Don’t Spit On My Food

Last updated on: July 31, 2020 at 3:13 am by Henry Karlson

Don’t Spit On My Food 2020-07-31T03:13:12-05:00 Henry Karlson

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Photo by CEphoto, Uwe Aranas: Batu Caves, Gombak, Selangor, Malaysia: “No spitting” sign / Wikimedia Commons

Don’t spit on my food. That seems like a reasonable request, doesn’t it? Clearly, everyone will follow it, right? We don’t need government stepping in and telling cooks they can’t spit in people’s food, do we? People should be free. People should be able to live their lives without government interference.

This seems like something everyone should agree with. No one wants people to spit in their food, and so people will not do it. Right? Of course, the answer is no. People have been known to spit in food, for all kinds of reasons. Because there are people who will do what they should not be doing, government has stepped in and made sure that if people did spit in others food, they will face the consequences of their actions. They are not allowed to do it. How many people complain about this? Only the people who want to spit in others’ food would be upset; everyone else, everyone who wants spit-free food, and who would do not spit in others’ food, are not upset. Government is not stepping on their freedom, but protecting them and their freedom not to have contaminated food.

Certainly, we like freedom. We don’t like being told what to do. But we have no problem being told not to do something which we would otherwise not be doing ourselves. Government is not changing us by telling us not to do what we don’t do. We especially do not mind it when the government tells us to not do something which we already do not do, but we know others, with malicious intent, do, because we know when the government steps in this way, it does help keep us safe. It might not do so perfectly: we know, for example, people still do spit in food, but it helps the situation and limit the harm which otherwise could be done, as it stops many people who might otherwise spit in someone’s food in a moment of anger or malice.

When people complain about being told what to do, or what not to do, by the government, what they seem to tell us is that they want to do the opposite. Those who would complain about lacking freedom because the government told them not to spit in people’s food would be those who want to spit in people’s food. They could say the government should not step in; if we didn’t want people to spit in our food, we should not go to restaurants, but if we go, we should know it is something which we choose to accept. How absurd, and yet, that is the kind of argument which many people give in regards to other, legitimate actions made by the government to protect its people.

“I don’t want the government to tell me to wear a mask during a pandemic.” I have heard variations of that said, sometimes to me, sometimes to others. Sometimes from friends who I otherwise respect, who I don’t think, understand the pandemic. I understand. I wish we did not need to be told we had to wear a mask. I wish we had no pandemic. I wish people would naturally do what is right and wear a mask. But what do we see instead? People ignoring social distancing rules, people, indeed, having COVID19 parties, mocking the government and their neighbor by laughing it up as people get seriously sick and die around them. We have people crowding into spaces, without masks, such as at churches, only to find they catch COVID19 and spread it to many people around them, causing people to die. I wish the government would not need to step in, but it is in such a situation as we find ourselves in that the government must step in – just as it has stepped in when it found people not respecting each other on the road by driving drunk, or, when it stepped in to tell restaurants the various sanitary conditions it must follow without being fined, or when it stepped in to tell people who own various buildings they must keep the building safe and up to code if they do not want to be closed down. This is in part why government is needed: because not everyone is good and will do what they should be doing for the safety of the community.

“For rulers are not a terror to good conduct, but to bad. Would you have no fear of him who is in authority? Then do what is good, and you will receive his approval” (Rom. 13:3 RSV). While there are many ways Christians have interpreted Paul’s statement here, with some seeing the government mentioned being the ecclesiastical government of the church, most see that this statement applies in some fashion or another to secular government. Paul is not saying that everything that a government tells us to do is just and so should be followed (after all, he and other early Christians disobeyed Rome when Rome wanted them to act contrary to the Christian faith), but he does point out, when government tells us to do something which is for the sake of good conduct, we should do it. Looking to the safety of our neighbor, so they do not get seriously sick or die, certainly is what Christians should be doing – we should be promoting life and easing suffering in the world. If others are unwilling to help out and, without governmental action, would put others needlessly at risk, Christians should see the justice involved and not complain about any “lack of freedom” if they are told to wear a mask to keep people safe. If they complain, not only do they suggest they will not be putting on a mask, they suggest they are not concerned about their neighbor, and so ignore the very people Christ told them to take care of and help support as if they are helping and supporting him.

In an ideal world, there would be no need for government. But, just as we know people do dangerous, indeed, stupid things, if they are not prevented from doing so, we need the government to protect the common good, to make sure that those who have no natural instinct or care for others do not hurt the community through their indifference or malice. It is not a reduction of freedom, it is, rather, the preservation of freedom which is at stake, for it is the freedom from undue harm which is the issue.

Stay in touch! Like A Little Bit of Nothing on Facebook.
If you liked what you read, please consider sharing it with your friends and family!

Previous Post

July 30, 2020

Greed, Charity, And Reformation

Next Post

August 2, 2020 Workers With God

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Abortion Abraham abuse Aesthetics AI Aliens Ambrose Ancestors and Everything Andrew Angels Animals Anne Anthony Antisemitism apologetics Apophatic Apostle John Aquinas Artificial Intelligence Asanga Ascension Asceticism Assumption Atheism Attachment Augustine Authority Avarice Balthasar Baptism Beauty Biden birthright citizenship Bishops Black History Books Buddhism Bulgakov Byzantine Calendar C.S. Lewis Calcidius Catholic Catholicism Catholicism Celibacy Charity Chastity children Chrismation Christ Christmas Christology Church Climate Change Common Good Communion Confession Confirmation Conscience Constantine conventions conversion councils Covid Creation Cross Dead Death Death Penalty Debate Deception Demagogues Demons Desert Monks Desert Mothers Desire destruction development Dialogue Dignity Dionsyius Dionysius Discipline Diversity Division Doctor Who doctrine dogma Dormition Dualism Easter Easter Series Ecumenical Councils Ecumenism Education Election Empathy Environment Error Eschatology eschaton Eternity Ethics Eucharist Evangelism Eve Evil evolution Faeries Faith Fear femininity Ficino Florence Florensky Folktale Fools Forgiveness Freedom Future gender Gentile Gentiles Glory Gnostic God gods Good Samaritan Goodness Gospel Government Grace Great Fast Guns Hate healing Health Heaven Hell Hellenism Heresy Hierarchy Hildegard Hinduism History Holiness Holy Spirit Holy Week Hope Horror Human rights humanity Humility hypocrisy ICE icon icons Identification Identity Idol II Nicea Immigration incarnation Individualism Informal Reflections Inklings Intention Inter-Religious Interfaith Internet Interpretation Intrinsic evil Irenaeus Islam Israel Jacob Jerome Jesus Jews John Chrysostom John of Damascus John the Baptist Joseph Judaism justice Justification kenosis Kindnesss Kingdom of God Kingdom of Heaven Law Law of Moses Lazarus Leaf by Niggle Lent Lenten Reflection Liberation Theology Lies Life Listen Literature Liturgy locutions Logic Logos Love Marriage Martyrs Mary Mass Maximos The Confessor Meanness Meditation Mercy Middle Path Migrants Mind Miracles Miriam Morals Moses Movies Music Muslims Myths Names Nationalism Native Americans New Year Nicea Nicholas Nothing Novatian Obedience Occam's Razor Ordination Origen Original Sin Orthodox orthopraxis Pagans Palamas Palm Sunday Paradise Paschaltide Paul Peace Pentecost person Peter piety PKD Plato pluralism Plurality Poem Poetry Poiltics Politics Poor Pope Pope Francis Pope Leo XIV Post Office Prayer Pride Pro-life Prodigal Son propaganda Prophecy Prophets Providence Putin Racism Reading Reason Reflection Refugees Relationships Religion Religion Series Religious Liberty Repent Republicans Rest Resurrection Rich Rites Russia Sacraments Saints Salvation Salvian Santa Science Scripture Self-Giving Sexuality Sibyl Sick Silence Sin Singlehood Social Justice Society Sodom Solovyov Speculations Spiritual Reflection St. Cyril of Alexandria St. Justin Martyr Suffering Sunday of the Paralytic Man Sunday of the Samaritan Woman Superhero Supreme Court Teaching Technology Thanksgiving The Father the Universe Theological Reflection Theology Theosis Theotokos Thomas Timaeus Time Tolerenace Tolkien Tradition Transfiguration Trinity Trump Truth Uncategorized Unity Universities USCCB Value Vatican II Vegetarian Vices Violence Virtue Vocations War Water Welcome Wisdom Womanhood Women Work World View Worship Writing Zacchaeus

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz