Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

henrykarlson

God Does Not Throw Us Away

Last updated on: April 24, 2020 at 4:44 am   by Henry Karlson

God Does Not Throw Us Away 2020-04-24T04:44:28-05:00 Henry Karlson

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

No photographer mentioned: Repair Work on Clothing /pxfuel

Hans Urs von Balthasar suggests that the way many of us treat the concept of hell is to use it as a weapon to condemn others. We warn people who do things we do not like that they risk going to hell, but we rarely consider the possibility for ourselves:

But woe is me if, looking back, I see how others, who were not so lucky as I, are sinking beneath the waves; if, that is, I objectify hell and turn it into a theological-scientific “object” and begin to ponder on how many perish in this hell and how many escape it. For at that moment everything is transformed; hell is no longer something there is ever mine but rather something that befalls “the others”, while I, praise God, have escaped it. [1]

While each of us might have different reasons why we think we will not face the possibility of hell, there remains a consistent pattern behind all such explanations. We excuse what we do, thinking we are not as bad as others.

Of course, hell is a real possibility, but as Balthasar points out, it is a possibility we make for ourselves. Indeed, hell must be understood as something which we create for ourselves. God does not want anyone to be damned. That’s the whole point of the incarnation. God loves the world and does not desire that anyone should perish. Those who use the threat of hell as a punishment for others, wishing hell for others, have misunderstood hell and, by their lack of charity, risk creating for themselves their own private hell.

We must seek for and hope for the salvation of all. That is what God himself desires. He will not force anyone to be saved, which is why in the eschatological judgment, Balthasar suggests people might deny his mercy and condemn themselves. But even when he judges someone, God is offering the person being judged his mercy. He is willing to restore what sin and egotism have destroyed, which is also why we can hope that all will be saved. For God works and acts out of love, not condemnation. Why would God destroy what he created, when he can restore it and make it better than before?  This is what Abba Mius understood as he explained to a soldier why God does not seek the perdition of anyone:

A soldier asked Abba Mius if God accepted repentance. After the old man had taught him many things he said, ‘Tell me, my dear, if your cloak is torn, do you throw it away?’ He replied, ‘No, I mend it and use it again.’ The old man said to him, ‘If you are so careful about your cloak, will not God be equally careful about His creature?’[2]

When we objectify hell, making it impersonal, we misunderstand what it is. Hell is subjectively established. We create our own hell. Our sins create their own consequences. We suffer as a result of our own ill will. Hell is the consequence not just of any exercise of the will, but the ultimate self-objectification of the will which denies God’s mercy. The unforgiveable sin, blasphemy of the Holy Spirit, is unforgiveable only because a person denies the Holy Spirit in their lives and the purification and sanctification which the Spirit wishes to give to them. When someone accepts that grace, then the Holy Spirit comes and makes the person whole. No sin is left in a person once they accept the Spirit in their life, and so there is nothing left in them which is unforgiven; but those who deny the Spirit deny such forgiveness and so remain unforgiven, not because God is unwilling to forgive but because they are unwilling to be forgiven.

Objectifying hell ignores free will. God, however, gave us our freedom, and works not only to preserve it, but to make it greater. This is why hell must never be treated as a foregone conclusion for anyone. To do so is to treat hell as necessity. Hell is never necessary. Through the incarnation, God shows his love to his creation. Thanks to his death and resurrection, we can meet with him in our death, and when we do, we will see him offering us his mercy and grace. He is willing to make us whole. He does not want to discard anything which he has created. But he does not force us to accept his mercy. His judgment and condemnation are not to be understood as threats which he uses to force us to love him; rather they are to be understood as what comes out of his analytical examination of what we make for and of ourselves with our free will. Will we deny him forever? Will anyone deny him for all eternity? To answer such a question with a necessary yes is to deny free will; to necessarily say no, also, is to deny free will.  We can hope that the answer is no. We can even think there are good reasons why the answer will be no. Nonetheless, we cannot say no with full assurance unless we deny the will in some fashion or another.

God is love, and in that love, God loves us. He created us out of his love, and he is willing to save us – and make us better – because of that love. The reason why we need saving is because of our failure to love.  Such failure to love is the ultimate denial of God. Why we have willed such a denial is a mystery, but it is that mystery which suggests why we cannot know if all will be saved. But we also know what God is like. He doesn’t want to discard us. In his love for us, he has set about making sure we do not have to be lost. Whatever we have done, whatever sin we have done which causes our own suffering, indeed, which corrupts us, making us less than what we can and should be, does not have to be permanent. The goodness of God is that he is willing to help us despite all that we have done to harm ourselves. He awaits our response. He does not force us to be healed. And it is in this patience, in this great love, we have reasons to hope that all will be saved. For we know he does not want to throw away anything which he has created. He takes more care of us than we do with our own goods, and we know how hard it is for us to throw away the things which we own. God is not willing to throw us away. That is the message at the heart of the Gospel. Those who are quick to threaten hell to others have yet to truly understand God and the good news which Jesus preached, the good news which says God loves us despite whatever we have ever done.


[1] Hans Urs von Balthasar, Dare We Have “That All Men Be Saved?” with a Short Discourse on Hell. Trans. David Kipp and Lothar Krauth (San Francisco: Ignatius Press, 1988), 190.

[2] The Sayings of the Desert Fathers. Trans. Benedicta Ward (Kalamazoo, MI: Cistercian Publications, 1984), 150 [Mius 3].

Balthasar

Desert Monks

Eschatology

God

Love

Balthasar

Desert Fathers

Eschatology

God

Love

Sayings of the Desert Fathers

Previous Post



April 22, 2020

We Should Acknowledge The Plight Of The People While Rejecting The Protests Against The Governors

Next Post



April 26, 2020 Women and the Resurrection


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Abortion Abraham abuse Aesthetics AI Aliens Ambrose Ancestors and Everything Andrew Angels Animals Anne Anthony Antisemitism apologetics Apophatic Apostle John Aquinas Artificial Intelligence Asanga Ascension Asceticism Assumption Atheism Attachment Augustine Authority Avarice Balthasar Baptism Beauty Biden birthright citizenship Bishops Black History Books Buddhism Bulgakov Byzantine Calendar C.S. Lewis Calcidius Catholic Catholicism Catholicism Celibacy Charity Chastity children Chrismation Christ Christmas Christology Church Climate Change Common Good Communion Confession Confirmation Conscience Constantine conventions conversion councils Covid Creation Cross Dead Death Death Penalty Debate Deception Demagogues Demons Desert Monks Desert Mothers Desire destruction development Dialogue Dignity Dionsyius Dionysius Discipline Diversity Division Doctor Who doctrine dogma Dormition Dualism Easter Easter Series Ecumenical Councils Ecumenism Education Election Empathy Environment Error Eschatology eschaton Eternity Ethics Eucharist Evangelism Eve Evil evolution Faeries Faith Fear femininity Ficino Florence Florensky Folktale Fools Forgiveness Freedom Future gender Gentile Gentiles Glory Gnostic God gods Good Samaritan Goodness Gospel Government Grace Great Fast Guns Hate healing Health Heaven Hell Hellenism Heresy Hierarchy Hildegard Hinduism History Holiness Holy Spirit Holy Week Hope Horror Human rights humanity Humility hypocrisy ICE icon icons Identification Identity Idol II Nicea Immigration incarnation Individualism Informal Reflections Inklings Intention Inter-Religious Interfaith Internet Interpretation Intrinsic evil Irenaeus Islam Israel Jacob Jerome Jesus Jews John Chrysostom John of Damascus John the Baptist Joseph Judaism justice Justification kenosis Kindnesss Kingdom of God Kingdom of Heaven Law Law of Moses Lazarus Leaf by Niggle Lent Lenten Reflection Liberation Theology Lies Life Listen Literature Liturgy locutions Logic Logos Love Marriage Martyrs Mary Mass Maximos The Confessor Meanness Meditation Mercy Middle Path Migrants Mind Miracles Miriam Morals Moses Movies Music Muslims Myths Names Nationalism Native Americans New Year Nicea Nicholas Nothing Novatian Obedience Occam's Razor Ordination Origen Original Sin Orthodox orthopraxis Pagans Palamas Palm Sunday Paradise Paschaltide Paul Peace Pentecost person Peter piety PKD Plato pluralism Plurality Poem Poetry Poiltics Politics Poor Pope Pope Francis Pope Leo XIV Post Office Prayer Pride Pro-life Prodigal Son propaganda Prophecy Prophets Providence Putin Racism Reading Reason Reflection Refugees Relationships Religion Religion Series Religious Liberty Repent Republicans Rest Resurrection Rich Rites Russia Sacraments Saints Salvation Salvian Santa Science Scripture Self-Giving Sexuality Sibyl Sick Silence Sin Singlehood Social Justice Society Sodom Solovyov Speculations Spiritual Reflection St. Cyril of Alexandria St. Justin Martyr Suffering Sunday of the Paralytic Man Sunday of the Samaritan Woman Superhero Supreme Court Teaching Technology Thanksgiving The Father the Universe Theological Reflection Theology Theosis Theotokos Thomas Timaeus Time Tolerenace Tolkien Tradition Transfiguration Trinity Trump Truth Uncategorized Unity Universities USCCB Value Vatican II Vegetarian Vices Violence Virtue Vocations War Water Welcome Wisdom Womanhood Women Work World View Worship Writing Zacchaeus

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Which Christian group follows the Five Points of Calvinism?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Methodists Reformed Pentecostals Baptists

Related posts from A Little Bit of Nothing

Catholic

The Unknown God Revealed In Christ

A Little Bit of Nothing

Catholic

Body, Mind, and Soul: Why Christians Must Value...

A Little Bit of Nothing

Catholic

We Will Struggle Against Temptation Until Our Last...

A Little Bit of Nothing

Catholic

The Illusion Of Perfection And The Path To...

A Little Bit of Nothing

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Catholic

Rejecting Doom: Christian Hope And Human Action

Christianity is a religion of hope. We are to have hope and...

It’s What Comes From Within Which Matters

One of the most difficult things for us to understand is why...

Why I Choose the Eucharist Over the Sermon

Choose the Eucharist, Not the Sermon What are we supposed to get...

5 Design Elements Found in Spiritually Rooted Homes

Putting Spirituality Into Home Decor Our homes are more than our living...

Credo: A Story of God Told with the...

About 10 years ago, I began to imagine a personal "Credo" that...

The Anatomy of Divine Revelation in Catholic Thought

The claim that God has made Himself known to human beings is...

view all Catholic blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube