Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Catholic
Without Him Nothing Was Made

Without Him Nothing Was Made

Last updated on: March 16, 2018 at 6:45 am by Henry Karlson

Without Him Nothing Was Made 2018-03-16T06:45:41-05:00 Henry Karlson

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Scripture is not meant intended to be a book which we simply pick up and read if we want to know and understand the truths it proclaims. Its intention was to be the central witness of the Christian faith, to be the standard declaration of truth which was read to the faithful so that through continuous hearing of the text, they will consistently gain new and greater insights to the truth of God. If and when someone were to come around and read the text outside of the liturgical setting, for in-depth study and engagement with the messages contained in it, they were expected to understand this as they search the Scripture and come out of their study several complementary interpretations of the texts which they read. It is not a book with one simple meaning which is easily ascertained by all; rather, it is intended to be filled with a diverse variety of meanings which require contemplative engagement if we are to discover them and employ it properly in our lives.

If we want to understand Scripture, we must reject the notion that there is only one intended meaning, one intended reading, for every text. The Holy Spirit, who we believe guided the writers in some fashion or another to write the inspired texts they left us, sowed within the texts many different meanings, some which will only become known once the seed is watered with the right hermeneutic lens.

We can get a sense of this from the opening of the Gospel of John:

In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. He was in the beginning with God; all things were made through him, and without him was not anything made that was made (John 1:1-3 RSV).

Notwithstanding the questions related to the relationship between the Word, the Logos, and God, which can and do fill huge volumes of theological text, what we can note is that the text says that in and through the Word everything was made, and without him, nothing was made, with the Greek for John 1:3 reading “πάντα δι’ αὐτοῦ ἐγένετο, καὶ χωρὶς αὐτοῦ ἐγένετο οὐδὲ ἕν ὃ γέγονεν,” in which it can be said that “οὐδὲ ἕν” means “not one” or “not anything’ or, as it is often translated, “nothing.”

The simple reading of this passage, which is they way most engage it and understand it, is to see it as explaining the creation of things. In this fashion it can be said that the Word, who was with God and is God in some sense or another, was the means by which all things are made. In and through the Word, all things are established. Flowing from this, theologians like to discuss how the Word, the Logos, established the logoi of creation, meaning that the one Word established in and through itself, in a derivative fashion, many words or principles which delineate and produce the essences of all the things which exist.

What is not so obvious, and yet is able to be ascertained by this passage, is a description and explanation for sin. Sin is not a thing, indeed, it is the nihilistic destruction of being, where the good things which the Word created finds themselves being destroyed. Their very nature, their very being is slowly destroyed by sin, so that as those things exist, they become less than what they are by nature. Sin is not a thing, and so is not made by the Word, but more than that, without him, without the Word, was this nothingness of sin made or established: those who set themselves apart from the Word, those which try to stand up as individuals apart from the Word and act contrary to the principles established by the Word are the ones who establish evil insofar as they act contrary to the Word. Therefore, the not-being of sin, the οὐδὲ ἕν, is made by those who act in opposition to the Word, making them without the Word. As the Word is establishes the rational principles of creation, sin is produced in irrational activity contrary to the good which is intended by the Word. Thus, as sin is not a thing, so it is not made by the Word. This is why John is able to say that without the Word we find οὐδὲ ἕν, the emptiness of being which destroys beings, is established.

This οὐδὲ ἕν, this nothing, must not be confused by equivocation with the transcendent nothingness of God which transcends being, but rather, it must always be understood as the denial of being. Sin is οὐδὲ ἕν, the denial of the One, the denial of the being which comes from and exists in God. Sin comes from the nihilistic rejection of being. The rejection of God being discussed here, the denial of the Word, must not be confused as some agnostic confusion about the existence of God, but rather, in relation to the principles established by God. Some might not know or understand God and yet follow with the good which God intended and so not said to be willfully acting contrary to the good of creation. It is the abandonment of that good which allows for and sets up fractures in the realm of creation which break apart and demolish the nature of being itself. This fracture was not established by the Word, the good creator who made all things good. For we must understand the Word, in creating all things, preserves them and holds them together in an integral whole; rather, it is in and through the embrace of not-being by those who abandon the rational order of being, the Logos, such as through an irrational attachment to the self, that not-being, οὐδὲ ἕν, is established. This not-being must not be seen as a rival principle to being; it is not a nothing, for it is the negation of all principles and things as they are, seeking to take being and destroy it, turning it into nothing.

This is why, Origen suggests, John was not merely repeating himself when we wrote, “without him was not anything made that was made.” As the text already said all things were made for him, so Origen suggests, we should consider and ponder what John intends us to learn from this discussion of nothing, and when we do so, we see emerging a theological explication of being and non-being, of goodness and sin:

Now we said before that “not being” and “nothing” are synonyms and for this reason those “who are not” are “nothing,” and all evil is “nothing,” since it too is “not being.” And evil, which is called “nothing” has been made without the Word, not being included in the “all things.” We have presented, therefore, to the best of our ability, what the “all things” are which have been made through the Word, and what that is which was made without him, and, because it never was, is also for this reason called “nothing.”[1]

Origen then explains how all have an implicit connection with the Word of God, the Logos, for as it is the principle of creation from which we emerge, it is also there teaching us, guiding us, directing us in our understanding insofar as we seek out the rational principles of creation. In this way, as our intellect seeks after and engages reason, the Word is already “inseparable” from us.[2] We all have some relationship with the Word in and through our conscience. When we ignore our conscience and reject it, then we are acting without the Word and engage in sin, causing the corruption of evil to penetrate the world. Evil, therefore, is not made through the Word, and the Word should not be blamed when such evil is established because it is not the Word, but the subjects of the Word who abandon the Word as they reject what their conscience suggests to them who bring about that evil, or as Origen also explained, “just as we must not blame the teacher who has shown the student what he ought when the one who errs no longer has any ground for defense as though he were ignorant, because of the teacher’s lessons.”[3]

This is why, though all things were made by the Word were made good, those given the good of free will can create, as it were, the nothing which destroys being, and insofar as they do that which should not be done, they create evil. Nonetheless, even though they do evil, their existence, indeed, the being which was given to them, remains good insofar as it remains. Evil is not a creation of God, while their essence and their existence is. In this respect, all things, insofar as they exist, remain good; insofar as they withdraw from the good given to them by the Word, they suffer corruption and can be said to be evil. This is why Origen said that the being which is known as the devil is good insofar as he exists and is a creation of God, and in that goodness he is not even known as a devil.[4] What exists after that fracturing we often give a new word for it, representing its new form. But we must still realize they remain connected to their original creation and keep some of that good which can be patched and repaired by God.

Scripture therefore, tells us all things are made by the Word, but it also tells us that in rejection of the Word, the destructive οὐδὲ ἕν of nothing is possible. Unless we understood the relationship between being and goodness, and sin and nothingness, it would be difficult for us to perceive this implication of the text and we would readily pass over it as we read Scripture, thinking John merely repeated the theme of creation for the sake of emphasis. What is true here, is true elsewhere in Scripture. Hidden in it are many different meanings, and if we want to gain from Scripture, we must be willing to search for them and bring them out into the open.

[Image=Wormhole by Alain r (Own work) [CC BY-SA 3.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0) or GFDL (http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/fdl.html)], via Wikimedia Commons]

[1] Origen, Commentary on the Gospel of John Books 1 -10. Trans. Ronald E. Heine (Washington, DC: CUA Press, 1989), 120.

[2] See ibid., 123.

[3] Ibid., 123.

[4] Cf. Ibid., 119.

Previous Post

March 14, 2018

Tell Congress To Reject Pompeo and Haspel (Updated)

Next Post

March 19, 2018 Mystical Theology of Dionysius: Transcendental God-Talk. Chapter One. Section Three. Part Three

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Abortion Abraham abuse Aesthetics AI Aliens Ambrose Ancestors and Everything Andrew Angels Animals Anne Anthony Antisemitism apologetics Apophatic Apostle John Aquinas Artificial Intelligence Asanga Ascension Asceticism Assumption Atheism Attachment Augustine Authority Avarice Balthasar Baptism Beauty Biden birthright citizenship Bishops Black History Books Buddhism Bulgakov Byzantine Calendar C.S. Lewis Calcidius Catholic Catholicism Catholicism Celibacy Charity Chastity children Chrismation Christ Christmas Christology Church Climate Change Common Good Communion Confession Confirmation Conscience Constantine conventions conversion councils Covid Creation Cross Dead Death Death Penalty Debate Deception Demagogues Demons Desert Monks Desert Mothers Desire destruction development Dialogue Dignity Dionsyius Dionysius Discipline Diversity Division Doctor Who doctrine dogma Dormition Dualism Easter Easter Series Ecumenical Councils Ecumenism Education Election Empathy Environment Error Eschatology eschaton Eternity Ethics Eucharist Evangelism Eve Evil evolution Faeries Faith Fear femininity Ficino Florence Florensky Folktale Fools Forgiveness Freedom Future gender Gentile Gentiles Glory Gnostic God gods Good Samaritan Goodness Gospel Government Grace Great Fast Guns Hate healing Health Heaven Hell Hellenism Heresy Hierarchy Hildegard Hinduism History Holiness Holy Spirit Holy Week Hope Horror Human rights humanity Humility hypocrisy ICE icon icons Identification Identity Idol II Nicea Immigration incarnation Individualism Informal Reflections Inklings Intention Inter-Religious Interfaith Internet Interpretation Intrinsic evil Irenaeus Islam Israel Jacob Jerome Jesus Jews John Chrysostom John of Damascus John the Baptist Joseph Judaism justice Justification kenosis Kindnesss Kingdom of God Kingdom of Heaven Law Law of Moses Lazarus Leaf by Niggle Lent Lenten Reflection Liberation Theology Lies Life Listen Literature Liturgy locutions Logic Logos Love Marriage Martyrs Mary Mass Maximos The Confessor Meanness Meditation Mercy Middle Path Migrants Mind Miracles Miriam Morals Moses Movies Music Muslims Myths Names Nationalism Native Americans New Year Nicea Nicholas Nothing Novatian Obedience Occam's Razor Ordination Origen Original Sin Orthodox orthopraxis Pagans Palamas Palm Sunday Paradise Paschaltide Paul Peace Pentecost person Peter piety PKD Plato pluralism Plurality Poem Poetry Poiltics Politics Poor Pope Pope Francis Pope Leo XIV Post Office Prayer Pride Pro-life Prodigal Son propaganda Prophecy Prophets Providence Putin Racism Reading Reason Reflection Refugees Relationships Religion Religion Series Religious Liberty Repent Republicans Rest Resurrection Rich Rites Russia Sacraments Saints Salvation Salvian Santa Science Scripture Self-Giving Sexuality Sibyl Sick Silence Sin Singlehood Social Justice Society Sodom Solovyov Speculations Spiritual Reflection St. Cyril of Alexandria St. Justin Martyr Suffering Sunday of the Paralytic Man Sunday of the Samaritan Woman Superhero Supreme Court Teaching Technology Thanksgiving The Father the Universe Theological Reflection Theology Theosis Theotokos Thomas Timaeus Time Tolerenace Tolkien Tradition Transfiguration Trinity Trump Truth Uncategorized Unity Universities USCCB Value Vatican II Vegetarian Vices Violence Virtue Vocations War Water Welcome Wisdom Womanhood Women Work World View Worship Writing Zacchaeus

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz