Religious Life, Child Bearing And The Dignity Of Women

Last updated on: January 24, 2022 at 3:45 am by Henry Karlson

Religious Life, Child Bearing And The Dignity Of Women 2022-01-24T03:45:44-05:00 Henry Karlson

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Anonymous: St Syncletica / Wikimedia Commons

Historically, one of the reasons why women entered religious orders was because they believed that the religious life would give them more control over their own lives than they would have if they remained in secular society. Sadly, over time, many women given over to religious orders in order to restrict them, to keep them in solitude away from society so that their voices could not and would not be heard. What could and should have served a good purpose, to help women overcome the abuses society heaped upon them, became perverted and itself abused, turning it inside-out. This does not mean this was always the case; many women still found their dignity affirmed and restored through their entrance into the religious life, and indeed, used it as a way to promote the dignity of all women. Thus, when we read St. Syncletica talking about the good to be had by those who embraced religious life, we can hear her giving a sharp criticism of the way society treated women:

Let us women not be misled by the thought that those in the world are without cares. For perhaps in comparison they struggle more than we do. For towards women generally there is great hostility in the world. They bear children with difficulty and risk, and they suffer patiently through nursing. And they share illnesses with their sick children – and these things they endure without having any limit to their travail. For either the children they bear are maimed in body, or, brought up in perversity, they treacherously murder their parents. Since we women know these facts, therefore, let us not be deluded by the Enemy that their life is easy and carefree. For in giving birth women die in labour; and yet, in failing to give birth, they waste away under reproaches that they are barren and unfruitful. [1]

Syncletica’s reasoning was quite common, not only in her era, but for many ages to come; women religious saw their ascetic practice as a way to liberate themselves, not only from sin, but from the abuse women experienced by society. Women saw it as a way to take control of their own lives, not to have to suffer the common fate of women in secular society, where they were expected to have many children (risking their lives each and every pregnancy) or else be maligned for their childlessness. It is sadly an attitude we can find among us today as many women feel pressured to have children, being told that there is something wrong with them, such as they are being selfish, if they do not want to have any. However, as Syncletica shows us, this mentality should be rejected. Thankfully women today have more opportunities than they did in the past, giving them a greater sense of dignity even if they do not join a religious community. They can and do have personal autonomy and respect in secular society. This is not to say there is not more which could and should be done, as there is; the improvements we have seen are only a beginning.

Interestingly enough, Syncletica’s view of childbirth was one held by many Christians in her day; they did not see the need to promote or encourage procreation. Christians did not feel there was a call for them to “replenish the earth.” Marriage was viewed as a good, but one with many burdens, which is why those who forswore marred life were not told they were selfish, but rather wise for doing so. Single life was seen as a good, even if someone did not join a religious order – indeed, many promoted it as a better way of life, often writing on the horrors of married life so as to encourage it; this became so accepted that some rejected the good inherent in marriage, requiring Christian scholars to write upon and acknowledge the good to be had in marriage so as to make sure that its institution was not abandoned (even if they often found difficult to do so). Thus, it can be said that ancient Christian views of marriage and children were vastly different from ours, and they would be surprised to see the way some think having large families is the great Christian ideal.

Syncletica showed an awareness of the plight of women in her and many other times. She was not the only one. Many Christian women promoted their own dignity, and they stood fast to their decision, even if it brought down the ire of society upon them, indeed, even if it led to their own deaths as they would rather die than to be forced into marriage and lose control over their own destinies. Thus, those who were able to resist society and its expectations stood out against various abusive norms, being a voice not only for themselves, but for all women, including those who did not have the ability to follow after them in their fight against the system. For those who were free could and would be able to speak out against the system and encourage reform in a way those who were not free could do; by improving their own lot, such women could and would be able to work for others. Selfishness only came into play if their only concern was for their own private good, but that also happens for those who choose married life and have large families: indeed, for many, such large families are an indication of selfishness for they have not considered the greater good and the needs which the common good entails (which often means, having a small family, such as in places where overpopulation is a real problem). [2]

Sadly, we do not have as much literature which shows us the historical thoughts, beliefs, and practices of religious women as we have for religious men. And many of the texts which we possess were written or edited by men, which likely meant, something of the wisdom of such holy women was lost in transmission. This makes it much more important for us to study what we do have and engage it for the wisdom contained in it. We will find that many of our thoughts and practices might not only need reform, but that such reform will free us from dangerous ideologies which threaten the world today. We can see this in the way many women were called to religious life; their reasoning was to stand against a broken, dangerous system which undermined their personal value; it is a system which sadly continues to be promoted to this day (especially by Christians). Women were not called to religious life merely to be celibate virgins put on a pedestal, to serve as the exceptions which prove the rule about their place in society, but rather, they were called to the full Christian witness, to confront and speak out against systematic evil. Thankfully, women do not need to join the religious life, or be one of the few born into privilege, to do so today, though if they have the calling for it, the religious life certainly remains a place for them to act in this fashion. This is one of the changes which shows us how things have improved over time, though it was a long, hard fight. The holiness we see in women like Syncletica shows us that this was not just an accident of history, but also a work of the Spirit, where the Spirit has affirmed and promoted women who did this work in order to make sure that society changed. This is why we should give an ear to those women actively involved with such work and listen to what they have to say to us today, for it is likely that the Spirit continues to work with them and have many more things for us to learn through them so that society can become even better in the future.

[1] Pseudo-Athanasius, The Life And Regimen of The Blessed And Holy Syncletica. Trans. Elizabeth Bryson Bongie (Eugene, OR: Wipf and Stock Publishers, 2005), 30.

[2] “Finally, in certain parts of the world problems resulting from population growth are generating concern,” Gaudium et spes. Vatican translation. ¶47. “ Governments undoubtedly have rights and duties, within the limits of their proper competency, regarding the population problem in their respective countries, for instance, in the line of social and family life legislation, or regarding the migration of country-dwellers to the cities, or with respect to information concerning the condition and needs of the country. Since men today are giving thought to this problem and are so greatly disturbed over it, it is desirable in addition that Catholic specialists, especially in the universities, skillfully pursue and develop studies and projects on all these matter”, ibid. 87.

Stay in touch! Like A Little Bit of Nothing on Facebook.
If you liked what you read, please consider sharing it with your friends and family!

Sayings of the Desert Fathers

Women

Previous Post

January 23, 2022

The Christological Affirmation Of Free Will

Next Post

January 26, 2022 The Consistent Option For The Poor

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Abortion Abraham abuse Aesthetics AI Aliens Ambrose Ancestors and Everything Andrew Angels Animals Anne Anthony Antisemitism apologetics Apophatic Apostle John Aquinas Artificial Intelligence Asanga Ascension Asceticism Assumption Atheism Attachment Augustine Authority Avarice Balthasar Baptism Beauty Biden birthright citizenship Bishops Black History Books Buddhism Bulgakov Byzantine Calendar C.S. Lewis Calcidius Catholic Catholicism Catholicism Celibacy Charity Chastity children Chrismation Christ Christmas Christology Church Climate Change Common Good Communion Confession Confirmation Conscience Constantine conventions conversion councils Covid Creation Cross Dead Death Death Penalty Debate Deception Demagogues Demons Desert Monks Desert Mothers Desire destruction development Dialogue Dignity Dionsyius Dionysius Discipline Diversity Division Doctor Who doctrine dogma Dormition Dualism Easter Easter Series Ecumenical Councils Ecumenism Education Election Empathy Environment Error Eschatology eschaton Eternity Ethics Eucharist Evangelism Eve Evil evolution Faeries Faith Fear femininity Ficino Florence Florensky Folktale Fools Forgiveness Freedom Future gender Gentile Gentiles Glory Gnostic God gods Good Samaritan Goodness Gospel Government Grace Great Fast Guns Hate healing Health Heaven Hell Hellenism Heresy Hierarchy Hildegard Hinduism History Holiness Holy Spirit Holy Week Hope Horror Human rights humanity Humility hypocrisy ICE icon icons Identification Identity Idol II Nicea Immigration incarnation Individualism Informal Reflections Inklings Intention Inter-Religious Interfaith Internet Interpretation Intrinsic evil Irenaeus Islam Israel Jacob Jerome Jesus Jews John Chrysostom John of Damascus John the Baptist Joseph Judaism justice Justification kenosis Kindnesss Kingdom of God Kingdom of Heaven Law Law of Moses Lazarus Leaf by Niggle Lent Lenten Reflection Liberation Theology Lies Life Listen Literature Liturgy locutions Logic Logos Love Marriage Martyrs Mary Mass Maximos The Confessor Meanness Meditation Mercy Middle Path Migrants Mind Miracles Miriam Morals Moses Movies Music Muslims Myths Names Nationalism Native Americans New Year Nicea Nicholas Nothing Novatian Obedience Occam's Razor Ordination Origen Original Sin Orthodox orthopraxis Pagans Palamas Palm Sunday Paradise Paschaltide Paul Peace Pentecost person Peter piety PKD Plato pluralism Plurality Poem Poetry Poiltics Politics Poor Pope Pope Francis Pope Leo XIV Post Office Prayer Pride Pro-life Prodigal Son propaganda Prophecy Prophets Providence Putin Racism Reading Reason Reflection Refugees Relationships Religion Religion Series Religious Liberty Repent Republicans Rest Resurrection Rich Rites Russia Sacraments Saints Salvation Salvian Santa Science Scripture Self-Giving Sexuality Sibyl Sick Silence Sin Singlehood Social Justice Society Sodom Solovyov Speculations Spiritual Reflection St. Cyril of Alexandria St. Justin Martyr Suffering Sunday of the Paralytic Man Sunday of the Samaritan Woman Superhero Supreme Court Teaching Technology Thanksgiving The Father the Universe Theological Reflection Theology Theosis Theotokos Thomas Timaeus Time Tolerenace Tolkien Tradition Transfiguration Trinity Trump Truth Uncategorized Unity Universities USCCB Value Vatican II Vegetarian Vices Violence Virtue Vocations War Water Welcome Wisdom Womanhood Women Work World View Worship Writing Zacchaeus

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz