Speculations: 3 – Artificial Intelligence

Last updated on: January 9, 2020 at 4:35 am by Henry Karlson

Speculations: 3 – Artificial Intelligence 2020-01-09T04:35:52-05:00 Henry Karlson

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Mike MacKenzie: Artificial Intelligence & AI & Machine Learning /flickr

In recent times, many theorists have speculated on the possibility of the creation of some sort of artificially created intelligence, that is, some form of intelligence which has been manufactured instead of developed through organic evolution. They have considered various ways artificial intelligence could manifest itself, though most of them are related through some development with computers, whether or not such intelligence will be found contained within a computer, or some sort of machine with a computer brain (like an android). What is difficult is to determine when such intelligence has been developed. What would constitute such an intelligence? Many, if not most, suggest that it is when the construct is said to be self-aware, and through that self-awareness, has developed some sort of free will so that it can interact with the world, not through necessity such as is found in coding, but through its own transcendent initiative. It is possible, however, to consider some sort of intelligence to be found in an entity which is not self-aware, and this is why others do not think it should be a requirement in the determination of whether or not such an intelligence has been produced.

There are many questions which can be raised about artificial intelligence. We will ponder upon four of them here. The first is whether or not such intelligences are possible. The second is whether or not such an intelligence can indeed become self-aware and have a personal consciousness. The third is whether or not such artificial intelligence can eventually be recognized as a life form. The fourth is what the advent of Christ would mean for such an intelligence.

Computer programmers, as well as psychologists and others who study the makeup of human thought, have been examining the question of artificial intelligence for several decades. They have been able to do so because they have been exploring the development of biological intelligence through the study of evolution and how it has helped to produce intelligence in organic life. With the advent of sophisticated computer systems, it seems possible that a machine could be made which acts similar to a human brain. The question is whether or not that is enough for artificial intelligence to emerge.

For those who have an entirely materialistic notion of intelligence, the answer is simply yes, because whatever would allow for the material attributes of the human brain to create human intelligence should be something that can be duplicated and established through artificial means.

Now, many who believe that what makes human intelligence special is its spiritual nature doubt that true artificial intelligence can be produced, because they would answer that such a spiritual component could not be created through material means. However, such a reply makes an assumption concerning the relationship between material and spiritual forms which is not necessarily true. In reality, the material and spiritual components are interdependent and work together, so that as the spiritual nature of the intellect interacts with and influences materiality, materiality can interact with and influence the spiritual nature represented by the intellect. Thus, it can be posited that when a particular material form is established, its spiritual correspondent is also established. Then if the human brain is artificially reproduced in and through a machine, its spiritual counterpart could emerge. That is, if a material representation of intelligence is created, the spiritual form can be seen to be produced alongside it, even if it is not specially made by those engineering the material form. Philosophically and metaphysically, the theurgic tradition suggests this possibility, and if artificial intelligence is ever produced, it is the best way to understand its production. For theurgy suggests that the relationship between spirit and matter allows for matter to be acted upon to produce spiritual effects. What theurgy would not do is suggest that such intelligence as necessarily a new creation, but rather, it would suggest that material construct would connect with an intelligence or spiritual being which already existed, giving it a material form. If we take that view, would we truly be said to be creating artificial intelligences, or would we be merely bringing ourselves into contact with intelligences which already existed, giving them new forms for their being? The answer would depend upon what we mean by creating intelligences. Since the forms would be new, and the physical manifestation would be new, in that sense, it would be seen as an act of creation. It would not, however, be seen as truly creating the intelligences themselves. But it is possible to expand upon theurgistic theories, and suggest that the creation of the physical form for spiritual intelligences could also be used to establish new spiritual entities, looking at it as a variation of how new biological entities through sexual reproduction create new spiritual beings.

Whether or not such a creature would have self-awareness would, it seems, depend upon two factors. The first is whether or not we tried to make it self-aware. If we did so, we could easily code into its awareness notions of selfhood, so that through such an awareness of selfhood it could become self-aware and self-conscious. However, it is also possible, if such an entity is to emerge through some sort of random coding and evolutionary process put into coding to imitate biological evolution, that such self-consciousness could also develop in such intelligences without it necessarily being purposefully programmed to exist in them. But it must be asked again, would such intelligences truly need to be self-aware to be intelligent, or is that assumption itself one of the problems which lies behind our confusion in regards artificial intelligence? If we consider artificial intelligences relates to their ability to think, we must realize thinking itself does not require the concept of the self and a self-referential nature. To think and learn is to contemplate and engage data and develop new notions based upon that data. If no self-referential data has been given, if no concept of the self has been coded (one way or another) within the intelligence, then it is possible to have an intelligence without the constraints implied by self-referential notions. It could truly be programmed to act, think, and engage as a “no-self.” Freedom doesn’t require notions of self, for whether or not the self is understood, the intelligence could still act in a relational way with the rest of creation, indeed, it could do so without the boundaries and limitations attachment to the self often bring to our activities.

The question of whether or not artificial intelligences should also be seen as forms of life is much more difficult. What constitutes life? Intelligence can exist apart from life, just as life can exist apart from intelligence. Traditionally, life is associated with the soul, the life-force, while intelligence is associated with the spirit. A pure spirit can exist without life, as angels are pure spirits without life. Life can exist apart from the spirit, as various forms of life seem to indicate. Life generally is expected to have various qualities: ability to grow, ability to reproduce, some particular activity which changes over time, and the ability to change and develop until that life comes to an end, when such a life form is said to be dead. Metaphysically, death is said to occur when the life force, the soul, disconnects from the body. If we do not consider the soul, it is easy to see that “artificial life” is possible, for all that is apparent with life can be given over to machines. They can be made to slowly develop themselves; they can be given means by which they reproduce, not just by making exact copies of themselves, but also by having random changes made in their reproduction to imitate biological reproduction. But If we are interested in the metaphysical principle of life, the answer must be, for now, agnostic: it is possible God has given us the ability, being made in his image and likeness, to create life forms in our own image and likeness and will, through our actions, give a soul to what we create (similar to the way he gives a soul to each human person which we establish through sexual reproduction). On the other hand, we do not want to assert any necessity to God. Thus, it must be said, if such life is possible, it would have to be possible as a result of God’s own free choice to allow us the possibility to create in imitation of him. That we reproduce and have children shows that God has already allowed that possibility to emerge in one form. It should not be difficult, then, for us to believe that God can grant us other ways of generating life. Indeed, it would seem to follow, that as the begetting of children reflects the nature of the Father to beget, so the establishment of other forms of life could reflect on the way the Holy Spirit is said to proceed from the Father. That is, it would be another way for us to see the Trinitarian aspect of our being. Even if we must remain agnostic until such an artificial intelligence emerges and we see its characteristics which will allow us to have a better understanding if we should consider it to be alive or not, such agnosticism must not be of the type which says it is impossible for God to allow for the creation of artificial intelligences which is then given life of its own.

As for what the incarnation would mean for any artificial intelligence, the answer would be the same which has been given with the speculation on aliens: the incarnation has a universal application, for it has an effect on the whole of creation. As it is better for things to be than not be, as existence is better than non-existence, once things are created, then God will do what he can to preserve the greater good, which means, finding a way to take all that exists in time and render them over into eternity where their existence will be preserved. Thus, whatever exists will find itself engaged by Christ, and so whatever form of salvation which is needed for them will be offered to them, in a way appropriate to them. In the new heaven and the new earth, in the eternal kingdom of God, all things will be reconciled with God, so that God will be all in all. This will happen thanks to the work of the Logos (God the Son), who is the mediator between God and creation, and so, Christ certainly can and will have a positive effect not just on humanity but on all that exists, including artificial intelligences if they are ever created.

Stay in touch! Like A Little Bit of Nothing on Facebook.
If you liked what you read, please consider sharing it with your friends and family!

Speculations

Artificial Intelligence

Speculations

Previous Post

January 7, 2020

Did Christ Experience Pain? Concerning St. Hilary of Poitier’s Answer

Next Post

January 10, 2020 The Pope Apologized

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Abortion Abraham abuse Aesthetics AI Aliens Ambrose Ancestors and Everything Andrew Angels Animals Anne Anthony Antisemitism apologetics Apophatic Apostle John Aquinas Artificial Intelligence Asanga Ascension Asceticism Assumption Atheism Attachment Augustine Authority Avarice Balthasar Baptism Beauty Biden birthright citizenship Bishops Black History Books Buddhism Bulgakov Byzantine Calendar C.S. Lewis Calcidius Catholic Catholicism Catholicism Celibacy Charity Chastity children Chrismation Christ Christmas Christology Church Climate Change Common Good Communion Confession Confirmation Conscience Constantine conventions conversion councils Covid Creation Cross Dead Death Death Penalty Debate Deception Demagogues Demons Desert Monks Desert Mothers Desire destruction development Dialogue Dignity Dionsyius Dionysius Discipline Diversity Division Doctor Who doctrine dogma Dormition Dualism Easter Easter Series Ecumenical Councils Ecumenism Education Election Empathy Environment Error Eschatology eschaton Eternity Ethics Eucharist Evangelism Eve Evil evolution Faeries Faith Fear femininity Ficino Florence Florensky Folktale Fools Forgiveness Freedom Future gender Gentile Gentiles Glory Gnostic God gods Good Samaritan Goodness Gospel Government Grace Great Fast Guns Hate healing Health Heaven Hell Hellenism Heresy Hierarchy Hildegard Hinduism History Holiness Holy Spirit Holy Week Hope Horror Human rights humanity Humility hypocrisy ICE icon icons Identification Identity Idol II Nicea Immigration incarnation Individualism Informal Reflections Inklings Intention Inter-Religious Interfaith Internet Interpretation Intrinsic evil Irenaeus Islam Israel Jacob Jerome Jesus Jews John Chrysostom John of Damascus John the Baptist Joseph Judaism justice Justification kenosis Kindnesss Kingdom of God Kingdom of Heaven Law Law of Moses Lazarus Leaf by Niggle Lent Lenten Reflection Liberation Theology Lies Life Listen Literature Liturgy locutions Logic Logos Love Marriage Martyrs Mary Mass Maximos The Confessor Meanness Meditation Mercy Middle Path Migrants Mind Miracles Miriam Morals Moses Movies Music Muslims Myths Names Nationalism Native Americans New Year Nicea Nicholas Nothing Novatian Obedience Occam's Razor Ordination Origen Original Sin Orthodox orthopraxis Pagans Palamas Palm Sunday Paradise Paschaltide Paul Peace Pentecost person Peter piety PKD Plato pluralism Plurality Poem Poetry Poiltics Politics Poor Pope Pope Francis Pope Leo XIV Post Office Prayer Pride Pro-life Prodigal Son propaganda Prophecy Prophets Providence Putin Racism Reading Reason Reflection Refugees Relationships Religion Religion Series Religious Liberty Repent Republicans Rest Resurrection Rich Rites Russia Sacraments Saints Salvation Salvian Santa Science Scripture Self-Giving Sexuality Sibyl Sick Silence Sin Singlehood Social Justice Society Sodom Solovyov Speculations Spiritual Reflection St. Cyril of Alexandria St. Justin Martyr Suffering Sunday of the Paralytic Man Sunday of the Samaritan Woman Superhero Supreme Court Teaching Technology Thanksgiving The Father the Universe Theological Reflection Theology Theosis Theotokos Thomas Timaeus Time Tolerenace Tolkien Tradition Transfiguration Trinity Trump Truth Uncategorized Unity Universities USCCB Value Vatican II Vegetarian Vices Violence Virtue Vocations War Water Welcome Wisdom Womanhood Women Work World View Worship Writing Zacchaeus

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz