Inter-Religious Interfaith Internet Interpretation Intrinsic evil Irenaeus Islam Israel Jacob Jerome Jesus Jews John Chrysostom John of Damascus John the Baptist Joseph Judaism justice Justification kenosis Kindnesss Kingdom of God Kingdom of Heaven Law Law of Moses Lazarus Leaf by Niggle Lent Lenten Reflection Liberation Theology Lies Life Listen Literature Liturgy locutions Logic Logos Love Marriage Martyrs Mary Mass Maximos The Confessor Meanness Meditation Mercy Middle Path Migrants Mind Miracles Miriam Morals Moses Movies Music Muslims Myths Names Nationalism Native Americans New Year Nicea Nicholas Nothing Novatian Obedience Occam's Razor Ordination Origen Original Sin Orthodox orthopraxis Pagans Palamas Palm Sunday Paradise Paschaltide Paul Peace Pentecost person Peter piety PKD Plato pluralism Plurality Poem Poetry Poiltics Politics Poor Pope Pope Francis Pope Leo XIV Post Office Prayer Pride Pro-life Prodigal Son propaganda Prophecy Prophets Providence Putin Racism Reading Reason Reflection Refugees Relationships Religion Religion Series Religious Liberty Repent Republicans Rest Resurrection Rich Rites Russia Sacraments Saints Salvation Salvian Santa Science Scripture Self-Giving Sexuality Sibyl Sick Silence Sin Singlehood Social Justice Society Sodom Solovyov Speculations Spiritual Reflection St. Cyril of Alexandria St. Justin Martyr Suffering Sunday of the Paralytic Man Sunday of the Samaritan Woman Superhero Supreme Court Teaching Technology Thanksgiving The Father the Universe Theological Reflection Theology Theosis Theotokos Thomas Timaeus Time Tolerenace Tolkien Tradition Transfiguration Trinity Trump Truth Uncategorized Unity Universities USCCB Value Vatican II Vegetarian Vices Violence Virtue Vocations War Water Welcome Wisdom Womanhood Women Work World View Worship Writing Zacchaeus

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Which high priest led in the reading and explaining of the Law to the people?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Zerubbabel Nehemiah Eliashib Ezra

Related posts from A Little Bit of Nothing

Catholic

Rejecting Doom: Christian Hope And Human Action

A Little Bit of Nothing

Catholic

How Right Belief Depends On Right Christian Living

A Little Bit of Nothing

Catholic

The Incarnation And The Christian Use Of Images

A Little Bit of Nothing

Catholic

How Christ Transformed The Meaning Of The Cross

A Little Bit of Nothing

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Catholic

Rejecting Doom: Christian Hope And Human Action

Christianity is a religion of hope. We are to have hope and...

It’s What Comes From Within Which Matters

One of the most difficult things for us to understand is why...

Why I Choose the Eucharist Over the Sermon

Choose the Eucharist, Not the Sermon What are we supposed to get...

5 Design Elements Found in Spiritually Rooted Homes

Putting Spirituality Into Home Decor Our homes are more than our living...

Credo: A Story of God Told with the...

About 10 years ago, I began to imagine a personal "Credo" that...

The Anatomy of Divine Revelation in Catholic Thought

The claim that God has made Himself known to human beings is...

view all Catholic blogs

What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube