Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

henrykarlson

Mystical Theology of Dionysius: Transcendental God-Talk. Chapter Five. Part Eleven

Last updated on: September 3, 2018 at 3:29 am   by Henry Karlson

Mystical Theology of Dionysius: Transcendental God-Talk. Chapter Five. Part Eleven 2018-09-03T03:29:02-05:00 Henry Karlson

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

God’s presence is manifest as the kingdom of heaven; because of this he is called King of Kings and Lord of Lords. He establishes the kingdom through his divine authority. In a sense, a kingdom and the one who presides over it are one and the same, for without the presence of the king the kingdom is no longer a kingdom. This is how and why kingship and kingdom are represented by the Greek, βασιλεία (basileíā ), with the king being the one who holds the seat of authority in the kingdom. The kingdom of God is found in the reign of God. God therefore is called βασιλεία, at once showing he is the king or authority and through him and his presence, the kingdom of God is discerned. Yet, in this way, the two are interdependent. Without a kingdom, there is no king, and without a king, there is no kingdom. Someone is king so long as they have a kingdom over which they exercise authority. The kingdom of God requires more than God for its existence. Kingship is contingently developed and discerned. God, however, is not a contingent being; there is nothing contingent in regards to who or what he is. For this reason, Dionysius, in bringing us further into the reality of God, asserted that in the absolute truth of God, we are to see God transcends any notion of kingdom and kingship, hence he asserted that we are to say “nor kingdom” (βασιλεία) as being appropriate to God as he is in himself. It too must be denied because the notion of kingship, and with it the kingdom of God, is derivative in nature, as it explains how God we understand God in relation to his activity with the created order and the eschaton.

According to the Divine Names, “Kingdom is the assignment of every limit and order, and ordinance and rank.”[1] There is, however, no limit, order or rank in God as he is in himself; he is the one who establishes order while he beyond all sense of established order. There is no limit to God. There is no ordinance which has authority or rule over God; what he wills, he establishes.  Likewise, then, as Thomas Gallus indicated, God’s authority is not something secondary to him as wrote: “nor kingdom, because he cannot be made into a ruler.”[2] God’s authority is not something which is made and established for God by some external force; he does not inherit authority, but rather, he establishes it; the kingdom of God is God, and when we experience the kingdom of God, we experience God, but not God as he is in himself but God as he acts with us and establishes his presence with us through his grace. As we experience God, we come to see God in and through the means by which he reveals himself to us and it is there we find the kingdom of God. The kingdom of God truly is established by God even as it reveals God.

Likewise, Dionysius then denied one of the key titles and designations for God: wisdom, writing after his denial of titles related to kingship and authority*, nor wisdom.*  Once again, the name of Wisdom is appropriate for God because it relates to his activity in relation to creation: “For the LORD gives wisdom; from his mouth come knowledge and understanding” (Prov. 2:6 RSV). God is the source of wisdom, the source and foundation for all truth and knowledge, as he is the creator who established all things in his creative will. This is how Dionysius explained the title of Wisdom for God in the Divine Names:

But, since the Divine Wisdom is called source, and cause, and mainstay, and completion and guard, and term of wisdom itself, and of every kind, and of every mind and reason, and every sensible perception, how then is Almighty God Himself, the super-wise, celebrated as Mind and Reason and Knowledge? For, how will He conceive any of the objects of intelligence, seeing He has not intellectual operations? or how will He know the objects of sense, seeing He is fixed above all sensible perception? Yet the Oracles affirm that He knoweth all things, and that nothing escapes the Divine Knowledge. But, as I have been accustomed to say many times before, we must contemplate things Divine, in a manner becoming God. For the mindless, and the insensible, we must attribute to God, by excess—-not by defect, just as we attribute the irrational to Him Who is above reason; and imperfection, to the Super-perfect, and Pre-perfect; and the impalpable, and invisible gloom, to the light which is inaccessible on account of excess of the visible light. So the Divine Mind comprehends all things, by His knowledge surpassing all, having anticipated within Himself the knowledge of all, as beseems the Cause of all; before angels came to being, knowing and producing angels; and knowing all the rest from within; and, so to speak, from the Source Itself, and by bringing into being.[3]

God knows all things in and through himself; he knows them because he establishes them as all things are made in and through him. This is what is meant by calling him Wisdom:

The Divine Wisdom then, by knowing Itself, will know all things; things material, immaterially, and things divisible, indivisibly, and things many, uniformly; both knowing and producing all. things by Itself, the One. For even, if as becomes one Cause, Almighty God distributes being to all things that be, as beseems the self-same, unique Cause, He will know all things, as being from Himself, and pre-established in Himself, and not from things that be will He receive the knowledge of them; but even to each of them, He will be provider of the knowledge of themselves, and of the mutual knowledge of each other.[4]

Robert Grosseteste, in interpreting Dionysius’s rejection of the term wisdom for God wrote: “nor wisdom, that is, the privation of error in acting, which is wisdom in the highest sense of the word.”[5] Those who are wise are known for sound, sensible opinions, providing good judgments. They reason out from what they know with prudence. But, they still come out lacking and can still be in error despite all that they know and how good their use of reason is. This is why those who are wise can appear foolish as their wisdom fails them and their judgments are shown to be full of grave faults. All we need to do is examine the understanding of many philosophers in regards the material sciences, and we will find many good, sound opinions based upon what little knowledge they possessed, and yet so far off from the truth that we would be foolish in following them in their wisdom. God, however, has no error in his action; he acts without error; he does not guess, and so there is in this sense, no wisdom in God but the transcendence of wisdom because he cannot err. God does not need to engage in prudential judgments: he is beyond them with his knowledge.

God establishes all things, gives them their nature and qualities, establishing the things which can be and are to be known; he knows them through himself, and not through some secondary observation. In this sense, he can be said to know all things, but he does so, not in the ordinary ways of knowing which we engage, but with his own transcendent sense as he establishes what is to be known in and through himself. Likewise, he is wise, but not in the way which we normally conceive: he is more than wise, more than wisdom, he is its foundation. [6] He is not wisdom because he transcends it and establishes it: he establishes the order of creation from which wisdom is derived, both within himself as a divine energy, but also in creation as created principle, a created wisdom, from which our concepts of wisdom are established.

 

[IMG=Ceiling of old church [CC0 Public Domain] via PxHere]


[1] Dionysius, Divine Names.  Trans. James Parker (London: James Parker and Co,, 1897), 120.

[2] Thomas Gallus, “Expossicio” in Robert Grosseteste, “De Mystica Theologia” in Mystical Theology: The Glosses of Thomas Gallus and the Commentary of Robert Grosseteste on De Mystica Theologia. Trans. and ed. By James McEvoy (Parish: Peeters, 2003), 51.

[3] Dionysius, Divine Names.  Trans. James Parker (London: James Parker and Co,, 1897), 88-9.

[4] Dionysius, Divine Names.  Trans. James Parker (London: James Parker and Co,, 1897), 90.

[5] Robert Grosseteste, “De Mystica Theologia” in Mystical Theology: The Glosses of Thomas Gallus and the Commentary of Robert Grosseteste on De Mystica Theologia. Trans. and ed. By James McEvoy (Parish: Peeters, 2003), 117.

[6] See A Thirteenth-Century Textbook of Mystical Theology at the University of Paris. trans. L Michael Harrington (Paris: Peeters, 2004), 105.

 

Stay in touch! Like A Little Bit of Nothing on Facebook

Apophatic

Dionysius

God

Kingdom of God

Kingdom of Heaven

Apophatic

Dionysius

God

Kingdom of God

Kingdom of Heaven

Mystical Theology

Pseudo-Dionysius

Wisdom

Previous Post



August 30, 2018

Listen to the Victims

Next Post



September 4, 2018 Nicolaus and Paul


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Abortion Abraham abuse Aesthetics AI Aliens Ambrose Ancestors and Everything Andrew Angels Animals Anne Anthony Antisemitism apologetics Apophatic Apostle John Aquinas Artificial Intelligence Asanga Ascension Asceticism Assumption Atheism Attachment Augustine Authority Avarice Balthasar Baptism Beauty Biden birthright citizenship Bishops Black History Books Buddhism Bulgakov Byzantine Calendar C.S. Lewis Calcidius Catholic Catholicism Catholicism Celibacy Charity Chastity children Chrismation Christ Christmas Christology Church Climate Change Common Good Communion Confession Confirmation Conscience Constantine conventions conversion councils Covid Creation Cross Dead Death Death Penalty Debate Deception Demagogues Demons Desert Monks Desert Mothers Desire destruction development Dialogue Dignity Dionsyius Dionysius Discipline Diversity Division Doctor Who doctrine dogma Dormition Dualism Easter Easter Series Ecumenical Councils Ecumenism Education Election Empathy Environment Error Eschatology eschaton Eternity Ethics Eucharist Evangelism Eve Evil evolution Faeries Faith Fear femininity Ficino Florence Florensky Folktale Fools Forgiveness Freedom Future gender Gentile Gentiles Glory Gnostic God gods Good Samaritan Goodness Gospel Government Grace Great Fast Guns Hate healing Health Heaven Hell Hellenism Heresy Hierarchy Hildegard Hinduism History Holiness Holy Spirit Holy Week Hope Horror Human rights humanity Humility hypocrisy ICE icon icons Identification Identity Idol II Nicea Immigration incarnation Individualism Informal Reflections Inklings Intention Inter-Religious Interfaith Internet Interpretation Intrinsic evil Irenaeus Islam Israel Jacob Jerome Jesus Jews John Chrysostom John of Damascus John the Baptist Joseph Judaism justice Justification kenosis Kindnesss Kingdom of God Kingdom of Heaven Law Law of Moses Lazarus Leaf by Niggle Lent Lenten Reflection Liberation Theology Lies Life Listen Literature Liturgy locutions Logic Logos Love Marriage Martyrs Mary Mass Maximos The Confessor Meanness Meditation Mercy Middle Path Migrants Mind Miracles Miriam Morals Moses Movies Music Muslims Myths Names Nationalism Native Americans New Year Nicea Nicholas Nothing Novatian Obedience Occam's Razor Ordination Origen Original Sin Orthodox orthopraxis Pagans Palamas Palm Sunday Paradise Paschaltide Paul Peace Pentecost person Peter piety PKD Plato pluralism Plurality Poem Poetry Poiltics Politics Poor Pope Pope Francis Pope Leo XIV Post Office Prayer Pride Pro-life Prodigal Son propaganda Prophecy Prophets Providence Putin Racism Reading Reason Reflection Refugees Relationships Religion Religion Series Religious Liberty Repent Republicans Rest Resurrection Rich Rites Russia Sacraments Saints Salvation Salvian Santa Science Scripture Self-Giving Sexuality Sibyl Sick Silence Sin Singlehood Social Justice Society Sodom Solovyov Speculations Spiritual Reflection St. Cyril of Alexandria St. Justin Martyr Suffering Sunday of the Paralytic Man Sunday of the Samaritan Woman Superhero Supreme Court Teaching Technology Thanksgiving The Father the Universe Theological Reflection Theology Theosis Theotokos Thomas Timaeus Time Tolerenace Tolkien Tradition Transfiguration Trinity Trump Truth Uncategorized Unity Universities USCCB Value Vatican II Vegetarian Vices Violence Virtue Vocations War Water Welcome Wisdom Womanhood Women Work World View Worship Writing Zacchaeus

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What is the distinctive cup used in receiving communion in many traditions?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Jug Bowl Plate Chalice

Related posts from A Little Bit of Nothing

Catholic

The Unknown God Revealed In Christ

A Little Bit of Nothing

Catholic

Earthen Vessels Holding Divine Light

A Little Bit of Nothing

Catholic

The Illusion Of Perfection And The Path To...

A Little Bit of Nothing

Catholic

Toxic Masculinity And The Distortion Of God’s Image

A Little Bit of Nothing

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Catholic

Rejecting Doom: Christian Hope And Human Action

Christianity is a religion of hope. We are to have hope and...

It’s What Comes From Within Which Matters

One of the most difficult things for us to understand is why...

Why I Choose the Eucharist Over the Sermon

Choose the Eucharist, Not the Sermon What are we supposed to get...

5 Design Elements Found in Spiritually Rooted Homes

Putting Spirituality Into Home Decor Our homes are more than our living...

Credo: A Story of God Told with the...

About 10 years ago, I began to imagine a personal "Credo" that...

The Anatomy of Divine Revelation in Catholic Thought

The claim that God has made Himself known to human beings is...

view all Catholic blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube