The Marian Element Of The Eucharist In Bulgakov’s The Eucharistic Sacrifice

Last updated on: December 21, 2021 at 7:25 am by Henry Karlson

The Marian Element Of The Eucharist In Bulgakov’s The Eucharistic Sacrifice 2021-12-21T07:25:55-05:00 Henry Karlson

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Lawrence OP: Statue From The Church Of Sainte Jean Baptiste In New York / flickr

The last chapter of Sergius Bulgakov’s book, The Eucharistic Sacrifice, is the most intriguing part of the book, both, because of what he said, but also because of what he did not say in it. He left it to the reader to explore and ponder the implications of his ideas for themselves. In the chapter, he presents the way in which he sees Mary, Jesus’ mother, is connected to the celebration of the eucharist. While the theme itself is provocative, it is not entirely unknown, and so he takes on a theme which others have explored, but adds to them in a way which they did not. He was, to say the least, very provocative in what he suggested. While it is possible he did not consider all the implications of his own ideas, it is very unlikely. But it is likely he was not sure of them and he wanted his readers to tackle them for themselves, to explore them further than he did, so as to better ascertain their validity.

Central to Bulgakov’s discussion of the relationship between Mary and Jesus is his understanding of Chalcedon. Mary is the Mother of Jesus, and as the Mother of Jesus, she is the Mother of God. His humanity comes directly from her; her flesh is transformed into his flesh, so that when he offers himself, his flesh, Mary’s transformed flesh is also being offered. Bulgakov did not confuse the two persons; he understood the difference between Christ and what he did, and Mary and what she did, but he believed that in the transformation of the flesh of Mary into the Godman, Mary was still present in and through that transformed flesh. Chalcedon, and its teaching that the two natures of Christ are not absorbed into each other, was central to him in this reflection. For he thought that it showed us the pattern of how God transforms things: such transformation does not destroy the nature of that which is transformed, but rather builds upon it, adding to it so that the original nature remains in the midst of all that change. Thus, Bulgakov said everyone has a special connection to Mary when they partake of communion:

All of this relates as much to the sacrifice itself as to the consumption of the eucharistic sacrifice, that is, communion. Receiving it, we commune of the Body and Blood of the Lord, but also co-commune of the humanity (the “body and blood”) of the Mother of God, in its “Chalcedonian” indivisibility with the Son. [1]

For Bulgakov, because of the unique way Mary is the Mother of God, she is in constant communion with Jesus, for she is always with him because he assumed his flesh from her. By giving birth to the Godman, she, in her own special way, is a mediator between God and humanity:

Such is the manner in which the nature of the Mother of God manifests itself: on the one hand it belong to creaturely humanity, to the world (as bread and wine), and on the other hand to Divine-humanity: She is inseparably united to the latter, for it took shape in Her womb. In this way, She is the living and personal mediation between God and humanity in the eucharistic transmutation.[2]

Mary mediates between God and humanity by giving her flesh to the Godman, allowing him to become human, and thus, allowing him to give of himself in the eucharist. Mary, as the Mother of God, had a special role in salvation history, and with it, in the work of salvation itself. She is in unceasing communion with the Godman, because the Godman took her flesh and transformed it, making it his own, but it still remains as it were, her flesh, her body and blood even as it is his. This means, what he does, is done in and with and through the flesh of Mary, making her a co-participant in his activities, not, of course, as the primary actor (for that is the Godman) but nonetheless, an actor, which is why, when understood properly, she can be called co-redemptrix:

And this mysterious connection between Christ and the Mother of God, which is the Holy Spirit by means of the energy of the Incarnation, hidden away in Divine-maternal silence, makes the Mother of God a co-participant in that salvific work. Justly She is sometimes called (in Catholic theology) co-redemptrix, the co-redeemer. Personally, She Herself is not the Redemptrix, but in natural terms [prirodono] She is undivided from the Redeemer. Of Her more than anyone else we say the words of the apostle in a very special sense, “it is no longer I who live, but it is Christ who lives in me” (Gal. 2:20). Life in Christ, through the communion of His Body and Blood, is given by the Holy Spirit. But for the Mother of God, this communion is the unceasing Incarnation of Christ through the Holy Spirit. [3]

But, Bulgakov continued, this means she is at work in and with Christ in all that he does, including in the establishment of and giving out of the eucharist:

And at the same time, through the Incarnation, She abides in a state of unceasing communion, so to speak, which is intrinsic to Her as the One who gave birth to God. We must augment this point further and say that, in this sense, She is not only co-redemptrix, but also co-server, co-liturgist with Christ. This is why some petitions are directed to Her in the liturgy, both for a worthy, salvific communion, and also in thanksgiving for it ( the same Is true in the prayers after Holy Communion). Is this not the reason that she is clothed in the Omophorion (in accordance with Church Tradition regarding the feast of the Protection of the Mother of God), as the High Priestess, side by side with the High Priest “forever according to the order of Melchizedek”? [4]

Thus, Bulgakov suggested, as Christ is the High Priest, fulfilling the eternal sacrifice, he does so not apart from, but with the priestly ministry of his Mother:

Godmotherhood, according to what has been said above, is co-service [so-sluzhenie] in the work of salvation, or, one might say, co-priesthood [so-zhrechestvo] with Christ. If the sacrificial offering of Christ contains all of His earthly life, with a perfecting zenith in the crucifixion, then His Mother too, in the silence and secrecy of Her service, walks along His entire path toward the Cross with Him and behind Him, and in the silent standing at the Cross co-offers His sacrifice along with Him, wholly giving up Herself for the salvation of the human race. [5]

Int this fashion, Bulgakov opened up a new notion of the eucharist and the eucharistic sacrifice, one which also allows us to see a new aspect to its institution. By suggesting that Mary also offered the sacrifice in and with Christ, and so can be said to be a co-celebrant in the eucharistic institution, could have all kinds of sacramental ramifications. What, exactly, does this theological understanding tell us about the priesthood in general? That question is one which Bulgakov did not ask nor answer. Yet, he did say that Mary should be seen as the High Priestess, next to the High Priest, Christ, offering the eucharistic sacrifice with him. This idea is worthy of further investigation and exploration, because the hints coming from Bulgakov’s reflection is enough to suggest a new way to understand the nature of the priesthood itself, one which does not disconnect with what has been understood of it in the past, but rather, one which transforms that understanding, allowing it to become something greater in the future.

[1] Sergius Bulgakov, The Eucharistic Sacrifice. Trans. Mark Roosien (Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 2021), 87.

[2] Sergius Bulgakov, The Eucharistic Sacrifice, 90.

[3] Sergius Bulgakov, The Eucharistic Sacrifice, 78.

[4] Sergius Bulgakov, The Eucharistic Sacrifice, 79

[5] Sergius Bulgakov, The Eucharistic Sacrifice, 84-5.

Stay in touch! Like A Little Bit of Nothing on Facebook.
If you liked what you read, please consider sharing it with your friends and family!

Previous Post

December 20, 2021

Tradition Should Be Living. It Is Not About Following A Dead Letter

Next Post

December 24, 2021 Gifts Of Love

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Abortion Abraham abuse Aesthetics AI Aliens Ambrose Ancestors and Everything Andrew Angels Animals Anne Anthony Antisemitism apologetics Apophatic Apostle John Aquinas Artificial Intelligence Asanga Ascension Asceticism Assumption Atheism Attachment Augustine Authority Avarice Balthasar Baptism Beauty Biden birthright citizenship Bishops Black History Books Buddhism Bulgakov Byzantine Calendar C.S. Lewis Calcidius Catholic Catholicism Catholicism Celibacy Charity Chastity children Chrismation Christ Christmas Christology Church Climate Change Common Good Communion Confession Confirmation Conscience Constantine conventions conversion councils Covid Creation Cross Dead Death Death Penalty Debate Deception Demagogues Demons Desert Monks Desert Mothers Desire destruction development Dialogue Dignity Dionsyius Dionysius Discipline Diversity Division Doctor Who doctrine dogma Dormition Dualism Easter Easter Series Ecumenical Councils Ecumenism Education Election Empathy Environment Error Eschatology eschaton Eternity Ethics Eucharist Evangelism Eve Evil evolution Faeries Faith Fear femininity Ficino Florence Florensky Folktale Fools Forgiveness Freedom Future gender Gentile Gentiles Glory Gnostic God gods Good Samaritan Goodness Gospel Government Grace Great Fast Guns Hate healing Health Heaven Hell Hellenism Heresy Hierarchy Hildegard Hinduism History Holiness Holy Spirit Holy Week Hope Horror Human rights humanity Humility hypocrisy ICE icon icons Identification Identity Idol II Nicea Immigration incarnation Individualism Informal Reflections Inklings Intention Inter-Religious Interfaith Internet Interpretation Intrinsic evil Irenaeus Islam Israel Jacob Jerome Jesus Jews John Chrysostom John of Damascus John the Baptist Joseph Judaism justice Justification kenosis Kindnesss Kingdom of God Kingdom of Heaven Law Law of Moses Lazarus Leaf by Niggle Lent Lenten Reflection Liberation Theology Lies Life Listen Literature Liturgy locutions Logic Logos Love Marriage Martyrs Mary Mass Maximos The Confessor Meanness Meditation Mercy Middle Path Migrants Mind Miracles Miriam Morals Moses Movies Music Muslims Myths Names Nationalism Native Americans New Year Nicea Nicholas Nothing Novatian Obedience Occam's Razor Ordination Origen Original Sin Orthodox orthopraxis Pagans Palamas Palm Sunday Paradise Paschaltide Paul Peace Pentecost person Peter piety PKD Plato pluralism Plurality Poem Poetry Poiltics Politics Poor Pope Pope Francis Pope Leo XIV Post Office Prayer Pride Pro-life Prodigal Son propaganda Prophecy Prophets Providence Putin Racism Reading Reason Reflection Refugees Relationships Religion Religion Series Religious Liberty Repent Republicans Rest Resurrection Rich Rites Russia Sacraments Saints Salvation Salvian Santa Science Scripture Self-Giving Sexuality Sibyl Sick Silence Sin Singlehood Social Justice Society Sodom Solovyov Speculations Spiritual Reflection St. Cyril of Alexandria St. Justin Martyr Suffering Sunday of the Paralytic Man Sunday of the Samaritan Woman Superhero Supreme Court Teaching Technology Thanksgiving The Father the Universe Theological Reflection Theology Theosis Theotokos Thomas Timaeus Time Tolerenace Tolkien Tradition Transfiguration Trinity Trump Truth Uncategorized Unity Universities USCCB Value Vatican II Vegetarian Vices Violence Virtue Vocations War Water Welcome Wisdom Womanhood Women Work World View Worship Writing Zacchaeus

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz