Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Catholic
What Connects The Conscience With Love?

What Connects The Conscience With Love?

Last updated on: June 11, 2023 at 2:46 am by Henry Karlson

0 Comments

What Connects The Conscience With Love? 2023-06-11T02:46:23-05:00 Henry Karlson

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Jules and Jenny: The Prick Of Conscience Window At All Saints Church In York / flickr

Paul, in the book of Romans, gives one of the great foundations for the Christian understanding of the conscience. He suggests that everyone has been given a conscience and that they will be judged on the basis by which they follow its promptings in their lives:

When Gentiles who have not the law do by nature what the law requires, they are a law to themselves, even though they do not have the law. They show that what the law requires is written on their hearts, while their conscience also bears witness and their conflicting thoughts accuse or perhaps excuse them on that day when, according to my gospel, God judges the secrets of men by Christ Jesus (Rom. 2:14-16 RSV).

Everyone has a conscience. Everyone has a sense of morality within them. Not everyone has it as well developed as everyone else, because, like with many innate things, to develop it, it must be actively engaged to reach its full potential. That potential will differ from person to person due to the circumstances of their lives. Some will have aids, such as the Law of Moses, or other forms of revelation, which will help direct the conscience; others will mostly have to rely upon empirical experience examined by the light of reason. Whatever the person knows, or think they know, will be used by the conscience. It will try to reason out what potential good or evil we could do, telling us, of course, to avoid the evil while giving us room to choose from a selection of possible goods. Because of this, different people will be led by their conscience to do different things, sometimes in contradiction from each other. Everyone is expected to follow their conscience, and not the conclusions of others, though they should listen to others and learn from them, for their wisdom can be one of many sources their conscience can and should consider when making its own decisions.

Everyone will be judged based upon what they know and understand, and how they relate to the way their conscience directs them to act based upon that knowledge. This is why there will be more expectations out of those with greater knowledge than those who have less, for they will have more for their conscience to consider and use to make their decisions. This also means that those who do not have knowledge of particular laws or precepts, or do not understand what they mean and how they apply, so long as their ignorance is not willful, are not bound by such laws or precepts (just as the Gentiles were not bound by the Law of Moses):

For that reason, no one is bound by some precept except by the medium of knowledge of that precept. And therefore, he does not have the capacity to notice the precept is not bound; nor is someone ignorant of the precept of God bound to carry out that precept, except insofar as he is held to know the precept. But if he were not held to know, nor knew, in no mode would he be bound by the precept. [1]

Thus, it is important to understand how the conscience works. It points us forward, to seek after and pursue the greater good which it knows and understands. If we resist that direction, indeed, if we do something which it tells us is evil, then, even if it is objectively in error and it really is a good, since we resist the conscience, it is clear our intention is to embrace something which we think is evil and we will be held culpable for choosing to do some evil instead of doing what we believe is good. On the other hand, if we believe incorrectly, and not out of willful ignorance, that some objective is good, when it is not, because we embrace what we believe is good, we are seen to embrace and seek after the good, and as such, will not be held culpable for choosing evil:

Someone that has an invincibly erroneous conscience, not only does not sin by acting according to it, but even that he is held to follow it at any time. The reasoning of each is that he does not sin, because although the action may not be right in itself, nevertheless, it is right according to the conscience of the one who does the act; at anytime one is held to act according to it, if his conscience, which is the proximate rule, so suggests it must be done. [2]

The conscience, to be sure, should be exercised and developed. This means we should strive to seek after wisdom and knowledge to help inform it, but also, we should develop ourselves so that we find it easier and easier to follow its prompting and not resist it. We will not know everything, and often, we will not know where to find what we need to know, or how to interpret what can be and is given to us to follow, but the conscience will do the best it can with what it has been given and we must not ignore its prompting. The more we know, the better our conscience will be able to engage the situation and direct us, but that does not mean there will not be some error in its reasoning. It is a tool with limits, and it can be mistaken. Nonetheless, even if it is shown to be objectively wrong in a particular case, it still can be shown to be pointing us in the right direction, that is, to seek after and pursue the greater good, and not become so attached to limited goods. That is why, even when it is mistaken, following it helps us become better. Similarly, the better we become, the more refined the conscience will be, and so it will end up being able to make better and better decisions, meaning, even if it is mistaken at first, it will allow itself to take in new facts to make new decisions, and so by use of moral triangulation, it will eventually be able to point us in the right direction.

This is why, once again, it must be said that if we ignore our conscience, if we resist it and its prompting, we turn away from the greater good, so that eventually, our triangulation will turn us away from the holistic good and instead pursue some private good at the expense of the greater good. Similarly, if we resist its growth, or its pursuit for greater insight, out of fear we will have to change our ways, then our ignorance might be culpable ignorance, and as such, our conscience is impeded and we end up sinning by making that impediment for ourselves. Even if we do not know any particular revelation about what we should or should not do, we still have a moral compass, and it is one which we follow and develop, using the resources that we have. Atheists just as much as theists possess it, and indeed, it seems many of them actually engage it better than theists because they do not try to use theological reflection as a way to damper their conscience. What is important is the conscience, and how it deals with what it knows. “For God shows no partiality. All who have sinned without the law will also perish without the law, and all who have sinned under the law will be judged by the law” (Rom. 2:11-12 RSV).

We must not, of course, take this to mean, it is better not to know the law (in any form) and to remain in ignorance. For once again, we should be developing our conscience, and as such, developing ourselves, working out the best way we can to achieve the holistic good. We should seek to be informed the best we can so as to help the conscience do its work. If we try to remain ignorant, thinking that will, in the end, save us from being culpable for what we do, because we do this, our ignorance will be willful and we will be culpable for that which we could readily have known if we didn’t resist it. Similarly, our conscience itself will prompt us to know and understand more, so that, if we do not do so, we are resisting it and so can be shown to already reject the holistic good. Similarly, the teaching of the law (religious or natural) is meant to help us, to make us and our life better. It is meant to help us come to learn about and apprehend the objective, absolute good. The more we know that good, the better we can make things in the world. The less we know it, though we might not be culpable for what we do, nonetheless, we (and those around us) will suffer the consequences of bad acts done in ignorance. Thus, it is important to seek after it, so that we can help people, including ourselves, away from needless suffering.

Our conscience is meant to help us ultimately unite our personal, subjective engagement with the good with the objective good. Revelation, wisdom from others beyond ourselves, can and should help in that objective, though it must also be acknowledged, our understanding of what we are told and how it applies to us in our own situation is not always easy to discern. For the Christian, the best way to approach the conscience, the best way to direct it, is to have it reflect what it knows from all sources of knowledge and then ask what would Jesus do:

And the best criterion of conscience is always closet art hand; it is this: Before making any important decision, whether of personal or social importance, call up the image of Jesus Christ in mind, let it have free play in the soul, and ask, Would he do this? In other words, Will he approve of this action or not? Will he bless me for it or not? [3]

Jesus is the ultimate revelation of God to us. As such, Christians should engage him first and foremost before all other revelation, before all other secondary wisdom, including the secondary wisdom of the saints. And as he shows us that God is love, the conscience should therefore be directed to engage the world primarily in and through love. Knowing facts, of course, will help, but if we do not put Jesus and his way at the forefront, if we do not use love as the hermeneutic to understand the law (revealed law or natural law), we will stunt the growth of our conscience. Jesus comes us to us, like he did with Peter and Andrew, asking us to follow him, and to follow him is to engage the path of love. The more we engage love, the more our conscience will develop properly, allowing it to do what it should do, direct us to what is good and true. Our conscience, therefore, should not only direct us in and through the use of reason, but reason as it is understood and seen in the light of love. For God is the absolute good, and God is love. If we want the absolute good, we will pursue love. Indeed, we will find our love will direct us and inspire us in a way which reason alone cannot, for love can direct us to act in ways which transcend reason, for reason only guides based upon what it knows and understands while love allows mystery and transcendence to shape and direct it. Thus, the good which we should seek, the good which we want, cannot be found without love, while it can be and will be found without extensive study and knowledge of facts and theories. Of course, the more we attain it, the more our knowledge should develop, and that is a result which we should not reject, but neither should we, like the so-called Gnostics, make it alone all that is important. Love is at the heart of revelation. Love alone is credible. The more we love, the more we will know that which we love, and so the more we will be able to love it. But love doesn’t require absolute knowledge. All it requires is a will to love, and thus, the conscience, when guided by love, will be able to point us to the greater good in a way which reason alone cannot and will not be able to do.

[1] St. Alphonsus Liguori, Moral Theology. Volume I: Books I – III On Conscience, Law, Sin and Virtue. Trans. Ryan Grant (Post Falls, ID: Mediatrix Press, 2017), 113.

[2] St. Alphonsus Liguori, Moral Theology. Volume I: Books I – III On Conscience, Law, Sin and Virtue, 26.

[3] Vladimir Solovyey, God, Man & The Church. The Spiritual Foundations Of Life. Trans. Donald Attwater (Cambridge: James Clarke & Co., 2016), 120.

Stay in touch! Like A Little Bit of Nothing on Facebook.
If you liked what you read, please consider sharing it with your friends and family!

N.B.: While I read comments to moderate them, I rarely respond to them. If I don’t respond to your comment directly, don’t assume I am unthankful for it. I appreciate it. But I want readers to feel free to ask questions, and hopefully, dialogue with each other. I have shared what I wanted to say, though some responses will get a brief reply by me, or, if I find it interesting and something I can engage fully, as the foundation for another post. I have had many posts inspired or improved upon thanks to my readers.

General Christian

Previous Post

June 9, 2023

Everyone Can Teach Us Something About God

Next Post

June 13, 2023 The Perfume Of Holiness

Recent Comments

0 | Leave a Comment

"First things first is the easiest way forward. "If someone is bleeding profusely, we must ..."

Dr.Cajetan Coelho

Why We Must Embrace Empathy, Sympathy ..."

"Gosh, did that hit the spot. I have been having great anxiety lately. And I ..."

Mark Wilson

Rejecting Doom: Christian Hope And Human ..."

"Justice and peace are two sides of the same coin. Where there is justice, there ..."

Dr.Cajetan Coelho

Justice First, Charity Beyond It: Serving ..."

"Thank you for your very, very powerful and very, very insightful analysis of the relationship ..."

alwayspuzzled

Justice First, Charity Beyond It: Serving ..."

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Abortion Abraham abuse Aesthetics AI Aliens Ambrose Ancestors and Everything Andrew Angels Animals Anne Anthony Antisemitism apologetics Apophatic Apostle John Aquinas Artificial Intelligence Asanga Ascension Asceticism Assumption Atheism Attachment Augustine Authority Avarice Balthasar Baptism Beauty Biden birthright citizenship Bishops Black History Books Buddhism Bulgakov Byzantine Calendar C.S. Lewis Calcidius Catholic Catholicism Catholicism Celibacy Charity Chastity children Chrismation Christ Christmas Christology Church Climate Change Common Good Communion Confession Confirmation Conscience Constantine conventions conversion councils Covid Creation Cross Dead Death Death Penalty Debate Deception Demagogues Demons Desert Monks Desert Mothers Desire destruction development Dialogue Dignity Dionsyius Dionysius Discipline Diversity Division Doctor Who doctrine dogma Dormition Dualism Easter Easter Series Ecumenical Councils Ecumenism Education Election Empathy Environment Error Eschatology eschaton Eternity Ethics Eucharist Evangelism Eve Evil evolution Faeries Faith Fear femininity Ficino Florence Florensky Folktale Fools Forgiveness Freedom Future gender Gentile Gentiles Glory Gnostic God gods Good Samaritan Goodness Gospel Government Grace Great Fast Guns Halloween Hate healing Health Heaven Hell Hellenism Heresy Hierarchy Hildegard Hinduism History Holiness Holy Spirit Holy Week Hope Horror Human rights humanity Humility hypocrisy ICE icon icons Identification Identity Idol II Nicea Immigration incarnation Individualism Informal Reflections Inklings Intention Inter-Religious Interfaith Internet Interpretation Intrinsic evil Irenaeus Islam Israel Jacob Jerome Jesus Jews John Chrysostom John of Damascus John the Baptist Joseph Judaism justice Justification kenosis Kindnesss Kingdom of God Kingdom of Heaven Law Law of Moses Lazarus Leaf by Niggle Lent Lenten Reflection Liberation Theology Lies Life Listen Literature Liturgy locutions Logic Logos Love Marriage Martyrs Mary Mass Maximos The Confessor Meanness Meditation Mercy Middle Path Migrants Mind Miracles Miriam Morals Moses Movies Music Muslims Myths Names Nationalism Native Americans New Year Nicea Nicholas Nothing Novatian Obedience Occam's Razor Ordination Origen Original Sin Orthodox orthopraxis Pagans Palamas Palm Sunday Paradise Paschaltide Paul Peace Pentecost person Peter piety PKD Plato pluralism Plurality Poem Poetry Poiltics Politics Poor Pope Pope Francis Pope Leo XIV Post Office Prayer Pride Pro-life Prodigal Son propaganda Prophecy Prophets Providence Putin Racism Reading Reason Reflection Refugees Relationships Religion Religion Series Religious Liberty Repent Republicans Rest Resurrection Rich Rites Russia Sacraments Saints Salvation Salvian Santa Science Scripture Self-Giving Sexuality Sibyl Sick Silence Sin Singlehood Social Justice Society Sodom Solovyov Speculations Spiritual Reflection St. Cyril of Alexandria St. Justin Martyr Suffering Sunday of the Paralytic Man Sunday of the Samaritan Woman Superhero Supreme Court Teaching Technology Thanksgiving The Father the Universe Theological Reflection Theology Theosis Theotokos Thomas Timaeus Time Tolerenace Tolkien Tradition Transfiguration Trinity Trump Truth Uncategorized Unity Universities USCCB Vainglory Value Vatican II Vegetarian Vices Violence Virtue Vocations War Water Welcome Wisdom Womanhood Women Work World View Worship Writing Zacchaeus

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz