Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

henrykarlson

Hypocrites, Hypocrisy And The Pursuit Of Power

Last updated on: October 6, 2022 at 2:44 am   by Henry Karlson

Hypocrites, Hypocrisy And The Pursuit Of Power 2022-10-06T02:44:03-05:00 Henry Karlson

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Thomson200: Herschel Walker: Wikimedia Commons

Jesus warned against those who like to emphasize and promote rigorous legalism while acting contrary to the rules they use to control the people. He indicated that they were hypocrites who, despite trying to hide their hypocrisy, could only do so for so long before their it is revealed:

Beware of the leaven of the Pharisees, which is hypocrisy. Nothing is covered up that will not be revealed, or hidden that will not be known. Therefore whatever you have said in the dark shall be heard in the light, and what you have whispered in private rooms shall be proclaimed upon the housetops (Lk. 12:1-3 RSV).

Those who like to embrace power for their own gain, using the pretense of being religiously pious as a way to achieve power, risk having their hypocrisy exposed. When it is revealed, they will have to deal with the fallout of that exposure. While some might shrug off such hypocrisy, we should not do so. Those who show themselves so dishonest should not be give any power in secular society. This is because their interest is not in the common good, nor in any objective good, but in their own personal gain. They will use and abuse particular notions of the good for their own sake, pretending, by doing so, that they are on the side of the good, but when confronted by what they have done, and how and why they act contrary to their own rhetoric, they will try to find a way to maintain the power they have attained. To do so, they will ask for the mercy which they have been unwilling to give to others. They will say that they have or will change, and that should be good enough. However, the way they have treated or treat others who make similar mistakes should serve as a warning; their concern remains for their own private gain, and they are willing to do anything to achieve their desires.

This is one of the many problems we find with most of those who run for office as pro-life candidates. Their interest, at best, is not in the dignity of life, but in abortion, and even then, many of them really do not care about abortion but just say what they think their followers want to hear. They do not want society to consider the root causes for abortions, nor to deal with those causes, for that often means they would have to promote initiatives which run contrary to either their ideology or their pursuit for power. Thus, few of them are concerned with health care, promoting living wages, eliminating racism or sexism, or similar such issues which, if properly dealt with, could and would lead to the lessening of abortions in society. And, as they tend to reject universal health care and the elimination of the death penalty, such politicians reveal that they  do not really consider life to be invaluable, but rather, they find it rather cheap, and something easily ignored. Without holding a consistent ethic underlying their opposition to abortion, they show us that their concern is not in the protection of life, despite what they say, but power, and they will use people’s fears and concerns as a way to gain their support. They tend to be sophists, saying what they think their followers want to hear, but never believing it themselves. This is why they don’t do as they speak, and in this way, combine the worst aspects of religion and politics, seeking power to lord it over others, using elements of the good as a way to bolster support for their evil ways. Jesus properly warned us not to act like this:

But Jesus called them to him and said, “You know that the rulers of the Gentiles lord it over them, and their great men exercise authority over them. It shall not be so among you; but whoever would be great among you must be your servant,  and whoever would be first among you must be your slave;  even as the Son of man came not to be served but to serve, and to give his life as a ransom for many. (Matt. 20:25-28 RSV).

Ever since supposed pro-life influencers promoted Scott Brown, it should have been clear, they are not concerned with life. They use pro-life rhetoric as a means of gaining political power for Republicans.[1] The same people who say abortion is murder, and those involved with a particular abortion should be punished, are the same people who say people can change, and those who were involved with abortions in the past should not be held responsible for what they have done if they now claim to be pro-life. This is why they do not suggest Abby Johnson should be imprisoned, even as to why there is a collective shrug with the notion that Herschel Walker might have made his girlfriend have an abortion. On the other hand, if a normal woman has a miscarriage, they have no difficulty requiring her to prove it was a miscarriage or else face punishment. Women, moreover, who have a medical reason to have an abortion, likewise, will have their lives put at risk as they have to prove the necessity for the abortion. The hypocrisy is real, but it also stands to reason it reveals that they have no real concern for abortion, but rather, the desire to find another way to penalize and punish those they dislike as well as to find a way to exercise greater control over society.

It’s not just abortion. Abortion is just one example of the way such hypocrisy is at work in American politics. Thus, many on the right, following culture war narratives, have also wanted to penalize gays while being gay themselves, something which Michael Rogers talked about years ago:

For years, I had known of prominent gay politicians who were in the closet but worked for homophobic causes in the interest, it seemed to me, of their political careers. And so, drawing on sources within and outside Washington, I began using my blog to expose these congressmen and their high-profile staffers. A media frenzy ensued. Within two days of the site’s launch, the  Washington Post published one  article;  another followed just six days later. Local and national television outlets called, challenging me to defend and explain my actions. In one early interview, Bill O’Reilly  said to me, “People’s sex life should have nothing to do with any kind of a policy.”[2]

Pope Francis understands what is going on with such hypocrisy:

When we say, “Be careful, that person is a hypocrite”, what are we trying to say? What is hypocrisy? It can be called the fear of the truth. Hypocrites are afraid of the truth. They prefer to pretend rather than be themselves.[3]

Hypocritical politicians,  politicians who pretend to be something they are not, certainly are afraid of the public finding out what are. They know, if their true way of life is revealed, they risk suffering the way they have made others suffer,  even as they might lose power and authority, as the people they used to get such power might turn on them. If, on the other hand, if many, if not most, of their followers do not really believe the ideology they present to the public, but only use it as a way to pretend they hold some objective moral principles as a way to denigrate their opponents, then that, too, is something they are afraid to have revealed. For then, it will be clear, they are nihilistic sophists who will say and do anything for power. No one who wants power for the sake of personal gain, and who holds no objective values, should be given such power. Those who would tell us not to be concerned when someone is revealed to be a hypocrite, those who would say we should show mercy to those who made mistakes in the past, while not being willing to give the same mercy to others, also tell us who and what they are, and that is hypocrites who likes to lord it over others. When confronted with their own policies, they try to run far away from them themselves. And if they run away so quickly away from them, so should we.


[1] In actuality, it should have been obvious even before Brown was promoted, but with Brown,  it became much clearer, and that much harder to dispute.

[2] Michael Rogers, “Why I Outed Gay Republicans” in Politico (6-26-2014).

[3] Pope Francis, “General Audience, August 25, 2021.” Vatican translation.

 

Stay in touch! Like A Little Bit of Nothing on Facebook.
If you liked what you read, please consider sharing it with your friends and family!

Progressive Christian

General Christian

Politics and Religion

Politics

Pope

Pope Francis

Hypocrisy

Politics

Pope

Power

Previous Post



October 5, 2022

Heaven Is Not Just A Place, But Also A State

Next Post



October 9, 2022 Casting Nets, Sowing What Is Good And Reaping The Harvest


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Abortion Abraham abuse Aesthetics AI Aliens Ambrose Ancestors and Everything Andrew Angels Animals Anne Anthony Antisemitism apologetics Apophatic Apostle John Aquinas Artificial Intelligence Asanga Ascension Asceticism Assumption Atheism Attachment Augustine Authority Avarice Balthasar Baptism Beauty Biden birthright citizenship Bishops Black History Books Buddhism Bulgakov Byzantine Calendar C.S. Lewis Calcidius Catholic Catholicism Catholicism Celibacy Charity Chastity children Chrismation Christ Christmas Christology Church Climate Change Common Good Communion Confession Confirmation Conscience Constantine conventions conversion councils Covid Creation Cross Dead Death Death Penalty Debate Deception Demagogues Demons Desert Monks Desert Mothers Desire destruction development Dialogue Dignity Dionsyius Dionysius Discipline Diversity Division Doctor Who doctrine dogma Dormition Dualism Easter Easter Series Ecumenical Councils Ecumenism Education Election Empathy Environment Error Eschatology eschaton Eternity Ethics Eucharist Evangelism Eve Evil evolution Faeries Faith Fear femininity Ficino Florence Florensky Folktale Fools Forgiveness Freedom Future gender Gentile Gentiles Glory Gnostic God gods Good Samaritan Goodness Gospel Government Grace Great Fast Guns Hate healing Health Heaven Hell Hellenism Heresy Hierarchy Hildegard Hinduism History Holiness Holy Spirit Holy Week Hope Horror Human rights humanity Humility hypocrisy ICE icon icons Identification Identity Idol II Nicea Immigration incarnation Individualism Informal Reflections Inklings Intention Inter-Religious Interfaith Internet Interpretation Intrinsic evil Irenaeus Islam Israel Jacob Jerome Jesus Jews John Chrysostom John of Damascus John the Baptist Joseph Judaism justice Justification kenosis Kindnesss Kingdom of God Kingdom of Heaven Law Law of Moses Lazarus Leaf by Niggle Lent Lenten Reflection Liberation Theology Lies Life Listen Literature Liturgy locutions Logic Logos Love Marriage Martyrs Mary Mass Maximos The Confessor Meanness Meditation Mercy Middle Path Migrants Mind Miracles Miriam Morals Moses Movies Music Muslims Myths Names Nationalism Native Americans New Year Nicea Nicholas Nothing Novatian Obedience Occam's Razor Ordination Origen Original Sin Orthodox orthopraxis Pagans Palamas Palm Sunday Paradise Paschaltide Paul Peace Pentecost person Peter piety PKD Plato pluralism Plurality Poem Poetry Poiltics Politics Poor Pope Pope Francis Pope Leo XIV Post Office Prayer Pride Pro-life Prodigal Son propaganda Prophecy Prophets Providence Putin Racism Reading Reason Reflection Refugees Relationships Religion Religion Series Religious Liberty Repent Republicans Rest Resurrection Rich Rites Russia Sacraments Saints Salvation Salvian Santa Science Scripture Self-Giving Sexuality Sibyl Sick Silence Sin Singlehood Social Justice Society Sodom Solovyov Speculations Spiritual Reflection St. Cyril of Alexandria St. Justin Martyr Suffering Sunday of the Paralytic Man Sunday of the Samaritan Woman Superhero Supreme Court Teaching Technology Thanksgiving The Father the Universe Theological Reflection Theology Theosis Theotokos Thomas Timaeus Time Tolerenace Tolkien Tradition Transfiguration Trinity Trump Truth Uncategorized Unity Universities USCCB Value Vatican II Vegetarian Vices Violence Virtue Vocations War Water Welcome Wisdom Womanhood Women Work World View Worship Writing Zacchaeus

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Which apostle did Jesus say, "Get thee behind me, Satan…"

Select your answer to see how you score.

John James Peter Judas

Related posts from A Little Bit of Nothing

Catholic

How Tradition Points Away From The Death Penalty

A Little Bit of Nothing

Catholic

Justice First, Charity Beyond It: Serving The Poor...

A Little Bit of Nothing

Catholic

'We're Like Pirates': Trump's Wars and Christian Faith

A Little Bit of Nothing

Catholic

Rejecting Mammon In The Defense Of Animals And...

A Little Bit of Nothing

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Catholic

Rejecting Doom: Christian Hope And Human Action

Christianity is a religion of hope. We are to have hope and...

It’s What Comes From Within Which Matters

One of the most difficult things for us to understand is why...

Why I Choose the Eucharist Over the Sermon

Choose the Eucharist, Not the Sermon What are we supposed to get...

5 Design Elements Found in Spiritually Rooted Homes

Putting Spirituality Into Home Decor Our homes are more than our living...

Credo: A Story of God Told with the...

About 10 years ago, I began to imagine a personal "Credo" that...

The Anatomy of Divine Revelation in Catholic Thought

The claim that God has made Himself known to human beings is...

view all Catholic blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube