Mystical Theology of Dionysius: Transcendental God-Talk. Chapter Three. Part. Three

Last updated on: May 7, 2018 at 2:42 am by Henry Karlson

Mystical Theology of Dionysius: Transcendental God-Talk. Chapter Three. Part. Three 2018-05-07T02:42:32-05:00 Henry Karlson

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

After mentioning his Theological Outlines and his Divine Names, presenting the names and titles given to the person of the Trinity and the Godhead as a whole, Dionysius mentioned his Symbolic Theology and how he explored the various metaphors which could be used to describe the activity of God in creation. As with the Divine Names, divine revelation served as the foundation for his theological reflection. In explaining what he thought was important in the Symbolic Theology, he wrote:

Further, in the Symbolical Theology, what are the Names transferred from objects of sense to things Divine?—-what are the Divine forms?—-what the Divine appearances, and parts and organs?—-what the Divine places and ornaments?—-what the angers?—-what the griefs?—-and the Divine wrath?—-what the carousals, and the ensuing sicknesses?—-what the oaths,—-and what the curses?—-what the sleepings, and what the awakings?—-and all the other Divinely formed representations, which belong to the description of God, through symbols.

The Divine Names explored the nomenclature which easily presented the transcendent characteristics best associated with God; they are more universal, indeed, conceptual in form, directing the reader away from a search for God in the material world so as to overcome an overly simplistic notion of God. Nonetheless, Dionysius understood that God could be discerned and understood metaphorically through material objects of sense such as hands, feet, ears, eyes, and the heart, that is, in various kinds of bodily parts and organs. This is also true with various emotive states, which once we understand them to be metaphoric, we can easily equate with God’s actions. Thus, we can talk about God’s angers, griefs, wrath, carousals, just as we can talk about God’s own metanoia, that is, repentance, as he stops his wrath in order to save someone or something. Even though he is all-good, indeed, all-loving, his judgments often appear to us to be curses, so that we can understand that God makes us suffer various evils in his justice*.* As it seems that sometimes God is active, and sometimes inactive, it is also possible to talk about his understand through sleepings and awakings, when he is either said to be at rest or at work in the world.

All of these, and many other metaphors found in Scripture, must not be understood literally; they are metaphoric or symbolic in intent, representing how God seems to be acting and reacting in history. What is important for us is to discern the intent implied with them, to see how talking about God in such conventional ways is pedagogically useful as we begin to explore who God is and what he does in relation to his creation. We must not take such metaphors literally because then we will turn God into some sort of physical creature who not only has hands and feet, but is inconsistent in his actions, constantly changing his mind for arbitrary reasons. Dionysius, by pointing out the metaphorical intent behind symbolic descriptions of God, could then affirm that the Divine Nature is eternal and unchanging, without material form.

It is difficult to know precisely how Dionysius actually accomplishes this because the Symbolic Theology is apparently another lost text. Since he is following what had already become a traditional way to read and engage Scripture, we guess how he would explain the various symbolic representations of God, but it is not necessary for us here to do so. What is important for us is how Dionysius points to the need to overcome an overly literalized understanding of divine revelation. Since our basic way of thinking and interacting in the world is dualistic in fashion, we cannot easily understand the eternal, single act of God. While we can and will be pointed to overcome such dualistic thought as we find ourselves experiencing the transcendent glory of God, until we reach that stage, our own ordinary thinking processes must be acknowledged and used to help point us in the right direction.

Metaphoric thought represents an important way this can be done because, by its nature, it seeks self-transcendence, warning us to not take the images being given simplistically. Thus, while talking about God having parts, we should always remember that God is spirit. As a spirit, God is immaterial and without such parts. We need to discern the meaning implied when we present such images, such as if we talk about the hand of God. As we use our hands as one of our primary means of transforming the world, so we can understand the discussion of God’s hand (or finger) in Scripture is to remind us of the power of God to transform the world. Similarly, to talk about the right and left hand of God must be understood in relation to the social status believed to be represented by the right and left hands. The right side was believed to be the side of power and glory, while the left was its inversion, the side of dishonor and weakness. To be said to be on the right hand of God is to be said to be empowered by him and his grace, while to be said to be on his left hand, therefore, is to be dishonored and without grace. In this way, to talk about the right and left hand of God was not meant to suggest God has any sides which we could discern, and to treat such descriptions as such was to misunderstand the intent of such symbolism.

Thus, Robert Grosseteste explained, when commenting upon this brief description of the Symbolic Theology, thought it was important to understand what is meant by symbol:

For the symbol is something sensible which has been assumed, or has taken the place of, something intelligible; for example, bread and wine for the immaterial and the divine feeding, and whatever is of that order. But in a broader sense a symbol is everything that signifies something more spiritual.[1]

What is sensible is something which can be ascertained by the senses, therefore, something with a material form, while what is intelligible is that which is ascertained by the intellect apart from the senses, that is, the metaphysical or spiritual reality in which the material form resides. Symbols use images from the material world, from what we can see and experience through the senses, including therefore the actions of others (because we can perceive it when someone is drunk or asleep or angry), and use them to represent something of the spiritual or intellectual reality which lies beyond the senses. Because of the difference between the material and spiritual form, the coarseness of the material symbol will require significant interpretation and purification in order for us to attain its proper meaning.

Yet, the coarseness of the image is what can cause confusion. They can even seem to offend us, St. Edith Stein suggested, because we do not understand the intent. But it is not because the metaphor is bad or useless. Rather, we often want things given to us simply. The truth, however, is mysterious and transcendent, and is not going to be something which is easily compartmentalized. We can, if we wish, consider symbols to be riddles for us to engage. If we want to know the truth we will work through them to discern what is being said by them. Those who want some the truth given to them in a form which does not require anything out of them will likewise think what is given to them is insignificant and worthless, for it is only that which we work hard to achieve that we treasure:

Holy Scripture is full of such bold images that may offend those who fail to understand them. But the person who can see the beauty hidden beneath the image will find them full of God-revealing light. Such is the very purpose of this image-language: to conceal what is holy from the profaning images of the throng and to unveil it for those who are striving for holiness and have freed themselves from childish thinking and have acquired the spiritual sensitivity needed to behold simple truths.[2]

Thus, not only do such symbols help meet us at the human condition and lower the divine nature into forms which we can understand, they still remind us, by their form and nature, that the truth lies not in the symbols but in what is being pointed out by them. Those who have no interest in the truth would trample it if it were given in a “clearer form;” thus thus turned away until they are to seek out the truth for themselves. Then, when they are ready, they will appreciate these symbolic representations and follow them as they point out the way which we are to go. The more they work with and engage the symbols and find themselves coming to greater and greater understanding of the truth, the more they will find satisfaction in their journey, enjoying the fruit of their labor even as they are shown that the journey is just beginning and they have a long way to go.

[Image=Hand of God from Sant Climent de Taüll. [Public domain], via Wikimedia Commons]

[1] Robert Grosseteste, “De Mystica Theologia” in Mystical Theology: The Glosses of Thomas Gallus and the Commentary of Robert Grosseteste on De Mystica Theologia. Trans. and ed. By James McEvoy (Parish: Peeters, 2003), 97.

[2] St. Edith Stein, “Ways to Know God” in Knowledge and Faith. Trans. Walter Redmond (Washington, DC: ICS Publications, 2000), 89.

Stay in touch! Like A Little Bit of Nothing on Facebook

Previous Post

May 3, 2018

Fascination With Evil

Next Post

May 9, 2018 He Ascended Into The Kingdom of Heaven

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Abortion Abraham abuse Aesthetics AI Aliens Ambrose Ancestors and Everything Andrew Angels Animals Anne Anthony Antisemitism apologetics Apophatic Apostle John Aquinas Artificial Intelligence Asanga Ascension Asceticism Assumption Atheism Attachment Augustine Authority Avarice Balthasar Baptism Beauty Biden birthright citizenship Bishops Black History Books Buddhism Bulgakov Byzantine Calendar C.S. Lewis Calcidius Catholic Catholicism Catholicism Celibacy Charity Chastity children Chrismation Christ Christmas Christology Church Climate Change Common Good Communion Confession Confirmation Conscience Constantine conventions conversion councils Covid Creation Cross Dead Death Death Penalty Debate Deception Demagogues Demons Desert Monks Desert Mothers Desire destruction development Dialogue Dignity Dionsyius Dionysius Discipline Diversity Division Doctor Who doctrine dogma Dormition Dualism Easter Easter Series Ecumenical Councils Ecumenism Education Election Empathy Environment Error Eschatology eschaton Eternity Ethics Eucharist Evangelism Eve Evil evolution Faeries Faith Fear femininity Ficino Florence Florensky Folktale Fools Forgiveness Freedom Future gender Gentile Gentiles Glory Gnostic God gods Good Samaritan Goodness Gospel Government Grace Great Fast Guns Hate healing Health Heaven Hell Hellenism Heresy Hierarchy Hildegard Hinduism History Holiness Holy Spirit Holy Week Hope Horror Human rights humanity Humility hypocrisy ICE icon icons Identification Identity Idol II Nicea Immigration incarnation Individualism Informal Reflections Inklings Intention Inter-Religious Interfaith Internet Interpretation Intrinsic evil Irenaeus Islam Israel Jacob Jerome Jesus Jews John Chrysostom John of Damascus John the Baptist Joseph Judaism justice Justification kenosis Kindnesss Kingdom of God Kingdom of Heaven Law Law of Moses Lazarus Leaf by Niggle Lent Lenten Reflection Liberation Theology Lies Life Listen Literature Liturgy locutions Logic Logos Love Marriage Martyrs Mary Mass Maximos The Confessor Meanness Meditation Mercy Middle Path Migrants Mind Miracles Miriam Morals Moses Movies Music Muslims Myths Names Nationalism Native Americans New Year Nicea Nicholas Nothing Novatian Obedience Occam's Razor Ordination Origen Original Sin Orthodox orthopraxis Pagans Palamas Palm Sunday Paradise Paschaltide Paul Peace Pentecost person Peter piety PKD Plato pluralism Plurality Poem Poetry Poiltics Politics Poor Pope Pope Francis Pope Leo XIV Post Office Prayer Pride Pro-life Prodigal Son propaganda Prophecy Prophets Providence Putin Racism Reading Reason Reflection Refugees Relationships Religion Religion Series Religious Liberty Repent Republicans Rest Resurrection Rich Rites Russia Sacraments Saints Salvation Salvian Santa Science Scripture Self-Giving Sexuality Sibyl Sick Silence Sin Singlehood Social Justice Society Sodom Solovyov Speculations Spiritual Reflection St. Cyril of Alexandria St. Justin Martyr Suffering Sunday of the Paralytic Man Sunday of the Samaritan Woman Superhero Supreme Court Teaching Technology Thanksgiving The Father the Universe Theological Reflection Theology Theosis Theotokos Thomas Timaeus Time Tolerenace Tolkien Tradition Transfiguration Trinity Trump Truth Uncategorized Unity Universities USCCB Value Vatican II Vegetarian Vices Violence Virtue Vocations War Water Welcome Wisdom Womanhood Women Work World View Worship Writing Zacchaeus

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz