Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Catholic
History and Religion
Legends of Nicea

Legends of Nicea

Last updated on: May 21, 2023 at 2:51 am by Henry Karlson

0 Comments

Legends of Nicea 2023-05-21T02:51:42-05:00 Henry Karlson

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Protatos Church: The Council of Nicea / picryl

Due to the importance of the council, and the limited historical records we have coming out of it, the Council of Nicea has become the stuff of legends. Stories have been told about it which have little to no empirical history to back them up. Some of them, like the story told about St. Nicholas punching Arius, have every indication of being pure fabrication. While it is possible St. Nicholas was at the council, as we do not have a full and accurate list of all its participants, the story falters when it has Nicholas go against his own known character, that is, of a kind, generous man who looked after those in need. Another legend, one which has some possibility of being based upon an actual event, concerns an intervention made by the monk-confessor–bishop Paphnutius:

The bishops assembled at Nicea in those days were of a mind to introduce a new law that sacred ministers (meaning the bishops, priests, deacons, and sub-deacons) should not sleep with the wives whom they had married when they were still laymen. Rising in the midst of the assembly of bishops, Paphnutius vociferously spoke against the imposition of a heavy yoke on the sacred ministers, saying that “Marriage is honourable”, as it is written [Heb 13:14], and that they should not damage the church by excessive severity, for not everybody was capable of tolerating the rigour of impassibility and perhaps they would not be protected by chastity (he called relations with one’s legitimate wife chastity). It would be sufficient [he argued] for an [unmarried] person presenting himself for ordination not to contract a marriage in the future (in accordance with the ancient tradition of the church) without [a married one] divorcing the wife whom he had already once married when he was formerly a layman. He said this even though he had no personal experience with marriage, or, to speak plainly, of a woman, for he had been raised in a monastery from infancy and he was famous for his chastity. All the bishops were won over to Paphnutius’ arguments; they stopped discussing this topic, leaving it to the judgment of those who wished to distance themselves from marriage. [1]

This story, though placed in the anonymous collection of the Sayings of the Desert Fathers, comes from the Church History of Socrates Scholasticus, written in the early 5th century. The lack of earlier references to this event, let alone to Paphnutius, have led some scholars to reject not only the event, but the existence of Paphnutius. Others believe our sources for them are sufficiently close to the time of Nicea that the story could be based upon an actual event. Whether or not it was historically true, it became an important legend, one which have been used by those who support married clergy to show that the Council of Nicea concluded that not only could married clergy continue to be with their spouses, they did not have to abstain from sexual relations. Indeed, the story indicates sexual relations are honorable, and should not be seen as defiling the couple (an important point, considering the way many have since treated sexuality).

Paphnutius is said to have been a disciple of St. Antony who had been severely tortured under emperor Maximinus, whereupon he lost sight in his right eye. Miracles were said to happen around him, drawing the attention of Constantine, which is one of the reasons why he was believed to have been called to be at Nicea. It is interesting that it is someone with such a stature who is invoked to not only defend married clergy, but sexuality as well. It took a celibate to point out the good of marriage, a good which was more than an aid for those who do not have the strength to persevere in celibacy. This legend became the story the East would use to preserve the use married clergy even if Eastern theological reflections did not always go as far as Paphnutius in defending the sanctity of the marriage bed; indeed, the East did give way to some of the pressures coming from the West, which is why bishops eventually were expected to be chosen from those who were not married. Yet, the legacy of this story is such that it made sure that married clergy would continue to exist and that they could have a healthy sexual life. While this is a legendary story, even if it might actually be based upon something which happened at Nicea, it was clearly remembered in a way which does not appear probable; that is, there were likely more than Paphnutius who supposed the continued use of married clergy in the church, and so he would not have been the lone voice having to convince everyone else at the council to agree with his intervention. He could not have been the lone voice for the tradition, for if he were, then his intervention would have been rejected.

What we see coming from Nicea, that is, legendary stories such as those of Nicholas and of Paphnutius, indicates the way the council became important later in Christian history. Legends were made to support ideological positions. While Nicea was intended to help draw Christians together, to establish a way they could speak in common about the Christian faith, it was not meant to become an inflexible presentation of the Christian faith. It was always open for further development. The fathers of Nicea understood the problem of trying to declare transcendent truths with words. They accepted that there could and would be better presentations. This is why it was not seen as problematic for the Council of Constantinople to edit and rewrite the creed. Nicea was not meant to be used as an excuse to justify hatred and violence, despite the way some like to use the legend of Nicholas to take on and fight “heretics” or anyone they don’t like. It was about drawing Christians together, recognizing that there will be some things which they need to agree in common, even if there can be and will be differences in their engagement of the faith. To be sure, this does not mean Nicea promoted anarchy, that anyone who claimed to be Christian should be accepted as such; it set a few norms, such as the teaching of the divinity of Christ, norms which it used to make sure the faith passed down to it could be passed down to later generations.

Nicea, and its fathers, became a thing of legend. We must remember it was not always seen as important as it would become. Many orthodox believers, like St. Cyril of Jerusalem, had problems with the creed. They had had to have proof that the term homoousious could have an orthodox interpretation They had to see how it was being understood by its adherents. Once they understood the intention behind its use, they accepted the creed. One of the lessons we can learn from this is that we should not be so concerned with the terms we use to explain the faith. We should know that any term we use will fail to present the fullness of the mystery of the Christian faith. We must recognize that people will interpret the terms we use differently, and so, they might not accept our terms, but in the end, they will mean the same thing we do with the terms they use. Thus, we should be concerned with the intention and meaning behind the words we use to express the faith than the terms themselves. Terms can and will have different meaning for different people. We must try to understand the intention others have with their words, accepting the most charitable possible interpretation possible instead of forcing the worst possible interpretation upon them. If this lesson had not been forgotten, it is likely the controversy surrounding the filioque would never have developed.For what the fathers following Nicea learned is that even with their differences, differences which often get overlooked in the legends about Nicea, they could come together and find a way to express their common faith, accepting that there would be many ways, many different terms,to do so. This, and not the legends which developed afterward, is what we should learn from Nicea. We must try to avoid needless disputes with others. We certainly should stop and think about what we are saying, making sure we are not being polemical when there is no reason for us to be so. We should realize that there are a wide variety of expressions which can point to one and the same transcendent truth, so that we should not fight each other over which we think is best if we can find that they, in the end, are talking about the same thing as we are with different words. And, certainly, we should not be like how Nicholas is presented in his legend, for in it, all he did is have Arius become defensive and double down in his theological error, which, in the end, runs contrary to Christian charity, a charity which looks to find a way to overcome rifts by bringing those in error to a new, greater understanding of the truth.

[1] John Wortley, trans., The Anonymous Sayings Of The Desert Fathers: A Select Edition And Complete English Translation (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013), 263-5 [N410 BHG 1483n].

Stay in touch! Like A Little Bit of Nothing on Facebook.
If you liked what you read, please consider sharing it with your friends and family!

N.B.: While I read comments to moderate them, I rarely respond to them. If I don’t respond to your comment directly, don’t assume I am unthankful for it. I appreciate it. But I want readers to feel free to ask questions, and hopefully, dialogue with each other. I have shared what I wanted to say, though some responses will get a brief reply by me, or, if I find it interesting and something I can engage fully, as the foundation for another post. I have had many posts inspired or improved upon thanks to my readers.

General Christian

History and Religion

Previous Post

May 18, 2023

The Ascension And The Eucharist

Next Post

May 23, 2023 God Is Mercy

Recent Comments

0 | Leave a Comment

"First things first is the easiest way forward. "If someone is bleeding profusely, we must ..."

Dr.Cajetan Coelho

Why We Must Embrace Empathy, Sympathy ..."

"Gosh, did that hit the spot. I have been having great anxiety lately. And I ..."

Mark Wilson

Rejecting Doom: Christian Hope And Human ..."

"Justice and peace are two sides of the same coin. Where there is justice, there ..."

Dr.Cajetan Coelho

Justice First, Charity Beyond It: Serving ..."

"Thank you for your very, very powerful and very, very insightful analysis of the relationship ..."

alwayspuzzled

Justice First, Charity Beyond It: Serving ..."

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Abortion Abraham abuse Aesthetics AI Aliens Ambrose Ancestors and Everything Andrew Angels Animals Anne Anthony Antisemitism apologetics Apophatic Apostle John Aquinas Artificial Intelligence Asanga Ascension Asceticism Assumption Atheism Attachment Augustine Authority Avarice Balthasar Baptism Beauty Biden birthright citizenship Bishops Black History Books Buddhism Bulgakov Byzantine Calendar C.S. Lewis Calcidius Catholic Catholicism Catholicism Celibacy Charity Chastity children Chrismation Christ Christmas Christology Church Climate Change Common Good Communion Confession Confirmation Conscience Constantine conventions conversion councils Covid Creation Cross Dead Death Death Penalty Debate Deception Demagogues Demons Desert Monks Desert Mothers Desire destruction development Dialogue Dignity Dionsyius Dionysius Discipline Diversity Division Doctor Who doctrine dogma Dormition Dualism Easter Easter Series Ecumenical Councils Ecumenism Education Election Empathy Environment Error Eschatology eschaton Eternity Ethics Eucharist Evangelism Eve Evil evolution Faeries Faith Fear femininity Ficino Florence Florensky Folktale Fools Forgiveness Freedom Future gender Gentile Gentiles Glory Gnostic God gods Good Samaritan Goodness Gospel Government Grace Great Fast Guns Halloween Hate healing Health Heaven Hell Hellenism Heresy Hierarchy Hildegard Hinduism History Holiness Holy Spirit Holy Week Hope Horror Human rights humanity Humility hypocrisy ICE icon icons Identification Identity Idol II Nicea Immigration incarnation Individualism Informal Reflections Inklings Intention Inter-Religious Interfaith Internet Interpretation Intrinsic evil Irenaeus Islam Israel Jacob Jerome Jesus Jews John Chrysostom John of Damascus John the Baptist Joseph Judaism justice Justification kenosis Kindnesss Kingdom of God Kingdom of Heaven Law Law of Moses Lazarus Leaf by Niggle Lent Lenten Reflection Liberation Theology Lies Life Listen Literature Liturgy locutions Logic Logos Love Marriage Martyrs Mary Mass Maximos The Confessor Meanness Meditation Mercy Middle Path Migrants Mind Miracles Miriam Morals Moses Movies Music Muslims Myths Names Nationalism Native Americans New Year Nicea Nicholas Nothing Novatian Obedience Occam's Razor Ordination Origen Original Sin Orthodox orthopraxis Pagans Palamas Palm Sunday Paradise Paschaltide Paul Peace Pentecost person Peter piety PKD Plato pluralism Plurality Poem Poetry Poiltics Politics Poor Pope Pope Francis Pope Leo XIV Post Office Prayer Pride Pro-life Prodigal Son propaganda Prophecy Prophets Providence Putin Racism Reading Reason Reflection Refugees Relationships Religion Religion Series Religious Liberty Repent Republicans Rest Resurrection Rich Rites Russia Sacraments Saints Salvation Salvian Santa Science Scripture Self-Giving Sexuality Sibyl Sick Silence Sin Singlehood Social Justice Society Sodom Solovyov Speculations Spiritual Reflection St. Cyril of Alexandria St. Justin Martyr Suffering Sunday of the Paralytic Man Sunday of the Samaritan Woman Superhero Supreme Court Teaching Technology Thanksgiving The Father the Universe Theological Reflection Theology Theosis Theotokos Thomas Timaeus Time Tolerenace Tolkien Tradition Transfiguration Trinity Trump Truth Uncategorized Unity Universities USCCB Vainglory Value Vatican II Vegetarian Vices Violence Virtue Vocations War Water Welcome Wisdom Womanhood Women Work World View Worship Writing Zacchaeus

Select a Month November 2026 October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz