Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

henrykarlson

Speculations: 1 – Aliens

Last updated on: December 17, 2019 at 3:48 am   by Henry Karlson

Speculations: 1 – Aliens 2019-12-17T03:48:49-05:00 Henry Karlson

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Interdimensional Guardians: GroupET8 Aliens /Flickr

It is often asked, can Christians believe in the existence of intelligent life on other words, that is, in vernacular terms, can they believe in the existence of alien life? If so, what does the incarnation mean for them? If they have no contact with humanity, is it possible for them to be saved by Christ? If not, can they be saved? Do they need to be saved?

While many people assume the question of alien life is a recent one, in reality, the question is old, very old. Historically, we can find discussions concerning the plurality of worlds, and with it, life on those worlds, preceding the Christian era (with Lucretius famously writing on the vast size of the universe and the likelihood of there being many other planets with life). Nonetheless, as there was no one answer to the question before Christianity, after Christianity, Christians would likewise make various, differing answers, some suggesting alien life should be believed to exist, and others denying it. And then there were some who, instead of speculating on the matter, decided to remain agnostic, thinking that unless such life was ever encountered, the question itself held little to no import.

Perhaps one of the most important debates on the plurality of worlds could be found in the medieval era, with Étienne Tempier condemning those who denied the possibility that a plurality of worlds existed. Nonetheless, we must be careful when reading this condemnation, for the debate on the plurality of worlds in the medieval era tended to be less about a plurality of worlds within our own universe and more about the possibility of a plurality of universes. This is because what the medieval mind considered to be the “world” was the cosmic system in which they believed the Earth was at the center, with all the life which existed in the universe being found on the Earth. Anything which existed in the heavens were seen to be spiritual entities. Despite this difference, the reason why Tempier condemned those who denied the possibility of a plurality of worlds existing remains pertinent in regards the possibility of a plurality of worlds within our own universe: it was to preserve the omnipotence of God.

The medieval argument still has relevance to the discussion at hand, because it certainly acknowledges God’s ability to create as he wills instead of how humanity thinks he wills. But now, because we have a different understanding of the universe, its size, and contents, so we do not spiritualize what lies beyond the scope of the Earth’s atmosphere, the question of a plurality of worlds once again emerges within our own universe. Once Christians realized this, we find them talking about the possibility of alien life within our own universe, and some, like Nicholas of Cusa, promoted it.

In other words, far from what many might expect, Christianity has long discussed the concept of alien life, and it has room for it within its own cosmological understanding. The theological argument in favor or alien life is two-fold: one, dealing with their possibility, the second, as to why we should expect them to exist.

In regards the possibility, the medieval response is used: if we deny their possibility, then we deny God’s omnipotence. Since Christian theology promotes God’s omnipotence, God must be said to be capable of producing other worlds (whether or not we consider them to be worlds within our own universe, or other universes). To say they are impossible, then, is seen as contradicting a basic tenet concerning God, which is why Tempier condemned those who said such other worlds were impossible.

The argument which says we should expect other such worlds existing comes, also, from qualities which we associate with God: God is all-good. Since it is good for God to create, and it is good for God to give life to his creation, the greatness of his goodness should lead us to expect God to create a great variety of life throughout creation. When we see how large the universe is, it seems rather odd for God, who demonstrates his goodness by the proliferation of life, would create a relatively dead universe, where life is found in one small, insignificant portion of creation. If God is a God of life, we should then expect an abundance of life in the universe.

Modern science gives us more reasons to expect other intelligent life to exist in the universe. Although science cannot fully explain the origin of life, it gives many different theories for that origin. It recognizes various possible material causes for the emergence of life. And, because of the size of the universe as it is, it is unlikely that the material causes for life are found solely on the Earth. And once life begins, the process of evolution will develop that life, producing creatures of all kinds, including intelligent ones who are our equals (if not our superiors) in matters of the intellect.

Some Christians might say that because science is uncertain of the origins of life, as well as the way in which evolution does not have a teleology which automatically leads to intelligent life, they do not think science gives enough cause to belief in existence of life other than life on Earth. But if one combines what we know about God, and his omnipotence and benevolence, with what we know with science, Christians have a good reason to believe in a universe inhabited by a multitude of intelligent creatures. This is not to say we will necessarily ever encounter them. It is quite possible there are vast distances between various civilizations which exist as a way to protect them from each other. Nonetheless, some might suggest, if we take this line of thought to its proper conclusion, shouldn’t the universe be so full of life, that every planet we visit, even within our own Solar System, we should be able to find them? Historically, before our own scientific ability allowed us to properly explore space, many Christians thought this was likely; but now that we know this is not the case, and this is because a part of the reasoning behind this attitude was faulty: it was trying to establish God’s actions according to human reasoning, which, of course. God’s actions will not always follow. Nonetheless, even if they took a good principle and exaggerated it to assume too much about God, their general disposition still has value: we can easily believe God will create other life, other forms of intelligent life, within the universe, because he is good.

Belief in aliens does not mean belief that humanity will encounter such aliens. With what little scientific knowledge we have of the size and nature of the universe, and the way travel can be had within the universe, it is quite possible no such interaction will ever be possible. Belief in aliens does not mean belief that aliens have already visited us and that stories of alien encounters and abductions are true. On the other hand, Christians do not have to believe that such encounters are false, either. What is important for us is the fact that Christians can believe in the existence of aliens, and that belief can be based upon the nature Christians attribute to God.

Why, then, does Scripture not talk about aliens? Should that not be reason enough for Christians to dispute their existence? Not at all. That is merely an argument from silence. There are many things Christians have learned through the centuries which are not found in Scripture, such as the power which is had with nuclear physics. Scripture does not talk about nuclear physics, but no one today will deny its reality. The point of Scripture is not to offer a science lesson, nor does Scripture pretend to delineate all that exists within creation. We must understand Scripture was written for humanity, so that humanity can have a way to understand their own relationship with God and the way God has worked with them to save them. Nonetheless, even then, from time to time, it points out God still has relationships with others beyond humanity, such as is found with the covenant he made with all creation after the flood of Noah. Thus, we should not expect Scripture to reflect upon issues which are not centrally related to the economy of salvation for humanity, though of course, this is not to say we cannot find elements within Scripture which can be used to extrapolate answers beyond what is found in Scripture itself.

Now, if such alien life exists, and humans do not have any contact with them (or even if they do), what can Christians consider the implications of the incarnation have for them? Does the fact that God became a human man, Jesus, have any value to them?  Do they even need a savior?

To answer these questions, the first thing we need to consider is whether or not such life would need a savior. Some think that only humanity is fallen, and so only humanity needs a savior. However, that seems to go against the norm of Scripture, which suggests not only humanity, but the cosmos as a whole is fallen; Scripture tells us that the whole cosmos was awaiting the incarnation and the revelation of the children of God to be freed from the contamination of sin. In this sense, Scripture offers a cosmic understanding of the incarnation, that though God became human, through the incarnation, God has a way to reconcile all things so that all things, once tainted by sin, could become saved. The universe, it is said, will become a new creation (a “new heavens and a new Earth”).  Thus, it can be believed that the incarnation by itself, in ways unknown to humanity, God has found a way to work with and transform all life in creation, wherever it is at, even if it does not find itself in immediate contact with humanity: the incarnation, after all, is of the transcendent God who is everywhere present and fills all things according to his divine nature.

But it can be asked, is the whole of creation fallen, or only the creation which is immediately in contact with humanity?  If we consider things carefully, it would seem that the fall happened before the creation of humanity, because many aspects of the fall (such as death) existed before the advent of humanity. Likewise, since humanity did not fall entirely by itself, but by enticement from an other (traditionally named Satan), we find fallen entities existing before humanity, apart from humanity, so that some sort of fall (at least in a temporal sense) happened before the fall of humanity. (It could be suggested that the fall of humanity, while it took place at one particular place in time and space, had a metaphysical priority so that it affected all of time and space, including that which happened before the advent of humanity, but to do so would create several paradoxes, which though are not insurmountable, are not necessary to be believed to explain the fall in creation). In this fashion, we have evidence of the effects of the fall happening before humanity, outside of direct human influence, influencing and affecting creation, so that all which comes to be in the wake of such a fall is at least tried by it. Aliens, then, can certainly can receive salvation in the classical sense, but on the other hand, it is possible to think that the limits of the fall are particular in place and time, and each intelligent species, each particular creature, could be tempted and tried on its own, with some successfully overcoming such a temptation and others falling for it (as C.S. Lewis suggested in his Space Trilogy).  Nonetheless, what is important is to recognize that it is possible to believe all life itself is affected by a cosmic fall, and is in need of a savior, and the work of Jesus Christ, though accomplished in a particular time and place in the cosmos, influences the whole of creation and is capable of transforming and saving it, for we are to believe all things are reconciled in and through him. Likewise, even if other life is not itself fallen, the work of Christ is not just salvific but deifying, and so through the incarnation, God’s deifying grace is shared to the whole of creation.

Nonetheless, there is the option for Christians to believe that God the Logos, who has created all things in and through himself, as logoi within the Logos, has the potential to assume the natures of all the logoi which have been created by the Logos. That is, as the Logos creates the logoi or natures of all things, they all reflect the Logos in their own nature and so have room for the Logos to become one of them. In this way, it can be suggested, God has found a way to interact with all possible life forms, in their own particular nature and in their own particular way. Multiple incarnations, to be sure, seems to be quite troubling to the Christian mind, and is in general, rejected, but never absolutely so; it has always been considered a possibility that God could do so if God wanted to do so, and some significant Christian thinkers, at the height of such speculation, suggest it in one form or another, such as the way some have said that the Logos took on the nature of an “angel’ and so was the “angel of the Lord” before the incarnation. Even if we accept this possibility, it is important to realize that it is not necessary; one incarnation is enough to bridge the difference between Creator and creation. On the other hand, because God shows himself caring for his creation, giving various ways in which we can get to know him and interact with him, the notion of a plurality of incarnation is not against what we know of him and his nature, even if any particular incarnation, such as the incarnation we know for sure about with the assumption of humanity unto himself, is fully willed from his extraordinary benevolence.  Thus, even if alien life does not encounter humanity, this does not mean God could not and would not have is way to engage such life by incarnating himself as one of them; nor does it mean, if he did, that the end result would have to be the same as it is with humanity (to assume such a conclusion is to once again embrace necessity in discussions about God, a necessity which we should avoid).

Now, even if assume that the incarnation only took place once, and humanity never makes any historical relationship with alien life, this does not mean God would leave them ignorant of the incarnation. As there are two revealing arms of God – the Logos and the Holy Spirit, it is quite possible for the Holy Spirit, going where it wills, reveals to others what it needs to know concerning the incarnation for their own religious needs. Indeed, as we witness the Holy Spirit consistently illuminates us and helps in the promotion of evangelization, it would make sense that the Holy Spirit, the Lord and giver of life, fills the universe with illumination so that even if humanity has no knowledge of what happens beyond the Earth, what lives beyond the Earth could have knowledge of what happens on the Earth. We do not have to be a silent planet, even if we ourselves are kept in the dark about what happens beyond the Earth.

In this way, then, Christians already have a concept of a cosmic incarnation, that by one incarnation, God could and does affects the whole creation. Alien life, therefore, would have no problem finding its own salvation (and deification) promoted by the work of Christ in the cross. But, if they exist, God can have other ways in which he is found interacting with them, both through the Holy Spirit, as well as with the possibility of other incarnations of the Logos. Only if and when Christians actually encounter such life will they be able to explore this question in a way beyond speculation, but what is important for Christians to realize is that their theological principles do allow for ways in which such alien life can be seen to be included in the work of Christ.

Thus, to answer our questions, until alien life is truly encountered, Christians can believe or disbelieve in its existence, but if it is ever encountered and found, Christians have enough resources to deal with their existence that it would not pose an absolute challenge to the Christian faith (though it will likely give them new knowledge and information about God and his ways in the universe; thus, encountering alien life, Christians would probably revise many of their ideas of the universe as well as various speculative views about God in order to meet the new reality).

 

Stay in touch! Like A Little Bit of Nothing on Facebook.
If you liked what you read, please consider sharing it with your friends and family!

Speculations

Aliens

Speculations

Previous Post



December 16, 2019

Speculations: Introduction

Next Post



December 19, 2019 Apologists Should Not Be Sophists


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Abortion Abraham abuse Aesthetics AI Aliens Ambrose Ancestors and Everything Andrew Angels Animals Anne Anthony Antisemitism apologetics Apophatic Apostle John Aquinas Artificial Intelligence Asanga Ascension Asceticism Assumption Atheism Attachment Augustine Authority Avarice Balthasar Baptism Beauty Biden birthright citizenship Bishops Black History Books Buddhism Bulgakov Byzantine Calendar C.S. Lewis Calcidius Catholic Catholicism Catholicism Celibacy Charity Chastity children Chrismation Christ Christmas Christology Church Climate Change Common Good Communion Confession Confirmation Conscience Constantine conventions conversion councils Covid Creation Cross Dead Death Death Penalty Debate Deception Demagogues Demons Desert Monks Desert Mothers Desire destruction development Dialogue Dignity Dionsyius Dionysius Discipline Diversity Division Doctor Who doctrine dogma Dormition Dualism Easter Easter Series Ecumenical Councils Ecumenism Education Election Empathy Environment Error Eschatology eschaton Eternity Ethics Eucharist Evangelism Eve Evil evolution Faeries Faith Fear femininity Ficino Florence Florensky Folktale Fools Forgiveness Freedom Future gender Gentile Gentiles Glory Gnostic God gods Good Samaritan Goodness Gospel Government Grace Great Fast Guns Hate healing Health Heaven Hell Hellenism Heresy Hierarchy Hildegard Hinduism History Holiness Holy Spirit Holy Week Hope Horror Human rights humanity Humility hypocrisy ICE icon icons Identification Identity Idol II Nicea Immigration incarnation Individualism Informal Reflections Inklings Intention Inter-Religious Interfaith Internet Interpretation Intrinsic evil Irenaeus Islam Israel Jacob Jerome Jesus Jews John Chrysostom John of Damascus John the Baptist Joseph Judaism justice Justification kenosis Kindnesss Kingdom of God Kingdom of Heaven Law Law of Moses Lazarus Leaf by Niggle Lent Lenten Reflection Liberation Theology Lies Life Listen Literature Liturgy locutions Logic Logos Love Marriage Martyrs Mary Mass Maximos The Confessor Meanness Meditation Mercy Middle Path Migrants Mind Miracles Miriam Morals Moses Movies Music Muslims Myths Names Nationalism Native Americans New Year Nicea Nicholas Nothing Novatian Obedience Occam's Razor Ordination Origen Original Sin Orthodox orthopraxis Pagans Palamas Palm Sunday Paradise Paschaltide Paul Peace Pentecost person Peter piety PKD Plato pluralism Plurality Poem Poetry Poiltics Politics Poor Pope Pope Francis Pope Leo XIV Post Office Prayer Pride Pro-life Prodigal Son propaganda Prophecy Prophets Providence Putin Racism Reading Reason Reflection Refugees Relationships Religion Religion Series Religious Liberty Repent Republicans Rest Resurrection Rich Rites Russia Sacraments Saints Salvation Salvian Santa Science Scripture Self-Giving Sexuality Sibyl Sick Silence Sin Singlehood Social Justice Society Sodom Solovyov Speculations Spiritual Reflection St. Cyril of Alexandria St. Justin Martyr Suffering Sunday of the Paralytic Man Sunday of the Samaritan Woman Superhero Supreme Court Teaching Technology Thanksgiving The Father the Universe Theological Reflection Theology Theosis Theotokos Thomas Timaeus Time Tolerenace Tolkien Tradition Transfiguration Trinity Trump Truth Uncategorized Unity Universities USCCB Value Vatican II Vegetarian Vices Violence Virtue Vocations War Water Welcome Wisdom Womanhood Women Work World View Worship Writing Zacchaeus

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who was struck dead instantly for lying about money they gave to the church?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Simon the Sorcerer and Demas Aquila and Priscilla Ananias and Sapphira Judas Iscariot and Mary Magdalene

Related posts from A Little Bit of Nothing

Catholic

Justice First, Charity Beyond It: Serving The Poor...

A Little Bit of Nothing

Catholic

Compassion, Justice, And The Rights Of The Poor

A Little Bit of Nothing

Catholic

Charity Begins With Justice In Public Life

A Little Bit of Nothing

Catholic

Why Government Should Not Enforce All Christian Morals

A Little Bit of Nothing

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Catholic

Rejecting Doom: Christian Hope And Human Action

Christianity is a religion of hope. We are to have hope and...

It’s What Comes From Within Which Matters

One of the most difficult things for us to understand is why...

Why I Choose the Eucharist Over the Sermon

Choose the Eucharist, Not the Sermon What are we supposed to get...

5 Design Elements Found in Spiritually Rooted Homes

Putting Spirituality Into Home Decor Our homes are more than our living...

Credo: A Story of God Told with the...

About 10 years ago, I began to imagine a personal "Credo" that...

The Anatomy of Divine Revelation in Catholic Thought

The claim that God has made Himself known to human beings is...

view all Catholic blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube