Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Catholic
Relationships and Religion
A Trans-Gender Eschatology?

A Trans-Gender Eschatology?

Last updated on: July 18, 2024 at 2:37 am by Henry Karlson

0 Comments

A Trans-Gender Eschatology? 2024-07-18T02:37:45-05:00 Henry Karlson

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Richard de Montbaston (From Jacobus de Voragine): Marina The Monk / Wikimedia Commons

There is a great deal of confusion concerning the categories of sex and gender in the world today. In part, this is because gender has often been treated as the absolutization or essentialization of someone’s assigned sex at birth. Christians, if they look to Scripture and subsequent Christian tradition, should at least question such essentialization. There are indications in both which suggest that in the eschaton, in the kingdom of God, humanity will transcend all temporal sexual and gender designations. To be sure, not all hold such a view. There are those who think everyone’s sexual identity will remain in eternity, as they believe it is something essential to a person’s own identity, but believe sexuality (and with it, gender relations) relate merely to temporal concerns, concerns which no longer remain in the eschaton, and so will not be manifest in the resurrected body. Both eschatological conceptions have a place in Christian speculation, as neither have been condemned. As such, those who suggest in the resurrection, we will transcend gender, hold to some form of gender transformation, demonstrating that some notions of gender fluidity have had a place in Christian speculation, and they can be found not only in the modern era, but in the earliest eras of Christian theological discussion as well.

To be sure, many discussions concerning sexuality and gender from ancient sources relates, in part, to a world view, including an anthropology, which is as outdated as Ptolemy’s cosmology. As such, it would be fruitful to reengage such discussions using modern scientifical developments as a way to update our discussions. And yet, as in the case of cosmology, there are truths found in the ancient engagement of sexuality and gender which can be and should be embraced today. Not everything they said was wrong. Similarly, there are principles revealed to us by revelation which transcend human sciences, principles which remain true no matter what science shows to us, truths which must be accounted for as we try to discern the way revelation and science can and should work together. One such principle is exemplified by Paul when he said that in Christ, all the distinctions we have made to divide humanity are to be relativized in Christ: “There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither slave nor free, there is neither male nor female; for you are all one in Christ Jesus” (Gal. 3:28 RSV). It is in this spirit we can find some women ascetics (some who were also saints) who presented themselves as men in order to join various monastic communities, and when it was revealed they were women, usually after their death, they were not treated as if they had done wrong, but rather, what they did was seen as another part of their story and the way they became holy. Today, it would seem, if some women did that, and it was revealed what they had done, they would be looked down as being transgendered, and therefore, as sinners. Those who do so tend to believe there is no distinction between sex and gender, and so they think the sex someone was identified at birth should be how they should identify themselves all their lives, and if they do not, they are denying the truth about themselves, which is how and why they end up being seen as sinners. The way the ancient Christians treated such holy saints should lead us to call into question the way many moderns would treat them, because if they were recognized as being holy while presenting themselves as male, indeed, for that being one of the many reasons why they were able to become and be holy, despite being designated as women at birth, it would seem the fact that they are saints, and how they became saints, confirms their path contrary to modern gender essentializers.

Maksim Vasiljević, Bishop of the Eparchy of Western America of the Serbian Orthodox Church, shows us how our understanding of gender has become a problem in the modern era because of the way many have conflated gender with sex:

The specter of gender is one of the most persistent cultural problems. Many have entered into an alliance to exorcise this specter: conservative politicians, some clergy, radical intellectuals, and moralists of all kinds and fashions. On the other side, almost in the same number, are those who have embraced it, fashioning a romantic “gender identity” even a “theology of gender.” Clearly, this problem is partly due to the existing confusion between the concepts of sex (which is biologically based) and gender (which is psychologically based).[1]

Gender, Maksim Vasiljević explains, has a psychological element to it, and therefore, relates more to our personal relationships than our physical, or bodily, characteristics. Obviously, our bodies will have a role to play in our gender association, but, as our mind transcends our body, so our psychological understanding of ourselves will not be limited to our physical qualities. Instead, they will relate to who we are as persons, and so, how we relate to others. Our bodies will be involved in our self-understanding, but it is clear, other factors also will play a role in our gender identification. Once we appreciate this, then we will begin to understand the relative value of gender (and, possibly, one’s sexual identity) and why some important Christian thinkers established a Christian anthropology that ended up presenting the need to transcend all sex and gender distinctions. Engaging Sts. Maximos the Confessor and Gregory of Nyssa, Maksim Vasiljević points out that humanity in its proper, eschatological, form, reveals the relative or contextual element associated with sex and gender:

Together with Sts Maximus the Confessor and Gregory of Nyssa, we should stress that the basic presupposition of man’s true “being” is not found in his historical form, but only in his eschatological state, which is anticipated in the Holy Eucharist. Seen in Christological perspective, gender is not an absolute category, but rather, it exists in relation to something else – it is contextual. So, although gender-based relations in history are activated through nature, in the eschaton they will not be controlled definitively by nature, and equally important, they will be inactive and useless.[2]

Those who follow this line of thought can and will live it out in their lives, in and through their relationships with other people. This is because the eschaton is immanent in Christ; the eschaton is already and not yet in such a way that the eschatological character of humanity will at least begin to reveal itself in history, even if the fullness of that character will transcend history. That is because the eschaton transcends temporal existence while it also touches and influences it. This, perhaps, is one way we can understand the women who identified themselves as men in order to join and be actively involved in a monastic community. They represented the eschatological dimension of humanity as they understood it; they lived it out by demonstrating the relative nature of gender, as they were able to identify themselves as men despite their sexual identity at birth as being women.

Thus, going back to St. Gregory of Nyssa, we find that he believed that in the resurrection, the differentiation between the sexes, let alone genders, would no longer apply to humanity:

For this reason, let us not feel we must imagine in those changed by the resurrection the kind of [sexual] differentiation that human nature now necessarily has, in view of the succession of our descendants (although it is not possible to prove clearly that this will not be so, since we do not know what these things will be changed to by our transformation). But we have no doubt that then there will be one race including all, when all of us will become one body of Christ, formed by the one shape, since the divine image will illuminate us all equally; and we shall make it clear that what will be given to us in that change of our nature, in place of these present characteristics, will be better than any idea we can form by guesswork.[3]

This is not to say the resurrection will be bodiless, and that is why we will find ourselves without such distinction, but rather, we will have our bodies, but they will be transformed in the resurrection so that they will no longer include all the coarse elements of their physical form:

Let not the body, then, be vilified by thoughtless people; after this life the soul will be adorned in a body that is transformed into a more divine state through regeneration, when death has purified it of what is superfluous and useless so that it can enjoy the life to come. [4]

Gregory, and those like him, wanted to follow what Jesus said about the resurrection, that is, humanity will be spiritualized and made like angels: “For when they rise from the dead, they neither marry nor are given in marriage, but are like angels in heaven” (Mk. 12:25 RSV). Angels are spiritual beings, not sexual beings, and so they do not have sex or gender. Following this line of thought, many have come to believe that humanity, in its transfigured, spiritualized state, will become like angels, and that means, their bodies will be transformed so that they no longer will have sexual qualities associated with them. Humans will be able to thrive just as angels thrive, having new, greater ways to engage intimacy and love; what was good and true in the physical form will remain, even if it is transformed into a new asexual or agendered state. If we follow this line of thought, one which many in the ancient world held, the resurrection can be said to lead everyone to a trans-gendered status, as the genders and all gender roles will be transcended and overcome. And if this is the case for humanity in the resurrection, in the eschatological kingdom of God, then as the eschaton touches history, we should not be surprised to see the effects of this in history and historical relationships, showing at least, the kind of fluidity necessary for gender if we are going to find ourselves changing from our current gender status to one which transcends all gender in the resurrection. And, one can say, this fluidity is what allowed those who were identified as women at birth to identify themselves and live out their lives as men. If we see ancient Christians could intuitively grasp this, and so accept such fluidity in their day, Christians should be able to engage such considerations today when trying to understand gender (and sexual) concern. Of course, those who do not hold this view, should at least recognize the potential of it in the Christian tradition, instead of instantly believing those who follow such a position runs contrary to the Christian tradition, because that is something which has yet to be absolutely denied by those who have the authority to do so.

[1] Maksim Vasiljević, Theology as a Surprise (Yonkers, NY: St Vladimir’s Seminary Press, 2018), 103.

[2] Maksim Vasiljević, Theology as a Surprise, 117.

[3] St. Gregory of Nyssa, “A Discourse on the Dead” in On Death and Eternal Life. Trans. Brian E. Daley (Yonkers, NY: St. Vladimir’s Seminary Press, 2022), 31.

[4] St. Gregory of Nyssa, “A Discourse on the Dead,” 28.

Stay in touch! Like A Little Bit of Nothing on Facebook.
If you liked what you read, please consider sharing it with your friends and family!

N.B.: While I read comments to moderate them, I rarely respond to them. If I don’t respond to your comment directly, don’t assume I am unthankful for it. I appreciate it. But I want readers to feel free to ask questions, and hopefully, dialogue with each other. I have shared what I wanted to say, though some responses will get a brief reply by me, or, if I find it interesting and something I can engage fully, as the foundation for another post. I have had many posts inspired or improved upon thanks to my readers.

Progressive Christian

Relationships and Religion

Previous Post

July 16, 2024

PRS* IX: J.D. Vance

Next Post

July 21, 2024 Walking On Water

Recent Comments

0 | Leave a Comment

"Gosh, did that hit the spot. I have been having great anxiety lately. And I ..."

Mark Wilson

Rejecting Doom: Christian Hope And Human ..."

"Justice and peace are two sides of the same coin. Where there is justice, there ..."

Dr.Cajetan Coelho

Justice First, Charity Beyond It: Serving ..."

"Thank you for your very, very powerful and very, very insightful analysis of the relationship ..."

alwayspuzzled

Justice First, Charity Beyond It: Serving ..."

"Given the amount of lethal malevolence that has prevailed in human history for the past ..."

alwayspuzzled

We Must Value Our Health

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Abortion Abraham abuse Aesthetics AI Aliens Ambrose Ancestors and Everything Andrew Angels Animals Anne Anthony Antisemitism apologetics Apophatic Apostle John Aquinas Artificial Intelligence Asanga Ascension Asceticism Assumption Atheism Attachment Augustine Authority Avarice Balthasar Baptism Beauty Biden birthright citizenship Bishops Black History Books Buddhism Bulgakov Byzantine Calendar C.S. Lewis Calcidius Catholic Catholicism Catholicism Celibacy Charity Chastity children Chrismation Christ Christmas Christology Church Climate Change Common Good Communion Confession Confirmation Conscience Constantine conventions conversion councils Covid Creation Cross Dead Death Death Penalty Debate Deception Demagogues Demons Desert Monks Desert Mothers Desire destruction development Dialogue Dignity Dionsyius Dionysius Discipline Diversity Division Doctor Who doctrine dogma Dormition Dualism Easter Easter Series Ecumenical Councils Ecumenism Education Election Empathy Environment Error Eschatology eschaton Eternity Ethics Eucharist Evangelism Eve Evil evolution Faeries Faith Fear femininity Ficino Florence Florensky Folktale Fools Forgiveness Freedom Future gender Gentile Gentiles Glory Gnostic God gods Good Samaritan Goodness Gospel Government Grace Great Fast Guns Hate healing Health Heaven Hell Hellenism Heresy Hierarchy Hildegard Hinduism History Holiness Holy Spirit Holy Week Hope Horror Human rights humanity Humility hypocrisy ICE icon icons Identification Identity Idol II Nicea Immigration incarnation Individualism Informal Reflections Inklings Intention Inter-Religious Interfaith Internet Interpretation Intrinsic evil Irenaeus Islam Israel Jacob Jerome Jesus Jews John Chrysostom John of Damascus John the Baptist Joseph Judaism justice Justification kenosis Kindnesss Kingdom of God Kingdom of Heaven Law Law of Moses Lazarus Leaf by Niggle Lent Lenten Reflection Liberation Theology Lies Life Listen Literature Liturgy locutions Logic Logos Love Marriage Martyrs Mary Mass Maximos The Confessor Meanness Meditation Mercy Middle Path Migrants Mind Miracles Miriam Morals Moses Movies Music Muslims Myths Names Nationalism Native Americans New Year Nicea Nicholas Nothing Novatian Obedience Occam's Razor Ordination Origen Original Sin Orthodox orthopraxis Pagans Palamas Palm Sunday Paradise Paschaltide Paul Peace Pentecost person Peter piety PKD Plato pluralism Plurality Poem Poetry Poiltics Politics Poor Pope Pope Francis Pope Leo XIV Post Office Prayer Pride Pro-life Prodigal Son propaganda Prophecy Prophets Providence Putin Racism Reading Reason Reflection Refugees Relationships Religion Religion Series Religious Liberty Repent Republicans Rest Resurrection Rich Rites Russia Sacraments Saints Salvation Salvian Santa Science Scripture Self-Giving Sexuality Sibyl Sick Silence Sin Singlehood Social Justice Society Sodom Solovyov Speculations Spiritual Reflection St. Cyril of Alexandria St. Justin Martyr Suffering Sunday of the Paralytic Man Sunday of the Samaritan Woman Superhero Supreme Court Teaching Technology Thanksgiving The Father the Universe Theological Reflection Theology Theosis Theotokos Thomas Timaeus Time Tolerenace Tolkien Tradition Transfiguration Trinity Trump Truth Uncategorized Unity Universities USCCB Value Vatican II Vegetarian Vices Violence Virtue Vocations War Water Welcome Wisdom Womanhood Women Work World View Worship Writing Zacchaeus

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz