Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Catholic
Politics and Religion
Nationalism In Christianity: Plurality Versus Supremacy

Nationalism In Christianity: Plurality Versus Supremacy

Last updated on: May 12, 2025 at 3:17 am by Henry Karlson

0 Comments

Nationalism In Christianity: Plurality Versus Supremacy 2025-05-12T03:17:11-05:00 Henry Karlson

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Jerjer: Colorful Array Of International Flags / pexels

Nationalism can have a few different connotations, some which are positive, and some which are not. It’s the negative ones which have taken over and become uses to represent all forms of nationalism, which is why, when reading documents in the past, we must be careful and not assume the negative kind is involved, especially if the nationalism in question is engaged in the defense and protection of one group of people from another. We can find Christians embracing both kinds of nationalism in their praxis, with some taking the positive forms of nationalism, those which ultimately promote some form of pluralism, while others take on the negative kind of nationalism, the kind which promotes a form of nationalistic supremacy. In modern times, when Christian nationalism is mentioned, it is the negative kind which is meant.

Thus, there are two major forms of nationalism Christians have embraced throughout history. The first kind embraces the plurality of nationalities in the world, looking to promote the unique cultural expressions which emerge from those nationalities, working to bring them together in a harmonious unity in diversity which does not look for ways to promote one as being superior to others. The other engages nationalistic divisions and looks at them in a hierarchical viewpoint, believing some nations and nationalities are superior to others, with one (or a few) deemed as the best and should hold power and authority over the rest.

Plurality, and the differences which plurality represents, does not have to end up being divisive; it can represent a good, as plurality is a way for humanity to represent the divine image, which is itself one (in nature) and plural (in persons). Similarly, as the divine nature infinitely transcends humanity, it can be conventionally expressed in an infinite number of ways, so that every nation, every culture, can be said to demonstrate some quality of the divine nature, with the unity of all these nations helping point to and express the divine nature greater than as it is found in any one particular nation or culture. “Every manifestation of God to man (theophany) bears the imprint of the circumstances in which it was given, especially by the national character of the people who received it.” [1] The plurality of nations, as they emerged in world history, is not necessarily a bad thing, so long as the national distinctions are seen as logical distinctions which do not undermine the unity of humanity; the way we are to do that is to make sure no nation, no culture is viewed as better or superior to others: they are all equal in dignity.

Thus, the positive form of nationalism, one where every nation is seen to have its own inherent worth, and the people within that nation are to be protected from undue subjugation (such as through colonialism or racist ideologies), is something which can be affirmed by Christians. This is especially true if nations come together, look at each other in wonder, and share with each their particular gifts so that they can all benefit from the good which is found in each of them. If one nation, one culture is being oppressed, those from it can and should stand together, promote the good of their culture, and seek not just equality, but equity for what they have experienced. This is what lies behind Gandhi, Badshah Khan, and their resistance to British rule, but it is also what lay behind civil rights protests (Black Theology), and Native American movements in the United States, and this is why, in those circumstances, we will find some of them talking about the good of nationalism: they are talking about the good of protecting and promoting the dignity of their own national culture which is being repressed if not actively being destroyed.

The negative form of nationalism is found when the positive elements of nationalism are distorted and used to promote division in humanity, and through that division, establish that one nation or culture is superior to all others. This leads to the notion of a national or cultural supremacy; when that supremacy is rejected, those who hold it try to act as if their cultural value is being undermined or rejected (abusing the way positive forms of nationalism seek to protect the value of every nation and culture in the world). That is, they will try to use the same arguments as the positive form of nationalism, but seek a different end, one which would not allow others to have the same rights as they do. As Vladimir Solovyov noted, this negative kind of nationalism demonstrates itself in and through egotism, an egotism which reflects in the culture the arrogance and problems which flow from all such egotism:

The more a certain nation is devoted to the universal (supranational) idea, the stronger, the better, the more significant it is itself. Therefore, I am decidedly an enemy of negative nationalism or national egoism, the self-deification of nationality, which in essence is just as disgusting as one’s own self-identification. I take the second command unconditionally: do not make idols for yourselves, neither any likeness, etc. [2]

If left unchecked, this form of nationalism becomes destructive on the world scene, as it begins to believe those coming from it have the right to control the world, and those who do not listen to and obey they, can be and should be punished or destroyed.

Christ’s call for us to love our neighbor as ourselves is true, not only on the personal level, but also on the national and international level. We should look to the world and the plurality of cultures within, and find the good in all of them. This is not to say everything about every culture is good, because, obviously, this is not so. We can and should distinguish the good from the bad, that is, the good contained in every culture from the corruption (and sin) which can be found in all of them. Christians are meant to free that good from the evil and then let it flourish (when they do this, it is often described as “baptizing” the various cultures of the world, where they purify the cultures and help give them the grace they need to perfect their innate goodness and the gifts which they have been given).

When Christians seek to eliminate and destroy all cultural differences, using one cultural norm as universal, they lose sense of the plurality which exists in the world and the good which is found in that plurality. This is what happens when so-called “Christian nationalism” develops. “Christian nationalism” engages the negative form of nationalism (as described by Solovyov); it ends up confusing various aspects of a nation and its culture with Christianity itself, so that if anyone is seen contending against that nationalistic ideology, they are seen as contending against Christianity itself. Such nationalism is not Christian in character, and yet, because it tries to call itself Christian, it tries to use religious liberty as a way to promote itself in the world while denying such liberty to others. Historically, Christian nationalism tends to promote racial superiority, indeed, white supremacy, sometimes denying the humanity of non-whites. Such a form of Christianity must be rejected, indeed, viewed as a heretical; it takes elements of the Christian tradition, various doctrinal and dogmatic statements, in order to view itself as Christian, but it finds its center not in the teaching of Christ and Christ’s call for brotherly and sisterly love, but in promoting the national character they believe is superior, and in doing so, they follow Judas who, as Bulgakov suggested, saw himself as being a follower of Christ while not being able to overcome his own nationalistic ideology:

Into personal love for Him he placed all his nationalistic fanaticism, his ideal, for which he lived. He saw Him in the light of the ideal, of those revolutionary-apocalyptic aspirations, and only in that sense did he took on His work. He did not understand his Teacher, and not only was he not aware of his inability to understand, but he sincerely wanted to change His path, to correct His ideas and actions. [3]

Christianity, therefore, can embrace the form of positive nationalism which promotes pluralism, and with us, unity (or inclusion) in and with diversity, a unity which looks for the good of all and not just some. A way to see this form of nationalism is through an analogy of St. John of Kronstadt who said humanity could be seen as one great tree with many branches: “The human race is one great tree of God, spreading and growing over the whole earth, and covering the whole earth with its branches.”[4] The tree of humanity flourishes and brings beauty into the world by developing various branches or nationalities with distinct character and gifts. The branches are to be respected and protected, and this is done by recognizing how they come together as one (in one humanity). This is important, because Christianity always looks to overcome the divisions created by sin, leading to the way humanity can become and should return to its integral unity in Christ:

For numerous and of almost infinite number are the men, women, and children who are distinct from one another and vastly different by birth and appearance, by nationality and language, by customs and age, by opinions and skills, by manners and habits, by pursuits and studies, and still again by reputation, fortune, characteristics, and connections: All are born into the Church and through it are reborn and recreated in the Spirit. To all in equal measures it gives and bestows one divine form and designation, to be Christ’s and to carry his name. [5]

Christianity teaches the sinful divisions in the world, the kind which separates nations from nations, viewing some as superior to others, is the opposite of what Christ seeks to bring about; the division is the result of sin (represented in the story of the Tower of Babel), and the restoration of humanity is therefore seen as overcoming that sin (which is prefigured at Pentecost). Christians who want to embrace nationalistic plurality and inculturation as a result of it are following the way of Christ, while those who want to keep to the sinful divisions and have nation fight against nation for superiority, subvert and resist the work of Christ. As long as Christian nationalism, and its divisive nature, is treated as Christian, we will find many who call themselves Christians are no longer the salt of the earth, protecting it and the people on it as they should, but rather, a part of the problem, a problem which Christians must acknowledge and overcome so they can then better present Christ’s message of love to the world.

[1] Vladimir Solovyey, God, Man & The Church. The Spiritual Foundations Of Life. Trans. Donald Attwater (Cambridge: James Clarke & Co., 2016), 65.

[2] Vladimir Soloviev, The Karamazov Correspondence. Letters of Vladimir S. Soloviev. Trans. and ed. Vladimir Wozniuk (Boston: Academic Studies Press, 2019), 66[ Letter to Alexander A. Kireev 1883].

[3] Sergius Bulgakov, Judas Iscariot – Apostle – Betrayer. Trans. Mike Whitton (No City Listed: Independently Published, 2023), 22.

[4] St John of Kronstadt, My Life in Christ. Trans. E.E. Goulaeff (London: Cassel and Company, Ltd., 1897; repr. Jordanville, NY: Holy Trinity Monastery, 2000), 86.

[5] St. Maximus the Confessor, “The Church’s Mystagogy” in Maximus the Confessor: Selected Writings. Trans. George C. Berthold (New York: Paulist Press, 1985), 187.

Stay in touch! Like A Little Bit of Nothing on Facebook.
If you liked what you read, please consider sharing it with your friends and family!

N.B.: While I read comments to moderate them, I rarely respond to them. If I don’t respond to your comment directly, don’t assume I am unthankful for it. I appreciate it. But I want readers to feel free to ask questions, and hopefully, dialogue with each other. I have shared what I wanted to say, though some responses will get a brief reply by me, or, if I find it interesting and something I can engage fully, as the foundation for another post. I have had many posts inspired or improved upon thanks to my readers.

General Christian

Politics and Religion

History and Religion

Previous Post

May 11, 2025

From Paralysis To Freedom: The Healing Power Of Christ

Next Post

May 14, 2025 My Initial Thoughts On Pope Leo XIV

Recent Comments

0 | Leave a Comment

"First things first is the easiest way forward. "If someone is bleeding profusely, we must ..."

Dr.Cajetan Coelho

Why We Must Embrace Empathy, Sympathy ..."

"Gosh, did that hit the spot. I have been having great anxiety lately. And I ..."

Mark Wilson

Rejecting Doom: Christian Hope And Human ..."

"Justice and peace are two sides of the same coin. Where there is justice, there ..."

Dr.Cajetan Coelho

Justice First, Charity Beyond It: Serving ..."

"Thank you for your very, very powerful and very, very insightful analysis of the relationship ..."

alwayspuzzled

Justice First, Charity Beyond It: Serving ..."

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Abortion Abraham abuse Aesthetics AI Aliens Ambrose Ancestors and Everything Andrew Angels Animals Anne Anthony Antisemitism apologetics Apophatic Apostle John Aquinas Artificial Intelligence Asanga Ascension Asceticism Assumption Atheism Attachment Augustine Authority Avarice Balthasar Baptism Beauty Biden birthright citizenship Bishops Black History Books Buddhism Bulgakov Byzantine Calendar C.S. Lewis Calcidius Catholic Catholicism Catholicism Celibacy Charity Chastity children Chrismation Christ Christmas Christology Church Climate Change Common Good Communion Confession Confirmation Conscience Constantine conventions conversion councils Covid Creation Cross Dead Death Death Penalty Debate Deception Demagogues Demons Desert Monks Desert Mothers Desire destruction development Dialogue Dignity Dionsyius Dionysius Discipline Diversity Division Doctor Who doctrine dogma Dormition Dualism Easter Easter Series Ecumenical Councils Ecumenism Education Election Empathy Environment Error Eschatology eschaton Eternity Ethics Eucharist Evangelism Eve Evil evolution Faeries Faith Fear femininity Ficino Florence Florensky Folktale Fools Forgiveness Freedom Future gender Gentile Gentiles Glory Gnostic God gods Good Samaritan Goodness Gospel Government Grace Great Fast Guns Halloween Hate healing Health Heaven Hell Hellenism Heresy Hierarchy Hildegard Hinduism History Holiness Holy Spirit Holy Week Hope Horror Human rights humanity Humility hypocrisy ICE icon icons Identification Identity Idol II Nicea Immigration incarnation Individualism Informal Reflections Inklings Intention Inter-Religious Interfaith Internet Interpretation Intrinsic evil Irenaeus Islam Israel Jacob Jerome Jesus Jews John Chrysostom John of Damascus John the Baptist Joseph Judaism justice Justification kenosis Kindnesss Kingdom of God Kingdom of Heaven Law Law of Moses Lazarus Leaf by Niggle Lent Lenten Reflection Liberation Theology Lies Life Listen Literature Liturgy locutions Logic Logos Love Marriage Martyrs Mary Mass Maximos The Confessor Meanness Meditation Mercy Middle Path Migrants Mind Miracles Miriam Morals Moses Movies Music Muslims Myths Names Nationalism Native Americans New Year Nicea Nicholas Nothing Novatian Obedience Occam's Razor Ordination Origen Original Sin Orthodox orthopraxis Pagans Palamas Palm Sunday Paradise Paschaltide Paul Peace Pentecost person Peter piety PKD Plato pluralism Plurality Poem Poetry Poiltics Politics Poor Pope Pope Francis Pope Leo XIV Post Office Prayer Pride Pro-life Prodigal Son propaganda Prophecy Prophets Providence Putin Racism Reading Reason Reflection Refugees Relationships Religion Religion Series Religious Liberty Repent Republicans Rest Resurrection Rich Rites Russia Sacraments Saints Salvation Salvian Santa Science Scripture Self-Giving Sexuality Sibyl Sick Silence Sin Singlehood Social Justice Society Sodom Solovyov Speculations Spiritual Reflection St. Cyril of Alexandria St. Justin Martyr Suffering Sunday of the Paralytic Man Sunday of the Samaritan Woman Superhero Supreme Court Teaching Technology Thanksgiving The Father the Universe Theological Reflection Theology Theosis Theotokos Thomas Timaeus Time Tolerenace Tolkien Tradition Transfiguration Trinity Trump Truth Uncategorized Unity Universities USCCB Vainglory Value Vatican II Vegetarian Vices Violence Virtue Vocations War Water Welcome Wisdom Womanhood Women Work World View Worship Writing Zacchaeus

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz