Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Catholic
The Spirit of Heresy

The Spirit of Heresy

Last updated on: June 21, 2016 at 8:32 am by Henry Karlson

The Spirit of Heresy 2016-06-21T08:32:33-05:00 Henry Karlson

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

But false prophets also arose among the people, just as there will be false teachers among you, who will secretly bring in destructive heresies, even denying the Master who bought them, bringing upon themselves swift destruction. And many will follow their licentiousness, and because of them the way of truth will be reviled (2Ptr. 2:1-2 RSV).

Unless we are careful, we will read Peter’s words anachronistically, interpreting the text with a later understanding of the word “heresy.” That is, we will read into the word heresy the technical meaning which developed, i.e., “doctrinal error held stubbornly in defiance of authority.”[1] Translating Peter’s words in this fashion has helped cause confusion to readers because they mostly will know and understand the later use of the term. Clearly, the translators understood its proper understanding because they translated the root word αἵρεσις differently when rendering into English Paul’s words in First Corinthians, “for there must be factions among you in order that those who are genuine among you may be recognized” (1. Cor. 11:19 RSV). What is rendered “factions” is the same word used by Peter, and indeed, this is why in many other translations of Paul’s text, the word is rendered as “heresies,” making for a consistent if not confusing translation.

The word “heresy,” when used in Scripture, should therefore not be read following the technical meaning which developed long after the Apostles. Rather, the word indicated a privately held opinion. The root word behind the noun αἵρεσις is the verb, αἱρέω, which means I choose or I prefer, and so when used as a noun, meant a personally established and held opinion or belief. Paul was saying there will always be people who develop factions based upon private opinion within the church, and through it, the truth will become known and realized. Peter was indicating that the promotion of private opinion over and above the common good will lead people astray, not only because it will lead people to deny truths of the revealed faith, but also because many will find ways to excuse or permit their various sins through such private opinion. Private opinion itself was not the problem, but “destructive” opinions, those which were held in contrast to the universal, common truth.

There certainly is a reason why the term “heresy” slowly developed into a technical, dogmatic term, because it was understood by the early Christians such privately held opinion when it was held against the common truth of the faith produced grave error and led people astray. Private opinion itself was understood as possible so long as it was not used to reject the public and universal truth established by the Apostles – after all, we all interpret what we hear and understand what we hear in such a way we establish private opinions based upon that understanding. Even privately held opinion which was erroneous was not necessarily heretical, in the technical sense, if the error did not contradict the public proclamation of faith, that is, if it could be held in unison with it. This is why St. Augustine was able to say not all errors leads to heresy, and why it is difficult to make a universal definition of heresy:

After all, not every error is a heresy; yet, since every heresy involves a defect, a heresy could only be a heresy by reason of some error. What it is, then, that makes one a heretic, in my opinion, either cannot at all, or can only with difficulty, be grasped in a definition in accord with the rules. [2]

We are limited in our knowledge and understanding. As we seek after truth, we will make mistakes. That is normal. Defining such mistakes was important, so that there could be a guide left behind to help people not fall for the same mistakes in the future. Many early texts against heresies were meant to be such guides, bringing together all kinds of erroneous opinions, such those beliefs found in Greek philosophy, with actual dogmatic error, such as found in various Gnostic circles (Cerinthus, Marcion, Valentinus, the Ophites, the Sethians, et., al.).[3] We would misunderstand these texts if we tried to read all discussion as indicative of dogmatic error because the pre-Christians could not be held as opposing dogma which had yet to be defined (though, if we follow them in errors which counter the truth of the faith, their private opinion could turn us into material and formal heretics).

It is normal for us to make mistakes, and so, for us to make various erroneous private opinions as we engage the truth. This is not itself a problem. The problem is found in the spirit in which we make our opinion. Do we think we know more than others, and our private opinions must be believed over and above all others, over and above the general and universal proclamation of the truth? When our ideas are examined, do we willingly let the universal and common truth overrule our private opinions, and acknowledge that there must be something missing from our understanding if our opinion contradicts the common truth? When we follow through with such humility, our errors, no matter how bad they are, are mere mistakes. It is when we begin to believe more in ourselves and our abilities and what we think we know over and above the public truth that we find our mistakes take on a new character, a destructive character, a prideful character which must be countered if we want to attain the truth.

Blurred image of statue from the Antiquities Museum in Egypt. Photograph by Henry Karlson

Humility requires us to understand our personal opinions are to be judged and criticized by the universally established truth. When our thoughts and beliefs are shown to be defective, we must put our private opinion aside. But when we do not, then we have taken on the spirit of heresy. Like all heretics, we promote ourselves as having superior knowledge to the commonly established and proven truth, to be gnostics, while we are ignorant and in reality, agnostic in regards to the truth. The spirit of heresy is the spirit of pride, which confuses conventions for absolutes and so cuts off the truth from its fullness as the absolute no longer remains absolute. It blurs things, so truth and falsehood look like.

Error, as St. Irenaeus explained, easily disguises itself as the truth because it takes some aspects of the truth and hides itself in that partial truth: “Error, indeed, is never set forth in its naked deformity, lest, being thus exposed, it should at once be detected. But it is craftily decked out in an attractive dress, so as, by its outward form, to make it appear to the inexperienced (ridiculous as the expression may seem) more true than the truth itself.”[4] The convention used by heresy will often appear similar to other presentations of truth, it will take on and use elements of the truth, but the private opinion with its interpretation has emptied the contents of the truth to mere opinion. Its exterior hides from the casual observer and investigation the corruption which has taken place, but an examination of what is believed will reveal its hollow nature. As individualism cuts people away from each other, from the common good, so private opinion, when left unchecked, cuts away from the truth, leaving it in pieces and incapable of being found among any of them.

This is why we must not rely upon ourselves, thinking we are, in and of ourselves, to be the upholders of the truth. We hold private opinions, and no matter how good they are, they are in need of the fullness of truth which is found outside of ourselves, of the truth guided by the Holy Spirit in the church as a whole.

St. Epiphanius once wrote, “For every heresy deceives, not having received the Holy Spirit according to the tradition of the Fathers in the holy catholic church of God.”[5] He is right insofar as every private opinion which holds itself apart from the common and universal faith cuts itself off from the Holy Spirit and the pillar and ground of the truth, so that no matter how great the idea that is presented when it is taken from and cut away from the fullness of the truth, it will collapse in and of itself. Tradition shows the work of the Holy Spirit in protecting the common truth from the unholy spirit of prideful opinion and its disintegration of the common good. This is why St. Irenaeus was able to say that the heretics, those who promoted private opinion as some superior truth, had to be criticized in relation to the one universal faith:

But, again, when we refer them to that tradition which originates from the apostles, [and] which is preserved by means of the succession of presbyters in the Churches, they object to tradition, saying that they themselves are wiser not merely than the presbyters, but even than the apostles, because they have discovered the unadulterated truth.[6]

Tradition helps keep private opinion in check. Tradition points out that no matter how wise and smart we are, whatever we will understand is going to be limited and the universal truth will transcend us. We need each other to complement each other so we can properly present that universal faith. If we think we can do it alone, we will fail. The spirit of heresy is that pride, that individualism, which seeks to bring us away from each other and trumpet ourselves above the rest. That spirit, while it has always run rampant throughout history, is especially present today, as modern society is based upon the spirit of individualism over the common good. We find it ever present on the internet, where such division is especially common, as factions fight each other over their private opinions, instead of uniting together in love.

The spirit of heresy is alive and well all around us. It is present in our lives, always tempting us to follow it. Let us turn away from, it, fight it at every turn, confess when we fail to do so, less we shall find its destructive nature affecting us, destroying us within and without, leaving us in confusion and despair.

[1] Walter L. Wakefield and Austin P. Evans, trans. and intr., Heresies of the High Medieval Ages (New York: Columbia University Press, 1991), 2.

[2] St. Augustine, Heresies in Arianism and Other Heresies. intr. and trans. Roland J. Teske, S.J.. ed. John E. Rotelle, O.S.A. (Hyde Park, NY: New City Press, 1995),33.

[3] Even as late as in the writings of St. John of Damascus do we find this mixed- use of the word heresy being employed when demonstrating the various possible heresies which he knew and understood.

[4] St. Irenaeus, Against Heresies in ANF(1):315.

[5] St. Epiphanius of Cyprus, Ancoratus. trans. Young Richard Kim (Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 2014), 149.

[6] St. Irenaeus, Against Heresies in ANF(1):415.

Stay in touch! Like A Little Bit of Nothing on Facebook:

A Little Bit of Nothing

Error

Heresy

Theological Reflection

Previous Post

June 18, 2016

Marian Reflections VII: The Death and Assumption of Mary (Conclusion)

Next Post

June 23, 2016 Love Casts Out Fear

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Abortion Abraham abuse Aesthetics AI Aliens Ambrose Ancestors and Everything Andrew Angels Animals Anne Anthony Antisemitism apologetics Apophatic Apostle John Aquinas Artificial Intelligence Asanga Ascension Asceticism Assumption Atheism Attachment Augustine Authority Avarice Balthasar Baptism Beauty Biden birthright citizenship Bishops Black History Books Buddhism Bulgakov Byzantine Calendar C.S. Lewis Calcidius Catholic Catholicism Catholicism Celibacy Charity Chastity children Chrismation Christ Christmas Christology Church Climate Change Common Good Communion Confession Confirmation Conscience Constantine conventions conversion councils Covid Creation Cross Dead Death Death Penalty Debate Deception Demagogues Demons Desert Monks Desert Mothers Desire destruction development Dialogue Dignity Dionsyius Dionysius Discipline Diversity Division Doctor Who doctrine dogma Dormition Dualism Easter Easter Series Ecumenical Councils Ecumenism Education Election Empathy Environment Error Eschatology eschaton Eternity Ethics Eucharist Evangelism Eve Evil evolution Faeries Faith Fear femininity Ficino Florence Florensky Folktale Fools Forgiveness Freedom Future gender Gentile Gentiles Glory Gnostic God gods Good Samaritan Goodness Gospel Government Grace Great Fast Guns Hate healing Health Heaven Hell Hellenism Heresy Hierarchy Hildegard Hinduism History Holiness Holy Spirit Holy Week Hope Horror Human rights humanity Humility hypocrisy ICE icon icons Identification Identity Idol II Nicea Immigration incarnation Individualism Informal Reflections Inklings Intention Inter-Religious Interfaith Internet Interpretation Intrinsic evil Irenaeus Islam Israel Jacob Jerome Jesus Jews John Chrysostom John of Damascus John the Baptist Joseph Judaism justice Justification kenosis Kindnesss Kingdom of God Kingdom of Heaven Law Law of Moses Lazarus Leaf by Niggle Lent Lenten Reflection Liberation Theology Lies Life Listen Literature Liturgy locutions Logic Logos Love Marriage Martyrs Mary Mass Maximos The Confessor Meanness Meditation Mercy Middle Path Migrants Mind Miracles Miriam Morals Moses Movies Music Muslims Myths Names Nationalism Native Americans New Year Nicea Nicholas Nothing Novatian Obedience Occam's Razor Ordination Origen Original Sin Orthodox orthopraxis Pagans Palamas Palm Sunday Paradise Paschaltide Paul Peace Pentecost person Peter piety PKD Plato pluralism Plurality Poem Poetry Poiltics Politics Poor Pope Pope Francis Pope Leo XIV Post Office Prayer Pride Pro-life Prodigal Son propaganda Prophecy Prophets Providence Putin Racism Reading Reason Reflection Refugees Relationships Religion Religion Series Religious Liberty Repent Republicans Rest Resurrection Rich Rites Russia Sacraments Saints Salvation Salvian Santa Science Scripture Self-Giving Sexuality Sibyl Sick Silence Sin Singlehood Social Justice Society Sodom Solovyov Speculations Spiritual Reflection St. Cyril of Alexandria St. Justin Martyr Suffering Sunday of the Paralytic Man Sunday of the Samaritan Woman Superhero Supreme Court Teaching Technology Thanksgiving The Father the Universe Theological Reflection Theology Theosis Theotokos Thomas Timaeus Time Tolerenace Tolkien Tradition Transfiguration Trinity Trump Truth Uncategorized Unity Universities USCCB Value Vatican II Vegetarian Vices Violence Virtue Vocations War Water Welcome Wisdom Womanhood Women Work World View Worship Writing Zacchaeus

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz