Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

henrykarlson

Faith, Fidelity, And Love

Last updated on: September 4, 2024 at 3:30 am   by Henry Karlson

0 Comments

Faith, Fidelity, And Love 2024-09-04T03:30:13-05:00 Henry Karlson

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Christian Faith Should Be About Following Christ Not Just An Intellectual Belief. Image from GFreihalter: Bayerisches Nationalmuseum in München, Scheibe mit Christuskopf aus der Minoritenkirche in Regensburg, um 1350 / Wikimedia Commons

One of the things Christians must realize is that their doctrines and dogmas, however important they are, can become distorted when they are written down. This is because many, if not most, Christians end up thinking what is to believed is found in the letter of such written declarations instead of the spirit which lay behind their creation. This has never been the intention of those who wrote them down. Christians must learn and engage the  intended meaning behind them, the meaning which transcends the letter, and when they do so, they must end up finding out the way dogmatic and doctrinal declarations should affect the way they live. A life of faith is more than just a life of learning the written declarations of the dogmas and doctrines of the church and believing them, but a life which is lived in respect to what they intend, for his is how Christians are to act in the way God wants them to act:

But between God and human beings the symbol of faith is confirmed by faith alone; it is entrusted not to the letter, but to the spirit; it is entrusted and committed to heart, not to a sheet of paper, since divine credit has no need of any human warranty. [1]

St. Peter Chrysologus, speaking about how the Christian faith is confirmed by the “faith alone,” must not be misunderstood as if he were suggesting Christians are expected to only believe in the doctrines and dogmas of the faith without doing anything more; rather, he understood faith in a holistic sense,  one which sees both belief and praxis as being necessary for one who lives in and with faith. To pit “ faith alone” against “works” is to misunderstand what faith is about, for how can one be said to be faithful if they do not live what they say they believe? When “faith alone” is understood as the ability to know and believe the right dogmatic declarations, instead of being faithful to God, “faith alone” leads to infidelity as Christians think whatever they do will not affect their salvation.

The Christian who is faithful will love God and what God has revealed in Jesus, including and especially, the way of life presented to us by him. As long as the faith is reduced to the rote memorization and belief of declaratory statements about the faith, and the ability to argue in support of those statements on the most simple, literal level, the Christian faith is not going to be very appealing to non-Christian. Non-believers will find the way Christians are not concerned about the common good to not only be contemptible, but they will see how the Christian faith can end up being used for an evil ideology.

Often, more often than many would like to admit, it is not the presentation of those apologetic arguments which suggest the truth of the Christian faith which leads to people being converted,  but rather those who embrace the transcendent mystery of the faith and engage it, living it out in a positive way throughout their lives, that leads people to find Christianity attractive and lead people to truly consider what Christ has to say. Gerald O’Collins understood this, which is why he could say:

Experience constantly shows how the mere force of argument is never enough by itself to convert someone to the Christian faith. If the (historical) evidence were sufficient to establish or conclusively confirm resurrection belief, such belief should be utterly convincing to all those willing to weight the evidence and draw the obvious conclusions from it. [2]

Certainly, it is important to be able to present the faith to others, to give explanations for Christian doctrine, but it is also important to realize we cannot argue with people and think they will come to a long-lasting, sustainable faith due to those arguments alone. Some might come to believe for a time, but when they find reasons to doubt the arguments, if they have not gone beyond the rationalism inherent with apologetics, that is, if they have not moved beyond a purely intellectual engagement of the faith, their faith will likely falter and they will turn elsewhere for their understanding of the truth. We can see this happening all the time with those involved in apologetics, as many of them can be seen going from one faith tradition to faith tradition, sometimes from one Christian ecclesiastical communion to another, but also, sometimes from one religion to another (such as from Christian to Jew or Muslim). Each time they do that, they say they have found (often, through their reason) the truth faith, and they end up continuing to engage in apologetics, but now hoping to convince people to follow them in their transfer of their faith. Many times, indeed, perhaps most times, their arguments end up being attempts to reassure themselves that they finally have found the true faith, but the more they argue with others, the more doubts they will have, until at last, they will abandon their faith and move on to  something else, either another religion, or pure skepticism.

So long as Christianity is treated merely as a rationalistic philosophy, the imperfections contained in every philosophical exploration, as every philosophical exploration comes from a limited perspective and appropriation of the truth, will end up undermining the Christian faith itself. This is not to say philosophy is unimportant,  but it the domain of philosophy must be understood, as philosophy is able to provide a far more limited presentation of the truth than religion as religion deals with and engages, and indeed, receives, transcendent truths while philosophy deals with what can be conformed to the human mind. To be sure, there are crossovers between the two, as philosophy and what it discerns can be used to help explain religious doctrines, that is, philosophy can be said to serve as a “handmaiden to theology,” even as what is discovered by religion can and will be used as givens which philosophers than will use as they engage their philosophical analysis. Likewise, some philosophers and theologians are both philosophers and theologians at the same time (as, for example, we find happening with many  influential figures in the Platonic tradition such as Iamblichus and Proclus). Nonetheless, in general, philosophy does not deal with revelation as it does not know how to properly appropriate it with its own categories of thought. For philosophy deals with ideas  (and perhaps, the implications of those ideas) while religion is a way of life, with Christianity being a religion of the  incarnation, and the way God works with and through the incarnation to transform the world and make it better. Christians are to engage God’s work with the world, to help it along. If  Christians become hyper-focused on the intellectual elements of the faith without engaging the world with grace and love, they will not present the world the sign which God wants them to show the world:

But the true sign of a Christian is the following: to feed the hungry and give drink to the thirsty, to endure hunger and thirst, to be poor in spirit, humble and contemptible in one’s own eyes, and for a man to beseech God both day and night that he might stand firmly in the truth. [3]

This is the sign Christians should give to the world. It should not be the sign of someone who  goes out into the world to debate or judge everyone who they come across. Rather, it should be the sign of love, where the Christian uses love as the foundation for their engagement with others. Those involved with the intellectual tradition of the Christian faith, those who explore and try to express the doctrines and dogmas of the faith, must also be involved in showing how that tradition reflects the praxis of the faith, how it connects to Christ’s teaching of love. Those who limit themselves to the letter are unable to do that, while those who are able to engage the spirit of what is written will find they will be embraced by the Spirit, the Spirit of love, who will then guide and show them the fullness of the truth, a truth which transcends simple declarations of the truth.  They will then understand what it means to say man is not made for the Sabbath, but the Sabbath for man, as they will understand this represents the value of the Christian faith and its teachings as a whole: the faith. It is all meant for the betterment of humanity (and the world at large). Reading and exploring Christian doctrine without such a hermeneutic will have Christians think humanity is made for Christian doctrines and dogmas in such a way they are meant to learn and follow them according to the letter in which they have been declared. This undermines the value which Christ showed is inherent in humanity, and Christians will find themselves ultimately challenging Christ and his work in the incarnation similar to the way many in the time of his temporal ministry did. They will try to promote the faith in a form which ultimately destroys the faith, something which we can see is happening all around us as we find more and more people rejecting Christianity because those who preach the Christian faith have lost sight of the true faith and the mercy, grace, and love which it is meant to bring to the world.


[1] St. Peter Chrysologus, Selected Sermons. Volume 2. Trans. William B Palardy (Washington, DC: CUA Press, 2004),240 [Sermon 62].

[2] Gerald O’Collins, SJ, Easter Faith(New York: Paulist Press, 2003), 49.

[3] Saint Isaac the Syrian, The Ascetical Homilies of Saint Isaac the Syrian. Trans. Monks of the Holy Transfiguration Monastery. Rev. 2nd ed (Boston, MA: Holy Transfiguration Monastery, 2011), 565 [First Epistle of Saint Macarius of Alexandria On the Christian Discipline, not St Isaac].

General Christian

apologetics

doctrine

Faith

Love

Apologetics

Doctrine

Faith

Love

Previous Post



September 3, 2024

PRS* XVI The Rings Of Power

Next Post



September 6, 2024 Knowing Others Through Praise

Recent Comments

0 | Leave a Comment

"Gosh, did that hit the spot. I have been having great anxiety lately. And I ..."

Mark Wilson


Rejecting Doom: Christian Hope And Human ..."

"Justice and peace are two sides of the same coin. Where there is justice, there ..."

Dr.Cajetan Coelho


Justice First, Charity Beyond It: Serving ..."

"Thank you for your very, very powerful and very, very insightful analysis of the relationship ..."

alwayspuzzled


Justice First, Charity Beyond It: Serving ..."

"Given the amount of lethal malevolence that has prevailed in human history for the past ..."

alwayspuzzled


We Must Value Our Health


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Abortion Abraham abuse Aesthetics AI Aliens Ambrose Ancestors and Everything Andrew Angels Animals Anne Anthony Antisemitism apologetics Apophatic Apostle John Aquinas Artificial Intelligence Asanga Ascension Asceticism Assumption Atheism Attachment Augustine Authority Avarice Balthasar Baptism Beauty Biden birthright citizenship Bishops Black History Books Buddhism Bulgakov Byzantine Calendar C.S. Lewis Calcidius Catholic Catholicism Catholicism Celibacy Charity Chastity children Chrismation Christ Christmas Christology Church Climate Change Common Good Communion Confession Confirmation Conscience Constantine conventions conversion councils Covid Creation Cross Dead Death Death Penalty Debate Deception Demagogues Demons Desert Monks Desert Mothers Desire destruction development Dialogue Dignity Dionsyius Dionysius Discipline Diversity Division Doctor Who doctrine dogma Dormition Dualism Easter Easter Series Ecumenical Councils Ecumenism Education Election Empathy Environment Error Eschatology eschaton Eternity Ethics Eucharist Evangelism Eve Evil evolution Faeries Faith Fear femininity Ficino Florence Florensky Folktale Fools Forgiveness Freedom Future gender Gentile Gentiles Glory Gnostic God gods Good Samaritan Goodness Gospel Government Grace Great Fast Guns Hate healing Health Heaven Hell Hellenism Heresy Hierarchy Hildegard Hinduism History Holiness Holy Spirit Holy Week Hope Horror Human rights humanity Humility hypocrisy ICE icon icons Identification Identity Idol II Nicea Immigration incarnation Individualism Informal Reflections Inklings Intention Inter-Religious Interfaith Internet Interpretation Intrinsic evil Irenaeus Islam Israel Jacob Jerome Jesus Jews John Chrysostom John of Damascus John the Baptist Joseph Judaism justice Justification kenosis Kindnesss Kingdom of God Kingdom of Heaven Law Law of Moses Lazarus Leaf by Niggle Lent Lenten Reflection Liberation Theology Lies Life Listen Literature Liturgy locutions Logic Logos Love Marriage Martyrs Mary Mass Maximos The Confessor Meanness Meditation Mercy Middle Path Migrants Mind Miracles Miriam Morals Moses Movies Music Muslims Myths Names Nationalism Native Americans New Year Nicea Nicholas Nothing Novatian Obedience Occam's Razor Ordination Origen Original Sin Orthodox orthopraxis Pagans Palamas Palm Sunday Paradise Paschaltide Paul Peace Pentecost person Peter piety PKD Plato pluralism Plurality Poem Poetry Poiltics Politics Poor Pope Pope Francis Pope Leo XIV Post Office Prayer Pride Pro-life Prodigal Son propaganda Prophecy Prophets Providence Putin Racism Reading Reason Reflection Refugees Relationships Religion Religion Series Religious Liberty Repent Republicans Rest Resurrection Rich Rites Russia Sacraments Saints Salvation Salvian Santa Science Scripture Self-Giving Sexuality Sibyl Sick Silence Sin Singlehood Social Justice Society Sodom Solovyov Speculations Spiritual Reflection St. Cyril of Alexandria St. Justin Martyr Suffering Sunday of the Paralytic Man Sunday of the Samaritan Woman Superhero Supreme Court Teaching Technology Thanksgiving The Father the Universe Theological Reflection Theology Theosis Theotokos Thomas Timaeus Time Tolerenace Tolkien Tradition Transfiguration Trinity Trump Truth Uncategorized Unity Universities USCCB Value Vatican II Vegetarian Vices Violence Virtue Vocations War Water Welcome Wisdom Womanhood Women Work World View Worship Writing Zacchaeus

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What is the distinctive cup used in receiving communion in many traditions?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Jug Bowl Plate Chalice

Related posts from A Little Bit of Nothing

Catholic

Rejecting Doom: Christian Hope And Human Action

A Little Bit of Nothing

Catholic

How Right Belief Depends On Right Christian Living

A Little Bit of Nothing

Catholic

The Unknown God Revealed In Christ

A Little Bit of Nothing

Catholic

Body, Mind, and Soul: Why Christians Must Value...

A Little Bit of Nothing

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Catholic

Rejecting Doom: Christian Hope And Human Action

Christianity is a religion of hope. We are to have hope and...

It’s What Comes From Within Which Matters

One of the most difficult things for us to understand is why...

Why I Choose the Eucharist Over the Sermon

Choose the Eucharist, Not the Sermon What are we supposed to get...

5 Design Elements Found in Spiritually Rooted Homes

Putting Spirituality Into Home Decor Our homes are more than our living...

Credo: A Story of God Told with the...

About 10 years ago, I began to imagine a personal "Credo" that...

The Anatomy of Divine Revelation in Catholic Thought

The claim that God has made Himself known to human beings is...

view all Catholic blogs

What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube