Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Catholic
Signs, Symbols and Sacraments: Part I

Signs, Symbols and Sacraments: Part I

Last updated on: April 26, 2021 at 8:31 am by Henry Karlson

Signs, Symbols and Sacraments: Part I 2021-04-26T08:31:19-05:00 Henry Karlson

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Signs, symbols, and figures. Often, one of these words implies the others, as can be seen throughout the marginal notes of a medieval translation of Pseudo-Dionysius’s Ecclesiastical Hierarchy: “Symbols – figures and signs” (Symbolorum – figurarum et signorum.). [1] “Symbols – that is, signs or figures” (Symbola – id est signa vel figuras). [2] “Symbols – that is, signs.” (Symbolis – id est signis). [3]

James Chan: Cross Crucifix Chalice / pixabay

Signs, symbols and figures all are used to communicate. Those who use them want to signify some element of the truth through them. Sometimes they do it by pointing out that truth in a sign or symbol has no other connection to that truth than some analogy being made through its use, but sometimes they do it using a sign which also contains the truth being signified within the sign or symbol itself.

Augustine discussed the meaning and value of signs in his work, On Christian Doctrine. He did so because Scripture, being filled with symbols, needs to be read with those symbols in mind. If people do not understand the symbolic content contained in Scripture, their reading will be incomplete if not erroneous.

Augustine began his work by saying that there are two types of signs. The first he designated as being natural. The second he indicated as being conventional:

Now some signs are natural, others conventional. Natural signs are those which, apart from any intention or desire of using them as signs, do yet lead to the knowledge of something else, as, for example, smoke when it indicates fire. For it is not from any intention of making it a sign that it is so, but through attention to experience we come to know that fire is beneath, even when nothing but smoke can be seen. And the footprint of an animal passing by belongs to this class of signs. And the countenance of an angry or sorrowful man indicates the feeling in his mind, independently of his will: and in the same way every other emotion of the mind is betrayed by the tell-tale countenance, even though we do nothing with the intention of making it known.[4]

Natural signs are those signs which can be found in the natural world, those things which we find all around us that we can use to understand and learn about the world around us. They often are elements of some nature which we can observe that indicate the presence of that nature itself. Thus, when we see there is smoke, we can infer that there is fire present. Smoke is a natural sign for fire. What was important is that a natural sign is made without any conscious effort. Thus, body language and the unconscious cues people give with it qualify as natural signs. Conventional signs are made and established by some conscious effort, creating conventions which require an interpreter, someone who knows the meaning of the convention, for them to be effective. They communicate meaning, but if one does not know the association of the sign or symbol with the meaning implied, it can be something which is not understood. Thus, for example, we know a red traffic signal means stop; it is a conventional sign with a meaning that is given to all who learn to drive so they know they must stop when they see a red light. Thus, conventional signs are established to communicate, but for the communication to be effective, both those who use the sign and those who are being communicated by it must know the relationship between the sign and its intended meaning:

Conventional signs, on the other hand, are those which living beings mutually exchange for the purpose of showing, as well as they can, the feelings of their minds, or their perceptions, or their thoughts. Nor is there any reason for giving a sign except the desire of drawing forth and conveying into another’s mind what the giver of the sign has in his own mind. [5]

Conventional signs can be established in a variety of ways. They can be very obscure and esoteric, so that only the initiated can understanding their meaning, or they can be related to and connected to some element of nature so that they are easier to understand. But, since a sign is established by the conventions of a particular community, outsiders can certainly find it difficult to interpret and understand the sign if they have not been given an explanation for the intended meaning (or the means to determine that explanation).

While sacraments are not merely signs or symbols, they come to us in and through such symbols, established both in their physical form but also in the ritual used to establish them, so that those who participate in the sacraments will be able to discern the truth being presented in and through them:

The doctors have designated with a brief description of what a sacrament is: “A sacrament is a sign of a sacred thing.” For just as in man there are two things, body and soul, and one in Scripture likewise two things, letter and sense, so also in every sacrament there is one thing which is treated visibly without and is seen, and there is another which is believed invisibly within and is received. What is visible without and material is a sacrament; the sacrament, however, which is treated and sanctified without is a sign of spiritual grace and this is thine thing of the sacrament and is received invisibly. [6]

Thus, with the sacraments, there is the physical aspect to them, an aspect which is often called the “sacrament” itself, and the thing which is being represented by the physical sacrament, the thing in itself, the grace of sacrament:

WHAT IS A SACRAMENT. – AUGUSTINE, IN BOOK 10, THE CITY OF God: “A sacrament is a sign of a sacred thing.” And yet a sacrament is also called a “sacred secret,” the sacrament of the Godhead, for example, so that a sacrament is a sacred thing which designates the sacred thing which is designated. But what is now at issue is the sacrament according to its being a sign. Also, a sacrament is a visible form of an invisible grace.[7]

The physical form of the sacrament, therefore is a symbol, and that symbol points to the grace contained within it. The grace is spiritual, and so not physical, making it invisible. The physical form is used so that we understand that we are receiving a reality which lies beyond our perception and comprehension:

Nor if anyone wishes to define more fully and more perfectly what a sacrament is, he can say: “A sacrament is a corporeal or material element set before the senses without, representing by similitude and signifying by institution and containing by sanctification some invisible and spiritual grace.” This definition is recognized as so fitting and perfect that it is found to befit every sacrament and a sacrament alone. For every thing that has these three is a sacrament, and everything that lacks these three can not be properly called a sacrament. For every sacrament ought to have a kind of similitude to the thing itself of which it is the sacrament, according to which it is capable of representing the same thing; every sacrament ought to have also institution through which it is ordered to signify this thing and finally sanctification through which it contains that thing and is efficacious for conferring the same on those to be sanctified. [8]

Peter Lombard, therefore, considered a sacrament to be a physical sign or symbol, while acknowledging what we receive is more than the symbol. Thus, he mentioned that there are three things involved in our reception of the sacraments: the physical sacrament, the grace, and the union of the two:

And so there are three things to distinguish here: one, which is the sacrament alone; another, which is a sacrament and thing; a third, which is thing and not sacrament. The sacrament and not thing is the visible species of bread and wine; the sacrament and thing is Christ’s own flesh and blood; the thing and not sacrament is his mystical flesh. – Moreover, that visible species is a sacrament of a double thing, because it signifies either thing, and bears the express likeness of each of the two. For just as bread restores and sustains the body more than other foods, so wine gives joy to and inebriates man, so the flesh of Christ, more than other graces, spiritually restores and nourishes the interior man; hence: *Your chalice inebriates; how magnificent it is! –*It also has the likeness of a mystical thing, which is the unity of the faithful, because, just as one loaf of bread is made from many grains, and wine flows into one from many grapes, so the unity of the Church is composed out of the many persons of the faithful. [9]

Sacraments, by their nature, are symbolic; the physical aspect of them is traditionally understood to be what we designate as the sacrament. The grace is one with the sacrament but it is not the same thing as the physical form. Thus, the physical form which we experience is a symbol pointing to that grace, a grace which is contained within the sacrament and so is not to be said to be other than the sacrament, and yet a grace which must not be confused with the symbolic element of the sacrament itself. We receive this grace when we partake of the sanctified sacraments, but it is important to realize that this is a grace which we can receive apart from the physical sacraments if God so wills: “Now God can save man without these, who can bestow upon man His virtue and sanctification and salvation in whatever way He wills.” [10] God is not bound by the sacraments, but we, who know of them and are guided and directed to them, are bound to them as the normative way to receive the graces signified by them. It would be impious to suggest that what is normative for us must be seen as the only way which such grace can be received, for those who would suggest this would put a limit on God:

You ascribe a necessity to sacraments and from the Author of sacraments you take away power and to Him you deny piety. You say to me that he who has not the sacraments of God can not be saved, and I say to you: “He who has the virtue of the sacraments of God can not perish.” Either deny that there can be virtue where there is no sacrament, or if you concede the virtue deny the damnation. Which is greater, the sacrament or the virtue of the sacrament? What is greater, water or faith? If you wish to speak the truth, say “faith.” [11]

The virtue, the grace, of the sacrament is the point of the sacrament. If God deigns to give us that grace apart from the sacraments, that is God’s prerogative, and not for us to reject. But we also know God has established the sacraments for us so we can receive their graces, and if we can obtain the sacraments for those graces, who are we to deny them and tell God how we want to receive them? It is for God to give them out as God wills, and for us to receive them in the way God has provided them to us; the key is to realize that God is not bound to the sacraments and can, with mercy and grace, give the grace of the sacraments, the thing signified by the physical sacraments, to those who have not received the physical sacraments. This is why we must not believe that those who have not received the sacraments will be damned for eternity; their status is known to God. It is for us to rest on the merciful and gracious love of God as a reason to hope that even those who do not receive the physical sacraments can be saved.

[1] Ed. and Trans., L Michael Harrington, On The Ecclesiastical Hierarchy: The Thirteenth Century Paris Textbook Edition (Paris: Peeters, 2011), 55.

[2] Ed. and Trans., L Michael Harrington, On The Ecclesiastical Hierarchy: The Thirteenth Century Paris Textbook Edition, 63.

[3] Ed. and Trans., L Michael Harrington, On The Ecclesiastical Hierarchy: The Thirteenth Century Paris Textbook Edition, 75.

[4] St. Augustine, “On Christian Doctrine” in NPNF1(2):535-6.

[5] St. Augustine, “On Christian Doctrine,” 536.

[6] Hugh of Saint Victor, On the Sacraments. Trans. Roy J. Deferrari (Cambridge: Medieval Academy of America, 1951), 154.

[7] Peter Lombard, The Sentences. Book 4. On the Doctrine of Signs. Trans. Giulio Silano (Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Medieval Studies, 2010), 3 [Distinction I, Chapter 2].

[8] Hugh of Saint Victor, On the Sacraments, 155.

[9] Peter Lombard, The Sentences. Book 4. On the Doctrine of Signs, 45 [Distinction VIII, Chapter 7].

[10] Hugh of Saint Victor, On the Sacraments, 161.

[11] Hugh of Saint Victor, On the Sacraments, 162.

Stay in touch! Like A Little Bit of Nothing on Facebook.
If you liked what you read, please consider sharing it with your friends and family!

Previous Post

April 25, 2021

Christ Heals Those Paralyzed By Sin

Next Post

April 28, 2021 Signs, Symbols and Sacraments: Conclusion

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Abortion Abraham abuse Aesthetics AI Aliens Ambrose Ancestors and Everything Andrew Angels Animals Anne Anthony Antisemitism apologetics Apophatic Apostle John Aquinas Artificial Intelligence Asanga Ascension Asceticism Assumption Atheism Attachment Augustine Authority Avarice Balthasar Baptism Beauty Biden birthright citizenship Bishops Black History Books Buddhism Bulgakov Byzantine Calendar C.S. Lewis Calcidius Catholic Catholicism Catholicism Celibacy Charity Chastity children Chrismation Christ Christmas Christology Church Climate Change Common Good Communion Confession Confirmation Conscience Constantine conventions conversion councils Covid Creation Cross Dead Death Death Penalty Debate Deception Demagogues Demons Desert Monks Desert Mothers Desire destruction development Dialogue Dignity Dionsyius Dionysius Discipline Diversity Division Doctor Who doctrine dogma Dormition Dualism Easter Easter Series Ecumenical Councils Ecumenism Education Election Empathy Environment Error Eschatology eschaton Eternity Ethics Eucharist Evangelism Eve Evil evolution Faeries Faith Fear femininity Ficino Florence Florensky Folktale Fools Forgiveness Freedom Future gender Gentile Gentiles Glory Gnostic God gods Good Samaritan Goodness Gospel Government Grace Great Fast Guns Halloween Hate healing Health Heaven Hell Hellenism Heresy Hierarchy Hildegard Hinduism History Holiness Holy Spirit Holy Week Hope Horror Human rights humanity Humility hypocrisy ICE icon icons Identification Identity Idol II Nicea Immigration incarnation Individualism Informal Reflections Inklings Intention Inter-Religious Interfaith Internet Interpretation Intrinsic evil Irenaeus Islam Israel Jacob Jerome Jesus Jews John Chrysostom John of Damascus John the Baptist Joseph Judaism justice Justification kenosis Kindnesss Kingdom of God Kingdom of Heaven Law Law of Moses Lazarus Leaf by Niggle Lent Lenten Reflection Liberation Theology Lies Life Listen Literature Liturgy locutions Logic Logos Love Marriage Martyrs Mary Mass Maximos The Confessor Meanness Meditation Mercy Middle Path Migrants Mind Miracles Miriam Morals Moses Movies Music Muslims Myths Names Nationalism Native Americans New Year Nicea Nicholas Nothing Novatian Obedience Occam's Razor Ordination Origen Original Sin Orthodox orthopraxis Pagans Palamas Palm Sunday Paradise Paschaltide Paul Peace Pentecost person Peter piety PKD Plato pluralism Plurality Poem Poetry Poiltics Politics Poor Pope Pope Francis Pope Leo XIV Post Office Prayer Pride Pro-life Prodigal Son propaganda Prophecy Prophets Providence Putin Racism Reading Reason Reflection Refugees Relationships Religion Religion Series Religious Liberty Repent Republicans Rest Resurrection Rich Rites Russia Sacraments Saints Salvation Salvian Santa Science Scripture Self-Giving Sexuality Sibyl Sick Silence Sin Singlehood Social Justice Society Sodom Solovyov Speculations Spiritual Reflection St. Cyril of Alexandria St. Justin Martyr Suffering Sunday of the Paralytic Man Sunday of the Samaritan Woman Superhero Supreme Court Teaching Technology Thanksgiving The Father the Universe Theological Reflection Theology Theosis Theotokos Thomas Timaeus Time Tolerenace Tolkien Tradition Transfiguration Trinity Trump Truth Uncategorized Unity Universities USCCB Value Vatican II Vegetarian Vices Violence Virtue Vocations War Water Welcome Wisdom Womanhood Women Work World View Worship Writing Zacchaeus

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz