Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Catholic
History and Religion
Embracing Inclusivity: Lessons From Peter and Paul

Embracing Inclusivity: Lessons From Peter and Paul

Last updated on: June 29, 2025 at 1:24 am by Henry Karlson

0 Comments

Embracing Inclusivity: Lessons From Peter and Paul 2025-06-29T01:24:49-05:00 Henry Karlson

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

George E. Koronaios: Icon of Sts. Peter and Paul / Wikimedia Commons

Peter and Paul are remembered for the way they helped establish and develop the structures of the institutional church, structures which were and continue to be vital for church, even if the structures can and should develop over time. Together, they also founded the See of Rome, and with it, the way for their combined authority to be preserved shared with their successors. Because of this, the See of Rome had the rights and privileges, indeed, missions of two apostles connected to it: it was given the leadership of the church through Peter, even as it was given the missionary spirit of Paul, making sure it would serve and guide Christian missions throughout the centuries. Nonetheless, when looking to their successors, the various bishops of Rome, they often found it difficult to balance out the charisms given to them by both Peter and Paul, even as it was often difficult for Peter and Paul to work together in harmony.

Peter and Paul were bound together by Christ. . It was through their love for Christ that they found a way to come together and form a bond of love which connected them, a bond which, like the bond of love found in the Trinity, had them go beyond themselves and look into the world in order to share that love with others. Both of them had their own problems, their own imperfections, even as every successor of theirs would be imperfect, and yet, despite themselves and their imperfections, they were able to complete their missions and hand over the future of the church to others; similarly, every one of their successors are expected to complete their own particular mission, serving Christ, the church, and the world, and in doing so, set the stage for those follow after them. No one who becomes a bishop of Rome is to look as the church as their own possession, but rather, they should view themselves as being the chief servants of the church.

It is important for us to recognize the greatness of Peter and Paul without romanticizing them, without, that is, ignoring their failures. Peter understood he was to spread the Gospel, but in doing so, he learned the church was meant to be inclusive in nature. While he taught what he learned, he often found it difficult to live it out. Peter’s biases and prejudices often got the best of him, which is why he needed Paul to remind him of what he knew was true, that he had to live out the implications of what he taught the church (through the inspiration of the Holy Spirit). Peter had to learn to eat with and associate with those who he would have once viewed as unclean but who were not thanks to their inclusion into the church. Paul, on the other hand, could be very hot-headed; he always thought he knew better than everyone else, and he could and would often act and react brashly, without thinking of what he was doing, which was the foundation for his attacks on Christ and Christ’s church before his conversion, but also, what made many of his friends, like Barnabas, find it extremely difficult to be with him for any length of time. Paul needed Peter to remind him that he was not an absolute authority in and of himself, and that he would have to learn from and accept the direction of others, direction which would help moderate Paul’s extreme tendencies.

By the time of their death, Peter and Paul had learned that their missions could only succeed when they came and worked together. They needed each other so that the imperfections of one could be countered and overcome by the gifts of the other. This is something which we need to learn in the church today. We need each other. We need to learn how to follow Peter and Paul by coming together, serving and helping, not only each other, but the world around us: together, we are strong, together, we get a sense of the mystical body of Christ at work in the world, and together, we will be able to do miracles. When we are divided, fighting against one another, selfishly looking after ourselves and our own private interests, defending our own biases and prejudices, we risk following the example of Judas who was unable to see beyond his vision of Christ. Judas’ betrayal was done, not because he denied Christ, but because he wanted to force Christ to become the messianic king Judas thought he was meant to be.

Peter and Paul followed Christ, and, in the end, they let themselves be stripped of everything as they took on the cross and followed it to their own execution. Peter had even been told by Christ what was to come, as to how he would in his old age be led by someone else who would take him where he did not want to go. Paul, on the other hand, had come to accept his own death, knowing that every day he remained alive, it gave Christ another day to live in and work with him, but when he died, that he would find himself glorified in and with Christ. What Paul learned was correct. After they were executed, Peter and Paul were glorified, but we find, just as Christ did not leave us after his ascension, so the spirit of Peter and Paul did not leave us after their death, as it is found residing in and with their successors in the See of Rome. Peter is said to speak through the papacy when there is extreme need for an authoritative response to some critical concern for the church community, such as we find happened when St. Leo the Great wrote his Tome. Peter was the first to use that authority when he declared Jesus was the Christ, and he also used it when he indicated that the institutional church’s mission extended to the Gentiles, revealing the church was meant to be inclusive in nature and not restricted to the Jews. The papacy, however, also speaks with and through Paul, especially when the Pope speaks on what is expected of us in regards the way we are to love one another, in regards the discipline expected to promote that love, indeed, in regards the way we are to follow through with the inclusive nature of the church by being open with and show love and care to those who are different from us, those who we might otherwise have had prejudicial thoughts against, thoughts which would have us be inhospitable to them. Paul’s intervention with Peter is the kind which we need to hear in the church today as too many follow Peter’s error and have become inhospitable to those deemed other.

It is because the papacy continues the legacy of Peter and Paul, and not just one or the other, it has a double-authority, the kind which is needed to prove its central place in the institutional church, and why, as St. Irenaeus said, all churches should look to and follow the authoritative guidance of the see of Rome. It is this double authority, and not just the authority of Peter, which needs to be brought forth, so that the See of Rome continues to act and promote the delicate balance which Peter and Paul finally found between themselves.

Stay in touch! Like A Little Bit of Nothing on Facebook.
If you liked what you read, please consider sharing it with your friends and family!

N.B.: While I read comments to moderate them, I rarely respond to them. If I don’t respond to your comment directly, don’t assume I am unthankful for it. I appreciate it. But I want readers to feel free to ask questions, and hopefully, dialogue with each other. I have shared what I wanted to say, though some responses will get a brief reply by me, or, if I find it interesting and something I can engage fully, as the foundation for another post. I have had many posts inspired or improved upon thanks to my readers.

General Christian

History and Religion

Previous Post

June 26, 2025

Heaven And The Kingdom Of God

Next Post

June 30, 2025 Prophets And Justice: A Reflection On Modern Injustices

Recent Comments

0 | Leave a Comment

"Gosh, did that hit the spot. I have been having great anxiety lately. And I ..."

Mark Wilson

Rejecting Doom: Christian Hope And Human ..."

"Justice and peace are two sides of the same coin. Where there is justice, there ..."

Dr.Cajetan Coelho

Justice First, Charity Beyond It: Serving ..."

"Thank you for your very, very powerful and very, very insightful analysis of the relationship ..."

alwayspuzzled

Justice First, Charity Beyond It: Serving ..."

"Given the amount of lethal malevolence that has prevailed in human history for the past ..."

alwayspuzzled

We Must Value Our Health

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Abortion Abraham abuse Aesthetics AI Aliens Ambrose Ancestors and Everything Andrew Angels Animals Anne Anthony Antisemitism apologetics Apophatic Apostle John Aquinas Artificial Intelligence Asanga Ascension Asceticism Assumption Atheism Attachment Augustine Authority Avarice Balthasar Baptism Beauty Biden birthright citizenship Bishops Black History Books Buddhism Bulgakov Byzantine Calendar C.S. Lewis Calcidius Catholic Catholicism Catholicism Celibacy Charity Chastity children Chrismation Christ Christmas Christology Church Climate Change Common Good Communion Confession Confirmation Conscience Constantine conventions conversion councils Covid Creation Cross Dead Death Death Penalty Debate Deception Demagogues Demons Desert Monks Desert Mothers Desire destruction development Dialogue Dignity Dionsyius Dionysius Discipline Diversity Division Doctor Who doctrine dogma Dormition Dualism Easter Easter Series Ecumenical Councils Ecumenism Education Election Empathy Environment Error Eschatology eschaton Eternity Ethics Eucharist Evangelism Eve Evil evolution Faeries Faith Fear femininity Ficino Florence Florensky Folktale Fools Forgiveness Freedom Future gender Gentile Gentiles Glory Gnostic God gods Good Samaritan Goodness Gospel Government Grace Great Fast Guns Hate healing Health Heaven Hell Hellenism Heresy Hierarchy Hildegard Hinduism History Holiness Holy Spirit Holy Week Hope Horror Human rights humanity Humility hypocrisy ICE icon icons Identification Identity Idol II Nicea Immigration incarnation Individualism Informal Reflections Inklings Intention Inter-Religious Interfaith Internet Interpretation Intrinsic evil Irenaeus Islam Israel Jacob Jerome Jesus Jews John Chrysostom John of Damascus John the Baptist Joseph Judaism justice Justification kenosis Kindnesss Kingdom of God Kingdom of Heaven Law Law of Moses Lazarus Leaf by Niggle Lent Lenten Reflection Liberation Theology Lies Life Listen Literature Liturgy locutions Logic Logos Love Marriage Martyrs Mary Mass Maximos The Confessor Meanness Meditation Mercy Middle Path Migrants Mind Miracles Miriam Morals Moses Movies Music Muslims Myths Names Nationalism Native Americans New Year Nicea Nicholas Nothing Novatian Obedience Occam's Razor Ordination Origen Original Sin Orthodox orthopraxis Pagans Palamas Palm Sunday Paradise Paschaltide Paul Peace Pentecost person Peter piety PKD Plato pluralism Plurality Poem Poetry Poiltics Politics Poor Pope Pope Francis Pope Leo XIV Post Office Prayer Pride Pro-life Prodigal Son propaganda Prophecy Prophets Providence Putin Racism Reading Reason Reflection Refugees Relationships Religion Religion Series Religious Liberty Repent Republicans Rest Resurrection Rich Rites Russia Sacraments Saints Salvation Salvian Santa Science Scripture Self-Giving Sexuality Sibyl Sick Silence Sin Singlehood Social Justice Society Sodom Solovyov Speculations Spiritual Reflection St. Cyril of Alexandria St. Justin Martyr Suffering Sunday of the Paralytic Man Sunday of the Samaritan Woman Superhero Supreme Court Teaching Technology Thanksgiving The Father the Universe Theological Reflection Theology Theosis Theotokos Thomas Timaeus Time Tolerenace Tolkien Tradition Transfiguration Trinity Trump Truth Uncategorized Unity Universities USCCB Value Vatican II Vegetarian Vices Violence Virtue Vocations War Water Welcome Wisdom Womanhood Women Work World View Worship Writing Zacchaeus

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz