Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Catholic
The American Bishops Must Respond To Barr’s Promotion of Death, But Will They?

The American Bishops Must Respond To Barr’s Promotion of Death, But Will They?

Last updated on: July 30, 2019 at 3:08 am by Henry Karlson

The American Bishops Must Respond To Barr’s Promotion of Death, But Will They? 2019-07-30T03:08:36-05:00 Henry Karlson

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Phil Roeder: No Death Penalty / Flickr

The inviolable dignity of life means that no one can ever deserve being put to death. If it is suggested that someone should be executed for something they have done, that means the dignity of life can be violated and overturned. To be prolife is to rejection such a violation of human dignity, which is why anyone who promotes such a violation of life, for any reason, cannot be said to be pro-life. It undermines the very postulate, the fundamental and inalienable dignity of the human person, by which the pro-life position is upheld. This is why an authentic pro-life position must be one that denies the death penalty; indeed, to properly be prolife, one does not look at easy cases and situations, but the difficult ones, and accept that despite such difficulty, the dignity of life remains inviolable so that there is nothing someone can do that ever deserves them to be executed.

It is true, the significance of the value of life itself, and the implications of that significance, have taken time for the church to properly come to the only possible conclusion: there is no justification for capital punishment and so it, not anyone’s life, should be put to an end. This, however, has been affirmed as the church’s proper position by Pope Francis’s revisions to the general Catechism:

Recourse to the death penalty on the part of legitimate authority, following a fair trial, was long considered an appropriate response to the gravity of certain crimes and an acceptable, albeit extreme, means of safeguarding the common good.

Today, however, there is an increasing awareness that the dignity of the person is not lost even after the commission of very serious crimes. In addition, a new understanding has emerged of the significance of penal sanctions imposed by the state. Lastly, more effective systems of detention have been developed, which ensure the due protection of citizens but, at the same time, do not definitively deprive the guilty of the possibility of redemption.

Consequently, the Church teaches, in the light of the Gospel, that “the death penalty is inadmissible because it is an attack on the inviolability and dignity of the person”, and she works with determination for its abolition worldwide.[1]

Pope Francis did not come to this conclusion independent from tradition, but rather, as the fulfillment of what had come before him. St. John Paul II declared the sacred, inviolable nature of life in Evangelium Vitae:

The sacredness of life gives rise to its inviolability, written from the beginning in man’s heart, in his conscience. The question: “What have you done?” (Gen 4:10), which God addresses to Cain after he has killed his brother Abel, interprets the experience of every person: in the depths of his conscience, man is always reminded of the inviolability of life-his own life and that of others-as something which does not belong to him, because it is the property and gift of God the Creator and Father. [2]

Despite killing Abel, God affirmed that Cain should not be killed; the murder of Abel was wrong because it represented humanity thinking it could find reasons to justify taking the life of someone else. To kill Cain would have suggested his ideology was correct. But God directed humanity away from the path of death. Slowly, God directed humanity away from its prideful attempt to judge whether or not someone is worthy of life. Since humanity was deeply committed to the power of bloodshed, God had to overcome this commitment to death by slowly revealing his true plan for humanity:

The commandment regarding the inviolability of human life reverberates at the heart of the “ten words” in the covenant of Sinai (cf. Ex 34:28). In the first place that commandment prohibits murder: “You shall not kill” (Ex 20:13); “do not slay the innocent and righteous” (Ex 23:7). But, as is brought out in Israel’s later legislation, it also prohibits all personal injury inflicted on another (cf. Ex 21:12-27). Of course we must recognize that in the Old Testament this sense of the value of life, though already quite marked, does not yet reach the refinement found in the Sermon on the Mount. This is apparent in some aspects of the current penal legislation, which provided for severe forms of corporal punishment and even the death penalty. But the overall message, which the New Testament will bring to perfection, is a forceful appeal for respect for the inviolability of physical life and the integrity of the person. It culminates in the positive commandment which obliges us to be responsible for our neighbour as for ourselves: “You shall love your neighbour as yourself” (Lev 19:18). [3]

To help Christians reawaken to this sense of the dignity of life, St. John Paul II explained that direct, voluntary killing of innocents must always be condemned:

Therefore, by the authority which Christ conferred upon Peter and his Successors, and in communion with the Bishops of the Catholic Church, I confirm that the direct and voluntary killing of an innocent human being is always gravely immoral. This doctrine, based upon that unwritten law which man, in the light of reason, finds in his own heart (cf. Rom 2:14-15), is reaffirmed by Sacred Scripture, transmitted by the Tradition of the Church and taught by the ordinary and universal Magisterium. [4]

With the kind of mistakes possible in relation to the death penalty, where innocents can be killed by poor judgments, this alone means that capital punishment must be put to an end. For accepting the death of even one innocent person as collateral damage demonstrates it is not justice which is being pursued. But, of course, this is not the only reason why capital punishment must be abolished: it is only an argument showing the fundamental flaw of those who try to claim some sort of justice in the act of killing those they claim are guilty. That they are willing to accept the death of innocents for their bloodlust indicates they have already violated the dignity of life.

Despite St. John Paul II’s clear indication that he wanted the abolition of the death penalty throughout the world, many tried to find loopholes in what he taught to justify and approve its use. Without surprise, such adherents of death ignored Pope Benedict XVI when he also advocated for the end of the death penalty:

This pastoral activity is a real service that the Church offers to society, and it is one that the state should support for the sake of the common good. Together with the Synod members, I draw the attention of society’s leaders to the need to make every effort to eliminate the death penalty and to reform the penal system in a way that ensures respect for the prisoners’ human dignity. Pastoral workers have the task of studying and recommending restorative justice as a means and a process for promoting reconciliation, justice and peace, and the return of victims and offenders to the community.[5]

Pope Francis, therefore, in rejecting the death penalty, pointed out it is a failure of society as they embrace evil, becoming worse than those they execute by doing so:

For a constitutional state the death penalty represents a failure, because it obliges the State to kill in the name of justice. Dostoyevsky wrote: “To kill a murderer is a punishment incomparably worse than the crime itself. Murder by legal sentence is immeasurably more terrible than murder by a criminal”. Justice is never reached by killing a human being.[6]

Many American Catholics, hearing the pleas from Rome, affirmed with St. John Paul II (and his successors) the dignity of life, and with it, the denunciation of capital punishment, but also, other violations of the dignity of life such as sexism and racism. John Paul II was pleased with such people and he indicated it in his audiences:

I am pleased to add that I found American Catholics very concerned and committed to the defence of life and the family, inseparable values which are a great challenge for the present and future of humanity. In a certain sense, my journey was a great appeal to America to accept the Gospel of life and the family in order to reject and combat any form of violence against the human person, from conception to natural death, with moral consistency. No to abortion and to euthanasia; enough of the unnecessary recourse to the death penalty; no to racism and to the exploitation of children, women and indigenous peoples; put an end to the arms trade, to drug trafficking and to the destruction of the environmental patrimony![7]

Why, then, do we find Catholics who have no problem with racism, sexism, or capital punishment, when all of them have been rejected as grave offenses to the dignity of the human person? How can some of them dare call themselves prolife when their rejection of human dignity, and with it, the inviolable dignity of life itself, allows them to promote and indeed rejoice in bloodshed? How can someone like Attorney General William Barr promote the death penalty? Since the law did not require executions, as they had ceased for over a decade, it cannot be said that William Barr was just following the law (though who would accept such an argument if someone lived in China and enforced their one-child policy?). It is a demonstration that the Trump administration, and with it William Barr, holds no sense of the dignity of life. Who will speak out? Will Barr’s bishop do anything in regards to Barr’s violation of Catholic teaching? Surely, the more the Trump administration demonstrates its disdain for the dignity of life, the greater the necessity for the church and its leaders do more than speak out, but act, lest their complacency will be judged against them in the future, just as the complacency of many church officials in Nazi Germany now stain the church’s history with their shame.

[1] Pope Francis, “New Revision of Number 2267 of the Catechism of the Catholic Church.” Vatican translation (02-08-2018).

[2] St. John Paul II, Evangelium Vitae. Vatican Translation. ¶40.

[3] St. John Paul II, Evangelium Vitae. Vatican Translation. ¶40.

[4] St. John Paul II, Evangelium Vitae. Vatican Translation. ¶57.

[5] Pope Benedict XVI, “Post Synodical Apostolic Exhortation Africae Munus,” ¶83.

[6] Pope Francis, “Letter to the International Commission Against the Death Penalty” (3-20-2015).

[7] St. John Paul II, General Audience Feb. 10, 1999. ¶4.

Stay in touch! Like A Little Bit of Nothing on Facebook.
If you liked what you read, please consider sharing it with your friends and family!

Previous Post

July 29, 2019

Animals, Saints, and Us

Next Post

August 1, 2019 Mother Earth and Christian Environmentalism

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Abortion Abraham abuse Aesthetics AI Aliens Ambrose Ancestors and Everything Andrew Angels Animals Anne Anthony Antisemitism apologetics Apophatic Apostle John Aquinas Artificial Intelligence Asanga Ascension Asceticism Assumption Atheism Attachment Augustine Authority Avarice Balthasar Baptism Beauty Biden birthright citizenship Bishops Black History Books Buddhism Bulgakov Byzantine Calendar C.S. Lewis Calcidius Catholic Catholicism Catholicism Celibacy Charity Chastity children Chrismation Christ Christmas Christology Church Climate Change Common Good Communion Confession Confirmation Conscience Constantine conventions conversion councils Covid Creation Cross Dead Death Death Penalty Debate Deception Demagogues Demons Desert Monks Desert Mothers Desire destruction development Dialogue Dignity Dionsyius Dionysius Discipline Diversity Division Doctor Who doctrine dogma Dormition Dualism Easter Easter Series Ecumenical Councils Ecumenism Education Election Empathy Environment Error Eschatology eschaton Eternity Ethics Eucharist Evangelism Eve Evil evolution Faeries Faith Fear femininity Ficino Florence Florensky Folktale Fools Forgiveness Freedom Future gender Gentile Gentiles Glory Gnostic God gods Good Samaritan Goodness Gospel Government Grace Great Fast Guns Hate healing Health Heaven Hell Hellenism Heresy Hierarchy Hildegard Hinduism History Holiness Holy Spirit Holy Week Hope Horror Human rights humanity Humility hypocrisy ICE icon icons Identification Identity Idol II Nicea Immigration incarnation Individualism Informal Reflections Inklings Intention Inter-Religious Interfaith Internet Interpretation Intrinsic evil Irenaeus Islam Israel Jacob Jerome Jesus Jews John Chrysostom John of Damascus John the Baptist Joseph Judaism justice Justification kenosis Kindnesss Kingdom of God Kingdom of Heaven Law Law of Moses Lazarus Leaf by Niggle Lent Lenten Reflection Liberation Theology Lies Life Listen Literature Liturgy locutions Logic Logos Love Marriage Martyrs Mary Mass Maximos The Confessor Meanness Meditation Mercy Middle Path Migrants Mind Miracles Miriam Morals Moses Movies Music Muslims Myths Names Nationalism Native Americans New Year Nicea Nicholas Nothing Novatian Obedience Occam's Razor Ordination Origen Original Sin Orthodox orthopraxis Pagans Palamas Palm Sunday Paradise Paschaltide Paul Peace Pentecost person Peter piety PKD Plato pluralism Plurality Poem Poetry Poiltics Politics Poor Pope Pope Francis Pope Leo XIV Post Office Prayer Pride Pro-life Prodigal Son propaganda Prophecy Prophets Providence Putin Racism Reading Reason Reflection Refugees Relationships Religion Religion Series Religious Liberty Repent Republicans Rest Resurrection Rich Rites Russia Sacraments Saints Salvation Salvian Santa Science Scripture Self-Giving Sexuality Sibyl Sick Silence Sin Singlehood Social Justice Society Sodom Solovyov Speculations Spiritual Reflection St. Cyril of Alexandria St. Justin Martyr Suffering Sunday of the Paralytic Man Sunday of the Samaritan Woman Superhero Supreme Court Teaching Technology Thanksgiving The Father the Universe Theological Reflection Theology Theosis Theotokos Thomas Timaeus Time Tolerenace Tolkien Tradition Transfiguration Trinity Trump Truth Uncategorized Unity Universities USCCB Value Vatican II Vegetarian Vices Violence Virtue Vocations War Water Welcome Wisdom Womanhood Women Work World View Worship Writing Zacchaeus

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz