Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Catholic
Politics and Religion
PRS V: The Chaos And Destruction Of The Supreme Court

PRS V: The Chaos And Destruction Of The Supreme Court

Last updated on: July 1, 2024 at 10:30 am by Henry Karlson

0 Comments

PRS V: The Chaos And Destruction Of The Supreme Court 2024-07-01T10:30:06-05:00 Henry Karlson

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Fred Schilling: Formal group photograph of the Supreme Court as it was been comprised on June 30, 2022 after Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson joined the Court / Wikimedia Commons

I was not surprised with the decisions made by the United States Supreme Court last week (the week of June 16 – 22 2024); indeed, I expected them based upon the known ideological influences affecting most of its current members. They have proven themselves to hold no consistent hermeneutic by which they decide their cases, which is why precedent means nothing to them; rather, they have a conclusion which they want to reach, and will justify it any way they can, even if it goes against principles they previously said they follow. This is why debating their arguments, showing the errors of them, while important ( to explain where they went wrong), is not enough. Many of the justices show they do not care for any theoretical consistency. While, it is true, they often promote what is called “originalism,” we need to realize they do so only because they see it as a tool for their own power and authority, and not because originalism makes sense or will be able to answer questions which come before them today. It is a rhetorical tool at best, one which is used to undermine the progress that happened in the 20th century because they do not like the results of that progress. However, if originalism gets in the way of their own desires, they will either ignore it or try some sort of rhetorical flourish to try to suggest they somehow are following what originalism would allow; this is exactly what is being done with the so-called “major questions” doctrine which many conservative members of the Supreme Court now promote – it is a very modern approach, one which has considerable logical flaws, and yet it is one which can be used to deny precedent and undermine the authority of the executive branch to properly enforce the law when the executive branch follows principles the same members of the Supreme Court despise. The “major questions” doctrine is a recent innovation, and does not properly connect with originalism, though many, who like its use and want to associate themselves with originalism, are trying to find a way to justify the connection, all to hide from themselves the reality is that they have no consistent legal theory they follow.

What is clear is that many in the Supreme Court make decisions long before they hear a case, decisions which they then try to find a way to justify. They dislike the social safety net, and the authority administrators need to protect and defend it, and so they know they have to find a way to justify weakening that power (which is what the “majors questions” doctrine does). What we really have is a will to power, a will to make what they want happen to happen. Once we understand that, we will finally know what we are dealing with and why arguing against their decisions and the justifications they use will not fix the problem, as we get stuck in a distraction, that is, an argument which the members of the Supreme Court do not care about themselves.

So, what did we see happen? First, they virtually approved the use of bribery (by saying what is being given are not bribes, merely gifts), even as members of the Supreme Court have been shown to be receiving such gifts themselves (explaining why they would vote in favor for it). But those who have given such “gifts” desire those who receive them to rule in certain ways, and that is exactly what saw happened next with the destruction of the Chevron deference, a long-established precedent which gave administrative bodies the common sense authority to interpret the laws they are executing in order to do their job. Now, as the executive branch relies on such administrators to enforce laws, it will find it impossible to truly do so, as no law is self-interpreting: every law requires the one executing it to interpret it to know how to execute it. Since administrative bodies are now told they cannot interpret the laws they are meant to execute, how can they act upon any law? It is one thing to say administrative agencies can err in their interpretations, and when that happens, the court can overturn their decision, but it is another thing to say they are not allowed to make any interpretation themselves, especially when there are questions as to how the law should be applied. To have to wait for Congress to give an answer when questions arise, and refine the laws to answer those questions, or to wait for the courts to give an interpretation when Congress does not do so, will leave the country is chaos, and with that chaos, those who are meant to be stopped from harming society will have free reign to do as they wish.

The Supreme Court has told us that the common good be damned because they did not like the power the executive branch needed to administer the laws. Now, federal agencies will find it difficult at best, impossible at worst, to help protect society from those who would harm the common good – indeed, that seems to be the point of the decision. Members of the Supreme Court (and those giving them gifts) hated the fact there were all kinds of regulations to follow, and instead of working to change the regulations (if needed) they wanted to make sure the executive branch had little to no power to enforce them.

The future of humanity, not just the United States, has now been put in jeopardy because members of the Supreme Court wanted to dismantle the authority of agencies like the EPA, as the federal government has been told it has little power left to safeguard the environment. Woe to those who do evil and call it good, indeed! I fear, are going to further create our own hell on earth, just as Scripture indicated the people of Sodom and Gomorrah did with their selfishness and disdain for the common good in their time! Indeed, the other major decision of the Supreme Court this week exemplifies the spirit of Sodom and Gomorrah as it said that it is not cruel and unusual punishment for cities to punish homeless people who have no place to live and rest but public lands, saying that cities can make it illegal for homeless people to rest on such spaces without giving them a place where they can safely go. It is not difficult to see where this is heading: homeless people, who have no money, will be fined, and when they are not able to pay their fines, will be arrested and jailed, and likely, in jail, will be forced to work off their debt (at such a low wage that they will be virtual slaves). The sin of Sodom and Gomorrah was their lack of hospitality, that is, their lack of charity to those in need, and now the Supreme Court has said the United States can become one giant Sodom and Gomorrah . If we were not concerned about the way we were making hell on earth due to our environmental policies, we should be concerned about the way we are making hell on earth due to the way we turn against social justice and the basic expectations society has to take care of everyone.

If this were not bad enough, we were also shown the way the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB), influenced by many of the same people who were giving gifts to Supreme Court justices, has decided to severely restrict its ministries dealing with peace and social justice as well as the Catholic Campaign for Human Development (CCHD). When the USCCB is needed to be a voice for the poor and needy, for those who are being disenfranchised by the Supreme Court, it is found to be destroying its ability to speak and act on such matters. What is worse, many of those who are involved with such disenfranchisement are themselves Catholics, and should be warned about the evil they are doing, and yet the USCCB is not doing so, indeed, it is undermining its ability to do so, showing us how it is neglecting its duty, not only to the poor, but to the rich and powerful.

I cannot state with certainty what will happen in the future, but, I can make a guess: the United States, indeed, the world, seems to be regressing, where a few people have wealth and power and everyone else, lacking such, will find their livelihood and dignity will be put at risk. The lack of regulations in the 19th century and the early 20th century led to many needless deaths; it appears the same will happen in our immediate future, but now, thanks to the Supreme Court, the government will have less power to deal with the problem as it has made sure that we, as a society, will not have the means to correct our course when the common good is destroyed.

Stay in touch! Like A Little Bit of Nothing on Facebook.
If you liked what you read, please consider sharing it with your friends and family!

N.B.: While I read comments to moderate them, I rarely respond to them. If I don’t respond to your comment directly, don’t assume I am unthankful for it. I appreciate it. But I want readers to feel free to ask questions, and hopefully, dialogue with each other. I have shared what I wanted to say, though some responses will get a brief reply by me, or, if I find it interesting and something I can engage fully, as the foundation for another post. I have had many posts inspired or improved upon thanks to my readers.

Progressive Christian

Politics and Religion

Previous Post

June 30, 2024

Becoming More Like God

Next Post

July 3, 2024 Learn From the Past And Transform The Present

Recent Comments

0 | Leave a Comment

"Gosh, did that hit the spot. I have been having great anxiety lately. And I ..."

Mark Wilson

Rejecting Doom: Christian Hope And Human ..."

"Justice and peace are two sides of the same coin. Where there is justice, there ..."

Dr.Cajetan Coelho

Justice First, Charity Beyond It: Serving ..."

"Thank you for your very, very powerful and very, very insightful analysis of the relationship ..."

alwayspuzzled

Justice First, Charity Beyond It: Serving ..."

"Given the amount of lethal malevolence that has prevailed in human history for the past ..."

alwayspuzzled

We Must Value Our Health

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Abortion Abraham abuse Aesthetics AI Aliens Ambrose Ancestors and Everything Andrew Angels Animals Anne Anthony Antisemitism apologetics Apophatic Apostle John Aquinas Artificial Intelligence Asanga Ascension Asceticism Assumption Atheism Attachment Augustine Authority Avarice Balthasar Baptism Beauty Biden birthright citizenship Bishops Black History Books Buddhism Bulgakov Byzantine Calendar C.S. Lewis Calcidius Catholic Catholicism Catholicism Celibacy Charity Chastity children Chrismation Christ Christmas Christology Church Climate Change Common Good Communion Confession Confirmation Conscience Constantine conventions conversion councils Covid Creation Cross Dead Death Death Penalty Debate Deception Demagogues Demons Desert Monks Desert Mothers Desire destruction development Dialogue Dignity Dionsyius Dionysius Discipline Diversity Division Doctor Who doctrine dogma Dormition Dualism Easter Easter Series Ecumenical Councils Ecumenism Education Election Empathy Environment Error Eschatology eschaton Eternity Ethics Eucharist Evangelism Eve Evil evolution Faeries Faith Fear femininity Ficino Florence Florensky Folktale Fools Forgiveness Freedom Future gender Gentile Gentiles Glory Gnostic God gods Good Samaritan Goodness Gospel Government Grace Great Fast Guns Hate healing Health Heaven Hell Hellenism Heresy Hierarchy Hildegard Hinduism History Holiness Holy Spirit Holy Week Hope Horror Human rights humanity Humility hypocrisy ICE icon icons Identification Identity Idol II Nicea Immigration incarnation Individualism Informal Reflections Inklings Intention Inter-Religious Interfaith Internet Interpretation Intrinsic evil Irenaeus Islam Israel Jacob Jerome Jesus Jews John Chrysostom John of Damascus John the Baptist Joseph Judaism justice Justification kenosis Kindnesss Kingdom of God Kingdom of Heaven Law Law of Moses Lazarus Leaf by Niggle Lent Lenten Reflection Liberation Theology Lies Life Listen Literature Liturgy locutions Logic Logos Love Marriage Martyrs Mary Mass Maximos The Confessor Meanness Meditation Mercy Middle Path Migrants Mind Miracles Miriam Morals Moses Movies Music Muslims Myths Names Nationalism Native Americans New Year Nicea Nicholas Nothing Novatian Obedience Occam's Razor Ordination Origen Original Sin Orthodox orthopraxis Pagans Palamas Palm Sunday Paradise Paschaltide Paul Peace Pentecost person Peter piety PKD Plato pluralism Plurality Poem Poetry Poiltics Politics Poor Pope Pope Francis Pope Leo XIV Post Office Prayer Pride Pro-life Prodigal Son propaganda Prophecy Prophets Providence Putin Racism Reading Reason Reflection Refugees Relationships Religion Religion Series Religious Liberty Repent Republicans Rest Resurrection Rich Rites Russia Sacraments Saints Salvation Salvian Santa Science Scripture Self-Giving Sexuality Sibyl Sick Silence Sin Singlehood Social Justice Society Sodom Solovyov Speculations Spiritual Reflection St. Cyril of Alexandria St. Justin Martyr Suffering Sunday of the Paralytic Man Sunday of the Samaritan Woman Superhero Supreme Court Teaching Technology Thanksgiving The Father the Universe Theological Reflection Theology Theosis Theotokos Thomas Timaeus Time Tolerenace Tolkien Tradition Transfiguration Trinity Trump Truth Uncategorized Unity Universities USCCB Value Vatican II Vegetarian Vices Violence Virtue Vocations War Water Welcome Wisdom Womanhood Women Work World View Worship Writing Zacchaeus

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz