Peter and Paul And The Struggle to Implement the Christian Faith

Last updated on: June 28, 2019 at 3:05 am by Henry Karlson

Peter and Paul And The Struggle to Implement the Christian Faith 2019-06-28T03:05:59-05:00 Henry Karlson

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Peter and Paul Icon/ PublicDomainPictures.net

Working together, Sts. Peter and Paul built up the church and set up the foundation of the See of Rome. But it was not an easy task.

St. Peter struggled to understand what faith in Christ really meant, to see its universality, to see how it transcended his Jewish background. Peter was a man of faith, a man of devotion, but also a man who made many mistakes. And yet, like many great men, he was willing to learn from his follies.

St. Paul was a man of faith and vision, a universal vision. It was not easy for him. Originally, he denounced Jesus, but, thanks to what happened to him on the road to Damascus, he came not only to believe but to see what Jesus had come to do in the world. He came to understand the way of Christ transcended particulars while allowing for the good found in various particularities to find themselves fulfilled in Christ. Thus, Paul who once said that in Christ Jesus there is neither male nor female, Jew or Gentile (cf. Gal. 3:28) also said that in following Christ, he became all things for all people:

For though I am free from all men, I have made myself a slave to all, that I might win the more. To the Jews I became as a Jew, in order to win Jews; to those under the law I became as one under the law — though not being myself under the law — that I might win those under the law. To those outside the law I became as one outside the law — not being without law toward God but under the law of Christ — that I might win those outside the law. To the weak I became weak, that I might win the weak. I have become all things to all men, that I might by all means save some (1 Cor. 9:19-22 RSV).

Paul pointed the way which Peter found it difficult to traverse; even when Peter understood it was what was intended for him and the church, he struggled with it in himself. He found himself in an unusual situation as the church grew: more and more Gentile converts were coming to him, looking to him for advice, while Jewish believers like him still felt tied to their Jewish heritage. It divided Peter: even when he knew what was right, he could be drawn in from pressure to return to his old ways. Paul was, in this sense, the thorn at Peter’s side which Peter needed:

But when Cephas came to Antioch I opposed him to his face, because he stood condemned. For before certain men came from James, he ate with the Gentiles; but when they came he drew back and separated himself, fearing the circumcision party. And with him the rest of the Jews acted insincerely, so that even Barnabas was carried away by their insincerity. But when I saw that they were not straightforward about the truth of the gospel, I said to Cephas before them all, “If you, though a Jew, live like a Gentile and not like a Jew, how can you compel the Gentiles to live like Jews?” (Gal. 2:11-14 RSV).

Hellenists and Hebrews were both trying to figure out the new faith and all its implications, and in doing so, they liked to keep to their old ways as much as possible. This caused conflict, consistent conflict, in the early church. We like to think of the early community of believers as an ideal utopian society which only later broke apart into conflict, but soon after Pentecost, the human factor entered the equation, and Christians were struggling with Christians, apostles with apostles, trying to figure out the faith and how to live it properly. Peter was confronted by Paul, not on doctrinal issues – Peter clearly affirmed the doctrines which Paul taught – but with his way of life, and it was important because Peter was the head of the church. Without Paul, perhaps, he would not have been able to do it properly. Without Paul by his side – nagging him to do the right thing – Peter could easily have forgotten a large portion of the flock which he had been given to feed, and that would have stunted the church at its inception. This, among other reasons, is why Peter and Paul are properly linked together, not just as co-apostles, but also as founders of the See of Rome. Paul, even in conflict, worked with Peter to make sure the church in Rome was universal in its status so it could continue on after them to lead the growing, and ever greater church in the future. St. Irenaeus was right in linking Peter and Paul together as the ones who founded the See of Rome. In this respect, St. Ambrose, with great insight, was able to say Paul was not inferior to Peter:

Nor was Paul inferior to Peter, though the latter was the foundation of the Church, and the former a wise builder knowing how to make firm the footsteps of the nations who believed; Paul was not, I say, unworthy of the fellowship of the apostles, but is easily comparable with the first, and second to none. For he who knows not that he is inferior makes himself equal.[1]

This equality can be understood as the foundation for their work together, for it allowed them to be more than co-workers, but friends. This might be surprising to some, as it often seems that Peter and Paul were in conflict with each other. But that conflict has to be understood within the proper context. St. John Chrysostom, reading Paul talk about how he stayed with Peter, understood that this implied they formed a close bond of friendship:

See what great friends he was with Peter especially; on his account he left his home, and with him he tarried. This I frequently repeat, and desire you to remember, that no one, when he hears what this Apostle seems to have spoken against Peter, may conceive a suspicion of him. He premises this, that when he says, “I resisted Peter,” no one may suppose that these words imply enmity and contention; for he honored and loved his person more than all and took this journey for his sake only, not for any of the others.[2]

Paul, then, confronted Peter with love and respect; it was a contention of friends, of Paul looking out for Peter and helping him, not denigrating him or his position or authority in the church. Paul did not deny Peter’s doctrinal authority. Paul did not start a campaign against Peter, saying that he had done wrong, was a heretic, and should have his authority removed from him. He did not question Peter’s faith. He only encouraged Peter to live it out to the fullest, to see the Gentile converts as being among those neighbors Christ has told his followers to love and respect. There is something very Jewish in this, for it was an ancient Jewish understanding to think of those “strangers” or “sojourners” mentioned in the Torah as representing Gentile converts to the Jewish faith, so that they should not be neglected by being foreign-born.[3] Paul only took this notion further by changing the expectations placed upon converts, to see Jesus and the New Covenant did not require converts to strictly follow the Mosaic Covenant.

Peter recognized the truth in Paul’s message, but he also understood how difficult it was to comprehend; there problem is something Petrine coming out of 2 Peter when the author wrote:

And count the forbearance of our Lord as salvation. So also our beloved brother Paul wrote to you according to the wisdom given him, speaking of this as he does in all his letters. There are some things in them hard to understand, which the ignorant and unstable twist to their own destruction, as they do the other scriptures (2Ptr. 3:15-16 RSV).

Peter trusted Paul, despite their conflicts. The Petrine tradition recognized the validity of Paul while pointing out that Paul’s transcendent, universal sense could be, and was, capable of being misrepresented and misapplied – such as was done with many Gnostics who used some of Paul’s writings to denounce the whole Jewish tradition. Paul was a Jew who loved his Jewish heritage, and its influence can be seen throughout all his writings: his universalism itself had a Jewish foundation, just it took on a new shape with Jesus.

Peter and Paul, then, were to come together and perish together in Rome in the time of Nero. Two men, born into the Jewish faith, promoted the most universal nature of their Jewish faith, pointing to the fulfillment of that universalism in Jesus Christ. Peter was a fisherman turned leader; Paul was a scholar turned missionary and mystic. They had different roles, different duties, and yet they had the same role and duty: the promotion and development of the early Christian faith. They are celebrated together because together, and not apart, were they capable of fulfilling their mission. Together, in all the trials and tribulations, in all the joys and sorrows, they were able to form a bond of love and set up the initial foundation of the Roman See. We need to look to them, to recognize how conflicts do not need to destroy friendships, but can be used to create stronger bonds once they have been worked through. Two men, who might otherwise have not come together, now stand together, united in eternity.

O Lord, You have taken up to eternal rest and to the enjoyment of Your blessings the two divinely-inspired preachers, the leaders of the Apostles, for You have accepted their labors and deaths as a sweet-smelling sacrifice, for You alone know what lies in the hearts of men (Kontakion for the Feast of Sts. Peter and Paul).

[1] St. Ambrose, “On the Holy Spirit” in NPNF2(10): 135.

[2] St. John Chrysostom, “Commentary in Galatians” in NPNF1(13): 13.

[3] See for example, Reuven Hammer, trans. and ed., The Classic Midrash: Tannaitic Commentaries on the Bible (New York: Paulist Press, 1995), 412-14.

Stay in touch! Like A Little Bit of Nothing on Facebook.
If you have liked what you read, please consider sharing it with your friends and family!

Previous Post

June 25, 2019

Don’t Fall Victim To Trump’s Bully Tactics

Next Post

June 30, 2019 Reform, Not Apologetics, Is Needed To Help People Return To The Faith

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Abortion Abraham abuse Aesthetics AI Aliens Ambrose Ancestors and Everything Andrew Angels Animals Anne Anthony Antisemitism apologetics Apophatic Apostle John Aquinas Artificial Intelligence Asanga Ascension Asceticism Assumption Atheism Attachment Augustine Authority Avarice Balthasar Baptism Beauty Biden birthright citizenship Bishops Black History Books Buddhism Bulgakov Byzantine Calendar C.S. Lewis Calcidius Catholic Catholicism Catholicism Celibacy Charity Chastity children Chrismation Christ Christmas Christology Church Climate Change Common Good Communion Confession Confirmation Conscience Constantine conventions conversion councils Covid Creation Cross Dead Death Death Penalty Debate Deception Demagogues Demons Desert Monks Desert Mothers Desire destruction development Dialogue Dignity Dionsyius Dionysius Discipline Diversity Division Doctor Who doctrine dogma Dormition Dualism Easter Easter Series Ecumenical Councils Ecumenism Education Election Empathy Environment Error Eschatology eschaton Eternity Ethics Eucharist Evangelism Eve Evil evolution Faeries Faith Fear femininity Ficino Florence Florensky Folktale Fools Forgiveness Freedom Future gender Gentile Gentiles Glory Gnostic God gods Good Samaritan Goodness Gospel Government Grace Great Fast Guns Hate healing Health Heaven Hell Hellenism Heresy Hierarchy Hildegard Hinduism History Holiness Holy Spirit Holy Week Hope Horror Human rights humanity Humility hypocrisy ICE icon icons Identification Identity Idol II Nicea Immigration incarnation Individualism Informal Reflections Inklings Intention Inter-Religious Interfaith Internet Interpretation Intrinsic evil Irenaeus Islam Israel Jacob Jerome Jesus Jews John Chrysostom John of Damascus John the Baptist Joseph Judaism justice Justification kenosis Kindnesss Kingdom of God Kingdom of Heaven Law Law of Moses Lazarus Leaf by Niggle Lent Lenten Reflection Liberation Theology Lies Life Listen Literature Liturgy locutions Logic Logos Love Marriage Martyrs Mary Mass Maximos The Confessor Meanness Meditation Mercy Middle Path Migrants Mind Miracles Miriam Morals Moses Movies Music Muslims Myths Names Nationalism Native Americans New Year Nicea Nicholas Nothing Novatian Obedience Occam's Razor Ordination Origen Original Sin Orthodox orthopraxis Pagans Palamas Palm Sunday Paradise Paschaltide Paul Peace Pentecost person Peter piety PKD Plato pluralism Plurality Poem Poetry Poiltics Politics Poor Pope Pope Francis Pope Leo XIV Post Office Prayer Pride Pro-life Prodigal Son propaganda Prophecy Prophets Providence Putin Racism Reading Reason Reflection Refugees Relationships Religion Religion Series Religious Liberty Repent Republicans Rest Resurrection Rich Rites Russia Sacraments Saints Salvation Salvian Santa Science Scripture Self-Giving Sexuality Sibyl Sick Silence Sin Singlehood Social Justice Society Sodom Solovyov Speculations Spiritual Reflection St. Cyril of Alexandria St. Justin Martyr Suffering Sunday of the Paralytic Man Sunday of the Samaritan Woman Superhero Supreme Court Teaching Technology Thanksgiving The Father the Universe Theological Reflection Theology Theosis Theotokos Thomas Timaeus Time Tolerenace Tolkien Tradition Transfiguration Trinity Trump Truth Uncategorized Unity Universities USCCB Value Vatican II Vegetarian Vices Violence Virtue Vocations War Water Welcome Wisdom Womanhood Women Work World View Worship Writing Zacchaeus

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz