Integralism Follows the Errors Of The Zealots

Last updated on: November 9, 2020 at 4:06 am by Henry Karlson

Integralism Follows the Errors Of The Zealots 2020-11-09T04:06:50-05:00 Henry Karlson

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Integralism ignores the lesson of the temptation of Jesus in the desert, where he rejected the call of worldly power. Photo by Marsyas: Wikimedia Commons

Christ, during his earthly ministry, found himself to be in the middle of a debate as to how the Jewish tradition, and therefore the practice of the Jewish faith, should and would continue in the future. Each of the various groups involved in the debate had some good associated with them. None of them were completely wrong. Jesus acknowledged this in the way he told his disciples to honor the “Seat of Moses” (cf. Matt. 23:2). Nonetheless, each of the various parties were imperfect, and so in each, there were reasons for Jesus to criticize them, resulting, of course, with the leaders of such groups becoming annoyed, if not outright hostile, towards him.

To many of the Jewish leaders of his day, the challenge Jesus presented was twofold: he did not place any one Jewish tradition and its ways above all others, and he was popular. His popularity meant that his deconstruction and reconstruction of Jewish interpretations of their covenant with God could not be ignored. His voice was one which could not be ignored; indeed, he spoke with authority.

Of all the major religious groups of his time, Jesus was closest to the Pharisees. Indeed, many of his disciples, many of his teachings, and indeed, the way he taught, could be seen connected with the early Rabbinic movement (connected mostly with the Pharisees). However, due to the way he engaged the powers that be, the way he transcended the Pharisees with this miracle working and promotion of the immanent kingdom of God, he attracted many Zealots to his cause. They hoped his talk about the messianic kingdom meant he would begin a militaristic uprising against Rome. The Zealots hoped that if they found the messiah, and worked with him in his quest for earthly power, they would come to hold positions of power and authority in the messianic kingdom. This explains why James and John, the Sons of Zebedee, wanted to “sit” right next to Christ; they were inspired by the Zealot ideal, hoping to be elevated and placed next to Christ in a purely earthly messianic kingdom.

Sadly, the lesson of James and John has not been properly understood by many, if not most, Christians today. They look to Christ along the lines of the Zealots, looking for Christ to take charge in the world. They seek after earthly power and want to possess that power for themselves. They think all they need to do is put it under the name of Christ, and others must follow after them and agree with them in their political pursuits. They do not just engage politics, they become possessed by politics, thinking political power is the way to enforce their understanding of the teachings of Christ. Nonetheless, if they listened to Jesus, they would know that such a politicization of his kingdom was not his intent. He did not come to engage earthly power and use it to force his will on others. He came as a servant, and his kingdom is manifested in and established in the way he liberates people from the tragedies of sin with his grace.

Thus, we can see the problem inherent with integralism: integralism follows after the errors of the Zealots. Those who embrace integralism think that if they establish some perfect theocracy on earth, they will manifest Christ’s through earthly power (power which they hope they will possess when that theocracy is established). Turning the message of Christ merely into a political platform translates the messianic kingdom into a purely earthly kingdom. They end up ignoring, if not outright rejecting, the transcendent element of the kingdom of God. As a result, instead of integrating the teachings of Christ, such as his teachings to help and elevate the poor and oppressed over the rich and powerful (which of course has political ramifications), zealotry confuses political power and authority, and the ways to hold on to such power, with the transcendent kingdom of God. Integralism, following its political ideology, creates a false representation of the kingdom which it then pits against Christ and the eschatological kingdom which is “not of this world” (not because it has no connection with the world, but because it does not establish itself from and support itself with the principles of earthly authority).

Sadly, so many Christians seek earthly power as the way to spread their understanding of the Christian faith, and when they gain such power, they become fanatics. They radicalize and absolutize their concerns and use it to justify their grasp for power. They take elements of the Gospel, elements of the Christian faith, to make it seem as if what they promote is Christian. But they neglect the true power of the Gospel. They follow after the Zealots who tried to use Christ as a pawn, claiming his name while ignoring all the teachings of the Christian faith. Thus, even though they claim to follow after Christ, and they try to show it by taking a few elements of what he said and emphasize it, ignoring the fullness of what he taught, they bow towards Satan, giving into his temptation for worldly power. What they represent is a pseudo-Christianity, an anti-Christianity which seeks to use Christ instead of to follow him. Those following this false Christianity will show themselves by the way they act against the dictates of love, all the while claiming religion and using it for their own private advantage. We are told to avoid associating such people with the faith:

For men will be lovers of self, lovers of money, proud, arrogant, abusive, disobedient to their parents, ungrateful, unholy, inhuman, implacable, slanderers, profligates, fierce, haters of good, treacherous, reckless, swollen with conceit, lovers of pleasure rather than lovers of God, holding the form of religion but denying the power of it. Avoid such people (2 Tim. 3:2-5 RSV).

True religion is not found with zealotry looking for power, but in loving one’s neighbor, working for the common good instead of seeking personal power and authority. “Religion that is pure and undefiled before God and the Father is this: to visit orphans and widows in their affliction, and to keep oneself unstained from the world” (Jas. 1:27 RSV). Those who are serving others will not seek power for themselves. Those who are serving others will be following Christ, truly bringing his presence with them, showing the power and value of the true kingdom of God. The eschatological kingdom reaches down onto the earth (through the incarnation) in order to lift up and help those in need instead of setting up and establishing an earthly kingdom. Thus, as Henri de Lubac said, “At each sincere stirring of charity, the Gospel triumphs, Christianity is already effective.”[1] It is in those following Christ, in those living a life of charity, and not those seeking worldly power, in which the kingdom of God is found.

Integralism might try to claim Christ, but they seek after an order which undermines and limits the true kingdom of God. Instead of raising the world up through the transcendence of the messianic kingdom, they will try to lower the kingdom of God to the ways of fallen creation, absolutizing principles which detour us from God’s kingdom. Integralism is one of the many ideological successors to the Zealots. When confronted by it, we should not give into the temptation which is inspires; instead, we should truly heed Christ and remember that his kingdom transcends all such earthly ambition, and so the glory which it will provide will be far greater than what can be found in earthly glory. It has been revealed on the cross, not in the sword, and so, if we want a part of it, we must put on the mantle of the cross and take away the sword and all that the sword suggests.

[1] Henri de Lubac, Paradoxes of Faith. Trans. Paul Simon, Sadie Kreilkamp and Ernest Beaumont (San Francisco: Ignatius Press, 1987), 152.

Stay in touch! Like A Little Bit of Nothing on Facebook.
If you liked what you read, please consider sharing it with your friends and family!

Previous Post

November 8, 2020

Theosis: God’s Plan For Creation

Next Post

November 11, 2020 Every Time We Stumble and Sin, Rise Back Up

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Abortion Abraham abuse Aesthetics AI Aliens Ambrose Ancestors and Everything Andrew Angels Animals Anne Anthony Antisemitism apologetics Apophatic Apostle John Aquinas Artificial Intelligence Asanga Ascension Asceticism Assumption Atheism Attachment Augustine Authority Avarice Balthasar Baptism Beauty Biden birthright citizenship Bishops Black History Books Buddhism Bulgakov Byzantine Calendar C.S. Lewis Calcidius Catholic Catholicism Catholicism Celibacy Charity Chastity children Chrismation Christ Christmas Christology Church Climate Change Common Good Communion Confession Confirmation Conscience Constantine conventions conversion councils Covid Creation Cross Dead Death Death Penalty Debate Deception Demagogues Demons Desert Monks Desert Mothers Desire destruction development Dialogue Dignity Dionsyius Dionysius Discipline Diversity Division Doctor Who doctrine dogma Dormition Dualism Easter Easter Series Ecumenical Councils Ecumenism Education Election Empathy Environment Error Eschatology eschaton Eternity Ethics Eucharist Evangelism Eve Evil evolution Faeries Faith Fear femininity Ficino Florence Florensky Folktale Fools Forgiveness Freedom Future gender Gentile Gentiles Glory Gnostic God gods Good Samaritan Goodness Gospel Government Grace Great Fast Guns Hate healing Health Heaven Hell Hellenism Heresy Hierarchy Hildegard Hinduism History Holiness Holy Spirit Holy Week Hope Horror Human rights humanity Humility hypocrisy ICE icon icons Identification Identity Idol II Nicea Immigration incarnation Individualism Informal Reflections Inklings Intention Inter-Religious Interfaith Internet Interpretation Intrinsic evil Irenaeus Islam Israel Jacob Jerome Jesus Jews John Chrysostom John of Damascus John the Baptist Joseph Judaism justice Justification kenosis Kindnesss Kingdom of God Kingdom of Heaven Law Law of Moses Lazarus Leaf by Niggle Lent Lenten Reflection Liberation Theology Lies Life Listen Literature Liturgy locutions Logic Logos Love Marriage Martyrs Mary Mass Maximos The Confessor Meanness Meditation Mercy Middle Path Migrants Mind Miracles Miriam Morals Moses Movies Music Muslims Myths Names Nationalism Native Americans New Year Nicea Nicholas Nothing Novatian Obedience Occam's Razor Ordination Origen Original Sin Orthodox orthopraxis Pagans Palamas Palm Sunday Paradise Paschaltide Paul Peace Pentecost person Peter piety PKD Plato pluralism Plurality Poem Poetry Poiltics Politics Poor Pope Pope Francis Pope Leo XIV Post Office Prayer Pride Pro-life Prodigal Son propaganda Prophecy Prophets Providence Putin Racism Reading Reason Reflection Refugees Relationships Religion Religion Series Religious Liberty Repent Republicans Rest Resurrection Rich Rites Russia Sacraments Saints Salvation Salvian Santa Science Scripture Self-Giving Sexuality Sibyl Sick Silence Sin Singlehood Social Justice Society Sodom Solovyov Speculations Spiritual Reflection St. Cyril of Alexandria St. Justin Martyr Suffering Sunday of the Paralytic Man Sunday of the Samaritan Woman Superhero Supreme Court Teaching Technology Thanksgiving The Father the Universe Theological Reflection Theology Theosis Theotokos Thomas Timaeus Time Tolerenace Tolkien Tradition Transfiguration Trinity Trump Truth Uncategorized Unity Universities USCCB Value Vatican II Vegetarian Vices Violence Virtue Vocations War Water Welcome Wisdom Womanhood Women Work World View Worship Writing Zacchaeus

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz