Engaging Others Through Comparative Theology

Last updated on: February 25, 2019 at 4:06 am by Henry Karlson

Engaging Others Through Comparative Theology 2019-02-25T04:06:51-05:00 Henry Karlson

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Religion Cross Islam Crescent Star Christianity
Source: Unknown / MaxPixel

There are many ways Christians find themselves engaging and reflecting upon the nature of the Christian faith in relation to other religions. Christian theological reflection on the status of non-Christian religion is underscored by many different theologies of religion, that is, many different theological interpretations which explain not only why other religions exist, but also, what Christians can think about their status in relation to the Christian faith.[1] Likewise, Christians, seeking to understand the freedom we all should have to believe and follow the religion of our choice, discuss and defend religious liberty: a Christian does not need a particular theology of religion in order to promote religious freedom, which is why it is a separate, though possibly related, discipline. Then, there is the field of Comparative Religion, where scholars look at and examine the similarities and differences of various religious traditions. For Christians who are interested in comparative religion, inter-religious dialogue is invaluable, because it brings them in contact with adherents of other faiths, allowing them to learn what others believe and why. Finally, there is the field of Comparative Theology, where Christian scholars not only listen and learn about what others believe, they do so with the intent to learn from others so that they can then reflect upon what they learn and engage it in their own theological tradition.

Comparative Theology can seem to be a radical response to other religious traditions. Why would someone look to what others have to say and let their own theological reflection be transformed as a result of what they learn? Many questions are often asked by those who engage Comparative Theology that a Comparative Theologian is likely to develop their own theology of religion as a means of defending and justifying their engagement with non-Christian faiths. They might look to the seeds or rays of truth found in other faiths and point out that such truth is meant to have its home with the fullness of the truth found in Christ. Some, like Origen, might compare this to the “spoiling of the Egyptians,”, but others, like Ficino, Steuco, Reuchlin, et. al., might look for a perennial tradition which they believe ties the truths of various religious faiths together as a way to justify exploring the way a particular aspect of the truth is discussed in other faiths, realizing that it is the same truth, but explored in a depth which Christians have yet to explore it. The key is to realize that the exploration and expression of the truth in other religious traditions might hold some connection to the truth within the Christian faith, and so the way religious thinkers in other traditions dealt with problems Christians deal with can and will be able to help Christians engage the issues in a new, indeed, vitalized manner.

Truth does not contradict truth: this is true not only in regards Christian theology with science, but any and every expression of the truth wherever it is found. How it and why it can found can be a theological question, but what one gains from the examination of such truth can and will have a positive effect in theology. This is why one of the greatest examples of Comparative Theology in the history of Christian theology can be seen as being the medieval scholastic enterprise, where Christian theologians, like St. Thomas Aquinas, examined, and learned from pagan philosophers such as Aristotle, Muslim theologians like Ibn-Sina and Jewish theologians like Maimonides. Christian theology has, from the beginning, welcomed input from non-Christian religious thinkers, which is how and why pagan philosophers helped shape the framework in which Christian theology was begun (with St. Clement of Alexandria suggesting God gave philosophy to the pagans as a way to prepare them for the incarnation). [2]

Comparative Theology, to be done right, requires proper examination of the other faith, studying and learning what it actually says, instead of assuming what it says and making arguments based upon such bad assumptions. Obviously, the tools various theologians have had to do this have changed over times. In many earlier eras, theologians had to deal with limited inter-religious resources, and so their work in comparative theology was limited. But even then, where it is found it should not be ignored, so long as the attempt is honest and the theological reflection which comes from it helps deal with a difficult theological question. Learning a little from another tradition might be all one has the time and ability to do, but even a little engagement with the other might be enough to transform theology, while a greater, more significant engagement with the other could, and sometimes does, produce a tremendous work of Christian theology. This can be seen in the way Christians slowly engaged the Platonic tradition: some commentators, like Calcidius or Boethius, gave to Western Christianity a small portion of the Platonic corpus, and yet what they provided established a grand theological view which was incorporated in the theologians of great theologians, such as those associated with the School of Chartres (and later, the Victorines). But, more than the small engagement with Platonic Theology established by such thinkers, the work of Pseudo-Dionysius, by his study, engagement and adaptation of the works of Proclus into a Christian theological synthesis demonstrates the way Comparative Theology has helped shape the development of Christian theology as a whole: for theology after Dionysius has never been the same.

Christian theology has a history of theologians learning from non-Christians, non-Christians who were asking and answering theological questions in relation to their own faith, and applying what they learned in their own theology. Both Origen and St. Jerome sought out Jewish scholars for this reason. St. Thomas Aquinas not only learned some ways to philosophically think about God due to his contact with Islamic thought, he also found notions which he disagreed with, such as found in the writings of Averroes, which suggested avenues of theological reflection that lent to the development of his own theological system. Comparative Theology, therefore, is not only going to look for the truth which can be found discussed in other faiths, but also important or significant theological notions which Christians disagree with, using them as the foundation for deeper theological reflection. Certainly, this could merge with the field of apologetics, though a serious engagement with the faith of others should not end up as a simplistic, triumphalistic analysis of what is wrong with the other, but a discernment with the questions the other raises and the positive theological answer which can be given to such questions. That is, as Aquinas, and other scholastics show us, engaging difficult questions and objections made by others to what we believe should result not in a negative condemnation of the other but a positive assessment of our own belief, enhancing it in the process. Christian theology should not dwell on the negation of the other, though of course it will critically examine what others believe, but rather, on the positive implications of divine revelation, using all the resources possible to examine and elucidate the meaning of the Christian faith and all the implications of the Christian faith for the world.

Comparative Theology, while not new to the history of the Christian faith, has been revitalized in the modern era because of inter-religious dialogue and the field of comparative religious. Due to what has been revealed by these disciplines, Christians are given a better chance to learn from and appreciate what others believe, allowing them to likewise come to see new questions which need to be asked and the kinds of answers possible to such questions. It is quite possible that comparative theology can establish a new kind of scholastic renewal: not, of course, to repeat what Aquinas and other schoolmen said in the past, but rather, to open up Christian theology to questions which need answers in today’s world as well as the kinds of answers which have already been given to them by members of other faith traditions. That is, by this new insight, Christians can and will look at their own faith in a new light, allowing them to reflect with the new wine skins needed for the new wine of today’s world. But to do this properly, Christians must always be careful with what they are doing. They must take care to know and understand the other religious tradition they are engaging, not turning it into a caricature of itself, and that means to be willing to listen and learn from those from other traditions. Then, having done so, they can take what they learned back to their own faith, admit where the source of their reflection comes from (as well as they way they are transforming the nature od what they are engaging by the nature of the engagement), in order to produce new theological insights. It worked for Dionysius. It worked for Aquinas. It worked for Ficino. It can and should work for us today.

[1] For those interested in the way other religions can fit into a theological model, Paul Knitter’s Introducing Theologies of Religion serves as a sound introduction to the topic by showing the way various theologians have seen the way other religions relate or do not relate to the Christian faith.

[2][2] This was also true in regards the development of the religion of Israel. Scholars find in the Tanakh evidence of ideas being borrowed from a wide range of sources including the Canaanites , Egyptians and Persians.

Stay in touch! Like A Little Bit of Nothing on Facebook

Theological Reflection

Theology

Comparative Theology

Inter-Religious Dialogue

Previous Post

February 20, 2019

Christians Must Be Honest With Themselves

Next Post

February 26, 2019 Defiled and Undefiled Willing: Exploring a Theme in St Maximos the Confessor and Yogacara Buddhism

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Abortion Abraham abuse Aesthetics AI Aliens Ambrose Ancestors and Everything Andrew Angels Animals Anne Anthony Antisemitism apologetics Apophatic Apostle John Aquinas Artificial Intelligence Asanga Ascension Asceticism Assumption Atheism Attachment Augustine Authority Avarice Balthasar Baptism Beauty Biden birthright citizenship Bishops Black History Books Buddhism Bulgakov Byzantine Calendar C.S. Lewis Calcidius Catholic Catholicism Catholicism Celibacy Charity Chastity children Chrismation Christ Christmas Christology Church Climate Change Common Good Communion Confession Confirmation Conscience Constantine conventions conversion councils Covid Creation Cross Dead Death Death Penalty Debate Deception Demagogues Demons Desert Monks Desert Mothers Desire destruction development Dialogue Dignity Dionsyius Dionysius Discipline Diversity Division Doctor Who doctrine dogma Dormition Dualism Easter Easter Series Ecumenical Councils Ecumenism Education Election Empathy Environment Error Eschatology eschaton Eternity Ethics Eucharist Evangelism Eve Evil evolution Faeries Faith Fear femininity Ficino Florence Florensky Folktale Fools Forgiveness Freedom Future gender Gentile Gentiles Glory Gnostic God gods Good Samaritan Goodness Gospel Government Grace Great Fast Guns Hate healing Health Heaven Hell Hellenism Heresy Hierarchy Hildegard Hinduism History Holiness Holy Spirit Holy Week Hope Horror Human rights humanity Humility hypocrisy ICE icon icons Identification Identity Idol II Nicea Immigration incarnation Individualism Informal Reflections Inklings Intention Inter-Religious Interfaith Internet Interpretation Intrinsic evil Irenaeus Islam Israel Jacob Jerome Jesus Jews John Chrysostom John of Damascus John the Baptist Joseph Judaism justice Justification kenosis Kindnesss Kingdom of God Kingdom of Heaven Law Law of Moses Lazarus Leaf by Niggle Lent Lenten Reflection Liberation Theology Lies Life Listen Literature Liturgy locutions Logic Logos Love Marriage Martyrs Mary Mass Maximos The Confessor Meanness Meditation Mercy Middle Path Migrants Mind Miracles Miriam Morals Moses Movies Music Muslims Myths Names Nationalism Native Americans New Year Nicea Nicholas Nothing Novatian Obedience Occam's Razor Ordination Origen Original Sin Orthodox orthopraxis Pagans Palamas Palm Sunday Paradise Paschaltide Paul Peace Pentecost person Peter piety PKD Plato pluralism Plurality Poem Poetry Poiltics Politics Poor Pope Pope Francis Pope Leo XIV Post Office Prayer Pride Pro-life Prodigal Son propaganda Prophecy Prophets Providence Putin Racism Reading Reason Reflection Refugees Relationships Religion Religion Series Religious Liberty Repent Republicans Rest Resurrection Rich Rites Russia Sacraments Saints Salvation Salvian Santa Science Scripture Self-Giving Sexuality Sibyl Sick Silence Sin Singlehood Social Justice Society Sodom Solovyov Speculations Spiritual Reflection St. Cyril of Alexandria St. Justin Martyr Suffering Sunday of the Paralytic Man Sunday of the Samaritan Woman Superhero Supreme Court Teaching Technology Thanksgiving The Father the Universe Theological Reflection Theology Theosis Theotokos Thomas Timaeus Time Tolerenace Tolkien Tradition Transfiguration Trinity Trump Truth Uncategorized Unity Universities USCCB Value Vatican II Vegetarian Vices Violence Virtue Vocations War Water Welcome Wisdom Womanhood Women Work World View Worship Writing Zacchaeus

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz