Christians Need To Accept What Science Teaches Us About Animals

Last updated on: August 12, 2019 at 3:06 am by Henry Karlson

Christians Need To Accept What Science Teaches Us About Animals 2019-08-12T03:06:41-05:00 Henry Karlson

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Unknown Photographer: Computer Laptop Office Glasses Spectacles Dog / Maxpixel

One of the worst aspects of medieval theological speculation is that it often relied upon theories about nature and the world coming from supposed authorities (like Aristotle) instead of experience. This influenced the way many viewed animals. Through centuries, indeed, millennia of undermining their potential, animals were denigrated, their rational abilities not only misunderstood but often outright denied, so that when Christians asked whether or not animals had immortal souls, the answer was no.

To have an immortal soul, many theologians suggested, one must have a rational soul. What that meant sometimes was debated, but what was rarely debated was the notion that what separated humanity from the rest of the animal world was the rational soul. That is, humans had a rational soul, the rest of animalkind did not. As this idea was believed through repetition, instead of observation, theological and philosophical ideas about animals came from imposition instead of actual study and research.

Historically, this was a problem not only for Christians, but many non-Christians as well. To be sure, the question of animal reason was raised by many of the philosophers, and there were those who actually took the time to observe animals, and among them, there were those who said that animals could and did have a sense of reason (even if it was limited in potential).

Perhaps one of the most famous philosophers to promote animal rational was Porphyry. In his Abstinence from Animal Flesh, he provided many examples to prove that animals could, indeed, did reason. Since the ability to speak was often tied to the potential to reason, Porphyry pointed out that animals did in fact communicate with each other, even if the language was not a human language, that they could and did render information to each other demonstrated they could and did reason. Likewise, animals often showed an ability to understand human speech, as they responded when called by name. The fact that animals could be trained was another indication of their reasoning ability as they showed that they were capable of learning. He also said that that they showed a sense of prudence, acting in the world according to the shape of their natural strengths and weaknesses. Similarly, he said that they possessed their own notions of justice, as, for example, could be seen in the ways bees and ants interacted with each other. Finally, among many other examples he offered, he saw within them the potential to engage the arts, with some learning how to dance, others learning how to play instruments, all demonstrating this potential could be and was often actualized.

Porphyry was not the only one who spoke for animals. Other authors, like Plutarch, also responded with similar kinds of observations. The key was that they did not just rely upon speculation and the suggestions of others, but they actually studied animals and saw them act and react, and learn from their actions. They were not mere automatons programmed to act in only one fashion but rather, they were said to be capable of learning and engaging the world with a will of their own.

Sadly, this voice, this wisdom, was often ignored. Animals were regulated as being lesser beings, as brutes without reason, and so incapable of enjoying the beatific vision. If they could not engage the beatific vision, then they were incapable of immortality. They had souls, but the souls were limited, and would perish when they died. Later, many would think animals did not even possess a soul, and so were mere objects, free to be used by humanity like any other object in the world. Although the belief that animals did not have a soul was never the official Christian position on them, it became a rather popular view which continues to be repeated to this day. This is the end product of the denigration they received by Christian polemicists who viewed them as lesser, irrational beings; as it seemed unfair for them to have souls and not partake of eternity, it seemed better to say they didn’t possess souls at all.

In recent times, things have shifted. Among scientists, who often do not think of or know of anything about souls (if they believe in souls, they realize it is a metaphysical and not a scientific truth), it has become difficult to argue animals and humans differed as a result of humans having abilities to reason while animals do not. Evolution suggested humans were a part of a larger family which include the rest of biological life on earth, with animals being closer cousins and more like humans than other forms of life. If this is true, then, many scientists began to wonder, what were animals really like; did they or did they not possess some level of intellect, reason, and emotions similar to humans? Though the answer differed from species to species, the answer which researchers found out was yes. Some were shown to have well developed languages, like prairie dogs, others, like gorillas, capable of learning to speak with humans through sign language, while others, like Porphyry understood, communicated with each other in a way which differed drastically from human communication that we might not understand all the nuances of that communication but we can see the rudiments of language involved with such communication. Animals, moreover, have shown themselves to be creative, some, like dolphins, are known not only to create tools, but to educate subsequent generations of how to use those tools. Some animals, when taken to a mirror, recognize themselves, showing high levels of self-consciousness. Animals are shown to have a wide range of emotions, with many of them mourning the loss of family and friends. The list of what scientists have learned about animals can go on and on: the point is that they are more complex, more like us than we imagined, and indeed, the reason why we did not know this before was the result of our arrogance and pride, where we did not want to see what should have been obvious to us in the first place. Or, as Laura Hobgood-Oster has noted, Christians, by rejecting science and its observations and what scientists have learned about animals, have demonstrated a dangerous level of narcissism which should be repudiated:

Yet in the last several hundred years Christianity has been hesitant, at times, to include animals in either its ethical or its theological systems. Without addressing the issue of “the animal,” Christianity not only lives in a potentially dangerous bubble, but it risks becoming increasingly narcissistic and marginal to the world as we know it, and as we are making it. [1]

Gary Kowalski explained that Christians, despite the morality taught to them by Jesus, often have found various reasons to denigrate others, to find excuses as to why some other is not to be seen as their equal. Once this is affirmed, then the other is not given equal treatment. Those who are inferior have inferior rights. This ideology remains a problem with the racism and sexism which confront us on a daily basis. Likewise, it remains a problem with various forms of speciesism. Many Christians ignore the plight of animals because they are looked on as inferiors to humanity and so have little to no rights of their own:

At various times, race, skin color, and other superficial qualities have been used to deny the rights of others and exclude them from our affection and concern. And just as nineteenth-century Europeans justified colonialism with the rationalization that “primitives” and “savages” were mentally and morally inferior, we continue to justify the exploitation of the animal world in the same way. By denying that animals possess a moral sense we tell ourselves that human beings are of a fundamentally higher order. We can therefore colonize and enslave with impunity those who are “lower.”[2]

It is this reason that many Christians have fought tooth and nail against the biological sciences and what has been taught by them. They wanted humans to be completely distinct from the rest of creation. They wanted humans to be utterly superior and to use that superiority to dominate the world instead of following the example of Christ who shows that any supposed superiority should be used for the sake of those who are weaker and vulnerable. They want to think less of animals so they do not have to face the moral questions which arise when animals are poorly treated and abused. Rejecting their ability to reason, their ability to feel and empathize like humans, indeed, their self-consciousness is a way to justify. But by doing this, such Christians demonstrate little love for God, for they limit the glory of God found in creation. This can be said to be blasphemous, because it denigrates God by denying his glory. It is an anti-Christian spirit, a spirit of anti-Christ, which dominates the thinking of many Christians. It is a spirit which must be exorcised by science, for when science and its proofs are given, such ignorance can be dispelled and the rote recitation of past opinions on animals based upon speculation instead of fact will no longer rule. Then, it will no longer be difficult for Christians to accept that animals not only have a place in the world to be respected, they will also have a place in the world to come.

[1] Laura Hobgood-Oster, The Friends We Keep: Unleashing Christianity’s Compassion for Animals (Waco, Texas: Baylor University Press, 2010), 6.

[2] Gary Kowalski, The Souls of Animals (Walpole, NH: Stillpoint Publications, 1991), 58.

Stay in touch! Like A Little Bit of Nothing on Facebook.
If you liked what you read, please consider sharing it with your friends and family!

Previous Post

August 9, 2019

Those Who Support Justice Must Triple Their Efforts To Resist Trump And His Cruelty

Next Post

August 13, 2019 St. Maximos the Confessor, Teacher Of Unity

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Abortion Abraham abuse Aesthetics AI Aliens Ambrose Ancestors and Everything Andrew Angels Animals Anne Anthony Antisemitism apologetics Apophatic Apostle John Aquinas Artificial Intelligence Asanga Ascension Asceticism Assumption Atheism Attachment Augustine Authority Avarice Balthasar Baptism Beauty Biden birthright citizenship Bishops Black History Books Buddhism Bulgakov Byzantine Calendar C.S. Lewis Calcidius Catholic Catholicism Catholicism Celibacy Charity Chastity children Chrismation Christ Christmas Christology Church Climate Change Common Good Communion Confession Confirmation Conscience Constantine conventions conversion councils Covid Creation Cross Dead Death Death Penalty Debate Deception Demagogues Demons Desert Monks Desert Mothers Desire destruction development Dialogue Dignity Dionsyius Dionysius Discipline Diversity Division Doctor Who doctrine dogma Dormition Dualism Easter Easter Series Ecumenical Councils Ecumenism Education Election Empathy Environment Error Eschatology eschaton Eternity Ethics Eucharist Evangelism Eve Evil evolution Faeries Faith Fear femininity Ficino Florence Florensky Folktale Fools Forgiveness Freedom Future gender Gentile Gentiles Glory Gnostic God gods Good Samaritan Goodness Gospel Government Grace Great Fast Guns Hate healing Health Heaven Hell Hellenism Heresy Hierarchy Hildegard Hinduism History Holiness Holy Spirit Holy Week Hope Horror Human rights humanity Humility hypocrisy ICE icon icons Identification Identity Idol II Nicea Immigration incarnation Individualism Informal Reflections Inklings Intention Inter-Religious Interfaith Internet Interpretation Intrinsic evil Irenaeus Islam Israel Jacob Jerome Jesus Jews John Chrysostom John of Damascus John the Baptist Joseph Judaism justice Justification kenosis Kindnesss Kingdom of God Kingdom of Heaven Law Law of Moses Lazarus Leaf by Niggle Lent Lenten Reflection Liberation Theology Lies Life Listen Literature Liturgy locutions Logic Logos Love Marriage Martyrs Mary Mass Maximos The Confessor Meanness Meditation Mercy Middle Path Migrants Mind Miracles Miriam Morals Moses Movies Music Muslims Myths Names Nationalism Native Americans New Year Nicea Nicholas Nothing Novatian Obedience Occam's Razor Ordination Origen Original Sin Orthodox orthopraxis Pagans Palamas Palm Sunday Paradise Paschaltide Paul Peace Pentecost person Peter piety PKD Plato pluralism Plurality Poem Poetry Poiltics Politics Poor Pope Pope Francis Pope Leo XIV Post Office Prayer Pride Pro-life Prodigal Son propaganda Prophecy Prophets Providence Putin Racism Reading Reason Reflection Refugees Relationships Religion Religion Series Religious Liberty Repent Republicans Rest Resurrection Rich Rites Russia Sacraments Saints Salvation Salvian Santa Science Scripture Self-Giving Sexuality Sibyl Sick Silence Sin Singlehood Social Justice Society Sodom Solovyov Speculations Spiritual Reflection St. Cyril of Alexandria St. Justin Martyr Suffering Sunday of the Paralytic Man Sunday of the Samaritan Woman Superhero Supreme Court Teaching Technology Thanksgiving The Father the Universe Theological Reflection Theology Theosis Theotokos Thomas Timaeus Time Tolerenace Tolkien Tradition Transfiguration Trinity Trump Truth Uncategorized Unity Universities USCCB Value Vatican II Vegetarian Vices Violence Virtue Vocations War Water Welcome Wisdom Womanhood Women Work World View Worship Writing Zacchaeus

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz