Aquinas on Eucharistic Miracles

Last updated on: May 31, 2021 at 2:59 am by Henry Karlson

Aquinas on Eucharistic Miracles 2021-05-31T02:59:40-05:00 Henry Karlson

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Junior: Eucharistic Miracle of Lanciano /Wikimedia Commons

Just as the eucharist is often misunderstood, the meaning and value of eucharistic miracles are often misconstrued by well-intentioned, pious Catholics. Most of the time, eucharistic miracles refer to situations when the eucharistic species of bread and wine no longer appear as bread and wine but as flesh and blood. Another kind of miracle is when someone perceives a vision of Christ superimposed over the eucharistic bread. In either occasion, the miracle is meant to point out a truth about the eucharist, that is, it is Christ who is present sacramentally in it; what it is not meant to do is have people become too attached to the physical form, assuming more of the form than the reality behind the form.

In the Summa Theologica, St. Thomas Aquinas tells us not to consider the physical form of the eucharist, no matter what form it comes in, as being anything more than an accident which represents and presents to us the greater truth of in the sacrament itself. What is contained in every physical portion of the eucharist is the fullness of Christ, no matter the size of the portion received. Thus, the physical form, the accidents, is always less than what is being offered in communion, for what is offered is the fullness of Christ. This is true, whether or not the physical form is of bread and wine, or of flesh and blood. The form, even if it is of flesh and blood, points to the invisible grace given by communion, the grace found in the reception of the sacramental presence of Christ in all its fullness.

This is why Aquinas calls the appearance associated with a eucharistic miracle an apparition. He suggests that there are two ways this appearance could be manifest, either in the form of flesh and blood, or in the figure of a whole person (like a child). In either situation, the appearance is but a physical sign for a greater reality. Whether or not one receives communion in the form of bread or wine, or as flesh and blood (such as if the eucharist seems to change its accidents while being consumed), the person receives the exact same thing. It is Christ, and the fullness of Christ. Since mere flesh and blood do not show the fullness of Christ, it is why we know that such a form is but a sign for the reality of communion and is not the fullness of that reality itself. Aquinas points out, moreover, whether or not the miracle lasts for but a moment, or for some extended period of time, there is no change in what is received. What is important is the thing in itself, the sacramental presence of Christ. The value of eucharistic miracles is that they help those who witness them to understand the kind of grace being offered to them by the eucharist so that it becomes easier for them to believe that they truly receive Christ himself when they receive communion.

And so, Aquinas, presenting his position on eucharistic miracles, begins by saying:

I answer that, Such apparition comes about in two ways, when occasionally in this sacrament flesh, or blood, or a child, is seen. Sometimes it happens on the part of the beholders, whose eyes are so affected as if they outwardly saw flesh, or blood, or a child, while no change takes place in the sacrament. And this seems to happen when to one person it is seen under the species of flesh or of a child, while to others it is seen as before under the species of bread; or when to the same individual it appears for an hour under the appearance of flesh or a child, and afterwards under the appearance of bread. Nor is there any deception there, as occurs in the feats of magicians, because such species is divinely formed in the eye in order to represent some truth, namely, for the purpose of showing that Christ’s body is truly under this sacrament; just as Christ without deception appeared to the disciples who were going to Emmaus. For Augustine says (De Qq. Evang. ii) that “when our pretense is referred to some significance, it is not a lie, but a figure of the truth.” And since in this way no change is made in the sacrament, it is manifest that, when such apparition occurs, Christ does not cease to be under this sacrament. [1]

Aquinas finds important is that we realize that so long as such a miracle lasts, and is seen by many, we must not confuse the physical form as being anything other than what it is, a physical appearance which manifests and points to the greater truth of communion. That means that the fact that the fullness of Christ’s body does not physically appear, but only some portion of it seems to appear, we should not use that to think communion is the reception of some partial portion of Christ. Likewise, we must not think that, with such a physical appearance, Christ’s body is properly said to be located where the eucharistic species is found. Rather, his glorified body is beyond mere physical locality, as it is said to be in heaven:

But this seems unlikely. First of all, because Christ’s body under its proper species can be seen only in one place, wherein it is definitively contained. Hence since it is seen in its proper species, and is adored in heaven, it is not seen under its proper species in this sacrament. Secondly, because a glorified body, which appears at will, disappears when it wills after the apparition; thus it is related (Luke 24:31) that our Lord “vanished out of sight” of the disciples. But that which appears under the likeness of flesh in this sacrament, continues for a long time; indeed, one reads of its being sometimes enclosed, and, by order of many bishops, preserved in a pyx, which it would be wicked to think of Christ under His proper semblance. [2]

And so, what we see, like when we see bread and wine, or if we see flesh and blood, or some personal figure, it is always less than what we receive, meaning, it only serves to signify and present to us ways for us to realize that truth for ourselves. We must come to understand that Christ is spiritually and not physically present in communion, though he is received in and through the physical accidents of the sacrament itself. To those who would suggest this is deceptive on the part of God, Aquinas argues it is not, because God is truly trying to tell us something through the signs and what is being presented through them is truly what we are given when we partake of the eucharist:

Consequently, it remains to be said, that, while the dimensions remain the same as before, there is a miraculous change wrought in the other accidents, such as shape, color, and the rest, so that flesh, or blood, or a child, is seen. And, as was said already, this is not deception, because it is done “to represent the truth,” namely, to show by this miraculous apparition that Christ’s body and blood are truly in this sacrament. And thus it is clear that as the dimensions remain, which are the foundation of the other accidents, as we shall see later on (III:77:2), the body of Christ truly remains in this sacrament.[3]

From all of this, it must be said that eucharistic miracles are to be understood as being another way by which God signifies what it is we receive and it does so in a way which helps people believe that the Holy Spirit truly is at work with the eucharistic species, transforming them so that they can present to us the sacramental presence and reality of Christ. The physical form of communion, even after a eucharistic miracle, remains but a sign. The reality is greater than what is found in the sign. Eucharistic miracles serve to help people have faith in what they receive, but they should not therefore confuse the sign as being the fullness of what is received. That is, we receive the fullness of Christ, and not just what it is we can perceive with our empirical senses.

[1] St. Thomas Aquinas, Summa Theologica: Volume Five. Trans. Fathers of the English Dominican Provence (New York: Benzinger Brothers, 1948), 2455 ( III-76.8).

[2] St. Thomas Aquinas, Summa Theologica: Volume Five, 2456 ( III-76.8).

[3] St. Thomas Aquinas, Summa Theologica: Volume Five, 2456 ( III-76.8).

Stay in touch! Like A Little Bit of Nothing on Facebook.
If you liked what you read, please consider sharing it with your friends and family!

Previous Post

May 30, 2021

All Saints: Nothing Is Lost, Nothing Is Forgotten

Next Post

June 2, 2021 The Value Of The Heart

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Abortion Abraham abuse Aesthetics AI Aliens Ambrose Ancestors and Everything Andrew Angels Animals Anne Anthony Antisemitism apologetics Apophatic Apostle John Aquinas Artificial Intelligence Asanga Ascension Asceticism Assumption Atheism Attachment Augustine Authority Avarice Balthasar Baptism Beauty Biden birthright citizenship Bishops Black History Books Buddhism Bulgakov Byzantine Calendar C.S. Lewis Calcidius Catholic Catholicism Catholicism Celibacy Charity Chastity children Chrismation Christ Christmas Christology Church Climate Change Common Good Communion Confession Confirmation Conscience Constantine conventions conversion councils Covid Creation Cross Dead Death Death Penalty Debate Deception Demagogues Demons Desert Monks Desert Mothers Desire destruction development Dialogue Dignity Dionsyius Dionysius Discipline Diversity Division Doctor Who doctrine dogma Dormition Dualism Easter Easter Series Ecumenical Councils Ecumenism Education Election Empathy Environment Error Eschatology eschaton Eternity Ethics Eucharist Evangelism Eve Evil evolution Faeries Faith Fear femininity Ficino Florence Florensky Folktale Fools Forgiveness Freedom Future gender Gentile Gentiles Glory Gnostic God gods Good Samaritan Goodness Gospel Government Grace Great Fast Guns Hate healing Health Heaven Hell Hellenism Heresy Hierarchy Hildegard Hinduism History Holiness Holy Spirit Holy Week Hope Horror Human rights humanity Humility hypocrisy ICE icon icons Identification Identity Idol II Nicea Immigration incarnation Individualism Informal Reflections Inklings Intention Inter-Religious Interfaith Internet Interpretation Intrinsic evil Irenaeus Islam Israel Jacob Jerome Jesus Jews John Chrysostom John of Damascus John the Baptist Joseph Judaism justice Justification kenosis Kindnesss Kingdom of God Kingdom of Heaven Law Law of Moses Lazarus Leaf by Niggle Lent Lenten Reflection Liberation Theology Lies Life Listen Literature Liturgy locutions Logic Logos Love Marriage Martyrs Mary Mass Maximos The Confessor Meanness Meditation Mercy Middle Path Migrants Mind Miracles Miriam Morals Moses Movies Music Muslims Myths Names Nationalism Native Americans New Year Nicea Nicholas Nothing Novatian Obedience Occam's Razor Ordination Origen Original Sin Orthodox orthopraxis Pagans Palamas Palm Sunday Paradise Paschaltide Paul Peace Pentecost person Peter piety PKD Plato pluralism Plurality Poem Poetry Poiltics Politics Poor Pope Pope Francis Pope Leo XIV Post Office Prayer Pride Pro-life Prodigal Son propaganda Prophecy Prophets Providence Putin Racism Reading Reason Reflection Refugees Relationships Religion Religion Series Religious Liberty Repent Republicans Rest Resurrection Rich Rites Russia Sacraments Saints Salvation Salvian Santa Science Scripture Self-Giving Sexuality Sibyl Sick Silence Sin Singlehood Social Justice Society Sodom Solovyov Speculations Spiritual Reflection St. Cyril of Alexandria St. Justin Martyr Suffering Sunday of the Paralytic Man Sunday of the Samaritan Woman Superhero Supreme Court Teaching Technology Thanksgiving The Father the Universe Theological Reflection Theology Theosis Theotokos Thomas Timaeus Time Tolerenace Tolkien Tradition Transfiguration Trinity Trump Truth Uncategorized Unity Universities USCCB Value Vatican II Vegetarian Vices Violence Virtue Vocations War Water Welcome Wisdom Womanhood Women Work World View Worship Writing Zacchaeus

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz