Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Catholic
Florensky On The Church’s Blessing Of Love

Florensky On The Church’s Blessing Of Love

Last updated on: March 25, 2021 at 5:52 am by Henry Karlson

Florensky On The Church’s Blessing Of Love 2021-03-25T05:52:22-05:00 Henry Karlson

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

No Photographer Listed: Pavel Florensky / Wikimedia Commons

Those who study Christian history should be able to see how the church, when it properly follows the lead of the Holy Spirit, looks for ways to meet the needs of the faithful, to make sure they are spiritually blessed. The church does this by taking whatever good it finds in the natural order and showing how it has a place for it in the Christian faith. It takes the good it finds and implants in it the grace, so that the good becomes transformed as it becomes something greater than it was before. Even when it finds some natural goods mixed with error and injustice, it should find a way to appreciate those goods, promoting them because they are good. It should not destroy what is good, for that is what sin does. Thus, it should find a way to take any defiled good, cleanse it from that defilement, and then set it free so it can attain its proper end. The problem is that Christians often only see the sin, not the good which is behind the sin, so that instead of purifying what should be promoted, they end up denying even the good, harming those who are naturally attracted to and can be saved by that good.

Pavel Florensky, the great Russian Orthodox theologian-scientist-martyr (and saint), recognized one such good in the close bonds and love which can be had by friends (of the same sex). It is a love which he believed could bind people together, making the two, one, similar to the way marriage makes a husband and wife one. It is a bond which he thought was found naturally in society but which also found a “sacramental” realization in the church when it institute its own ceremonies which spiritually bound two friends together. The natural form often had its own rituals and acknowledgments, such in the way two friends could become “blood-brothers,” where they made vows and shared blood with one another; the ecclesial (or grace-filled) form of this elevates what is found in nature and makes it greater, so that the two friends become spiritually one as they share the body and blood of Christ together:

Traditionally, there have been two such reinforcements of friendship: (1) the “natural sacrament” (may the reader forgive this inappropriate combination of words) of the pledging of brotherhood; and (2) the grace-giving office of adelphopoiesis, akolouthia eis adelphopoiesin or eis adelphopoiia, which grew out of this “sacrament” as from a fruitful natural soil. [1]

Thus, Florensky said, there is a way that two close, loving people can be joined together and blessed by the church. The two made their commitment to each other before the church, and before Christ, as they received the “brother-making” (adelphopoiesis) ceremony which took their friendship, and the love held in that friendship, and reinforced it with grace. Because the natural form of this rite existed first, and was elevated by the church, it was important to point out what he saw was the essence of the natural rite:

Let me only note that the pledging of brotherhood consists, in essence, of a real unification through an exchange of blood and names (and sometimes even an exchange of shirts, clothes, and weapons), or through co-partaking of sacred food, a vow of faithfulness, and a kiss. [2]

Christianity transformed the rite, taking and adapting what it had been given but making it something richer, greater, by imparting grace to it:

On the other hand, in the office of adelphopoiesis, the exchange of blood and co-partaking of sacred food are replaced by Holy Communion, by the co-partaking of the Blood of Christ, while the exchange of names is replaced by the exchange of crosses, which corresponds to the exchange of Christian names. The half-ecclesiastical, half-popular rite of adelphopoiesis is accomplished through an exchange of crosses, a vow of brotherly love and faithfulness before an icon in church, and by the brothers alternately holding a burning candle during the Cherbuic Hymn. [3]

Florensky saw a connection to this rite of “brother-making” with marriage. In marriage, it is husband and wife who are made one, but with the brother-making rite, it is two beloved friends who find grace uniting them together so that their mutual love can be affirmed by the church:

Just as agapic love must be accompanied by philic love, which is irreducible to but inseparable from agapic love, so liturgical offices of the agapic and philic unions, which are irreducible to each other, must coexist. And it is clear that, just as the two forms of love are analogous to each other, so the corresponding rites of the communal liturgy and of adelphopoiesis are also analogues. [4]

Scripture, he said, was filled with such passionate love between friends, that it would be hard for Christians to deny it grace. He believed that the love held between David and Jonathan represented one of the greatest examples of this love in history:

The Bible also shows the realization of this ideal friendship in living reality. I have in mind the extremely touching friendship of David and Jonathan, depicted in just a word words, but for that reason almost painfully touching: “Written as if for me,” everyone thinks. [5]

Likewise, Jesus sent out the disciples two by two, because he found and saw their inner connection and recognized that if they were connected with a common bond in their mission, they would be greater together in the unity of that bond than they would be if they were sent out as mere individuals:

Thus, the knowing of mysteries, i.e., the inward-directed bearing of spirit (like the doing of miracles, i.e., the outward-bearing of spirit, or more briefly, the bearing of spirit in general), is based on the abiding of the disciples two by two. “Two” is not “one plus one,” but something essentially greater, something essentially more manifoldly significant and powerful. [6]

When the bonds between friends grow and are strengthened by love (and grace), then they find themselves merging so that they act and think often as one: “Being united thus, by their essence, and forming a rationally unknowable duality-unity, friends enter into a unity of feeling, will, and thought that completely excludes divergence of feeling, will, and thought.” [7] Similar to the way a husband and wife come together and share all that they have, such friends share all things together: “The interests of friends merge. The property of one becomes the property of the other, and the good of one becomes the good of the other.” [8] The two, likewise, can and often have physical affection for each other:

It is necessary not only to “love” one another but also to be close together, to attempt, as much as possible, to come closer and closer to one another. But when are friends closest to each other, if not when kissing? The very word for “kiss” in Russian (potselui) is very close to the Russian word for “whole” (tselyi) and the Russian verb for “to kiss” (tselovat’sia) signifies that friends are brought to a state of wholeness (tselostnost’) or unity. A kiss is the spiritual unification of the persons kissing. [9]

And finally, the bond, once it is made, is, like marriage, indissoluble:

Faithfulness to a once-established friendship, the indissolubility of friendship, as strict as the indissolubility of marriage, firmness to the end, unto the “blood of the martyrs” – that is the fundamental commandment of friendship. And the whole force of friendship lies in the observance of this commandment. [10]

Thus, Florensky shows us that the church has recognized the close bonds of love that two people of the same gender can have for each other. It has found a way to affirm that love and bless it. Jesus, in sending out the disciples two by two, has affirmed what is found in nature, the possibility of a great, all-encompassing love between two such friends, and elevated it with his grace. This is similar to the way he saw the great love possible in a married couple and elevated it at the Wedding of Cana. The church, following Christ, can indeed bless that love, bless and affirm it, and historically has found ways to do so. It is therefore vital for the church to look at its own tradition and practices and us it today to creatively engage the concerns of Christians today, finding ways it can affirm the bond of love formed by two people, seeing the good of that love and promoting it for their salvation.

[1] Pavel Florensky, The Pillar and Ground of the Truth. Trans. Boris Jakim (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1997), 327.

[2] Pavel Florensky, The Pillar and Ground of the Truth, 327.

[3] Pavel Florensky, The Pillar and Ground of the Truth, 327.

[4] Pavel Florensky, The Pillar and Ground of the Truth, 329.

[5] Pavel Florensky, The Pillar and Ground of the Truth, 299.

[6] Pavel Florensky, The Pillar and Ground of the Truth, 302-3.

[7] Pavel Florensky, The Pillar and Ground of the Truth, 312.

[8] Pavel Florensky, The Pillar and Ground of the Truth, 310

[9] Pavel Florensky, The Pillar and Ground of the Truth, 316.

[10] Pavel Florensky, The Pillar and Ground of the Truth, 318.

Stay in touch! Like A Little Bit of Nothing on Facebook.
If you liked what you read, please consider sharing it with your friends and family!

Love

Florensky

Love

Previous Post

March 24, 2021

Two Kinds Of Grief

Next Post

March 28, 2021 Jesus Comes To Jerusalem: Jesus Comes To Us

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Abortion Abraham abuse Aesthetics AI Aliens Ambrose Ancestors and Everything Andrew Angels Animals Anne Anthony Antisemitism apologetics Apophatic Apostle John Aquinas Artificial Intelligence Asanga Ascension Asceticism Assumption Atheism Attachment Augustine Authority Avarice Balthasar Baptism Beauty Biden birthright citizenship Bishops Black History Books Buddhism Bulgakov Byzantine Calendar C.S. Lewis Calcidius Catholic Catholicism Catholicism Celibacy Charity Chastity children Chrismation Christ Christmas Christology Church Climate Change Common Good Communion Confession Confirmation Conscience Constantine conventions conversion councils Covid Creation Cross Dead Death Death Penalty Debate Deception Demagogues Demons Desert Monks Desert Mothers Desire destruction development Dialogue Dignity Dionsyius Dionysius Discipline Diversity Division Doctor Who doctrine dogma Dormition Dualism Easter Easter Series Ecumenical Councils Ecumenism Education Election Empathy Environment Error Eschatology eschaton Eternity Ethics Eucharist Evangelism Eve Evil evolution Faeries Faith Fear femininity Ficino Florence Florensky Folktale Fools Forgiveness Freedom Future gender Gentile Gentiles Glory Gnostic God gods Good Samaritan Goodness Gospel Government Grace Great Fast Guns Halloween Hate healing Health Heaven Hell Hellenism Heresy Hierarchy Hildegard Hinduism History Holiness Holy Spirit Holy Week Hope Horror Human rights humanity Humility hypocrisy ICE icon icons Identification Identity Idol II Nicea Immigration incarnation Individualism Informal Reflections Inklings Intention Inter-Religious Interfaith Internet Interpretation Intrinsic evil Irenaeus Islam Israel Jacob Jerome Jesus Jews John Chrysostom John of Damascus John the Baptist Joseph Judaism justice Justification kenosis Kindnesss Kingdom of God Kingdom of Heaven Law Law of Moses Lazarus Leaf by Niggle Lent Lenten Reflection Liberation Theology Lies Life Listen Literature Liturgy locutions Logic Logos Love Marriage Martyrs Mary Mass Maximos The Confessor Meanness Meditation Mercy Middle Path Migrants Mind Miracles Miriam Morals Moses Movies Music Muslims Myths Names Nationalism Native Americans New Year Nicea Nicholas Nothing Novatian Obedience Occam's Razor Ordination Origen Original Sin Orthodox orthopraxis Pagans Palamas Palm Sunday Paradise Paschaltide Paul Peace Pentecost person Peter piety PKD Plato pluralism Plurality Poem Poetry Poiltics Politics Poor Pope Pope Francis Pope Leo XIV Post Office Prayer Pride Pro-life Prodigal Son propaganda Prophecy Prophets Providence Putin Racism Reading Reason Reflection Refugees Relationships Religion Religion Series Religious Liberty Repent Republicans Rest Resurrection Rich Rites Russia Sacraments Saints Salvation Salvian Santa Science Scripture Self-Giving Sexuality Sibyl Sick Silence Sin Singlehood Social Justice Society Sodom Solovyov Speculations Spiritual Reflection St. Cyril of Alexandria St. Justin Martyr Suffering Sunday of the Paralytic Man Sunday of the Samaritan Woman Superhero Supreme Court Teaching Technology Thanksgiving The Father the Universe Theological Reflection Theology Theosis Theotokos Thomas Timaeus Time Tolerenace Tolkien Tradition Transfiguration Trinity Trump Truth Uncategorized Unity Universities USCCB Value Vatican II Vegetarian Vices Violence Virtue Vocations War Water Welcome Wisdom Womanhood Women Work World View Worship Writing Zacchaeus

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz