Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Catholic
Love Hopes For All As It Works For All

Love Hopes For All As It Works For All

Last updated on: August 8, 2017 at 4:01 pm by Henry Karlson

Love Hopes For All As It Works For All 2017-08-08T16:01:04-05:00 Henry Karlson

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Ralph Martin’s Will Many Be Saved? systematized the basic criticism many have had concerning modern theologians who have hoped that many, if not all, might end up saved. Hans Urs von Balthasar and Karl Rahner are central to Martin’s book, where he believes their theological opinions, even if they end up not being heretical, have hindered Christian evangelization because of their hope that those who do not affiliate themselves as Christians can still be saved. Martin suggested that from their hope a type of universalism emerges which thinks that all will end up being saved and so there is no longer any need for formal evangelization:

One reason why evangelization may be stymied is that there seems to be in the minds of many Catholics, and other Christians as well, a lack of conviction that being a Christian is really necessary in order to be saved. If it is not really necessary to become a Christian in order to be saved, why bother to evangelize? [1]

Martin reluctantly admitted that there is some room in the Church’s teaching to believe that some who, in their life, did not join the Christian faith might yet find themselves among the saved: “Of course, this lack of conviction finds a certain basis in the Church’s own teaching. The Church definitively teaches that it is possible for non-Christians to be saved without hearing the gospel or coming to explicit faith in Christ.”[2] But, Martin is clear: we must not rely upon such exceptions; we must know that those who do not hear the Gospel do not receive the help, the grace, which the Gospel provides, making it much harder for them to be saved. So, for Martin, we must acknowledge with fear that many, if not most, of humanity risks being lost, and those who suggest otherwise, must be criticized as harming the Church’s mission: “The reasons for the command – namely, that the eternal destinies of human beings are really at stake and for most people the preaching of the gospel can make a life-or-death, heave-or-hell difference – needs to be unashamedly stated.” [3]

Photograph by Henry Karlson

Martin’s reading of Balthasar and Rahner is highly distorted, indeed, outright misleading; neither is, as Martin suggests, a universalist. My book, The Eschatological Judgment of Christ: The Hope of Universal Salvation and the Fear of Eternal Perdition in the Theology of Hans Urs von Balthasar, takes on Martin’s reading and criticism of Balthasar and demonstrates, through it, how Martin and many like him create a strawman presentation which hinders the actual points which Balthasar makes through his theologizing.

But that is not our interest here. Rather, I find Martin’s mercenary attitude towards God and the Christian faith to be troubling. If people convert solely out of fear of hell, or for sake of some great reward, with that alone ending up as the basis of their following God, they have failed to follow Christ. They prop up themselves and hold on to themselves and look after themselves above all things. To evangelize employing such self-centered justifications for being a Christian undermines what it means to be a Christian and so fails to properly convert the listener to the Christian faith itself, a faith which tells us to pick up our cross, die to the self, so that we can love God and be loved by God. What he offers is a view of God which is also quite unlike God, where God is seen like a tyrant who demands worship and obedience instead of entices it out of his inner beauty and the awe we experience in his presence.

True, conversion away from sin, and the possibility of perdition as a result of sin, can be and should be a part of evangelization, but they should all be subsumed into the higher order which does not give way to the caricature of God as tyrant found in many atheistic criticisms of the Christian faith. Those who see through such a childish notion of God will not be convinced by such evangelical methodologies as suggested by Martin, but rather, turned away in horror, so that even if they end up believing such a God is possible, they would deny him love because such a God does not appear to be the God who is love.

By Dr. Manuel at de.wikipedia [Public domain], via Wikimedia Commons

Maimonides was clear, such a way of viewing God is detrimental to following God in and with the love God desires out of us. We should serve God, not out of fear, nor because we think we will be rewarded by God as if we charm God and convince him to give us his gifts because we played along with his demands, but because we love him:

Let not a man say, “I will observe the precepts of the Torah and occupy myself with its wisdom, in order that I may obtain all the blessings written in the Torah, or to attain life in the world to come; I will abstain from the transgressions against which the Torah warns, so that I may be saved from the curses written in the Torah, or that I may not be cut off from life in the world to come. It is not right to serve God after this fashion for whoever does so, serves Him out of fear. This is not the standard set by the prophets and sages. [4]

The person who loves God, will do what is right because it is right. They will follow God out of love, and do what God suggests, not because they fear God, but because they know God loves us and what he suggests is suggested out of his love. Love promotes not only the right attitude towards God, but the right way to engage praxis. We can follow the motions, do what is said to be done, but out of the wrong intention and so be far off from the truth – it is an illusion of goodness which imitates the true good, but without the depth of grace found in the communion of love between God and humanity, that external activity remains hollow, and unworthy of a true follower of God:

Whoever serves God out of love, occupies himself with the study of the Law and the fulfillment of the commandments and walks in the paths of wisdom, impelled by no external motive whatsoever, moved neither by fear of calamity nor by the desire to obtain material benefits; such a man does what is truly right because it is truly right, and ultimately, happiness comes to him as a result of his conduct. This standard is indeed a very high one; not every sage attained it. It was the standard of the patriarch Abraham whom God called His love, because he only served out of love. It is the standard which God, through Moses, bids us achieve, as it said, “And thou shalt love the Lord, thy God” (Deut. 6:5). When one loves God with the right love, he will straightway observe all the commandments out of love.[5]

St. Bernard of Clairvaux, in his classic, On Loving God, presented four stages of our engagement with God; the first two, the lowest, each represent is a lowly love mixed with selfishness and fear, where God is loved but God is loved for what he offers less than for God himself. This is why God is also feared, because the person fears the rejection of God, and with it, the consequences of such rejection. Thus, the person goes from loving themselves seeking all the goods they can get for themselves, to loving God for the goods he offers. Yet none of it is truly loving God for the right reason. They could help someone start on their path to God, but neither of them are our proper end (and so all evangelism which relies upon these notions fails to provide the proper foundation for faith because it keeps the one being evangelizes within the sin-bound egotism which prevents true conversion to God). It is only with the last two levels of love that true love for God emerges. The person is to love God without measure, loving God because God loved them first, that is, because God’s love changes them so that they can love God freely, without reservation, and without seeking anything for themselves in return:

This love is acceptable because it is given freely. It is chaste because it is not made of words or talk, but of truth and action. It is just because it gives back what it has received. For he who loves in this way loves as he is loved. He loves, seeking in return not what is his own, but what is Jesus Christ’s, just as he sought not his own but our good, or rather, our very selves. [6]

Already indicated in this response, then, is the move to the fourth way of loving God, which is to love ourselves, and all that is in the world, all of creation, because all these things are loved by God. We love them, including ourselves, freely and without expectation; we desire what is good to be given to all things, because love seeks the good for the beloved; but unlike the first stage, we do so without selfish expectations, without putting ourselves first. We return to the world full of God’s love for the world because God is the focus and center of our love, and through him as the center, we find ourselves then united to all things in him and his love:

From this point that fourth degree of love can be possessed forever, when God is loved alone and above all, for now we do not love ourselves except for his sake; he is himself the reward of those who love him, the eternal reward of those who love him for eternity.[7]

Thus, the words of al-Shushtari are relevant:

I am content in the Creator, upon him I rest.
In him I am joined, in him I am separated, in him
I desire him.
In him I see, in him I hear and my soul is in his hands. [8]

We love God, and in God, we see and view the whole of creation, seeing God in creation and creation in God. It is this which should motivate us to evangelize: we evangelize out of love, to spread the love of God, to encourage the response of love back. True love is itself the goal. True love does not turn us into self-seeking mercenaries who wants the gift of salvation for ourselves and would cry out if others are blessed with it; true love will see all things in the light of God’s love, and so will work to spread that love, to come to the world in and through that love, hoping for all things to be integrated and raised up in that love. That is why there is the hope for the salvation of all and yet why there is no denial of evangelism: proper evangelism is from the fourth, highest, kind of love, where the person in God turns to the world and loves the world as God’s creation. It is full of compassion, and mercy; indeed, to the one who knows and loves God, hate and fear will fall away and as long as either remain, the love of God remains impure, and so the evangelism itself will remain impure.

“I no longer fear God, but I love Him. For love casts out fear” is the principle by which we should live and act in and with God.[9] Evangelism, proper evangelism, engages it and establishes it as the basis for true conversion to God. It is the conversion of love. It is the conversion which knows all things only in the light of love. It is hopeful. It is elevated. It lifts us up and then brings us back to the world so that we can share that love and lift others up in it.

Only love remains,
ask it and it shall answer for me.[10]

Without love, the basis of evangelism is lost. Without love, we are nothing. And so whatever conversion is had without that love, will itself end as nothing as well. While hell and brimstone preaching might make people fear God and so seek to appease God, it does not truly provide proper conversion to God. This is why the hope that all might be saved, whether or not they will, does not counter evangelism at all.

[1] Ralph Martin, Will Many Be Saved (Grand Rapids, MI: William B Eerdman’s Publishing Company, 2012), 5.

[2] Ralph Martin, Will Many Be Saved, 5.

[3]Ralph Martin, Will Many Be Saved, 204.

[4] Maimonides, The Book of Knowledge. trans. Moses Hyamsom (Jerusalem: Feldheim Publishers, 1981),92a.

[5] Maimonides, The Book of Knowledge, 92b.

[6] St. Bernard of Clairvaux , “On Love God” in Bernard of Clairvaux: Selected Works. trans. G.R. Evans (New York: Harper Collins, 2005), 77.

[7] St. Bernard of Clairvaux , “On Love God” 84-5.

[8] Abu al-Hasan al-Shushtari, Songs of Love and Devotion. trans. Lourdes Maria Alvarez (New York: Paulist Press, 2009), 61 [“My love is beyond compare”]

[9] From the Sayings of St. Anthony in The Sayings of the Desert Fathers. trans. Benedicta Ward (Kalamazoo, MI: Cistercian Publications, 1984), 8.

[10] Abu al-Hasan al-Shushtari, Songs of Love and Devotion, 56. [“Only Love Remains”]

Stay in touch! Like A Little Bit of Nothing on Facebook:

A Little Bit of Nothing

Previous Post

June 20, 2017

In Silence, Love Remains

Next Post

June 22, 2017 God Spews Out The Lukewarm Who Gives Preference To Riches

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Abortion Abraham abuse Aesthetics AI Aliens Ambrose Ancestors and Everything Andrew Angels Animals Anne Anthony Antisemitism apologetics Apophatic Apostle John Aquinas Artificial Intelligence Asanga Ascension Asceticism Assumption Atheism Attachment Augustine Authority Avarice Balthasar Baptism Beauty Biden birthright citizenship Bishops Black History Books Buddhism Bulgakov Byzantine Calendar C.S. Lewis Calcidius Catholic Catholicism Catholicism Celibacy Charity Chastity children Chrismation Christ Christmas Christology Church Climate Change Common Good Communion Confession Confirmation Conscience Constantine conventions conversion councils Covid Creation Cross Dead Death Death Penalty Debate Deception Demagogues Demons Desert Monks Desert Mothers Desire destruction development Dialogue Dignity Dionsyius Dionysius Discipline Diversity Division Doctor Who doctrine dogma Dormition Dualism Easter Easter Series Ecumenical Councils Ecumenism Education Election Empathy Environment Error Eschatology eschaton Eternity Ethics Eucharist Evangelism Eve Evil evolution Faeries Faith Fear femininity Ficino Florence Florensky Folktale Fools Forgiveness Freedom Future gender Gentile Gentiles Glory Gnostic God gods Good Samaritan Goodness Gospel Government Grace Great Fast Guns Hate healing Health Heaven Hell Hellenism Heresy Hierarchy Hildegard Hinduism History Holiness Holy Spirit Holy Week Hope Horror Human rights humanity Humility hypocrisy ICE icon icons Identification Identity Idol II Nicea Immigration incarnation Individualism Informal Reflections Inklings Intention Inter-Religious Interfaith Internet Interpretation Intrinsic evil Irenaeus Islam Israel Jacob Jerome Jesus Jews John Chrysostom John of Damascus John the Baptist Joseph Judaism justice Justification kenosis Kindnesss Kingdom of God Kingdom of Heaven Law Law of Moses Lazarus Leaf by Niggle Lent Lenten Reflection Liberation Theology Lies Life Listen Literature Liturgy locutions Logic Logos Love Marriage Martyrs Mary Mass Maximos The Confessor Meanness Meditation Mercy Middle Path Migrants Mind Miracles Miriam Morals Moses Movies Music Muslims Myths Names Nationalism Native Americans New Year Nicea Nicholas Nothing Novatian Obedience Occam's Razor Ordination Origen Original Sin Orthodox orthopraxis Pagans Palamas Palm Sunday Paradise Paschaltide Paul Peace Pentecost person Peter piety PKD Plato pluralism Plurality Poem Poetry Poiltics Politics Poor Pope Pope Francis Pope Leo XIV Post Office Prayer Pride Pro-life Prodigal Son propaganda Prophecy Prophets Providence Putin Racism Reading Reason Reflection Refugees Relationships Religion Religion Series Religious Liberty Repent Republicans Rest Resurrection Rich Rites Russia Sacraments Saints Salvation Salvian Santa Science Scripture Self-Giving Sexuality Sibyl Sick Silence Sin Singlehood Social Justice Society Sodom Solovyov Speculations Spiritual Reflection St. Cyril of Alexandria St. Justin Martyr Suffering Sunday of the Paralytic Man Sunday of the Samaritan Woman Superhero Supreme Court Teaching Technology Thanksgiving The Father the Universe Theological Reflection Theology Theosis Theotokos Thomas Timaeus Time Tolerenace Tolkien Tradition Transfiguration Trinity Trump Truth Uncategorized Unity Universities USCCB Value Vatican II Vegetarian Vices Violence Virtue Vocations War Water Welcome Wisdom Womanhood Women Work World View Worship Writing Zacchaeus

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz