Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Catholic
Death Is Not The End

Death Is Not The End

Last updated on: July 24, 2019 at 3:09 am by Henry Karlson

Death Is Not The End 2019-07-24T03:09:22-05:00 Henry Karlson

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Lothar Dieterich: Death, Transition To Beyond / Pixabay

Plato taught that philosophy serves as preparation for death. Life is impermanent. What comes next relies, in part, on what we have done in life, and philosophy, with its love for wisdom, gives us the guidance which we need in order to have a good death. That is, philosophy prepares us not only to die well, but to be well in our death. Coming to terms with death will help us accept not only death but the process of dying itself. Indeed, it will help us realize that death is always before us and with us. We cannot escape it. The more we try to hide ourselves from it, the worse the process of death and death itself can be for us.

While Plato’s understanding of the afterlife differed radically from Christian eschatology, because Plato accepted a notion of reincarnation, Christians agreed with him in saying that we need to prepare for death. In many ways, Christians saw death and preparing for death to be more important for all of humanity than Plato because Christianity teaches us that death is something which we undergo only once. We have life, and then we shall die. Life is temporal. Death takes us into eternity. But, Christians explained, life and death are intricately connected: what happens in death relates to what we do in life: life is not superfluous, and what we do and achieve in life is integral in the establishment of who we will be in eternity.

As death takes us away from the good of life, humanity has long seen death as the enemy of life itself. For many, this remains their primary way of understanding death. Even those of us who understand there is potentially something greater which awaits us after death still seek to preserve life as long as we can because life is good. And yet, Christianity tells us that even if death originally served as a curse, brought about as a result of sin, the nature of death has been transformed by Christ. Jesus took on death, the death of all of us, so that he can make it into something good. While death originally led us further away from God, to spiritual death, through Christ it now has the potential of taking us away from the suffering and horrors of temporal existence contaminated by sin. Through death, we can now enter and experience the glory of the kingdom of God. Through Christ’s transformation of death – by death, he conquered the defilement of death from within — we can now be moved to contemplate death and to see the potential good which it can now bring to us once we come to our time to die.

We must not absolutize the good of temporal existence and our current form of physical life: it is good, but it is only a temporary good. It is a part of who and what we are. As we live out our life, we are able to establish ourselves and who we are in eternity. That is what life is for, and why it is good. The error which we must avoid is vitalism, an error which looks at and absolutizes temporal existence, suggesting that we should never allow it end, no matter how torturous prolonging it can cause. Such vitalism keeps us away from our full potential, from the realization of our eternal being. Once we come to understand and accept death, that our temporal mode of existence will come to an end, we can then accept the good which God has established through death itself. Thus, Hans Urs von Balthasar reminded us, vitalism, by having us ignore death, does not allow us to act and be ourselves. Instead of seeking to establish ourselves and to be ourselves, we seek rather to prolong life, ignoring what life is for:

Physical and vital health are not absolutes or ends in themselves. Their value is largely a function of the capacity to accomplish one’s life work as a member of the human community. A person’s central concern, then, should be the best possible performance of his allotted task – even when his physical energies abate, or perhaps largely fail, and he finds it difficult to maintain his vital equilibrium. [1]

In this fashion, Christians are called, even in their lives, to put themselves to the cross, that is, to embrace death, to die to the self and to the world, in order to properly embrace life and live it without delusion. The more we embrace vitalism, the more our existence will become a living hell; the more we embrace the transitory nature of temporal existence, the pilgrimage of life, the more we find ourselves free because the relative goods of temporal existence will not have the power to delude us. We will be able to enjoy them without attachment, understanding and appreciating both their goodness but also their limitations. Then, as Bede Griffiths explained with his wisdom, we can have a good life:

But what happens when we have died to the world, the flesh and the self, when we have seen through the illusion and faced reality? Why then we begin to live to the real world, the real flesh and the real self. This is the paradox which it is so difficult to understand. It is only when you have renounced the world that you can really enjoy the world; it is only when you have renounced the flesh that you can take a pure delight in the flesh; it is only when you have renounced yourself that you can discover your real being. [2]

By accepting death, we can properly live life. By accepting death, we do not reject the good of life, the value of our worldly existence, but rather we understand their limits, allowing us to properly appreciate the good of life itself. By preparing for death, we renounce the world in order to live in it, to accept it for what it is and not attempt to make it for what it is not. We must not gnostically reject temporal existence as if it is valueless. To embrace death, to live life with the acceptance of death, must not be used to disregard our duty to live our life and to live in it well, but rather, it must be used to understand and accept how we act in the world, what we do in the world, will be a part of us and with us in eternity. Death is a change in our state of being, but it is still the same being. The doctrine of the resurrection of the dead teaches us that while we will have the same body in eternity, it will be changed and transformed in its state of being: it will be “spiritualized” instead of merely material in nature. This spiritualized body will transcend the limitations of mere physical existence, and yet it will remain in touch with that which exists within the material realm. The teaching of church about the communion of saints is, in part, a demonstration of this. The saints, though experiencing the glory of heaven, remain in contact with and concerned with those in temporal existence. Henri de Lubac, therefore, showed how Christianity, from its earliest stages, understood this connection, where death was able to be seen as a good allowing us to have far “wider prospects” while remaining in fellowship those living in temporal existence:

The early Christians had a very lively sense of this single fellowship of all individuals, and of the different ages in the course toward the one same salvation. If St. Paul was so filled with joy at the approaching dissolution of his fleshly body that would soon allow him to be united to Christ, it was because this personal feeling of his sprang from a faith that had made it possible by throwing open far wider prospects. [3]

We, too, should look to death, no longer seeing it as a thing of fear, but as something to embrace, as a joy. Obviously, we should not ignore the potential good which we can and should fulfill while we are still alive. For this reason, we should not artificially shorten temporal existence for anyone, including ourselves, but on the other hand, we must not artificially prolong earthly existence, when that potential has been achieved. Though we have long put death to the side, so we do not like to think about it, prepare for it, nor see in it any good, explaining why so many fall for the errors of vitalism, when we realize the pain and suffering which happens when we artificially prolong a life which is ready to be transitioned to the new state of being, we can then accept death and the good which it can bring to the world. It is a delicate balance, to be sure, required for us so that we do not artificially shorten or prolong life, but that balance is entirely lost when we lose sight that death is something to be embraced and accepted because Christ transformed the nature of death. Cardinal Christoph Schönborn, realizing the way Christianity has embraced death as a transition, indeed, as an exodus following Christ into eternity, said that we should no longer treat death with silence, as a kind of taboo which is to be left ignored:

Dying loses its speechlessness when it is not reduced to a biological misfortune but is celebrated as a human event. There is no more eloquent proof of the failure of materialism than its panicked helplessness in the face of death. If death is merely the irreparable final stasis of the machine that is the body, then it is only logical that dying is swept aside into the anonymity of a clinic. [4]

This is not to say there is no horror to death; because, of course, especially for those who of us who have not properly prepared ourselves to face and embrace death, it will come to us all too sudden, when we are not ready. Likewise, it will be terrible for many of us because it will be apocalyptic in nature: when we die, we find who we are and what we have made of ourselves revealed to us (a realization established in and through the particular judgment). “The dangers of the transition are the same as the dangers of life. Life is revealed in dying, and this is why the ars bene moriendi consists in the ars bene vivdendi.” [5] If we have not embraced death in life, and so lived life in the face of death, we will have to face that which we have ignored, and that can be horrifying. But even that horror can and will come to an end; the revelation will be great and shocking, but it is never the end: it is only the beginning. Accordingly, Sergius Bulgakov wrote, we will move beyond that shock and into what comes after, the resurrection of the dead:

The face of earthly life is turned toward death. Death is an object of horror, about which people try to forget; terrible is the hour of death and the “preliminary judgment.” But despite this and above this, death is a joyous hour of initiation or new revelation, of the fulfillment of the “desire to be delivered and to be with Christ,” of communion with the spiritual world. In practical terms, death, as what awaits us on the immediate horizon, blocks for us what is more distant: the resurrection to come, which seems abstract compared with the immediate concreteness of death. But in the afterlife, all this has changed, for the prospect of death and its revelation no longer menaces us: Death has come and its revelation has been accomplished. The place of death is taken by universal resurrection, which naturally becomes an object of fear and trembling for some and joyous hope for others, while for many, if not the majority, it becomes an object of fear and hope at the same time.[6]

We prepare for death by preparing for what comes after death. We live well in order to die well. Life and death are intricately connected; if we do not live well, we cannot die well. But to live well, we must embrace that life itself has a beginning and an end, and during the time in-between, we can and should develop ourselves, our personal character, so that we can die well. It is because of death we find that life and what we do during it has value. It is because of death we cannot, indeed, must not ignore life and what we can do in it. With a Christian understanding of death, we find ourselves rejecting any gnostic treatment of the world which says the world and all that happens within it is meaningless, while we also reject any notion of existence which reverses such a gnostic error by thinking there is nothing to be gained in the transition of death. Death is not our end; it is only the end of the beginning.

[1] Hans Urs von Balthasar, “Health Between Science and Wisdom” in Explorations in Theology V: Man Is Created. Trans. Adrian Walker (San Francisco: Ignatius Press, 2014), 111.

[2] Bede Griffiths, Return to the Center (Springfield, IL: Templegate, 1977), 91-2.

[3] Henri de Lubac, Catholicism: Christ and the Common Destiny of Man. Trans. Lancelot Sheppard and Elizabeth Englund, OCD (San Francisco: Ignatius Press, 1988), 119-20.

[4] Christoph Schönborn, From Death to Life. Trans. Brian McNeil, CRV (San Francisco: Ignatius Press, 1995), 180.

[5] Christoph Schönborn, From Death to Life, 185.

[6] Sergius Bulgakov, Bride of the Lamb. Trans. Boris Jakim (Grand Rapids, MI: William B Eerdmans Publishing Company, 2002), 375.

Stay in touch! Like A Little Bit of Nothing on Facebook.
If you liked what you read, please consider sharing it with your friends and family!

Previous Post

July 22, 2019

The Incarnation Is For The Whole Of Creation

Next Post

July 25, 2019 The Chinese Rites, The Amazon Synod, And The So-Called Traditionalists Attack On Catholic Tradition

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Abortion Abraham abuse Aesthetics AI Aliens Ambrose Ancestors and Everything Andrew Angels Animals Anne Anthony Antisemitism apologetics Apophatic Apostle John Aquinas Artificial Intelligence Asanga Ascension Asceticism Assumption Atheism Attachment Augustine Authority Avarice Balthasar Baptism Beauty Biden birthright citizenship Bishops Black History Books Buddhism Bulgakov Byzantine Calendar C.S. Lewis Calcidius Catholic Catholicism Catholicism Celibacy Charity Chastity children Chrismation Christ Christmas Christology Church Climate Change Common Good Communion Confession Confirmation Conscience Constantine conventions conversion councils Covid Creation Cross Dead Death Death Penalty Debate Deception Demagogues Demons Desert Monks Desert Mothers Desire destruction development Dialogue Dignity Dionsyius Dionysius Discipline Diversity Division Doctor Who doctrine dogma Dormition Dualism Easter Easter Series Ecumenical Councils Ecumenism Education Election Empathy Environment Error Eschatology eschaton Eternity Ethics Eucharist Evangelism Eve Evil evolution Faeries Faith Fear femininity Ficino Florence Florensky Folktale Fools Forgiveness Freedom Future gender Gentile Gentiles Glory Gnostic God gods Good Samaritan Goodness Gospel Government Grace Great Fast Guns Hate healing Health Heaven Hell Hellenism Heresy Hierarchy Hildegard Hinduism History Holiness Holy Spirit Holy Week Hope Horror Human rights humanity Humility hypocrisy ICE icon icons Identification Identity Idol II Nicea Immigration incarnation Individualism Informal Reflections Inklings Intention Inter-Religious Interfaith Internet Interpretation Intrinsic evil Irenaeus Islam Israel Jacob Jerome Jesus Jews John Chrysostom John of Damascus John the Baptist Joseph Judaism justice Justification kenosis Kindnesss Kingdom of God Kingdom of Heaven Law Law of Moses Lazarus Leaf by Niggle Lent Lenten Reflection Liberation Theology Lies Life Listen Literature Liturgy locutions Logic Logos Love Marriage Martyrs Mary Mass Maximos The Confessor Meanness Meditation Mercy Middle Path Migrants Mind Miracles Miriam Morals Moses Movies Music Muslims Myths Names Nationalism Native Americans New Year Nicea Nicholas Nothing Novatian Obedience Occam's Razor Ordination Origen Original Sin Orthodox orthopraxis Pagans Palamas Palm Sunday Paradise Paschaltide Paul Peace Pentecost person Peter piety PKD Plato pluralism Plurality Poem Poetry Poiltics Politics Poor Pope Pope Francis Pope Leo XIV Post Office Prayer Pride Pro-life Prodigal Son propaganda Prophecy Prophets Providence Putin Racism Reading Reason Reflection Refugees Relationships Religion Religion Series Religious Liberty Repent Republicans Rest Resurrection Rich Rites Russia Sacraments Saints Salvation Salvian Santa Science Scripture Self-Giving Sexuality Sibyl Sick Silence Sin Singlehood Social Justice Society Sodom Solovyov Speculations Spiritual Reflection St. Cyril of Alexandria St. Justin Martyr Suffering Sunday of the Paralytic Man Sunday of the Samaritan Woman Superhero Supreme Court Teaching Technology Thanksgiving The Father the Universe Theological Reflection Theology Theosis Theotokos Thomas Timaeus Time Tolerenace Tolkien Tradition Transfiguration Trinity Trump Truth Uncategorized Unity Universities USCCB Value Vatican II Vegetarian Vices Violence Virtue Vocations War Water Welcome Wisdom Womanhood Women Work World View Worship Writing Zacchaeus

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz