St. Athanasius?

Last updated on: April 17, 2018 at 2:43 pm by Henry Karlson

St. Athanasius? 2018-04-17T14:43:51-05:00 Henry Karlson

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Arians questioned the divinity of Jesus Christ. They said that the Son, by being begotten, was a created being, and that there was a time in which the Son was not. In debate after debate with Arius and the Arians, St. Athanasius emphasized the divinity of Jesus Christ; discussions of the incarnation, and how to portray it, was not entirely worked out.

At the time of Athanasius, there was no talk about Jesus as being “two natures in one person.” This developed would come later and made official through the efforts of Pope St. Leo and the Council of Chalcedon. Athanasius was able to work with Apollinaris against the Arians because they two agreed on the divinity of Jesus Christ. Only when it was clear that Apollinaris’ notion of the incarnation was deficient because he denied the complete and perfect humanity of Jesus Christ by denying Jesus’s soul did Athanasius reject the teachings of his former ally. Athanasius eventually had to convene a synod and condemn Apollinaris’s Christological views, because Athanasius understood that God becoming man took on the whole of humanity and all that it entailed to be human including a human soul.

Athanasius certainly went into exile many times as a result of his conflict with the Arians. It was not over the explanation of how and why Jesus is said to be God and man, and it especially was not because he gave a Chalcedonian explanation for the incarnation. To suggest that Athanasius present the incarnation with Chalcedonian vocabulary would be absurd. This is why I am somewhat surprised that such a basic historical error was given by Cardinal Burke in a reply to LifeSiteNews:

One has only to remember how Saint Athanasius, for example, was exiled for defending the truth of the two natures in the one Divine Person of Our Lord.

This is not to say that St. Athanasius was unorthodox in his theological view, but his notions were not as sophisticated as we would find in theological investigations after Chalcedon. The difference between person and nature was not distinguished so that in the anathemas of the Nicene Creed, it was said that those who said the Son was a different hypostasis or ousia from the Father were anathema. Christological and Trinitarian vocabulary later developed to help clarify what is meant by person and nature so that the persons of the Trinity could be distinguished while affirming their unity; St. Athanasius would never have said “two natures in one divine person” because of his understanding of “person” and “nature” differed from what the Cappadocian Fathers and their theological successors established in relation to the concepts of hypostasis and ousia.

It is very easy to believe oneself to be the lone hero fighting against apostasy in the church. Not even Athanasius thought of himself in such terms, because he understood such individualistic self-promotion countered the whole meaning of the church and tradition. It is easy to assume the church is wrong when we disagree with it, making ourselves the judge of the church instead of listening to the work of the Holy Spirit in the church itself. Indeed, to think of oneself as the heroic champion the church needs to fix the church from all its errors comes out of pride; it neglects to consider the possibility we are the ones wrong. We end up with a spirit which denies the church, which denies the inspiration of the Holy Spirit in the church as we turn ourselves into an oracle which must be listened to and believed over against the church as a whole. This spiritual delusion not only leads to schism, but outright heresy. Each and every heretic thought themselves as being above the church, and that their own private interpretation of theology and history was able to overrule the teachings of the church in their own day, forgetting the wise rule of Scripture: “do not rely on your own insight” (Prov. 3:5b RSV).

Arius, Nestorius, Eutyches, Leo III the Isaurian, Savronola, Martin Luther, and many others like them, thought they were upholding the tradition of the church and teaching it based upon what they understood, not willing to change their view when the church’s theological reasoning and self-understanding developed. Some of what they said might have been true, but it was not complete; they became imprisoned with a literal emphasis of past theological narratives without understanding the meaning intended by them, which is why they were not able to recognize and accept the greater truth being presented by the church.

Likewise, we find so-called traditionalists employing the same self-reliance and literalistic rigorism rejecting the church today. They claim their understanding of the church and its theological legacy is greater than the Spirit inspiring the church today. If they wanted us to believe their claim, it would at least be helpful if they could demonstrate theological competence, understanding and explaining the basics of the history of Christian theology right. If they want to be seen in the light of St. Athanasius, they would be best to understand St. Athanasius, his teaching, and the conflicts he faced as a result of his beliefs. If they cannot get that right, then we can see how and why it is incredible and absurd for us to follow them in their declarations of the greater and more complex theological and pastoral guidelines of the church. They fight the church with their own limited understanding and of course, as with everyone else like them in the past, their words will end up being footnotes in history as the church continues to teach and preach what the Spirit inspires her to teach.

[Image=Athanasius at Nicea by Anonymous [Public domain], via Wikimedia Commons]

Stay in touch! Like A Little Bit of Nothing on Facebook

Previous Post

April 16, 2018

Mystical Theology of Dionysius: Transcendental God-Talk. Chapter Two. Part Three.

Next Post

April 19, 2018 Awaken, O Sleeper!

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Abortion Abraham abuse Aesthetics AI Aliens Ambrose Ancestors and Everything Andrew Angels Animals Anne Anthony Antisemitism apologetics Apophatic Apostle John Aquinas Artificial Intelligence Asanga Ascension Asceticism Assumption Atheism Attachment Augustine Authority Avarice Balthasar Baptism Beauty Biden birthright citizenship Bishops Black History Books Buddhism Bulgakov Byzantine Calendar C.S. Lewis Calcidius Catholic Catholicism Catholicism Celibacy Charity Chastity children Chrismation Christ Christmas Christology Church Climate Change Common Good Communion Confession Confirmation Conscience Constantine conventions conversion councils Covid Creation Cross Dead Death Death Penalty Debate Deception Demagogues Demons Desert Monks Desert Mothers Desire destruction development Dialogue Dignity Dionsyius Dionysius Discipline Diversity Division Doctor Who doctrine dogma Dormition Dualism Easter Easter Series Ecumenical Councils Ecumenism Education Election Empathy Environment Error Eschatology eschaton Eternity Ethics Eucharist Evangelism Eve Evil evolution Faeries Faith Fear femininity Ficino Florence Florensky Folktale Fools Forgiveness Freedom Future gender Gentile Gentiles Glory Gnostic God gods Good Samaritan Goodness Gospel Government Grace Great Fast Guns Hate healing Health Heaven Hell Hellenism Heresy Hierarchy Hildegard Hinduism History Holiness Holy Spirit Holy Week Hope Horror Human rights humanity Humility hypocrisy ICE icon icons Identification Identity Idol II Nicea Immigration incarnation Individualism Informal Reflections Inklings Intention Inter-Religious Interfaith Internet Interpretation Intrinsic evil Irenaeus Islam Israel Jacob Jerome Jesus Jews John Chrysostom John of Damascus John the Baptist Joseph Judaism justice Justification kenosis Kindnesss Kingdom of God Kingdom of Heaven Law Law of Moses Lazarus Leaf by Niggle Lent Lenten Reflection Liberation Theology Lies Life Listen Literature Liturgy locutions Logic Logos Love Marriage Martyrs Mary Mass Maximos The Confessor Meanness Meditation Mercy Middle Path Migrants Mind Miracles Miriam Morals Moses Movies Music Muslims Myths Names Nationalism Native Americans New Year Nicea Nicholas Nothing Novatian Obedience Occam's Razor Ordination Origen Original Sin Orthodox orthopraxis Pagans Palamas Palm Sunday Paradise Paschaltide Paul Peace Pentecost person Peter piety PKD Plato pluralism Plurality Poem Poetry Poiltics Politics Poor Pope Pope Francis Pope Leo XIV Post Office Prayer Pride Pro-life Prodigal Son propaganda Prophecy Prophets Providence Putin Racism Reading Reason Reflection Refugees Relationships Religion Religion Series Religious Liberty Repent Republicans Rest Resurrection Rich Rites Russia Sacraments Saints Salvation Salvian Santa Science Scripture Self-Giving Sexuality Sibyl Sick Silence Sin Singlehood Social Justice Society Sodom Solovyov Speculations Spiritual Reflection St. Cyril of Alexandria St. Justin Martyr Suffering Sunday of the Paralytic Man Sunday of the Samaritan Woman Superhero Supreme Court Teaching Technology Thanksgiving The Father the Universe Theological Reflection Theology Theosis Theotokos Thomas Timaeus Time Tolerenace Tolkien Tradition Transfiguration Trinity Trump Truth Uncategorized Unity Universities USCCB Value Vatican II Vegetarian Vices Violence Virtue Vocations War Water Welcome Wisdom Womanhood Women Work World View Worship Writing Zacchaeus

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz