Following An Ideology Will Have Us Reject The Greater Good

Last updated on: December 18, 2020 at 4:08 am by Henry Karlson

Following An Ideology Will Have Us Reject The Greater Good 2020-12-18T04:08:39-05:00 Henry Karlson

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Anonymous: Deathbed Scene With Monks / picryl

The trouble with ideologies is that they use some element of the truth to mislead people and turn them away from the fullness of the truth. It is the classical problem of heresy. When ideologies are put into action, they highlight some elements of the good at the expense of the fullness of the good, so that what is proper and just is ignored for the sake of that lesser good. People trapped by an ideology will use the limited truth and good contained in their ideology to suggest their ideology represents the absolute truth and good. They will suggest that if anyone rejects their ideology, that means they must reject the good or truth contained within it. That, of course, is not true – one can accept the truths contained in an ideology without accepting the ideology because those truths have their proper place in the fullness of the truth, not in the ideology itself.

Ideologies abuse and misconstrue the truths they possess, so that even those truths become perverted when interpreted by the ideology. What the ideology says about them is false, because the meaning they suggest for those elements of the truth ends up being used to contest the truth itself. Likewise, when the fullness of the good is rejected, whatever good is intended by someone following an ideology will not only be a lessor good, but will produce alongside that lesser good many different evils in relation to what elements of the good have been rejected or suppressed by the ideology.

Abba Alonius, in the Sayings of the Desert Fathers demonstrates this by the way he discusses lying; lying is wrong, it is indeed a sin, but if all our thought and consideration about speech lies only with lying, we will say the wrong thing, and as a result, we will be responsible for what happens as consequence of what we say:

One day Abba Agathon questioned Abba Alonius saying, ‘How can I control my tongue so as to tell no more lies?’ And Abba Alonius said to him, ‘If you do not lie, you prepare many sins for yourself.’ ‘How is that?’ said he. The old man said to him, ‘Suppose two men have committed a murder before your eyes and one of them fled to your cell. The magistrate, seeking him, asks you, “Have you seen the murderer?” If you do not lie, you will deliver that man to death. It is better for you to abandon him unconditionally to God, for he knows all things.’[1]

Certainly, we are not to lie. But that does not mean we have to answer every question given to us. We are not to lie, but we must consider what we say, and the implications of what we say to others, and speak (or not speaking) accordingly. We can be creative in our speech, speaking the truth while not saying what should not be said. We can be silent, and engage that silence creatively, knowing that silence is not a lie.

Abba Alonius, knowing that we should not kill, knowing that Christians should not be involved in the death of another, believed that if telling the truth to some authority will lead to the capture and conviction of some criminal, who would be sentenced to death, it would be better to say nothing and let things work themselves out without our help, than it would be to be the one who revealed where the criminal is. This is not because Alonius thought that such a criminal, such as a murderer, did no wrong, nor that they should suffer no consequences for their actions. Rather, he knew that justice is not had by those who seek such a criminal out so that they can kill them: killing a killer only justifies the killer by suggesting killing can be a morally good act. With that in mind, Alonius points out that those whose actions help lead to the execution of another person would be seen as morally complicit in that death. We would become killers if we become complicit in the killing of someone else. Thus, it is better not to speak than it is to speak and be involved with someone’s death. Alonius chose an extreme circumstance to make his point, not because he defended murder, but rather wanted us to realize the expectations of the good itself. If it is true with a difficult case, than it is also true in other circumstance as well.

The truth of this is not to be found only with the words we speak. It is true in regards all our actions. We can become ideologues, who take some good and use it to ignore the fullness of the good, making us complicit in evil. We can be so concerned with saving the unborn, we are willing to let the world burn. We can be so concerned with going to church, we can spread a deadly virus and have many people suffer cruel, agonizing deaths. We can be so concerned with promoting our own religious liberty, we ignore the obligations such liberty entails. We can be so concerned with making a criminal pay for what they have done, we do not care if the resources used to do so causes more harm to society at large than what they criminal themselves have done. We can be so concerned with our own rights, we think they have no limitations, and so be willing to abuse them as a way to prove we still have them (such would be the case if a person says their freedom of speech must not be repressed, and to fight for that right, they go into a theater and yell fire).

We must never let the partial good become the enemy of the good. We must never allow ourselves to subvert the truth by taking some element of the truth and use it to fight the fullness of the truth itself. We must recognize the holistic nature of the truth, and with it, the holistic expectations of morality. We must consider the full implications of what we say and do. We must be concerned about the consequences of what we say and do, and not excuse what happens by saying “we were just following the dictates of the truth.” If we were not following the fullness of the truth, and all it expects of us, we were not following the truth, but our own wants and desires as they pervert the truth. Abba Alonius gave us the extreme example in his saying to remind us that we have a responsibility to protect all human life, even those of murderers, so that we can realize the implications of this wisdom and apply it in our activities.

It is right to want a criminal to be properly dealt with by authorities, but it is also wrong to turn someone in to those authorities if they know the authorities will abuse their power and act contrary to the good; there is value in the police, but if the police act against the greater good, then they have become the enemy of the good and truth themselves and should be seen to no longer have the authority to place demands upon us so long as they abuse their power. If we know the police will abuse or kill someone, if the police will act like judge and executioner, then they lose their authority and the right to question us in order to find those they would like to abuse. Police must not be, cannot be, allowed such power. Police must not be the primary means by which society controls itself. Rather, we need something better. We need more safety nets for people so they do not feel as if the only answer they have in life is to be a criminal. We need more social networks, more help for people in need; using police as the only answer to such needs means that we, as a society, are complicit in what happens, both in the actions which people take making them to be criminals, as well as in the actions the police take after they have become criminals. We are the criminals when we, as a society, do not protect people and their best interests. And the police, then, who should be working for the greater good, become rather, employed for private interests, and in so doing, lose all moral authority. We must change how society works. We must not think the only solution to the evils of society is funding the police. We must fund social safety nets. We must make sure society is properly balanced in justice. We must avoid ideologies which want to take a tough stance on crime, if they are not first willing to take an even greater stand against those disparities in society which result in those crimes. We must stand for the greater good.

[1] The Sayings of the Desert Fathers. trans. Benedicta Ward (Kalamazoo, MI: Cistercian Publications, 1984), 35 [Alonius 4].

Stay in touch! Like A Little Bit of Nothing on Facebook.
If you liked what you read, please consider sharing it with your friends and family!

Sayings of the Desert Fathers

Previous Post

December 16, 2020

Doctor Who, Mo Tzu, And The Peace Of Christ

Next Post

December 20, 2020 Learning From The Ancestors Of Christ

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Abortion Abraham abuse Aesthetics AI Aliens Ambrose Ancestors and Everything Andrew Angels Animals Anne Anthony Antisemitism apologetics Apophatic Apostle John Aquinas Artificial Intelligence Asanga Ascension Asceticism Assumption Atheism Attachment Augustine Authority Avarice Balthasar Baptism Beauty Biden birthright citizenship Bishops Black History Books Buddhism Bulgakov Byzantine Calendar C.S. Lewis Calcidius Catholic Catholicism Catholicism Celibacy Charity Chastity children Chrismation Christ Christmas Christology Church Climate Change Common Good Communion Confession Confirmation Conscience Constantine conventions conversion councils Covid Creation Cross Dead Death Death Penalty Debate Deception Demagogues Demons Desert Monks Desert Mothers Desire destruction development Dialogue Dignity Dionsyius Dionysius Discipline Diversity Division Doctor Who doctrine dogma Dormition Dualism Easter Easter Series Ecumenical Councils Ecumenism Education Election Empathy Environment Error Eschatology eschaton Eternity Ethics Eucharist Evangelism Eve Evil evolution Faeries Faith Fear femininity Ficino Florence Florensky Folktale Fools Forgiveness Freedom Future gender Gentile Gentiles Glory Gnostic God gods Good Samaritan Goodness Gospel Government Grace Great Fast Guns Hate healing Health Heaven Hell Hellenism Heresy Hierarchy Hildegard Hinduism History Holiness Holy Spirit Holy Week Hope Horror Human rights humanity Humility hypocrisy ICE icon icons Identification Identity Idol II Nicea Immigration incarnation Individualism Informal Reflections Inklings Intention Inter-Religious Interfaith Internet Interpretation Intrinsic evil Irenaeus Islam Israel Jacob Jerome Jesus Jews John Chrysostom John of Damascus John the Baptist Joseph Judaism justice Justification kenosis Kindnesss Kingdom of God Kingdom of Heaven Law Law of Moses Lazarus Leaf by Niggle Lent Lenten Reflection Liberation Theology Lies Life Listen Literature Liturgy locutions Logic Logos Love Marriage Martyrs Mary Mass Maximos The Confessor Meanness Meditation Mercy Middle Path Migrants Mind Miracles Miriam Morals Moses Movies Music Muslims Myths Names Nationalism Native Americans New Year Nicea Nicholas Nothing Novatian Obedience Occam's Razor Ordination Origen Original Sin Orthodox orthopraxis Pagans Palamas Palm Sunday Paradise Paschaltide Paul Peace Pentecost person Peter piety PKD Plato pluralism Plurality Poem Poetry Poiltics Politics Poor Pope Pope Francis Pope Leo XIV Post Office Prayer Pride Pro-life Prodigal Son propaganda Prophecy Prophets Providence Putin Racism Reading Reason Reflection Refugees Relationships Religion Religion Series Religious Liberty Repent Republicans Rest Resurrection Rich Rites Russia Sacraments Saints Salvation Salvian Santa Science Scripture Self-Giving Sexuality Sibyl Sick Silence Sin Singlehood Social Justice Society Sodom Solovyov Speculations Spiritual Reflection St. Cyril of Alexandria St. Justin Martyr Suffering Sunday of the Paralytic Man Sunday of the Samaritan Woman Superhero Supreme Court Teaching Technology Thanksgiving The Father the Universe Theological Reflection Theology Theosis Theotokos Thomas Timaeus Time Tolerenace Tolkien Tradition Transfiguration Trinity Trump Truth Uncategorized Unity Universities USCCB Value Vatican II Vegetarian Vices Violence Virtue Vocations War Water Welcome Wisdom Womanhood Women Work World View Worship Writing Zacchaeus

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz